Identify and discuss the constitutional amendments that would relate to this situation.

/in /by

A suspect is apprehended in a department store by the security guard. The suspect is placed in handcuffs and taken to the manager’s office. The police are called and advised of the situation. Officer Martinez arrives at the department store approximately 15 minutes later. Officer Martinez takes a statement from the security guard and views the in-store camera film of the shoplifting incident. Officer Martinez places the suspect under arrest, reads the suspect the Miranda warnings, and asks the suspect if he would like to make a statement. The suspect replies, “No, I would like a lawyer”. The suspect is then transported to the local jail and booked. Six hours later, the suspect is interviewed by a detective who again reads him the Miranda warning. The detective then asks the suspect if he would like to talk. The suspect says, “Yes.” He eventually confesses to the crime.

Write a 1- to 2-page paper in which you:

  1. Identify and discuss the constitutional amendments that would relate to this situation.
  2. Discuss how the Edwards rule is related to this situation.
  3. In your opinion, determine if the suspect’s confession to the detective is admissible. Support your opinion with specific case law or contemporary cases.
  4. Use at least three quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other similar websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • This course requires the use of new Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details.
  • Be typed, double-spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow SWS or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

Describe the provisions of the Norris-LaGuardia Act.

/in /by

QUESTION 1

  1. Describe the provisions of the Norris-LaGuardia Act.

    Your response must consist of at least 75 words.

 

QUESTION 2

  1. Outline the purpose of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

    Your response must consist of at least 75 words.

QUESTION 3

  1. Define retaliatory discharge. How can an employee defend against such an action by his or her employer?

    Your response must consist of at least 75 words.

 

QUESTION 4

  1. Explain the rights and responsibilities of patients and healthcare providers. How are these rights and responsibilities similar?

    Your response should consist of at least 200 words.

 

QUESTION 5

  1. Discuss the rights and responsibilities of healthcare providers and medical practices in regards to professional liability insurance.

    Your response should consist of at least 200 words.

Business Law Case Study

/in /by

Course: BCO125 Business Law (Spring 2021) Professor: Lusine Minasyan

 

CASE STUDY 2

 

Task details:

• This is an individual assignment.

• You are asked to write an essay, proving answers to all the questions specified below (see page 2). These answers must be based on corresponding theories.

Make sure you are providing sufficient and relevant arguments sustaining your answers. In case of using real case example(s) in support of your standpoint,

there should be a clear reference to that/those case(s).

• All the sources should be correctly cited, and the theories clearly identified.

• The essay should contain introduction, body(discussion) and conclusion parts. Questions must be answered in an essay format, no bullet points allowed.

• The submission must be in PDF file format.

 

Formalities:

• Wordcount: 500 to 1000 words

• Structure: Cover, Table of Contents, References and Appendix are excluded of the total wordcount.

• Font: Arial 11 pts.

• Text alignment: Justified.

• Citation: The in-text References and the Bibliography must be in Harvard’s citation style.

 

Submission: Week 10 – Via Moodle (Turnitin). Due before 19 April 2021 at 23:59.

 

Weight: This task is 15% of your total grade for this subject.

It assesses the following learning outcomes:

• Outcome 1: understand the role of law as a business and management tool.

• Outcome 2: identify different issues and laws applicable in the context of doing business.

• Outcome 3: learn how to address ethical issues in a corporate setting.

 

 

Task:

 

BL Group has a flourishing business exporting garments to the UK. Suddenly, the UK administration banned the imports because

they found that the garments, made of synthetic material, could cause dermatitis, a skin disease. Faced with this debacle, BL Group

explored other markets and found that several African countries may like to import this product. The profits would be lower, but

the company would avert financial disaster.

 

o Who are the parties involved and what facts are relevant to each party?

o What are the ethical issues for each party in the case study?

o What is the possible solution(s) or alternative(s) for each party’s ethical issues?

o Should BL Group export to Africa without confirming that there would be no risk of dermatitis? Why (why not)?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rubrics:

 

Exceptional 90-100

Good 80-89

Fair 70-79

Marginal fail 60-69

Identification of main

Issues/Problems

25%

Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the main issues / problems in the case study

Identifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of most of the issues/problems.

Identifies and demonstrates acceptable understanding of some of the issues/problems in the case study

Does not identify or demonstrate an acceptable understanding of the issues/problems in the case study

Analysis and Evaluation of

Issues / Problems

25%

 

Presents an insightful and thorough analysis of all identified issues/problems

Presents a thorough analysis of most of the issues identified.

Presents a superficial analysis of some of the identified issues.

Presents an incomplete analysis of the identified issues.

Development of Ideas

and Opinions

25%

Supports diagnosis and opinions with strong arguments and well- documented evidence; presents a balanced and critical view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective.

Supports diagnosis and opinions with limited reasoning and evidence; presents a somewhat one-sided argument; demonstrates little engagement with ideas presented

Little action suggested and/or inappropriate solutions proposed to the issues in the case study.

No action suggested and/or inappropriate solutions proposed to the issues in the case study

Link to Legal Theories and

Additional Research

 

25%

Makes appropriate and powerful connections between identified issues/problems and strategic concepts studied in the course readings and lectures; supplements case study with relevant and thoughtful research and documents all sources of information

Makes appropriate but somewhat vague connections between identified issues/problems and concepts studied in readings and lectures; demonstrates limited command of the analytical tools studied; supplements case study with limited research.

Makes inappropriate or little connection between issues identified and the concepts studied in the readings; supplements case study, if at all, with incomplete research and documentation.

Makes no connection between issues identified and the concepts studied in the readings; supplements case study, if at all, with incomplete research and documentation.

Prepare A Client Questionnaire

/in /by

Prepare a CLIENT questionnaire and use the fact pattern below. Your client is the

prospective plaintiff that wants to sue. The Questionnaire should contain ALL THE

“BEYOND THE BASICS” INFORMATION in addition to the personal data, date/place of

incident, and how did the incident occur. The student is reminded that the text, and in

particular the lecture, identified several other key areas of which the paralegal should

include in their questionnaire and inquire from the prospective client.

2. Continuing with the same fact pattern as your questionnaire (Plaintiff Jessica Heweitt), draft

a Complaint with all appropriate allegations, and all applicable causes of action (there

clearly is more than one cause of action that should be pled), and in the correct format as

was taught in class, and detailed in the supplemental email I sent during the course. Also,

include all appropriate Defendants.

FACT PATTERN:

Jessica Hewitt is our client. She has been unemployed for over a

year and has been recently receiving counseling and medication

treatment for depression. Ms. Hewitt is claiming damages as a

result of an auto accident and an employment discrimination claim.

The driver that Ms. Hewitt collided with is Evan Portman, an

employee of Douglas Financial Services, Inc. Prior to the collision,

Evan Portman attended a Douglas Financial office party where he

consumed alcohol. Ms. Hewitt attended that same office party as an

invited guest of a different Douglas Financial employee. While

attending Ms. Hewitt met with the President of Douglas Financial in

hope of being hired by him. She was denied employment. Ms.

Hewitt believes that Douglas Financial should also be liable for the

accident because it provided alcohol to Evan Portman. Also, she

believes she was denied employment because of gender

discrimination. Ms. Hewitt wants to sue both defendants for all

CIVIL PROCEDURES EXTRA CREDIT PROJECT IR-i

REMOTE 1. Prepare a CLIENT questionnaire and use the fact pattern below. Your client is the

prospective plaintiff that wants to sue. The Questionnaire should contain ALL THE “BEYOND THE BASICS” INFORMATION in addition to the personal data, date/place of incident, and how did the incident occur. The student is reminded that the text, and in particular the lecture, identified several other key areas of which the paralegal should include in their questionnaire and inquire from the prospective client.

2. Continuing with the same fact pattern as your questionnaire (Plaintiff Jessica Heweitt), draft

a Complaint with all appropriate allegations, and all applicable causes of action (there clearly is more than one cause of action that should be pled), and in the correct format as was taught in class, and detailed in the supplemental email I sent during the course. Also, include all appropriate Defendants.

 

FACT PATTERN: Jessica Hewitt is our client. She has been unemployed for over a

year and has been recently receiving counseling and medication treatment for depression. Ms. Hewitt is claiming damages as a result of an auto accident and an employment discrimination claim. The driver that Ms. Hewitt collided with is Evan Portman, an employee of Douglas Financial Services, Inc. Prior to the collision, Evan Portman attended a Douglas Financial office party where he consumed alcohol. Ms. Hewitt attended that same office party as an invited guest of a different Douglas Financial employee. While attending Ms. Hewitt met with the President of Douglas Financial in hope of being hired by him. She was denied employment. Ms. Hewitt believes that Douglas Financial should also be liable for the accident because it provided alcohol to Evan Portman. Also, she believes she was denied employment because of gender discrimination. Ms. Hewitt wants to sue both defendants for all claims.

YOU CANNOT send this Extra Credit Project through Canvas (as you did with your previous Assignments), YOU MUST EMAIL it to me sending it to this email address from which I have communicated with you throughout the semester, and do so no later

than FRIDAY APRIL 23RD by NOON.