Professional Ethics, Essay

Straighten Up Business Analysis

Read: Roller Bags Case Study

ROLLER BAGS: Lightening the Load All Over The World.

In 2002, Claude Ciseria started the Straighten Up program, the premise of which was to provide backpacks with rollers for children in need. For every roller bag sold, a free roller bag would be donated promoting Ciseria’s belief that the purpose of all humans is to help others and give to those less fortunate.

Why Roller Bags?

Ciseria asserts that children in many countries have to walk miles with either a heavy backpack that adds weight to their spine or carry heavy books and other items to school in their arms, also lending to curvature of the spine. Furthermore, this damage to the spine can have life-long damaging effects as the children move into adulthood. Ciseria’s idea to provide roller bags so that children can pull their books may prevent lifelong back pain.

The Spine

Prolonged carrying of backpacks can cause scoliosis or curvature of the spine. In children, progression can be an issue and may require the use of a brace. Additionally, chronic neck and shoulder pain starts in middle school and can cause the need for inflammatory drugs throughout adulthood.

Furthermore, the constant weight of backpacks actually causes the spinal cords to compress and cause significant back pain. Compressing the spine by carrying a heavy backpack can affect how tall you one will grow. The lumbar disks, located in the lower spine, contribute to about an inch of human height. When children carry an extremely heavy backpack, 5 days a week for years, the spine is compressed causing them to shrink more quickly.

Straighten Up Program

Roller bags are produced in Ethiopia, Cuba, and Somalia and are provided to children in 20 countries. An outside firm audits the factories to ensure that the workers receive a fair wage and that children are not being exploited.

The Straighten Up program had donated 1 million roller bags by 2008. There is also a segment of the program that returns to villages and replaces worn or damaged roller bags.

How Straighten Up Works

Ciseria and his partners first established partnerships with global humanitarian organizations that have a long history with the communities in which they serve. Using the criterion of economic, health, and educational conditions and the needs of the community, the program identifies communities with the most need. Straighten Up ensures that the program will not have a negative effect on local businesses and that the children who receive the roller bags also receive support with health and educational needs.

Critiques of the Program

There has been concern over whether Straighten Up hurts local businesses that also make bags or backpacks. Critical needs require donations, but long-term, it may be better to teach local businesses to make the roller bags and develop entrepreneurs who would generate revenue to help the community.

Additionally, as a privately held company, Straighten Up is not required to provide financial statements. It may be beneficial to customers and stakeholders to know how much it costs to make each roller bag, as well as how much it costs to give away each bag. Without transparent financial reports, the program has been criticized as being more or a marketing ploy than a corporate social responsibility program.

Imagine you are an I/O psychologist and have been asked to evaluate this company.

Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word formal evaluation of this company. Include the following:

  • Outline the stakeholders of the organization, and identify ways for managing them.
  • Describe the ethical business practices this program encompasses. Explain how these business practices are similar to or different from ethical business practices in the United States.
  • Explain organizational community responsibility, and justify whether this program complies with this requirement.
  • Describe recommendations for ethical business sustainability practices to meet the needs of the future.
  • Recommend strategies, based on psychological concepts, for ethically addressing employee- and consumer-related concerns. Describe how this feedback can be implemented in the program.
  • Evaluate the program’s methods of marketing and advertising. Determine whether the program’s methods comply with ethical guidelines. Describe ways to ensure that their marketing is honest and transparent.

Include a minimum of three scholarly peer-reviewed sources.

Format your paper according to APA guidelines.

Module 5 SPSS Data Interpretation

Review the SPSS output file, which reports the results of the between-group (independent group) one-way ANOVA to see if the mean alcohol by volume (%) of the beer differs as a function of quality of the brand as rated by a beer expert (in 2012). Answer the following questions based on your observations of the SPSS output file:

  1. Looking at the descriptives (first information), do you see differences in the mean alcohol contents for the three levels of quality? Explain.
  2. Looking at the Test for Homogeneity of Variances (Levene Statistic), is it reasonable to proceed with the ANOVA? Is the assumption met, or violated? How do you know?
  3. Looking at the results of the ANOVA, is there a significant difference in the mean alcohol content for beers in the three quality groups? How do you know? Write the results in the following format: F(df value) = ___, p value = ______.
  4. The pairwise post hoc tests indicate which quality groups’ means are statistically significantly different for the others. Using the results of the Tukey HSD post hoc test, what two quality rating groups had significantly different mean alcohol by volume levels? How do you know?

Discuss the cultural issues and trends that specifically apply to each of the following regional population groups of the United States

In a Word document, provide short answers to the statements below. Refer to the “Cultural Considerations Resource” for help in completing this assignment.

Explain cultural considerations that the counselor must account for when working with a client from each of the following groups (100-150 words each):

  1. Immigrants (Documented and Undocumented)
  2. Refugees

Discuss the cultural issues and trends that specifically apply to each of the following regional population groups of the United States (100-150 words each):

  1. The Hmong in California
  2. Cuban Americans in Florida
  3. Hispanic Americans in the Southwest
  4. Your choice of a white ethnic group (e.g., German, Irish, Italian)cid:D7D4B297-EEAE-4174-AD01-F87097282051@canyon.com

     

    PCN-509 Cultural Considerations Resources

    Hmong

    Hmong Americans in the 2013 American Community Survey (2014)

    http://www.hmongstudiesjournal.org/uploads/4/5/8/7/4587788/2013_acs_hmong_analysis_article_for_website.pdf

    Hmong Studies Journal (census data)

    http://www.hmongstudiesjournal.org/hmong-census-data.html

    “Mental Health of Hmong Americans: A Metasynthesis of Academic Journal Article Findings,” by Lee, from the Hmong Studies Journal (2013). http://link.galegroup.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/apps/doc/A367641451/AONE?u=canyonuniv&sid=AONE&xid=28e7400c

    Cuban Americans

    Hispanics of Cuban Origin in the United States, 2011

    http://www.pewhispanic.org/2013/06/19/hispanics-of-cuban-origin-in-the-united-states-2011/

    Hispanic Americans

    Pew Hispanic Center: The 10 Largest Hispanic Origin Groups: Characteristics, Rankings, Top Countries

    http://www.pewhispanic.org/2012/06/27/the-10-largest-hispanic-origin-groups-characteristics-rankings-top-counties/

    “Mental Health at the U.S.-Mexico Border: A BRFSS Glimpse,” by Olson et al., from Hispanic Health Care International (2007).

    https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/docview/205485646?accountid=7374

    Other Cultural Considerations Resources

    “Stereotypes of U. S. Immigrants from Four Global Regions Stereotypes of U. S. Immigrants from Four Global Regions,” by Timberlake and Williams, from Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell) (2012).

    https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=83172359&site=ehost-live&scope=site

    © 2015. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

     

    © 2015. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Introduction To Conflict Resolution

Analyze the following conflict: “Who Do We Hire?Preview the document

Instructions:

First, write a short background about the nature of the conflict, using the following questions

  1. What is the conflict about? When did the conflict start? What caused it?
  2. Was it a series of events or one event? What was the trigger event(s)?
  3. When did the conflict originate? Why did it occur?
  4. Use a metaphor to describe your conflict.

Next, analyze your perceptions of each element of the conflict, using the following questions:

  • Expressed struggle: How has the conflict been expressed? What was the trigger event?
  • Interdependent parties: What binds the parties together? In what ways each party needs the other?
  • Perceived incompatible goals: What are the parties not getting?
  • Perceived scarce resources: Examples include time, money, affection, inclusion, oil, land, or other natural resources, etc.
  • Perceived interference to achieve goals: In what ways each party is interfering with the other’s goals?

In your analysis, you must incorporate ideas, concepts, and theory from the chapter(s) to support your thoughts, answers, and/or rationales. This way, you can demonstrate your understanding of the readings and key concepts.

1 Rev S17

“Who Do We Hire?”

Dialogue

Participants: John, Jim (the Director), Laura, Karl, Keith and Celeste

Setting: Mental health center

Situation: An opening for a full-time therapist has been created by one of the

staff therapists quitting

Jim: We need to fill this position since Lee is leaving. I suggest we hire

Nikki full time. She’s done a great job as an intern, and the kids seem to

really like her. What do you think?

 

Keith: I agree. We should hire her.

 

Jim: Anyone else?

 

(Long silence)

 

John: Yeah, that’s okay with me.

 

Jim: Is there any discussion on this matter?

 

Laura: Yes. I don’t think we should hire Nikki without doing a search. She does

a good job, but we might be able to get someone even better.

 

Karl: I sort of feel that way, too.

 

Keith: I don’t think we could find anyone better. Besides, it could take months

to do it and we need the help right away, especially on the weekends.

 

Karl: Yeah, but that doesn’t mean we should hire just anyone.

 

Jim: Nikki’s not just anyone. Plus, we could lose the funding if we don’t hire

right away. I’ve talked to Nikki about it—I’m sure she’d take the position.

 

Keith: And if we don’t offer it to her, I think she’ll quit completely.

 

Laura: Sounds like you guys have already figured it out. Why are you even

asking us if you’ve made up your mind already?

 

Jim: There’s no “we” here, and I didn’t already make up my mind.

 

Celeste: I don’t think we should act so quickly. I’m not sure Nikki is all that

committed to her work. You say the kids like her, but personally, I think she

just likes having them do what she wants. She seems like a control freak to me.

She likes having the kids like her.

 

Jim: What is it with you, Celeste? You always disagree with what this group

wants to do. Everyone wants this but you. I’m tired of your constant

opposition. You should listen to what we’re saying.

 

 

 

2 Rev S17

Celeste: What is it with me? Why do you act like we’re making a group decision,

when you already made a decision and obviously got Keith and John to agree before

talking to the rest of us?

 

Jim: If you can’t be a team player, then maybe it’s you who needs to start

looking for a new job.

 

Instructions Analyze the conflict: “Who Do We Hire?”

First, write a background about the nature of the conflict, using the following questions:

a. What is the conflict about? When did the conflict start? What caused it? b. Was it a series of events or one event? What was the trigger event(s)? c. When did the conflict originate? Why did it occur? d. Use a metaphor to describe your conflict.

Next, analyze your perceptions of each element of the conflict, using the following questions:

a. Expressed struggle: How has the conflict been expressed? What was the trigger event? b. Interdependent parties: What binds the parties together? In what ways each party needs the other? c. Perceived incompatible goals: What are the parties not getting? d. Perceived scarce resources: Examples include time, money, affection, inclusion, oil, land, or other natural

resources, etc. e. Perceived interference to achieve goals: In what ways each party is interfering with the other’s goals?

 

In your analysis, you must incorporate ideas, concepts, and theory from the chapter(s) to support your thoughts,

answers, and/or rationales. This way, you can demonstrate your understanding of the readings and key concepts.