When prompted, enter your personal information. Some information may be required by your administrator.

Microsoft Word 2016 – Normal User

As in any employment search, time is of the essence, so please complete these assessments as soon as you can. You can begin taking the tests by going to:

http://www.appleone.com/OnlineApplication/ola_assessment.aspx

 

 

1)   Click on the link above.

2)  Ensure that your computer meets or exceeds the minimum system requirements by checking the list here. Important Note Regarding Pop-Up Blockers: Certain pop-up blockers prohibit the launching of a Prove It! test.  If you have Pop-Up Blocking software, please locate the software and disable your pop-up blocker.

3)  When prompted, enter your personal information. Some information may be required by your administrator.
4)  Click on the title you wish to begin. If you have been assigned more than one title, you must complete the one you began before you will be allowed to begin another one.
5)  After carefully reading the Disclaimer, click “I Accept” to proceed.  If you do not accept the terms of the Disclaimer, click “I Decline” and contact your administrator.
6)  After carefully reading the Instructions, click “Begin” to start.
7)  Your Assessment will now launch.
*  Follow any and all on-screen directions.

*  Answer each question as quickly and efficiently as possible; the amount of time you spend in the Assessment will be recorded and reported to your administrator.

*  Once you have made your final answer choice, move on to the Next Question.

*  The use of reference materials or other assistance is not allowed unless you are directed otherwise by your administrator.  Failure to comply with these instructions may result in disqualification.

*  You will not be able to skip questions or go back to previous questions.

*  If you choose to leave the Assessment early, you will not be able to restart the Assessment.

8)  Continue this process until the Assessment is complete.
*  If you complete an Assessment you will not be able to re-enter that Assessment. To complete an Assessment you must answer all questions presented to you or choose to leave the Assessment early. If you are unable to complete the Assessment due to loss of Internet service or other computer problems, you will be able to re-enter the Assessment until your session expires. In most cases, you will be able to pick up where you left off. Due to the nature of some Assessments (such as Typing, Data Entry, or Audio), questions must be answered in one sitting and in a sequential order. For those types of Assessments, you will be able to re-enter the Assessment but you will have to begin again from the first question. If you experience a disruption while testing, you will be able to continue your session when you log in again with your Session ID. You will be prompted to verify certain information that will allow you to continue the current session.
9)  Following the Assessment, you will be provided with feedback chosen by your administrator.  You may be offered specific question information, or you may be given a raw score.  In some cases, your administrator may want you to contact him or her for the results.
10)  After viewing any results, follow the on-screen directions.  If you have been assigned multiple Assessments, choose Continue Session and continue by following the instructions that begin with step 5 above until all Assessments are completed.    Otherwise, choose Logout.

 

 

Good luck!

 

 

Assimilation dilemma: adaptation versus preservation

Select Case Study 3.5, 3.7, 3.8, or 3.9 in “For Cultural Competence: Knowledge, Skills and Dispositions needed to Embrace Diversity.” 

 

**For Cultural Competence: Knowledge, Skills and Dispositions Needed to Embrace Diversity

Read pages 21-24, 36-50, and 54-66 in “For Cultural Competence: Knowledge, Skills and Dispositions Needed to Embrace Diversity,” by Williams, located on the Virginia Department of Education website.

http://www.doe.virginia.gov/special_ed/tech_asst_prof_dev/self_assessment/disproportionality/cultural_competence_manual.pdf

 

Examine the scenario through a lens of cultural competence to determine when/how a deeper cultural understanding would have influenced the teacher’s responses.

In a 500-750 word analysis, discuss 2-3 of the following concepts of deep culture in the context of the selected case study:

  • Collective orientation (promoting needs of the group versus promoting needs of the individual)
  • Time orientation
  • Respect for authority
  • Perceptions and value of education
  • Priority of family
  • Communication (e.g., language development, verbal communication styles, nonverbal communication, physical proximity)
  • Value of work/Work ethic
  • Peer pressure
  • Assimilation dilemma: adaptation versus preservation

In addition, include specific advice to the teacher in your case study to help him or her respond more appropriately to the student/family.

 

Use at least 2-3 scholarly sources (other than the assigned readings) to justify your responses.

SIOP Teaching Model

1.Lesson Preparation: Content and language objectives, content concepts appropriate for age, supplementary materials used, adaptation of content for all student proficiency levels, meaningful activities that integrate lesson concepts with language practice.

2.Building Background: Concepts linked to students’ background experiences, links explicitly made between past learning and new concepts, key vocabulary emphasized.

3.Comprehensible Input: Speech appropriate for students’ proficiency levels, clear explanation of academic tasks, and variety of techniques to make content concepts clear

4.Strategies: Ample opportunities for students to use learning strategies, scaffolding techniques consistently used, a variety of questions or tasks the promote higher-order thinking.

5.Interaction:  Frequent opportunities for interaction and discussion, grouping configurations support language and content objectives, sufficient wait time for student responses, ample opportunity for students to clarify key concepts.

SIOP Teaching Model – Worksheet

Class Subject:

Class Topic:

Students’ ELP Levels:

Standard:

 

SIOP Teaching Model

 

 

How did the teacher use SIOP Component I: Lesson Preparation in the case study?

How did the teacher use SIOP Component I: Lesson Preparation Features in the case study?

(features: content and language objectives, content concepts appropriate for age, supplementary materials used, adaptation of content for all student proficiency levels, meaningful activities that integrate lesson concepts with language practice)

How did the teacher use SIOP Component II: Building Background in the case study?

How did the teacher use SIOP Component II: Building Background Features in the case study?

(features: concepts linked to students’ background experiences, links explicitly made between past learning and new concepts, key vocabulary emphasized)

How did the teacher use SIOP Component III: Comprehensible Input in the case study?

How did the teacher use SIOP Component III: Comprehensible Input Features in the case study?

(features: speech appropriate for students’ proficiency levels, clear explanation of academic tasks, variety of techniques to make content concepts clear)

How did the teacher use SIOP Component IV: Strategies in the case study?

How did the teacher use SIOP Component IV: Strategies Features in the case study?

(features: ample opportunities for students to use learning strategies, scaffolding techniques consistently used, a variety of questions or tasks the promote higher-order thinking)

How did the teacher use SIOP Component V: Interaction in the case study?

How did the teacher use SIOP Component V: Interaction Features in the case study?

(features: frequent opportunities for interaction and discussion, grouping configurations support language and content objectives, sufficient wait time for student responses, ample opportunity for students to clarify key concepts)

 

 

© 2015. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Assignment 2 Comparative Study Of Emerging Technologies

Assignment 2: Comparative Study of Emerging Technologies

Due Week 5 and worth 175 points

Refer to both the Overall Concept for Assignments 1-4 and your responses from Assignment 1 in order to complete this assignment.

Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:

  1. Debate the overall merits of the selected emerging technology over the three (3) others that you had previously identified from Assignment 1.
  2. Compare and contrast the emerging technology that you chose with the three (3) other emerging technologies that you did not choose. Your comparison should address the following:
    1. Three (3) methods in which the attributes and features of each address the needs and or challenges inherent in the educational setting or related to the scenario you selected in Assignment 1.
    2. Significant ways in which each technology supports meaningful learning.
    3. Three (3) attributes and / or features inherent in each emerging technology that instructors may use to address select characteristics of the 21st Century student population that you had previously identified.
    4. Three (3) aspects of your selected technology that best address two (2) of the NETS-S standards for using technology to guide learning.
  3. Provide at least five (5) sources that document detailed information about this emerging technology. The sources must be within the last five (5) years.
  4. Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements:
    1. Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.
    2. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.
  5. Include a reference page. Citations and references must follow APA format. The reference page is not included in the required page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Review current research related to emerging technologies for instruction and learning.
  • Analyze the effects of technology in different instructional settings.
  • Analyze the characteristics of 21st Century learners to aid in determining effective ways of using technologies for teaching and learning.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in designing, developing, and evaluating educational technologies.
  • Write clearly and concisely about issues in designing, developing, and evaluating educational technologies.

Points: 175

Assignment 2: Comparative Study of Emerging Technologies

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 70% F

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Debate the overall merits of the selected emerging technology over the three (3) others that you had previously identified from Assignment 1.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely debated the overall merits of the selected emerging technology over the three (3) others that you had previously identified from Assignment 1.

Partially debated the overall merits of the selected emerging technology over the three (3) others that you had previously identified from Assignment 1.

Satisfactorily debated the overall merits of the selected emerging technology over the three (3) others that you had previously identified from Assignment 1.

Thoroughly debated the overall merits of the selected emerging technology over the three (3) others that you had previously identified from Assignment 1.

2a. Compare and contrast the emerging technology that you chose with the three (3) other emerging technologies that you did not choose addressing three (3) methods in which the attributes and features of each address the needs and or challenges inherent in the educational setting or related to the scenario you selected in Assignment 1

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted the emerging technology that you chose with the three (3) other emerging technologies that you did not choose addressing three (3) methods in which the attributes and features of each address the needs and or challenges inherent in the educational setting or related to the scenario you selected in Assignment 1.

Partially compared and contrasted the emerging technology that you chose with the three (3) other emerging technologies that you did not choose addressing three (3) methods in which the attributes and features of each address the needs and or challenges inherent in the educational setting or related to the scenario you selected in Assignment 1.

Satisfactorily compared and contrasted the emerging technology that you chose with the three (3) other emerging technologies that you did not choose addressing three (3) methods in which the attributes and features of each address the needs and or challenges inherent in the educational setting or related to the scenario you selected in Assignment 1.

Thoroughly compared and contrasted the emerging technology that you chose with the three (3) other emerging technologies that you did not choose addressing three (3) methods in which the attributes and features of each address the needs and or challenges inherent in the educational setting or related to the scenario you selected in Assignment 1.

2b. Compare and contrast the emerging technology that you chose with the three (3) other emerging technologies that you did not choose addressing significant ways in which each technology supports meaningful learning.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted the emerging technology that you chose with the three (3) other emerging technologies that you did not choose addressing significant ways in which each technology supports meaningful learning.

Partially compared and contrasted the emerging technology that you chose with the three (3) other emerging technologies that you did not choose addressing significant ways in which each technology supports meaningful learning.

Satisfactorily compared and contrasted the emerging technology that you chose with the three (3) other emerging technologies that you did not choose addressing significant ways in which each technology supports meaningful learning.

Thoroughly compared and contrasted the emerging technology that you chose with the three (3) other emerging technologies that you did not choose addressing significant ways in which each technology supports meaningful learning.

2c. Compare and contrast the emerging technology that you chose with the three (3) other emerging technologies that you did not choose addressing three (3) attributes and / or features inherent in each emerging technology that instructors may use to address select characteristics of the 21st Century student population that you had previous identified.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted the emerging technology that you chose with the three (3 attributes and / or features inherent in each emerging technology that instructors may use to address select characteristics of the 21st Century student population that you had previous identified.

Partially compared and contrasted the emerging technology that you chose with the three (3) attributes and / or features inherent in each emerging technology that instructors may use to address select characteristics of the 21st Century student population that you had previous identified.

Satisfactorily compared and contrasted the emerging technology that you chose with the three (3) attributes and / or features inherent in each emerging technology that instructors may use to address select characteristics of the 21st Century student population that you had previous identified.

Thoroughly compared and contrasted the emerging technology that you chose with the three (3) attributes and / or features inherent in each emerging technology that instructors may use to address select characteristics of the 21st Century student population that you had previous identified.

2d. Compare and contrast the emerging technology that you chose with the three (3) other emerging technologies that you did not choose addressing three (3) aspects of your selected technology that best address two (2) of the NETS-S standards for using technology to guide learning.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted the emerging technology that you chose with the three (3) other emerging technologies that you did not choose addressing three (3) aspects of your selected technology that best address two (2) of the NETS-S standards for using technology to guide learning.

Partially compared and contrasted the emerging technology that you chose with the three (3) other emerging technologies that you did not choose addressing three (3) aspects of your selected technology that best address two (2) of the NETS-S standards for using technology to guide learning.

Satisfactorily compared and contrasted the emerging technology that you chose with the three (3) other emerging technologies that you did not choose addressing three (3) aspects of your selected technology that best address two (2) of the NETS-S standards for using technology to guide learning.

Thoroughly compared and contrasted the emerging technology that you chose with the three (3) other emerging technologies that you did not choose addressing three (3) aspects of your selected technology that best address two (2) of the NETS-S standards for using technology to guide learning.

3. 5 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; most references high quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

4. Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and Formatting

Weight: 5%

Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Error free or almost error free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

5. Appropriate use of APA in-text citations and reference section

Weight: 5%

Lack of in-text citations and / or lack of reference section.

In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style.

Most in-text citations and references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in APA style.

In-text citations and references are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted correctly in APA style.

6. Information Literacy/Integration of Sources

Weight: 5%

Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use in-text citations.

Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

7. Clarity and Coherence of Writing

Weight: 5%

Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

  • 5 years ago
  • 04.02.2018
  • 30