Case Study 3 Planning, Negotiation, & Implementation

Case Study 3 Instructions

Overview:

In this case study, you will apply your Statesmanship model to a public administration context dealing with the challenges of planning and implementation of policy and programs. Remember to discuss the importance of the following:

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now

Case study Grading Rubric

 

Criteria Levels of Achievement
Content

70%

Advanced

92-100%

Proficient

84-91%

Developing

1-83%

Not present

0%

Total
Personal Leadership Skills

 

 

 

 

14 to 15 pts

Personal leadership skills and attributes needed for effective leadership and statesmanship.

 

12.5 to 13.5 pts

Mostly discusses personal leadership skills and attributes needed for effective leadership and statesmanship.

 

1 to 12 pts

Some discussion of personal leadership skills and attributes needed for effective leadership and statesmanship.

 

0 pts

Lacks discussion of personal leadership skills and attributes needed for effective leadership and statesmanship.

 

 
Statescraft
14 to 15 pts

An understanding of the

important concepts related to

government structures and

processes needed for

effective leadership.

 

12.5 to 13.5 pts

Mostly understands important concepts related to government structures and processes needed for effective leadership.

 

1 to 12 pts

Somewhat understands important concepts related to government structures and processes needed for effective leadership.

 

0 pts

Does not understand important concepts related to government structures and processes needed for effective leadership.

 

 
Organization of

Content

7.5 to 8 pts

Organized discussion of

content.

 

6.5 to 7 pts

Mostly organized discussion of content.

 

1 to 6 pts

Discussion of content somewhat organized.

 

0 pts Disorganized discussion of content.

 

 
Use of Important Ideas from Readings

 

 

 

 

9.5 to 10 pts

Thorough review and use of

important ideas from required

reading and research.

 

8 to 9 pts

Mostly thorough review and use of important ideas from required reading and research.

 

 

1 to 7.5 pts

Somewhat thorough review and use of important ideas from required reading and research.

 

0 pts

Review is not thorough and important ideas not presented.

 

 
Using real case, apply Statesmanship Model to the Public Admin Context

 

14 to 15 pts

Detailed and relevant discussion of public administration context.

 

12.5 to 13.5 pts

Mostly detailed and relevant discussion of public administration context.

 

1 to 12 pts

Somewhat detailed and relevant discussion of public administration context.

 

0 pts

Discussion of public administration context has little detail or relevance.

 

 
Integrate Public Admin and Statesmanship

 

 

 

Public Admin.

Context

 

 

14 to 15 pts

A logical, critical and focused

discussion of how

statesmanship concepts are

relevant to the public

administration context.

 

 

12.5 to 13.5 pts

Mostly logical, critical and focused discussion of

statesmanship relevance to public administration context.

 

 

1 to 12 pts

Somewhat logical, critical and focused discussion of statesmanship relevance to the public administration context.

 

0 pts

Discussion is not logical and lacks focus of how statesmanship

relevance to public administration.

 

 

 

Detailed Conceptual Applications

 

9.5 to 10 pts

Thorough and critical review and use of important ideas on from required reading and research. Vagueness is avoided in lieu of detailed conceptual applications to specific contexts.

 

 

8 to 9 pts

Mostly thorough and critical review and use of important ideas from required reading and research. Vagueness is mostly avoided of detailed conceptual applications to specific contexts.

 

 

1 to 7.5 pts

Somewhat thorough and critical review and use of important ideas from required reading and research. Vagueness is somewhat avoided of detailed conceptual applications to specific contexts.

 

 

 

 

0 pts

Review is not thorough and lacks criticality of important ideas from required reading and research. Vague applications to specific contexts.

 

 

 
Structure

30%

Advanced

92-100%

Proficient

84-91%

Developing

1-83%

Not present

0 %

Total
Use of Sources

From Course

 

9.5 to 10 pts

Use of all relevant sources

from the module/week and

previous modules/weeks.

 

8 to 9 pts

Use of most relevant sources from the module/week and

previous modules/weeks.

 

1 to 7.5 pts

Use of some relevant sources from the module/week and previous modules/weeks.

 

0 pts

Use of no relevant sources from the module/week and

previous modules/weeks.

 

 
Outside Sources

 

9.5 to 10 pts

Use of 3 to 5 outside

scholarly sources.

 

8 to 9 pts

Use of 2 or 3 outside scholarly sources.

 

1 to 7.5 pts

Use of 1 or 2 outside scholarly sources.

 

0 pts

Use of no outside scholarly sources.

 

 
Pages & Spacing

 

 

 

 

4.5 to 5 pts

4 to 5 pages; double-spaced

 

3.5 to 4 pts.

3 to 4 pages; double-

spaced

 

1 to 3 pts

2 to 3 pages or not double-spaced

 

0 pts.

Less than 2 pages or not double-spaced

 
Grammar & APA

 

 

 

 

11 to 12 pts

Proper grammar and current

APA format

 

10 to 10.5 pts

A few grammar and APA errors

 

1 to 9.5 pts

Several grammar and APA errors

 

0 pts

Grammar and APA not at graduate level

 

 
Professor Comments:   Total /125

· Conflict resolution and consensus building

· Covenant

· Statecraft

General Guidelines:

· Case Study scenarios must be taken from documented (published) public administration contexts; no hypotheticals are allowed. Students can focus on one particular public administration organization or may refer to a particular situation (well-documented by the research) that many public administrators face.

· All ideas shared by the student must be supported with sound reason and citations from the required readings, presentations, and additional research.

· Integrate Biblical principles within the analysis of the paper.

· The paper should be 4-5 pages of content in length (not counting the title page or references), double-spaced, and in APA format.

· All required readings and presentations from the assigned module must be cited.

· 3-5 additional sources must be used. This need not be scholarly so long as they are provide relevant political and economic analysis of your chosen nation. Wikipedia may not be used (though certainly the student is welcome to review its content), and informal blogs are not appropriate.

 

resentation: Strategic Planning in Public Organizations

Attached Files:

  • File Presentation: Strategic Planning in Public Organizations Click for more options (757 B)