How are conference presentations professionally relevant?

/in /by

Effective clinical innovations and the dissemination of research findings are key elements in the growth and development of the psychology profession. There are numerous avenues that enable authors to publish and present their work. Poster presentations at conferences are effective methods for communicating research findings and providing opportunities to meet with other researchers and clinicians to discuss the research being presented. Thus, these types of conference presentations play a key role in the proliferation of research.

In this week’s discussion, you will be submitting your proposal for the Week Five Virtual Conference. You may utilize relevant assignments from previous courses in this program or suitable projects from your professional life. See the PSY699 Call for Student Poster (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. Presentations document for specific parameters and instructions on how to create your proposal. Following the guidelines presented in the document, create your proposal and attach it to your initial post in the discussion forum. Evaluate the impact participating in conference presentations may have on potential work settings and/or doctoral programs and comment on the following questions in your initial post.

  • How are conference presentations      professionally relevant?
  • What elements of the proposal process      were most difficult for you, and why?
  • What positive outcomes do you      anticipate will come from this process, which may be applied to potential      work settings and/or doctoral programs?Required Resources

    Articles

    1 .American Psychological Association. (2010).  Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct: Including 2010 amendments. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx

    · insertDescription

    2 .Caplan A. C.  (2008).  Denying autonomy in order to create it: The paradox of forcing treatment upon addicts . Addiction, 103(12), 1919–21. Retrieved from https://library.ashford.edu/ezproxy.aspx?url=http%3A//search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true%2526AuthType=ip,cpid%2526custid=s8856897%2526db=a9h%2526AN=35118770%2526site=ehost-live

    · The author of this article makes an argument that client autonomy can still be maintained when treatment is mandated.

    3. Manchak, S. M., Skeem, J. L., & Rook, K. S. (2014).  Care, control, or both? Characterizing major dimensions of the mandated treatment relationship . Law and Human Behavior, 38(1), 47–57. Retrieved from https://library.ashford.edu/ezproxy.aspx?url=http%3A//search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true%2526AuthType=ip,cpid%2526custid=s8856897%2526db=pdh%2526AN=2013-24290-001%2526site=ehost-live

    · The study described in this article examines whether mandated treatment relationships involve greater control than traditional treatment relationships. The principles of healthy adult attachment are also explored.

    4. Snyder, C. M. J., & Anderson, S. A. (2009).  An examination of mandated versus voluntary referral as a determinant of clinical outcome . Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 35(3), 278–292. doi:10.1111/j.175-0606.2009.00118.x

    · The full-text version of this article can be accessed through the ProQuest database in the Ashford University Library. In this article, the authors examine the evidence related to the effectiveness of psychotherapy with mandated clients.

    5. Sullivan, M. A., Birkmayer, F., Boyarsky, B. K., Frances, R. J., Fromson, J. A., Galanter, M., . . . Westermeyer, J. (2008).  Uses of coercion in addiction treatment: Clinical aspects . American Journal on Addictions, 17(1), 36–47. doi:10.1080/10550490701756369

    · The full-text version of this article can be accessed through the EBSCOhost database in the Ashford University Library. While involuntary treatment in health care raises many clinical, cultural ethical, legal, philosophical, and political concerns, evidence exists that it can be an integral component of effective mental health treatment. Various dimensions of mandated treatment are explored in this article.

    6.Walker, R., Cole, J., & Logan, T. K. (2008).  Identifying client-level indicators of recovery among DUI, criminal justice, and non-criminal justice treatment referrals . Substance Use & Misuse, 43(12/13), 1785–1801. doi: 10.1080/10826080802297484

    · The full-text version of this article can be accessed through the EBSCOhost database in the Ashford University Library. This study examined differences in treatment outcomes between mandated and non-mandated clients referred for substance misuse with a focus on client-level factors.

    All of the requirement has been download except number 1. Number 1 you can go straight to the internet address.

    1.American Psychological Association. (2010).  Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct: Including 2010 amendments. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx

     

     

    2. Addicition

    Denying autonomy in order to create it: the paradox

    of forcing treatment upon addicts

    THE PRIMACY OF AUTONOMY IN

    PROVIDER–PATIENT RELATIONSHIPS

    American bioethics affords extraordinary respect to

    the values of personal autonomy and patient selfdetermination

    [1]. Many would argue that the most significant

    achievement deriving from bioethics in the past

    40 years has been to replace a paternalistic model of

    health provider–patient relationships with one that sees

    patient self-determination as the normative foundation

    for practice. This shift away from paternalism towards

    respect for self-determination has been ongoing in behavioral

    and mental health as well, especially as it is reflected

    in the ‘recovery movement’ [2–4].

    As a result of the emphasis placed on patient

    autonomy, arguments in favor of mandatory treatment

    are rare and often half-hearted. Restrictions on

    autonomy are usually grounded in the benefits that will

    accrue to others from reining in dangerous behavior [5].

    However, anyone who wishes to argue for forced or mandated

    treatment on the grounds that society will greatly

    benefit is working up a very steep ethical hill.

    A person has the fundamental right, well established

    in medical ethics and in Anglo-American law, to refuse

    care even if such a refusal shortens their own life or has

    detrimental consequences for others. Therefore,while the

    few proponents of mandatory treatment for those

    afflicted with mental disorders or addictions are inclined

    to point to the benefit such treatment could have for

    society, it is exceedingly unlikely that any form of treatment

    that is forced or mandated is going to find any

    traction in American public policy on the basis of a consequentialist

    argument, great as those benefits might be.

    However, is benefit for the greater good the only basis

    for arguing for mandatory treatment? Can a case be made

    which acknowledges the centrality and importance of

    autonomy but which would still deem ethical mandatory

    treatment for addicts? I think it can.

    INFRINGING AUTONOMY TO

    CREATE AUTONOMY

    People who are truly addicted to alcohol or drugs really

    do not have the full capacity to be self-determining or

    autonomous. Standard definitions of addiction cite loss

    of control, powerlessness and unmanageability [6]. An

    addiction literally coerces behavior.An addict cannot be a

    fully free, autonomous agent precisely because they are

    caught up in the behavioral compulsion that is addiction.

    If this is so, at least for some addicts, then it may be

    possible to justify compulsory treatment involving medication

    or other forms of therapy, if only for finite periods

    of time, on the grounds that treatment may remove the

    coercion causing the powerlessness and loss of control.

    Addicts, just as many others with mental illnesses and

    disabilities, are not incompetent. Indeed, to function as

    an alcoholic or cocaine addict onemust be able to reason,

    remember complex information, set goals and be orientated

    to time, place and personal identity; but competency

    by itself is not sufficient for autonomy. Being

    competent is a part of autonomy, but autonomy also

    requires freedom from coercion [7]. Those who criticize

    mandatory treatment on the grounds that an addict is

    not incompetent and thus ought not be forced to endure

    treatment are ignoring this crucial fact. Addiction, bringing

    in its wake as it does loss of will and control, does not

    permit the freedom requisite for autonomy or selfdetermination.

    If a drug can break the power of addiction sufficiently

    to restore or re-establish personal autonomy then mandating

    its use might be ethically justifiable. Government,

    families or health providers might force treatment in the

    name of autonomy. If a drug such as naltrexone is

    capable of blocking the ability to become high from

    alcohol, heroin or cocaine [8,9], then it may release the

    addict from the compulsive and coercive dimensions of

    addiction, thereby enhancing the individual’s ability to be

    autonomous. If a drug or therapy can remove powerlessness

    and loss of control from the addict’s life, then that

    fact can serve as an ethical argument allowing the mandating

    of treatment. If naltrexone or any other drug can

    permit people to make choices freed from the compulsions

    or cravings that would otherwise control their behavior

    completely, then it would seem morally sound to permit

    someone who is in the throes of addiction to regain the

    ability to choose, to be self-governing, even if the only

    way to accomplish this restoration is through a course of

    mandated treatment.

    Of course, it would not be ethical to force treatment

    upon anyone if there were significant risks involved with

    the treatment but new drugs, such as naltrexone, appear

    safe and effective for those addicted to heroin and perhaps

    cocaine, and should also prove so for alcoholics. The

    mechanisms behind the drug are well understood [8,9],

    and in some populations this drug has been used for a

    long time to reduce the cravings of addiction safely and

    EDITORIAL doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02369.x

    © 2008 The Author. Journal compilation © 2008 Society for the Study of Addiction Addiction, 103, 1919–1921

    effectively. Mandating treatment requires that the intervention

    carry minimal risk as the patient cannot consent,

    but some interventions may be able to meet this admittedly

    difficult standard.

    Nor would it make moral sense to force treatment

    upon someone, restore their autonomy successfully and

    then continue to force treatment upon them in their fully

    autonomous state. The restoration of autonomy is the

    end of any moral argument for mandatory treatment.

    Similarly, efforts to restore autonomywould not justify

    continuous, open-ended use of drugs or therapy in

    addicts. There must be some agreed-upon interval, after

    which treatment must be acknowledged to have failed

    and other avenues of coping with addiction to alcohol or

    drugs pursued.

    PRECEDENTS FOR MANDATING

    TREATMENT IN THE NAME

    OF AUTONOMY

    Interestingly enough, despite the emphasis on autonomy

    in law and ethics in American health care there are situations

    where the ethical acceptability of the rationale of

    autonomy restoration in permitting mandatory treatment

    is already accepted. Consider what occurs in rehabilitation

    medicine. The short-term infringement of

    autonomy is tolerated in the name of long-term creation

    or restoration of autonomy.

    Patients, after devastating injuries or severely disfiguring

    burns, often demand that they be allowed to die. They

    say: ‘Don’t treat me’, or they may insist that: ‘I can’t live

    like this’. In evaluating their requests, no one would be

    able to question seriously their competency. They know

    where they are. They know what is going on. However,

    staff in rehabilitation and burn units almost always

    ignore these initial demands. Patient autonomy is not

    respected. Why?

    What rehabilitation experts say is that they want to

    allow an adaptation to the new state of affairs: to the loss

    of speech, amputation, facial disfigurement or paralysis.

    They know from experience that if they do certain things

    with people—train them, counsel them, teach them

    adaptive skills—they can encourage them to start to

    ‘adjust’ [10].

    There are, admittedly, still peoplewho say at the end of

    a run of rehabilitation: ‘I don’t want to live like this’. The

    suicide rate is higher in these populations. Nevertheless,

    at least initially, rehabilitation specialists will say that

    they have to force treatment on patients because they

    know from experience that they can often encourage

    them to accept their new state of affairs. The normal

    practice of rehabilitation immediately after a severe

    injury is to mandate treatment, ignore what patients

    have to say, and then seewhat happens. If they still do not

    want treatment after a course of rehabilitation then their

    wishes will be respected [10].

    The rehabilitation model is precisely the model to

    follow in thinking about the mandatory use of a drug

    such as naltrexone for the treatment of addiction. The

    moral basis for mandating treatment is for the good of the

    patient by rebirthing their autonomy. How long and

    whether someone ought to be able at some point say: ‘I’ve

    done this for 6 months, I’m finished, I want to get high

    again’ is a challenging problem, but it is not the key one.

    The keymoral challenge is to open the door to temporary

    mandatory treatment. That can be achieved, ironically,

    on the grounds of autonomy. It may press current ethical

    thinking to the limit, but mandating treatment in the

    name of autonomy is not as immoral as many might

    otherwise deem forced treatment to be [7]. Once competency

    and coercion are distinguished, it is clear that both

    are requisite for autonomy. Mandatory treatment which

    relieves the coercive effects of addiction and permits the

    recreation or re-emergence of true autonomy in the

    patient can be the right thing to do.

    Acknowledgement

    The author is grateful for the support of the Scattergood

    Foundation in writing this essay.

    Declaration of interest

    None.

    Keywords Addiction, autonomy, mandatory treatment,

    naltrexone, paternalism, right-to-refuse treatment.

    ARTHUR CAPLAN

Triggers Of Personailty Disorder Of Joseph Paul Franklin

/in /by

What  are common triggers associated with psychopath Joseph Paul Franklin and which were present in the individuals background. Hw would these triggers differ if the individual (Joseph Franklin )was either a psychopath or sociopath? Include any risk factors you expect to be associated with a particular trigger. Based on the personality disorder determine appropriate communication skills that could have been used when interacting with this individual ( Joseph Franklin) and attempting to obtain information. Which communication approaches would not be effective for this individual’s personality disorder ( Joseph Franklin)? Justify your determinations.

History And Theory Paper

/in /by

Assignment Content

  1. Consider the eras, life histories, and personalities of Freud and Rogers.

    Identify two research articles published in the last 5 years: one that investigates a psychoanalytic or Freudian construct and one that investigates a client-centered, humanistic, or Rogerian construct.

    Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper about Freud and Rogers that addresses the following:

    • Provide a summary of each article, highlighting the processes that contemporary psychologists use to develop the theories of Freud and Rogers.
    • Explain their views of human nature and their worldviews as expressed in their respective theories.
    • Which aspect of their theory do you think would be different if they were alive and working today?
    • Explain how social and cultural factors influenced the development of Freud’s and Rogers’ respective theories of personality.
    • Format your paper according to APA guidelines.

Psychology Of Consulting And Coaching

/in /by

Literature Review Resources

Successful completion of a doctoral dissertation requires significant amounts of independent reading on the research topic. This allows the doctoral learner/researcher to become familiar with the scope of the topic and to identify gaps or tensions within the existing literature on the topic. These gaps and tensions become the source of the dissertation research. In this assignment, you will read and annotate potential sources in your dissertation field of interest. Those demonstrating the most merit to the best of your understanding of the topic at this time should be added to your RefWorks list for potential inclusion in the Literature Review section of your dissertation.

PLEASE NOTE: My dissertation is based on the current issues on Immigration in the US with focus on DACA, the Border Wall, Amnesty, Deportation, the contribution of immigrants to the US Economy and the fate of immigrants in the country.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

· Locate the assignment submission for “Literature Review Resources” from PSY-804. You will be adding to this document to begin building a running literature review.

·  It is strongly recommended that you engage in this activity throughout the duration of your program.

· Instructors will be scoring your submission based on the number of unique sources identified in the list submitted.

·  Download the resource entitled “Literature Review Resources Tool” and use it to complete the assignment.

·  Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.

·  Refer to the resource, “Preparing Annotated Bibliographies,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.

Directions:

Read at least 10 peer-reviewed articles in your general dissertation field that you have not read previously.

In the “Literature Review Resources” document that you submitted in RES-830, provide the following for each source you are adding to the document:

1. The APA-formatted citation.

2. A brief annotation of the key points of the source.

3. An indication of whether the source has been added to (Y) or excluded from (N) your RefWorks list.

LITERATURE REVIEW RESOURCES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PSY-804 Humanistic, Transpersonal and Existential Psychology

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PSY-804 Literature Review Resources

Number Article Information Added to RefWorks? (Y or N)
1. Bibliographic Information

Bernstein, J. 2018.

The U.S. immigration debate: what’s all the shouting for? Palgrave Macmillan Bus Econ 53: 141. https://doi.org/10.1057/s11369-018-0079-z

 Y
  Link

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s11369-018-0079-z

  
  Annotation

The author of this research article analyzed the hidden and probable slowed GDP growth in the US economy. He logically concluded that this is due to the decline in the labor force, which was as a result of the approaching immigration policy that would significantly lead to demographic challenges; however, this may consequently complement the national macroeconomic growth. Nevertheless, this policy has resulted into anger from all walks of life because there is little evidence that supports the notion that increased migration to the country have or would have negative impacts on the incomes of US Citizens workers, and a likely net positive fiscal impact.

  
2. Bibliographic Information

Edwards, Ryan D. Liu, Mao-Mei. 2018.

A New Look at Immigration and Employment in the U.S. since 2005.

 Y

 
  Link

https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0q21g0b8

  
  Annotation

The authors of this scholarly research article, Edwards, R. D. & Liu, Mao-Mei.; reviewed and analyzed the decades long gradually increasing rise of migration into the United States of America, which is believed to be nearing its historic maximum. They assessed the fair share and contributions of the immigrants to the U.S. population and economy by focusing on specific areas that have not been generally examined as compared to other areas that have persistently been of high focus of immigration, such as the macroeconomic impacts of foreign-born individuals on the U.S. native born citizens, which is now getting a lot of attention due to the greater increase in migration to the country.

In the authors’ views, and based on economic theory, shifts in immigration out labor supply, and has thereby reduced the income of U.S. natives in the short run because of the sloping downward in labor demand that has raised unemployment among U.S. native born citizens.

  
3.

 

 Bibliographic Information

Devadoss, Stephen, et al. 2018.

US Immigration Policies and Dynamics of Cross‐Border Workforce in Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12684

 Y

 
  Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/twec.12684

  
  Annotation

This article examines the current U.S. policy on immigration and the contentious debate that has generated so much controversies in the last few years. The authors developed a unique model to efficiently and productively analyze possible effects of tight and stringent border control and enforcement policies to streamline programs such as the “guest‐worker programs” that enables employment in a cross-border migration from Mexico to the U.S. This dynamic model developed by the authors revealed that stricter border control policies would heighten the current labor-shortage being experienced and reduce and weaken the US agricultural production. It is however the authors conclusion that a streamline of the guest‐worker program would lead to stable supply of workers on the farms with negligible impact on wages in the US.

  
4.

 

 Bibliographic Information

Cook, Maria Lorena, et al. 2018.

Introduction to a Special Issue on the Impact of Immigrant Legalization Initiatives: International Perspectives on Immigration and the World of Work. Volume: 71 issue: 4, page(s): 807-822.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793918775362

 N

 
  Link

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0019793918775362

  
  Annotation

This article takes a critical look at the legal and integration of immigrants into US national labor markets irrespective of the demanding calls for immigration reform in the country. The authors analyzed the impacts of changes that stems from the illegal to legal status of immigrants in the workplace. Similarly, the article examines the lack of adequate attention on the US immigration literature, including policies that are responsible for immigrant legalization in and outside the country even though most countries have put measures in place that addresses such policies on regular basis.

Furthermore, the article takes a look at the legalization actions of some immigrant destinations around the world, including that of Canada, Italy, and the United Kingdom. The authors also emphasized and highlights the significance of cross-national contexts so as to understand the extent of different legal programs and how they affect immigrant workers, their working environments, as well as the labor market.

  
5.

 

 Bibliographic Information

Griswold, D. 2018. The Benefits of Immigration: Addressing Key Myths

 Y

 
  Link

https://www.mercatus.org/system/files/griswold_-_policy_brief_-_myths_of_immigration_-_v1.pdf

  
  Annotation

In this article, the authors examine and discussed the US historical impartial and acceptance to immigration, which over the years has continue to enrich the country’s culture, broadened her economic opportunity, and which has been enhancing its influence around the world. The authors believe that the immigrants, through their successful integration into American society are complementary to US native-born workers and helps in raising the overall US economic productivity through innovative and entrepreneur initiatives.

The research concluded that it is worth looking deeply into the historical background of the US as almost everyone in today’s America, has either immigrated from one country or another or belong to descendants of immigrants that came from different parts of the world, including England, Germany, and Ireland, and the Eastern Europe in the colonial era and others from Scandinavian countries in the 19th and early 20th centuries that makes the United States of America.

  
6. Bibliographic Information

Espenshade, Thomas J, et al. 1996.

Contemporary American Attitudes toward U.S. Immigration.

https://doi.org/10.1177/019791839603000207

 Y

 
  Link

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/019791839603000207

  
  Annotation

The authors of this article used it to examine the American perspectives in regard to immigration using survey and data from different credible sources including the CBS News/New York Times and a Southern California survey to analyze the impacts of undocumented migrants and illegal immigration in the United States. The survey included questions to U.S. native born citizens about their feelings and how they rate and balance the level of immigration to the country?

Although several hypotheses were used to test these factors to understand which and what influenced the respondents; however, most of the views were centered on the state of the country’s economy, including feelings of social and political alienation as well as sentiments of isolation regarding foreign relations and economic issues.

  
7.

 

 Bibliographic Information

Nardini, AK. 2018. Economics Journal. Trump and US Immigration Policies. Lessons from the Eisenhower Administration

 Y

 
  Link

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325263866_Trump_and_US_Immigration_Policies_Lessons_from_the_Eisenhower_Administration

  
  Annotation

This article examined the government’s immigration entry policies into the United States dating back to 1953 when the US became a symbol of ideological openness, which made her the designated and the unquestionable leader of a free and just world order. The article investigated and made comparisons with the current immigrations strategies of President Donald Trump.

The article emphasizes the negative aspects of these strategies including the isolation of the country, the damages it is causing the economy of the country as well as the feelings of division in the country even among native-born citizens. It is the aim of the article to appeal to the Republican Party not to return back to the pre-1953 restrictions by reverting those early policies that will undo the great work that the Eisenhower Administration had undertaken.

  
8.

 

 Bibliographic Information

Kennedy, Andrew. 2018. Politics of Skilled Immigration

Explaining the Ups and Downs of the US H-1B Visa Program

https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918318769312

 N

 
  Link

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0197918318769312

  
  Annotation

This scholarly reviewed article is centered around the H-1B visa program. The author examined the reason(s) behind rise and fall in the yearly program dating back from the1990s to the present-day. The article also reiterated the fact that the United States of American has always attracted immigrants with most of them skilled; however, over the years, the country’s openness and acceptance of these immigrants has become divided.

While the nation focused on capital and labor, the article contends that the United States policy demonstrates a conflict between capital and citizen groups, which has significantly changed in the last 20 years. The author’s conclusion henceforth challenged the notion on skilled immigration and country’s immigration policy.

  
9.

 

 Bibliographic Information

Colston, E. 2018. Deportation and Detention: ICE-y and Dangerous Conditions. University of Texas. Repositories.lib.utexas.edu

 Y

 
  Link

https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/64646/www-thetexasorator-com-blog-2018-3-19-deportation-and-detention-ice-y-and-dangerous-conditions.pdf?sequence=2

  
  Annotation

The author of this article analyzed the present US administration and the President’s campaign promises on immigration and how the policy is been delivered. Emphasis were on travel ban on Muslim countries, the proposed border wall and the deportation of 2 to 3 million illegal immigrants. The article also touched on the proposed cancellation of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program and the increased ICE immigration arrests/deportation of undocumented immigrants.

In this article, the author investigated the building of a new $110 million ICE detention facility in Conroe, Texas that is scheduled to house up to 1,000 undocumented immigrants for deportation and the illegal immigrants seeking asylum in the United States as part of President Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigration.

  
10.

 

 Bibliographic Information

Kim, A. 2017. Deportation Deadline. Wash. UL Review HeinOnline

 N

 
  Link

https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/walq95&section=19

  
  Annotation

This research study discusses the deadlines that regulates practically all facets of life in the United States law and how it controls the timeliness of any claim in the designs of statutes of limitations. The author asserts in all aspects of the law in this country, irrespective of criminal or civil contexts or claims by private citizens or the government, there is an expiration date that cuts off a plaintiff’s right to assert any claim but with an exception in the enforcement of immigration actions.

The author emphasized that the U.S. government can deport immigrants even for offenses that are over several decades; due to this action, millions of law-abiding, resourceful and individuals who have been residing in the country for several decades now live in fear and threat of being deported for offenses that might have occurred decades ago. The author of this article exposes this trend while also examines the procedural deviation and inconsistencies between immigration and non-immigration law.

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

Bernstein, J. (2018). The U.S. immigration debate: what’s all the shouting for? Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s11369-018-0079-z

Boehm, D. A. (2016). Returned: Going and Coming in the Age of Deportation. Retrieved from http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/509313

Colston, E. (2018). Deportation and Detention: ICE-y and Dangerous Conditions. University of Texas. Retrieved from https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/64646/www-thetexasorator-com-blog-2018-3-19-deportation-and-detention-ice-y-and-dangerous-conditions.pdf?sequence=2

Cook, M. L., Gleeson, S., Griffith, K. L. & Kahn, L. M. (2018). Introduction to a Special Issue on the Impact of Immigrant Legalization Initiatives: International Perspectives on Immigration and the World of Work. Volume: 71 issue: 4, page(s): 807-822. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0019793918775362

Devadoss, S. Luckstead, J. (2018). US Immigration Policies and Dynamics of Cross‐Border Workforce in Agriculture. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/twec.12684

Donohue, L. K. (2018). Border Search Authorities Related to Customs. Retrieved from https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1122&context=cong

Edwards, R. D. & Liu, M. (2018). A New Look at Immigration and Employment in the U.S. since 2005. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0q21g0b8

Espenshade, T. J. & Hempstead, K. (1996). Contemporary American Attitudes toward U.S. Immigration. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/019791839603000207

Figlio, D. & OzekInflux, U. (2018). Influx of Haitian refugees in Florida didn’t hurt student outcomes. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/research/haitian-post-earthquake-migrants-did-not-harm-incumbent-students/

Griswold, D. (2018). The Benefits of Immigration: Addressing Key Myths. Retrieved from https://www.mercatus.org/system/files/griswold_-_policy_brief_-_myths_of_immigration_-_v1.pdf

Kennedy, A. (2018). Politics of Skilled Immigration: Explaining the Ups and Downs of the US H-1B Visa Program. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0197918318769312

Kim, A. (2017). Deportation Deadline. Retrieved from https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/walq95&section=19

Nardini, A. K. (2018). Economics Journal. Trump and US Immigration Policies. Lessons from the Eisenhower Administration. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325263866_Trump_and_US_Immigration_Policies_Lessons_from_the_Eisenhower_Administration

Pierce, S., Bolter, J. & Selee, A. (2018). U.S. Immigration Policy Under Trump: Deep Changes and Lasting Impacts. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/James%20Dada/Downloads/TCMTrumpSpring2018-FINAL.pdf