How the IWY model supports the introduction of new literacy concepts.

There are various instructional strategies to use when teaching a new literacy concept to students. The I Do, We Do, You Do (IWY) method is

I Do, We Do, You Do Template

Part 1: I Do, We Do, You Do Observation

Describe the literacy standards-based concept that was introduced.
Direct Instruction

I DO

Guided Practice

WE DO

Independent Work

YOU DO

 

Materials/Resources

       
What differentiation was applied during the lesson to accommodate students?
What were the gaps identified during the lesson observation?

 

Part 2: Teacher Collaboration Notes

 

Part 3: Reflection

 

 

 

© 2017 Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved

a common best practice that can be adapted during instruction. This practice includes direct instruction (I Do), guided practice (We Do), and independent practice (You Do).

Research various instructional strategies specific to concepts of print and phonemic awareness to teach new literacy concepts. Include the IWY method in your research. Describe how this strategy is implemented in grade levels K-8 and how it is effective as an instructional strategy in the classroom.

In 500-750 words, create a literacy instructional plan for how you will apply the IWY method in your future classroom when introducing new literacy concepts.

In your plan, be sure to address the following in your reflection:

  1. How the IWY model supports the introduction of new literacy concepts.
  2. How the IWY model creates and supports student engagement of typical and atypical students.
  3. How the IWY model supports differentiation to meet the diverse needs of students.
  4. Include any gaps that may be present in the IWY model.
  5. How you will use the IWY model in your future professional practice.

Support your findings with a minimum of three scholarly resources.

Explain your recommendations for initial resources and treatment

The sign of an effective clinician is the ability to identify the criteria that distinguish the diagnosis from any other possibility (otherwise known as a differential diagnosis). An ambiguous clinical diagnosis can lead to a faulty course of treatment and hurt the client more than it helps. In this Assignment, using the DSM-5 and all of the skills you have acquired to date, you asse

CASE of HERMOSA

 

Intake Date: April 2020

 

 

PRESENTING PROBLEM:

Hermosa indicated that since her husband died suddenly of a Myocardial Infarction (MI) on Christmas Day in 2018, she has progressively become “more and more depressed.” During the week prior to this assessment, she indicated becoming progressively dysphoric, crying uncontrollably for several hours and had suicidal thoughts of taking an overdose. Patient presented in the Emergency Department (ED) on a voluntary basis. She denied wanting to kill herself on admission to the ED.

 

PSYCHOLOGICAL DATA:

Hermosa is a 43-year old, Hispanic widowed female. Hermosa reports being of Christian faith. She completed her BS in Education and one semester in graduate school in Special Education. She has been voluntarily unemployed since 6/19. She lives with her 18-year old daughter who is a college student. She also has a son, age 20, who is a college student in California. She has two step-daughters who are identical twins, age 22. They are college students and living on campus in Indiana. Prior to being widowed, Hermosa was married twice. Her first marriage ended in 2003, and she remarried in 2007. Hermosa also has a brother, age 40, and a sister, age 38, both of whom live within a two-hour drive of Hermosa. Her father & mother, ages 69 and 65 respectively, are both retired and living within a four-hour drive of Hermosa.

 

MEDICAL HISTORY:

Menses are irregular and accompanied by severe dysmenorrhea. Hermosa previously took birth control pills at ages 17 to 27 for hormone imbalance and severe dysmenorrheal, when she was not focused on getting pregnant. Her last menstrual period began 3/30/20. Hermosa has had two pregnancies and given birth to two children. She is allergic to spores, mold, dust, cigarette smoke, Penicillin and Demerol. She has previously had hyposensitization shots which ended in 6/19 (History taken from ED chart).

 

SUBSTANCE ABUSE HISTORY:

Hermosa denies consumption of alcohol/drugs.

 

PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY:

Hermosa has been in outpatient individual psychotherapy with Dr. W since 6/19. In addition, her family physician, Dr. A prescribed Prozac in 6/19. Hermosa indicated seeing a psychiatrist, whose name she could not recall, from 2001-2003. She said that she was put on Seroquel, because she was hearing things and couldn’t sleep, but could not recall the dosage. Once everything become better she was weaned off the medication.

 

MENTAL STATUS:

Hermosa presented as a casually dressed, meticulously groomed woman who appeared her stated age of 43. She lay on her bed during the interview. She had a fixed, mood congruent expression on her face. Motor activity was normal. Mood was dysphoric. Affect was constricted. Speech was guarded and soft with some evidence of stuttering. Content was adequate, however. Thought processes were goal-directed, logical and abstract. There was no evidence of delusions. Hermosa acknowledged auditory hallucinations in the form of two men sitting on her shoulder telling her self-depreciating thoughts. Hermosa was oriented in three spheres. Concentration was markedly impaired. Digit span was 7 forward and 4 in reverse. She was unable to calculate serial 7’s. Recent and remote memory appeared intact. Intelligence appeared above average and fund of knowledge was excellent. All factual questions were answered correctly. Hermosa was able to abstract similarities and proverbs with detail and accuracy. Ordinary social and personal judgment was appropriate. Hermosa’s three wishes were that “my family stays well, that I am able to get on with my life, and that I am close to my family and kids.” Five years from now, Hermosa sees herself in “graduate school, getting a doctorate in social work.” If Hermosa could change something about herself, she would “feel better about myself, more secure more confident.”

 

SUICIDAL ASSESSMENT:

Hermosa admitted to recurring thoughts about “taking an overdose and ending my life.” She said that “I would be better off dead, then I would no longer be in pain.” Hermosa denied any concrete plan about taking an overdose, vis-s-vis the type of medication or the amount. Hermosa also denied intent. Hermosa admitted to a prior suicide attempt in 2001, in which she took an overdose of Valium and Alcohol. Hermosa denied any other attempts.

 

HOMICIDAL ASSESSMENT:

Hermosa denied any homicidal thoughts, plan or intention. Hermosa denied any previous homicidal history.

 

SUMMARY NOTE:

Hermosa thought she has been depressed since her husband died suddenly of an MI on Christmas Day in 2015. Initially she felt “numb” and in shock, but later became increasingly dysphoric and tearful and unable to carry on every day tasks. At the end of the school year, 6/19, Hermosa resigned her position as special education teacher and began outpatient treatment with Dr. W, 3x/week. Hermosa hears two male voices commenting on her activities, telling her to hurt herself when she is upset and telling her she “shouldn’t be here.” They come at various times during the day and night, but are worse in the late afternoon. Hermosa shows no sign of delusional thinking. Immediately prior to her presentation at the ED, Hermosa’s therapist went on vacation. She had recently decreased her individual therapy sessions to twice a week and she joined a group therapy run by her therapist once a week. Hermosa complains of difficulty falling asleep because she fears she will not wake up. She feels her mood has improved as a result of being on Prozac but has still experienced hallucinations despite the Seroquel.

During the week prior to her admission to the ED, Hermosa became increasingly dysphoric, cried uncontrollably for several hours and had suicidal thoughts of taking an overdose. She has felt increasingly anxious, has sat for hours at a time at home, just staring out a window. Hermosa said she is unable to concentrate, feels responsible for her husbands’ death, hates herself, is anhedonic, fatigued, unable to make decisions, and had decreased libido. A friend called Hermosa on the Saturday prior to admission, while Hermosa was distraught, and Hermosa confided to her friend her suicidal thoughts. Hermosa had also told her therapist of her suicidal thoughts and her therapist encouraged a voluntary inpatient admission. An additional stressor for Hermosa was the physical and sexual abuse she experienced during her first marriage. She still has nightmares about this and if awakened suddenly, she covers her face with her arms as if to protect herself. She is unable to talk about what happened during her marriage, because she does not trust anyone and fears that she will be blamed if she confides in staff or peers. Prior to her leaving her first marriage, she was losing weight and had difficulty concentrating. Her husband would abuse her about her disheveled appearance. One day she suddenly packed a suitcase and took her children, who were then ages 2 and a newborn and left. She has never fully told her parents why she left. Hermosa has applied and has been accepted at a graduate school for social work and hopes to be a therapist.

 

COLLATERAL CONTACT:

Hermosa’s daughter and Hermosa’s friend were interviewed by telephone by the intake social worker. Each of the persons interviewed described relief in having Hermosa in the hospital. Her friend stated she may have diverted Hermosa’s plan of suicide by making a call to Hermosa at just the right time. Hermosa said to the friend, “I just don’t know how I can go on.” When the friend asked Hermosa how she could help her, Hermosa replied, “Please just shoot me.” According to daughter and friend, Hermosa’s sadness began at the time to her second husband’s death two years ago, and has extended beyond the “normal grieving period.” Her friend stated, “I have watched her get worse and worse,” indicating that Hermosa has changed from a capable detail oriented person with strong conviction, to a depressed, nonfunctional person, with an inability to cope with life. Daughter states that her mother never smiles…”Hermosa thinks she is not worth anything, that she is undesirable and that she is not capable.” Daughter describes her mother’s recent behavior as sad and tearful, “staring into space.” Hermosa lives with her daughter, who indicates that she and her mother have become friends since her step-father died. Daughter states she is confused by her mother’s behavior and feels sad for her. She also experiences fear that her mother will kill herself. Friend indicates that Hermosa has made new friends since her husband’s death, but states Hermosa is “terrified of long-lasting male relationships, intimacy and any physical contact.” According to friend, Hermosa maintains a close relationship with her parents who have always required a strong sense of stability from Hermosa. Although Hermosa has been a teacher for the past 13 years, she currently is not gainfully employed.

 

 

 

 

3

ss a client.

This is a culmination of learning from all the weeks covered so far.

To prepare: Use a differential diagnosis process and analysis of the Mental Status Exam in the case provided by your instructor to determine if the case meets the criteria for a clinical diagnosis.

By Day 7

Submit a 4- to 5-page paper in which you:

  • Provide the full DSM-5 diagnosis. Remember, a full diagnosis should include the name of the disorder, ICD-10-CM code, specifiers, severity, and the Z codes (other conditions that may need clinical attention).
  • Explain the full diagnosis, matching the symptoms of the case to the criteria for any diagnoses used.
  • Identify 2–3 of the close differentials that you considered for the case and have ruled out. Concisely explain why these conditions were considered but eliminated.
  • Identify the assessments you recommend to validate treatment. Explain the rationale behind choosing the assessment instruments to support, clarify, or track treatment progress for the diagnosis.
  • Explain your recommendations for initial resources and treatment. Use scholarly resources to support your evidence-based treatment recommendations.
  • Explain how you took cultural factors and diversity into account when making the assessment and recommending interventions.
  • Identify client strengths, and explain how you would utilize strengths throughout treatment.
  • Identify specific knowledge or skills you would need to obtain to effectively treat this client, and provide a plan on how you will do so.

What similarities or legacy do you see of the educational policies implemented during the 1983-1993 reform period to today’s reforms?

4 PAGES OR APPROXIMATELY 1100 WORDS EXCLUSING COVERPAGE AND REFERENCES

DEADLINE 10 HOURS MAXIMUM

APA FORMAT

0% PLAGIARISM

Purpose: After reading Tyack & Cuban: Tinkering Toward Utopia, Chapters 3 and 4, and Spring: The Politics of American Education, Chapters 1, please answer the following questions:

Chapter 3
What similarities or legacy do you see of the educational policies implemented during the 1983-1993 reform period to today’s reforms? How are they similar? Who were the stakeholders involved in the decisions back then and today?

In the reforms described in chapter 4, the authors explore ways in which they have impacted the grammar of schooling and how they shape the modern school system (Provide a specific example of such reform in today’s school system). What, in your opinion, is the most significant of the reforms described in this chapter, and why?

The Politics of American Education- Chapter 1
Joel Spring explains on chapter 1 that there are three questions in politics of education that shape how decisions are made. Select a current issue in education and analyze it through the lenses of how the three questions influence (for better or worse) the decision-making of your selected issue.

Adapted from: Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence, Carnegie Mellon University

Weekly Assignments Assessment Rubric EDG 7692C

Sophisticated – 2 Points Competent – 1 Point Needs Work – 0 Points Depth of analysis

Student’s answers go beyond the assignment to explore the implications or evidence in new contexts or in particularly thoughtful, insightful, and/or original ways.

Student’s answers show a nuanced grasp of the readings and the ability to apply these readings with facility to current educational curriculum policies.

Student’s answers fully meet the parameters of the assignment but do not exceed them. (and/or…)

Student’s answers demonstrate a good grasp of the readings but some awkwardness applying them (citing specific examples and/or relationship to politics of curriculum)

Student’s answers do not address the assignment. (and/or…)

Student’s answers are inconsistent with the readings (i.e. it makes or fails to challenge assumptions.)

Grasp of reading(s)

Student’s answers represent the student’s arguments/point of views, evidence and conclusions accurately, fairly and eloquently. Demonstrates a firm understanding of the implications of the author’s arguments/point of view.

Student’s answers represent the student’s arguments/point of views, evidence and conclusions accurately.

Student’s answers badly misrepresent the student’s arguments, evidence, and/or conclusions.

Evidence Evidence used to support the central point of the readings is rich, detailed and well chosen.

Evidence sections employ appropriate illustrations and/or quotations.

The connection between the students’ point of view and evidence is clearly and compellingly articulated in all written responses.

(Where applicable) Important opposing evidence (i.e. evidence that might seem to contradict your argument) is considered and convincingly refuted.

Evidence used to support the central point of the readings is well chosen, though not particularly rich or detailed.

The connection between the student’s point of view and evidence is clearly articulated.

(Where applicable) Some opposing evidence is considered and refuted.

Evidence used does not clearly support the main points of the readings. (and/or…)

(Where applicable) Important opposing evidence is ignored, thereby weakening the central argument.

Conclusion Elegantly synthesizes and reframes key points from the students’ answers.

Suggests new perspectives or questions relevant to the central argument, and brings closure. Excellent use of APA format.

Synthesizes and brings closure but does not examine new perspectives or questions. Appropriate use of APA format with one or three errors.

Is missing or cursory. (and/or…)

Repeats the topic paragraph more-or-less verbatim. Inadequate use of APA format, four errors or more.

Clinical Field Experience C: Intervention

English language arts is an academic area that can be challenging for many students due to comprehension and writing difficulties. When planning interventions, it is first important to identify where and why the student struggles. With this information, the appropriate tier of intervention can be addressed. Understanding the tiers of intervention can help to differentiate struggles associated with content, application, or delivery.

Allocate at least 3 hours in the field to support this field experience.

Collaborate with the mentor teacher to create an intervention plan for the student/s identified in Clinical Field Experience B. Base the plan on your own observational data, as well as other assessment data the mentor teacher has available. Discuss with the mentor an upcoming grade level ELA lesson or activity during which you can implement applicable interventions from the plan.

Include the following in your plan:

  • The names and grade levels of the students for whom the plan is designed. (Continue to use pseudonyms to maintain student confidentiality.)
  • The tier of RTI (1, 2, or 3).
  • A brief description of 1-2 intervention strategies for the student/s, and how each supports the identified ELA challenges.
  • Materials needed and procedures for each intervention strategy.

Use any remaining field experience hours to assist the mentor teacher in providing instruction and support to the class.

Upon completing the intervention plan, continue to collaborate with the mentor teacher to ensure the plan will appropriately meet the needs of the student/s identified. Incorporate feedback accordingly.

Use any remaining field experience hours to assist the teacher in providing instruction and support to the class.

In 250-500 words, summarize and reflect upon your conversations and instructional support. Address how your mentor teacher plans for and reflects upon intervention choices in his or her own classroom and explain how you will use your findings in your future professional practice.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.