Analyze The Case Study
Analyze the case study The Expansion of Human Services in Allegheny County, 1968-95, pages 145 – 164 of the text. Your written assignment analysis essay must address the following questions:
• Explain how the case study offered support for or against the: (a) the rational model; (b) the political model; and (c) the policy process model.
Save your time - order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines
Order Paper Now• Which elements of the three-stage Cobb and Elder model on agenda setting could you identify in the case study?
• Explain how Kingdon’s “three streams” model of the policy process sheds light on how human service policy developed in Allegheny County.
• Your paper must be written at the graduate level and cited properly according to APA style guidelines.
Your narrative should go beyond the obvious and be written at a graduate level. Your paper should be no less than 1,200 words and no more than 2,500 words. Any sources including but not limited to journals, magazine, and/or books must be properly cited using the APA style. Click here to view the scoring rubric for the assignment.
Case Study Analysis Grading Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Not Achieved Novice Basic Proficient Exceptional
0 1 2 3 4
Provided a brief
background description
of the situation that is
being examined.
Did not provide a brief background description of the situation that is being examined.
Provided a brief summary that did not adequately describe the depth of the situation.
Provided a brief background description of the situation that is being examined.
Provided a brief background description of the situation that is being examined and framed the key issues.
Provided a brief background description of the situation that is being examined and framed the key issues in relation to the participants and stakeholders involved.
Identified possible
contributory factors or
root causes of the
problems.
Did not Identify the possible contributory factors or root causes.
Identified some of the possible contributory factors, but missed the most obvious or critical ones.
Identified possible contributory factors or root causes of the problems.
Identified possible contributory factors or root causes of the problems consistent with the key issues previously identified.
Identified many contributory factors or root causes of the problems consistent with the key issues previously identified, and noted the interdependencies between those factors.
Analyzed contributory
factors and determined
lessons learned and best
practices.
Did not analyze any contributory factors.
Analyzed some
contributory
factors, but did not
determine lessons
learned or best
practices.
Analyzed contributory factors and determined lessons learned and best practices.
Analyzed contributory factors and determined lessons learned and best practices. Considered one or more possible outcomes.
Analyzed a number of
contributory factors. Used an
analytical approach that
considers either risk analysis,
cost-benefit analysis, or SWOT
analysis (strengths, weaknesses,
opportunities, and threats).
Offered
recommendations or
practical courses of
action based on the
conclusions of the
analysis.
Did not offer any recommendations or practical courses of action based on the conclusions of the analysis.
Offered recommendations that were not practical, or were not in alignment with the factors in the case study.
Offered recommendations or practical courses of action based on the conclusions of the analysis.
Offered
recommendations or
practical courses of
action based on the
conclusions of the
analysis. Considered
possible barriers to
implementation and
ways to overcome
them.
Offered recommendations or
practical courses of action based
on the conclusions of the
analysis. Considered possible
barriers to implementation and
ways to overcome them.
Considered the potential
ramifications associated with
the recommended courses of
action.
Continued below… Continued below… Continued below… Continued below… Continued below… Continued below…
Submitted a well written product using proper terminology, grammar, and sentence structure.
Submitted a very poor written product that does not meet the minimum standards of a college scholastic work.
Submitted a poorly written product containing numerous grammatical errors, poor syntax, and inappropriate terminology.
Submitted a well written product using proper terminology, grammar, and sentence structure.
Submitted a well written product using proper terminology, grammar, and sentence structure with no, or very few errors.
Submitted an outstanding written product using proper terminology, grammar, and sentence structure with no errors. Avoided very long paragraphs and were logically divided. The syntax and tone of the narrative was consistent throughout the work.
Total Points =
Total Maximum Points = 20
Conversion Table (from 20 point scale to a 25 point scale)
Rubric Score Percentage Gradebook Score
20 100 50
19 95 48
18 90 45
17 85 43
16 80 40
15 75 38
14 70 35
13 65 33
12 60 30
11 55 28
10 50 25
9 45 23
8 40 20
7 35 18
6 30 15
5 25 13
4 20 10
3 15 8
2 10 5
1 5 1
0 0 0
