Prosocial Behavior, Power Point Slides

Week 7: Assignment: Prosocial Behavior

Top of Form

Hide Assignment Information

Turnitin®

Turnitin® enabledThis assignment will be submitted to Turnitin®.

Instructions

Week 7 Exercise: Prosocial Behavior

Much of what we tend to focus on when we study social psychology are topics that often have a negative connotation such as conformity, prejudice, aggression or obedience. A huge component of the study of social psychology; however, focuses on prosocial behavior – behaviors that focus on compassion and helping others. For this activity, you will focus on this more uplifting aspect of social psychology. Topics that fall under the area of prosocial behavior include altruism, helping, bystander intervention, empathy, and compassion, among others.

For this exercise, pick one day and seek to structure your thoughts and behaviors entirely around helping others. With each interaction or action you take, pause to think and ask yourself “is there a way I might help another here?” Hold a door for someone, offer your seat, share a smile, give a sincere compliment, show empathy to another, attempt to be more patient or understanding, etc. Your efforts should be in social settings that involve interactions with others (rather than something such as donating to a charity for instance). The goal is to be as thoughtfully prosocial in your interactions throughout the day as possible.

· At the beginning of the day, jot down your general mood, feelings, attitude, etc.

· Then throughout the day, whenever possible, carry a small notebook with you or make notes in an app on your phone to jot down meaningful encounters or experiences as you attempt to engage in prosocial behaviors.

· At the end of the day, again reflect and take notes on how you feel, your general mood, feelings and attitudes, etc.

PLEASE NOTE: If you are unable to engage in prosocial behavior outside of your home due to COVID-19 restrictions/precautions, you are encouraged to engage in such behaviors with your family/people with whom you are sheltering. You may also engage in prosocial behavior with others virtually or through other means (e.g., through video calls, emails, etc…). This assignment will be more meaningful if you are able to engage in-person with acquaintances or strangers, but you can still find ways to make a significant difference to others even if quarantined or sheltering in place.

In a 5-7 slide PowerPoint presentation, not counting title or reference slides:

· Summarize your experience. Describe the prosocial behaviors you engaged in, others’ reactions to these behaviors, and your assessment of any changes in mood, attitude, good fortune, or anything else of note you experienced.

· Review what you have learned about human behavior in social settings this week in your readings. Connect what you learned or experienced through your day of conscious, prosocial behavior with the terms, concepts, and theories from your research. Integrate at least two academic sources (your assigned readings/resources can comprise one of these sources), citing any references used in APA format.

· Describe any new insights you gained through this experience about your interactions with others on a daily basis, including any behaviors you wish to change or to continue.

· Use the features of PowerPoint to your advantage to communicate your ideas – include pictures, audio recorded narration, speaker’s notes, video, links, etc. as appropriate to enhance your ideas.

· Include an APA formatted title slide and reference slide. APA components such as an abstract, headings, etc. are not required since this is a PowerPoint presentation.

Submit your presentation as an attachment in the Week 7 Assignment Prosocial Behavior link in the Assignments area of the classroom no later than 11:55 pm EST Sunday of Week 7.

Due Date

Feb 21, 2021 11:59 PM

Hide Rubrics

Rubric Name: PSYC101 Week 7 Assign. Rubric: Prosocial Behavior

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria

Exemplary

Accomplished

Developing

Beginning

Did not attempt

Criterion Score

Description of Behaviors and Impact

33 points

Student provides a detailed, insightful description of prosocial behavior, reactions and impact on others.

28.05 points

Student provides a complete description of prosocial behavior, reactions and impact on others.

24.75 points

Student provides a marginal description of prosocial behavior, reactions and impact on others.

21.45 points

Student attempts to provide a description of prosocial behavior, reactions and impact on others but description does not demonstrate an understanding of the concepts.

0 points

Student does not describe prosocial behavior, reactions or impact on others.

/ 33

Connection to Theory

33 points

Student provides an accurate, thorough description of the connections between experiences and relevant psychological theory using many examples from the literature.

28.05 points

Student provides a mostly accurate description of the connections between experiences and relevant psychological theory using at least two examples from the literature.

24.75 points

Student provides a marginal description of the connections between experiences and relevant psychological theory using at least one example from the literature.

21.45 points

Student attempts to provide a description of the connections between experiences and relevant psychological theory but does not use examples from the literature for support.

0 points

Student does not provide a description of the connections between experiences and relevant psychological theory.

/ 33

Behavioral Insights

14 points

Student provides an insightful discussion of how the information gleaned will impact future behaviors.

11.9 points

Student provides a discussion of how the information gleaned will impact future behaviors.

10.5 points

Student provides a marginal discussion of how the information gleaned will impact future behaviors.

9.1 points

Student attempts to provide a discussion of how the information gleaned will impact future behaviors, but discussion does not demonstrate an understanding of the concepts.

0 points

Student does not provide a discussion of how the information gleaned will impact future behaviors.

/ 14

Formatting/Writing

20 points

Work is presented in a logical and coherent way. Writing is clear, articulate, and error free. Citations are composed in proper format with few or no errors. Powerpoint is engaging and visually effective.

17 points

Work is grammatically sound with a few minor errors. Citations are composed in the proper format with some errors. Powerpoint is used effectively.

15 points

Work contains frequent grammatical errors. Citations are inaccurate or improperly formatted. Presentation is somewhat hard to follow and/or does not make effective use of common features (images, bullet points, speaker’s notes, etc.).

13 points

Writing errors are so prevalent as to interfere with understanding of the content. Presentation is confusing, hard to read, and difficult to follow.

0 points

Work does not demonstrate appropriate undergraduate level writing. Presentation is not included.

/ 20

Rubric Total ScoreTotal

/ 100

Bottom of Form

Complete the Scholarly Article Content Analysis Worksheet for the Hass & Ray (2020) article.

It is important that the worksheet is completed and the questions below are answered.

Assignment

  • Complete the S

    COUN 6626: Research Methodology and Program Evaluation

    Week 4 Scholarly Article Content Analysis

    Case Conceptualization:

    Orion is a 4-year-old African American child. He comes into counseling referred by his primary pediatrician. Orion has been diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder. He has difficulty with communication, has deficits in empathizing with others’ intentions, and struggles with single-mindedness. Orion’s parents and preschool teacher have noticed a pervasive pattern of emotional dysregulation which includes frequent episodes of hysterical crying. Orion’s parents are concerned that he is not going to be promoted to kindergarten next year if he does not improve his ability to relate positively with others and improve his ability to regulate his emotions.

     

    Article:

    Haas, S. C., & Ray, D. C. (2020, July 6). Child-Centered Play Therapy With Children Affected by

    Adverse Childhood Experiences: A Single-Case Design. International Journal of Play Therapy.

    Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pla0000135

     

    1. Is the article above a peer-reviewed, scholarly source?

     

    Tip: Peer review is part of the editorial process an article goes through before it is published in a peer-reviewed journal. Once an article is submitted to a peer-reviewed journal, the journal editors send that article to “peers” or scholars in the field to evaluate the article. To determine if a journal is peer reviewed (also sometimes called refereed journals), try one or both of these steps:

    · Look up the journal in the UlrichsWeb.com (available on the A-Z Database List) and determine whether it is identified as peer reviewedUlrich’s is a directory. It is a searchable list of periodicals (magazines, journals, newspapers, etc.). It provides information about each periodical such as publisher, scope, and whether the journal uses peer review. 

    · Examine the journal’s website and review the submission and editorial process for evidence of peer review.

     

    2. What is the (a) problem the researchers were investigating/purpose of the research and (b) research question the researchers were trying to answer? This is a 2 part question.

    Tip: All studies have a research question that drives the investigation (what the researchers are trying to learn). Sometimes this is formally stated while other times the reader must discover this information which can usually be found in the Abstract or the Introduction section. Usually there is a section that is named “Purpose of the study”. The Results section or the Discussion section will provide the answer(s) to the research question. Research studies can use either quantitative, qualitative or mixed methods to investigate the question. Sometimes researchers are investigating more than one intervention and so research questions may include multiple parts. Be sure to review all parts of the inquiry or use multiple questions to explain.

     

    3. Describe the sample/participants in the study. Be sure to include how many participants were included in the study.

     

    Tip: Participants are also known as the sample. Quantitative studies generally have larger samples sizes than qualitative studies. Case studies may have one main “case” which may include a single person, a family, a group, or community. You want to describe who (e.g., demographics) and how many persons participated in the study.

    4. Did the researchers secure permission to conduct the study and/or secure informed consent from the participants? Were there any cultural concerns noted or do you have any concerns about bias?

     

    TipCultural considerations are related to research procedures. Consider whether there were cultural elements that may have changed the way the study took place such as language barriers, the need for an interpreter, and whether the sample matches the population that the researchers say they are studying.

    The key is to consider what cultural factors are pertinent to the research question. If you say you are studying an intervention for depression, the sample needs to include persons with depression. If a study is not specific to race or gender, for example, that does not make it culturally insensitive if the researches didn’t set out to learn about that intervention specifically applied to race or gender.

     

    5. Identify exactly what data was collected by the researchers in the study.

    Is the data quantitative (numeric data such as scores on assessments like the Iowa Basic Skills Test (IBST) or the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)? If there are assessment instruments used – are they numerical results or narrative results?

    Is the data qualitative (for example, clinical intake interviews or a narrative behavioral observation?

    image1

    Tip: The variables (e.g., substance abuse) or characteristic (e.g., geographic location) being investigated is usually found in the Introduction and Method sections (and sometimes the Abstract). For example: if a researcher is investigating an intervention for the treatment of depression. The variable may be “level of depression” and the data collected could be scores on the Beck Depression Scale.

    All data points represent something the researcher is trying to investigate. Data can be quantitative (like a measurement, frequency, or score that is represented by a numeral) or qualitative (data captured using written or spoken words, observations or photos). This includes things like student academic or behavioral records, historical documents, records, or artifacts like diaries or case notes.

     

    6. What was the outcome or the general result of the research study?

    What is the answer to the research question?

    image2

    Tip: The Discussion section is where what the authors present how the results can be applied when working with clients or students. The authors will articulate their greatest take away from the study outcomes and what they view as most important to know to meet the needs of clients or students with similar needs.

     

    7. Based on your understanding of the results of the research study presented, discuss how the outcomes can be generally applied to your future counseling practice.

    image3

    Tip: The authors identify if the results of the investigation support their hypothesis and present the major findings. The Results section and the Discussion section present the answer to the question the researchers were trying to learn. Keep in mind that when you are investigating an intervention, the results could be mixed. In other words, the intervention might be successful, not successful, or partially successful.

     

    8. How does this research article apply to the case study at the top of the worksheet?

    image4

    Tip: While there are similarities and differences between the article and the case study on the worksheet, describe how the general outcomes from the article relate to the case study. Explain your insights into how the information from the article could be useful to meet the needs of the case study.

    NOTE: As a counselor, what did you interpret from the outcomes of the research study in the article that you could use in developing treatment goals or action plans for the child in the case study on the worksheet?

     

    Your Answer here should include the steps and process you took to find the selected research article. Explain how you know your selected article is peer reviewed.

     

    Your Answer here should include details about the participants, or information about the population (sample) used in the research study.

     

    Your Answer here should provide a snapshot of the participants.

     

     

    © 2020 Walden University 1

    cholarly Article Content Analysis Worksheet for the Hass & Ray (2020) article.

  • Analyze the contents of the article and apply the findings to the case conceptualization included in the worksheet.
  • Critically analyze the article and identify all components:
    • Is the article scholarly?
    • What is the problem/purpose?
    • What is(are) the research question(s)?
    • Who are the participants?
    • What are the ethical/cultural considerations?
    • What data /information was collected from participants?
    • How did the researchers describe the results/answer to the research question?
    • How does this research apply to the case study?

Be sure to support your Assignment by citing all resources including those in the Learning Resources. Use proper APA format and citations.

Stroop Effect Research Report

Final Research Paper – due May 11, 2021 by 11:59 PM.

For this assignment, you will complete a research paper on The Stroop Effect and selective attention. The Stroop Effect is a phenomenon that occurs with the Stroop Task, a test that looks at what happens when we are asked to perform an ordinary task (such as reading or identifying  a list of colors) when there is some sort of visual interference.

You are acting like you are the researcher who conducted this study! However, you do not have to actually collect the data – that will be provided for you. In order to understand how the study works and how data was collected, you will need to participate in an online experiment on the Stroop Effect located within the “psychology learning tools”.  You should have already completed this part for the discussion in Week 4.  And in Week 4 you were to identify your hypothesis.  If you have decided to change your hypothesis, you may do so but get professor permission first.

Once you have completed the experiment you will need to analyze data that is contained in Week 4 Discussion Question and write a lab report (7- 10 pages – this page count does not include the title page or references) in APA style consisting of the following sections:

  • Title Page
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Method
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • References

(More information on each section is located below)

Just like the mini lab report, you will participate in the online experiment so you know what the experiment is like.

Here is the data file: DATA

Remember that you were given additional details in the Hypothesis discussion.

You will write the report as if you were the researcher conducting the experiment. You have some options in your research question for this project. The data you are given includes the gender and age of the participants as well as two columns of results data (reading the words and saying the colors). You can choose one independent variable, either gender or age.  You should try to use as much of your data as possible. Do not discard data unless there is a really good reason to do so.

Careful attention must be paid to APA Style as it represents a significant portion of your grade for the paper and is an intended learning outcome for the course. At the end of the term, you will submit your completed paper to your assignment folder.

Here is the grading rubric for the paper: Rubric

Main components on your research paper – See Chapter 11 Presenting Your Research for additional information.

  1. Title page – Make sure that the main points of a title page are included.
  2. Abstract – This is a well written summary of your paper. A reader should be able to get a clear picture of your paper based on the abstract. Include everything from a quick introduction of the topic to a sentence that implies that you will discuss results and implications.
  3. Introduction – This is so much more than a summary of your paper and should not be treated that way. For this paper, your introduction should be 2-3 pages of double spaced writing. Start by introducing your topic in general. Then you should discuss research from relevant published studies. Most, if not all, of your 8 references from peer reviewed sources will be cited in this section. Discussing these studies are important as they help provide a rationale for your study. Give that rationale next. Finish by clearly stating your hypothesis.
    1. Here is an article to get you started. Remember that this website isn’t the source for this article. You need to locate and cite the original source!
  4. Methods – Split this section into participants, materials and procedures subsections. You know the gender and age of all of your participants. You are welcome to include other demographic or recruiting information as it helps you with your study. Try the study here so you can adequately write about the procedures. Click on Run Experiment to get started.
  5. Results – Use the data I provided to calculate your results. Remember that your hypothesis drives your statistics. Think about what statistics you need to include to test your hypothesis. Write out all of your numbers even if you are including them in a table. Don’t forget to include a chart or table!
  6. Discussion – This is the best section because it is finally time to talk about what YOU think. After restating your results, talk about what they mean. What are the implications of your findings? Why are they important? For instance, why should we care that one gender is better at this than the other or that there aren’t gender differences for this study? After that, talk about the limitations to your study and give specific ideas for future research.
  7. References – Don’t forget that your references (and all of your paper) need to be in APA format. You need at least 8 references from peer reviewed sources (e.g., journals).

Stroop Effect Explanation

Psychology Of Personality

FINAL EXAM INSTRUCTIONS: Summer 2021-1

 

Your Final Exam begins with your completing one of the Personal Assessment tests in your textbook. Choose any one of them you want. Your Final Exam questions 4a, 4b, and 4c will be based on your participation in your selected Assessment.

 

Your Final Exam will consist of 12 items for you to answer: Items 1a,b,c; Items 2a,b,c; Cognitive Theory Items 3a, b, c; and your Personal Assessment Analysis Items: 4a, b and c. To begin, take one of the self-assessments listed in our Burger Text. You will be asked to EVALUATE  that test’s usefulness in question #4 of your Final Exam. 

 

For some sections, there are specific numbers of sentences requested. You will be graded according both to your content and answers’ length requirements.

 

 

 

You may consult your own notes and text, but not share information with other students.

Your content will be reviewed by UML’s plagiarism detection software.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

*For grading purposes, all papers must be received by the deadline of Monday June 28. You will have 9 days to complete your FINAL EXAM, from Friday June 19 to Monday 28.

 

BEFORE YOU BEGIN:

 

BE SURE TO CHECK THE RUBRIC IN YOUR GRADEBOOK BEFORE YOU BEGIN YOUR FINAL EXAM.

 

SUBMIT THROUGH THE ASSIGNMENT BOX, NOT EMAIL.

it will help if you can successfully copy and paste your paper into the Assignment Box, under the link “Write here”.  Otherwise, post your document itself.

 

 

Please go to the next page to see your 4 FINAL EXAM QUESTIONS.

 

 

PSYCHOLOGY OF PERSONALITY FINAL EXAM QUESTIONS (4)

TOTAL POINTS=110

Name of student:

Date:

 

QUESTION 1   (28 P0INTS)

In the space below:

1a. How do Trait Theorists and Neo-Freudians differ in their explanations of Personality? (About 100 words).

1b. What common explanations of Personality do Freudians and Behaviorists share? (About 100 words).

1c. How do Humanists utilize Cognitivist theory principles in counseling patients? (100 words)

 

 

QUESTION (27 POINTS)

 

In the space below:

2a. How might Behaviorists and Humanists differ in their treatment of anger? (about100 words)

2b. Explain why Freud’s theories are still relevant today? (About 100 words).

2c. What do Biologists say about the importance of 2 topics: genetics, and the extravert-introvert question. (100 words)

 

 

QUESTION 3 (27 POINTS)

 

In the space below:

3a. From a Cognitivist perspective, explain the behavior of one person you have observed. (100 words)

3b. From a Behaviorist perspective, explain the behavior of a second person you have observed. (100 words)

3c From a Freudian perspective, explain the behavior of a third person you have observed. (100 words)

(About 100 words).

 

 

QUESTION 4 (28 POINTS)

 

In the space below:

 

4a. Take and complete one I PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT that is in your textbook. Name the test and describe its methodology and assumptions. (About 100 words).

4b. Identify and explain one concept or principle that the test is supposed to measure or illustrate,

in words that you think a relative or colleague could understand. (About 100 words).

4c. Rate this Assessment (low 1 to 10 high) for 1. Its Reliability and 2. Its Validity. Explain your answer. (About 100 words).

 

 

DIRECTIONS:

1. Label the 12 sections: “1a.” through “4c”.

2. Confine your answers to the correct sections.

 

GOOD LUCK!