Discuss the historical application of statistics in the field of health care. Describe an example, other than Florence Nightingale’s contributions, where the statistical application has greatly influenced or changed health care operations or practice.
SOCS185N-11504 Assignments Week 5 Assignment: Essay – Yo…!
Total Points: 175.0
Week 5 Assignment: Essay – You Decide
Due Monday by 1:59am Points 175 Submitting a file upload
Week 5 Essay Grading Rubric – 175 pts
Criteria Ratings Pts
10.0 pts
10.0 pts
35.0 pts
50.0 pts
20.0 pts
20.0 pts
10.0 pts
20.0 pts
Submit Assignment
Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:
Textbook: Chapter 9 Lesson Link (website): Pew Research Center
Click on the Social Trends tab. Click on the Interactives tab. Locate the following link: How Census Race Categories Have Changed Over Time Click on “1790” to see two columns comparing the 1790 Census categories with the 2010 Census categories.
Minimum of 4 outside scholarly sources
Instructions In this week’s lesson, you learned about the U.S. Census Bureau’s most recent racial and ethnic categories. For this assignment, consider the racial and ethnic categories used in the 2010 Census with the four racial, ethnic, and gender categories used in the 1790 Census: Free white males, free white females, all other free persons, slaves (Pew Research Center, 2015). Analyze the concepts of race, ethnicity, and gender as social constructs, just as sociologists do, by addressing the following:
1. Explain how you might have been categorized by the 1790 Census and how you would have been categorized by the 2010 Census.
2. Compare and contrast the two potential categorizations and explain how this exercise shows that the concepts of race, ethnicity, and even gender change over time. Most importantly, explain how this exercise shows that the concepts of race, ethnicity, and gender are social constructs.
3. Determine and describe what ethnic, racial, and/or gender categories, if any, would be best, in your view, for the 2020 Census or the 2030 Census, to most accurately show the diversity of the U.S. population. What categories would be best to reveal the segments of the U.S. population most vulnerable to racial, ethnic, and/or gender inequalities or discrimination? What categories could be listed in the 2020 Census or the 2030 Census that might best educate the U.S. population on differences between race and ethnicity? Explain your decisions.
Include headings for each of the three main sections of the paper:
What the Census Might Have Called Me Social Constructs Better Future Census Categories
Each of the three main sections of your paper must contain scholarly support in the form of quotes or paraphrases with respective citations from assigned reading (the textbook/lesson) and the outside scholarly source that you identify on your own.
*This assignment is adapted from Glaser (2018).
Writing Requirements (APA format)
Length: 3-4 pages (not including references page) 1-inch margins Double spaced 12-point Times New Roman font Running header in the upper left of all pages Page number in the upper right of all pages Minimum of 3 headings (centered, bold, & title case) Parenthetical in-text citations included and formatted in APA style References page (minimum of 4 outside scholarly sources plus the textbook/lesson) Title page not required
Grading This activity will be graded based on Essay (W5) Grading Rubric.
Course Outcomes (CO): 3, 4, 5, 6
Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday
References
Pew Research Center. (2015, June 10). What Census calls us: A historical timeline. Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/interactives/multiracial- timeline/
Glaser, L.B. (2018, May 10). Sociology department launches Active Learning Initiative project. Cornell Chronicle. Retrieved from http://news.cornell.edu/stories/2018/05/sociology- department-launches-active-learning- initiative-project
Length 10.0 pts Meets length requirement
0.0 pts Does not meet length requirement
Content 10.0 pts Addresses all aspects of the assignment.
8.5 pts Addresses most aspects of the assignment.
7.5 pts Addresses some aspects of the assignment.
6.0 pts Addresses few aspects of the assignment.
0.0 pts No effort
Explanation of Concepts
35.0 pts Thoroughly explains race, ethnicity, and gender as social constructs.
29.75 pts Explains race, ethnicity, and gender as social constructs, but more details could be added.
26.25 pts Adequately explains race, ethnicity, and gender as social constructs. Additional explanation and details are needed to clarify the topics.
21.0 pts Explanation of race, ethnicity, and gender as social constructs is inadequate or unclear.
0.0 pts No effort
Analysis 50.0 pts The central idea is developed and expanded with depth of critical thought. Thorough analysis of census categories and the social constructs of race, ethnicity, and gender is included.
42.5 pts The central idea is discernible and developed. A good analysis of census categories and the social constructs of race, ethnicity, and gender is included, though additional details could provide a stronger examination of the concepts.
37.5 pts The central idea needs more development with points tying back to the thesis. Adequate analysis of census categories and the social constructs of race, ethnicity, and gender is included. Additional support and details are needed to clarify points.
30.0 pts The central idea is not developed, and the analysis lacks critical thought.
0.0 pts No effort
Source Integration
20.0 pts Paraphrases or quotations from all required resources are included to support the analysis: 4 outside scholarly sources and textbook/lesson.
17.0 pts Paraphrases or quotations from most required resources are included to support the analysis.
15.0 pts Paraphrases or quotations from some required resources are included to support the analysis.
12.0 pts Paraphrases or quotations from few required resources are included to support the analysis.
0.0 pts No effort
Writing: Mechanics & Usage
20.0 pts The writing is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that would detract from a clear reading of the paper.
17.0 pts The writing contains a few major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation, but the errors do not detract from a clear reading of the text.
15.0 pts The writing contains some major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that need to be addressed for a clearer reading of the paper.
12.0 pts The writing contains several major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that impede a clear reading of the paper.
0.0 pts No effort
APA Paper Format
10.0 pts Paper is formatted to include all 6 of the following: references page, Times New Roman, 12-point font, double spacing, running header, and page numbers.
8.5 pts Paper is formatted to include 5 of the following: references page, Times New Roman, 12-point font, double spacing, running header, and page numbers.
7.5 pts Paper is formatted to include 4 of the following: references page, Times New Roman, 12-point font, double spacing, running header, and page numbers.
6.0 pts Paper is formatted to include 3 of the following: references page, Times New Roman, 12-point font, double spacing, running header, and page numbers.
0.0 pts No effort
APA Resource Citation
20.0 pts All sources are properly cited in the text and references page demonstrating a mastery of APA format.
17.0 pts Most sources are cited in the text and references page. Some minor errors may exist in citation, but it does not interfere with understanding the source of the information.
15.0 pts Most sources are cited in the text and references page. Some errors may exist in citation that need to be addressed to clarify the source of information.
12.0 pts Sources are not properly/cited in the text/references page. Formatting contains several errors that suggest a lack of understanding of APA format.
0.0 pts No effort
“Previous Next#
September 2019
Home
Syllabus
Announcements
Resources
Modules
Files
Grades
People
VoiceThread
Bookstore
Library Guides
Media Gallery
My Media
New Webex
Academic Support
Surveys
Account
Dashboard
Courses
Groups
Calendar
Inbox
Help
10/4/19, 11(59 PM Page 1 of 1
Module 1 Written assignment: Compare and contrast two Mental Health theories.
You may choose your theories from the textbook or from other sources.
Describe each theory, including some history about the person who developed the theory and the major ideas and applications of the theory.
Describe the ways in which the two theories are similar, and how they differ.
Include a statement of how each theory could be used in your nursing practice. Include specific patient examples if you have them. You may also critique the theory: Is there anything with which you disagree or are there any problems you can identify?
It is expected that this essay will be 2-3 pages in length (not including the title page), double-spaced. Your paper should include an introduction and conclusion and proper APA citations from any source material you use, including your text.
The Assignment (3-6 pages total):
Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)
Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)
Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages)
Incivility at the workplace is common in nursing education and clinical practice (Clark, Olender, Cardoni, & Kenski, 2011). Workplace incivility can be defined as repeated offensive, disrespectful, or discouraging behavior, misuse of power, or unfair punishments that make the receiver distressed and feel shamed; creating strain; and decreasing the employee’s self-confidence (Warner, Sommers, Zappa, & Thornlow, 2016). Uncivil behaviors can appear in different forms and may cause profound effects on their recipients.
The work environment assessment of my workplace resulted in a score 35. According to Clark (2015), a score below 50 in the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory indicates a very unhealthy work environment. It is surprising that two statements where the organization scored the highest were those that stated individuals and collective achievements are celebrated and publicized ; and that use of effective conflicts resolution skills, (Clark, 2015). The publicity and celebration of individual and collective achievements is a new thing that has just been initiated and we are going strong with it. The staffs are vastly knowledgeable on conflicts resolutions. The organization is neutral on communication, living by shared vision and employee are treated in fair and respectful manner. Somewhat untrue about communication. The organization scored low in all other aspect of the assessment.
Going by this score form Workplace assessment, I will say the organization is a very unhealthy place. We discuss this almost every day with other staff in my department. Unhealthy place is not safe for both staff and even patients Communication is very poor. Nobody has the idea of when decisions are made which means staffs are excluded from decision making. The staff feels that Patient’s acuity is not put into consideration before staffing is made which made the workload voluminous and makes the environment unsafe. Staff from other departments with no basic knowledge of crisis prevention intervention are been thrown to the psychiatry units. The staff doesn’t feel supported by the management. The organization is not able to retain staff because the salary is not competitive enough and are not true to their words in terms of benefits, so there is very high turnover of staff. Only few staff has stayed for more than 2 years. Most new staff leaves between 2 weeks and 6 months.
One occasion of incivility that I have experienced was when the supervisor spoke to me in a disrespectful manner because one unidentified person called from ER and asked if we had an extra mental health worker and I responded no. She said I was being unfair and there is a reason while they called for a help. I requested to speak to her in the staff room with one other staff that was with me when the call came in . She apologized after I had expressed myself because we were never staff with an extra staff. I couldn’t have sent any staff to ER because I have an agency staff working with me who does know these patients. I could have created an unsafe place for patient and the staffs when we were already short staff and an agency staff?.
To create a high-performance team, implementation of strategies to improve work environment safety is necessary . To create an even stronger work team, it is vital that establishing excellent communication between employees be present in the organization. Respect and professional communication in a healthcare organization produces improved outcomes for patients and more civil employees (Griffin & Clark, 2014).
References
Clark, C. M. (2015). Conversations to inspire and promote a more civil workplace. American Nurse Today, 10(11), 18-23. Retrieved fromhttps://www.americannursetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ant11-CE-Civility-1023.pdf
Clark, C. M., Olender, L., Cardoni, C., & Kenski, D. (2011). Fostering civility in nursing education and practice: Nurse leaders perspective. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 41(7/8), 324-330. doi:10.1097/NNA.0b013e31822509c4
Griffin, M., & Clark, C. M. (2014). Revisiting cognitive rehearsal as an intervention against incivility and lateral violence in nursing: 10 years later. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 45(12), 535-542. doi:10.3928/00220124-20141122-02
Warrner, J., Sommers, K., Zappa, M., & Thornlow, D. (2016). Decreasing workplace incivility. Nursing Management, 47(1), 22-30. doi: 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000475622.91398.c3
We are experienced and have access to ample research materials to guarantee quality A+ papers. Our Professional Writers can handle all subjects and deliver your papers on time.
For any questions, feedback, or comments, we have an ethical customer support team that is always waiting on the line for your inquiries.
Send us an E-mail: support@homeworkhandlers.com or Call us: +1 (518)-934-6741
