be 521 paper review 1

The review of the paper should be 700 words (± 10%). Use 1” margins, 1.15 line spacing, and Arial 12-point font.

• 1.Summary (3 points)
• 2.Critique (6 points)
• 3.Recommendation (1 point) 1.Summary (3 points)

Provide a brief (~ 1 paragraph) summary of the article at the beginning of your report. This serves the dual purpose of reminding the editor of the details of the report and also reassuring the author and editor that you have understood the article.

2.Critique (6 points)

Commentary should be courteous and constructive, and should not include any personal remarks or personal details including your name. This section should be divided into “Major” and “Minor” points. Major points include general issues with the background review, research question, hypotheses, experiment design, and conclusions. Minor points include inconsistencies between text and figures, places that need clarification, etc. In general, it is always good to indicate where in the manuscript the issue is (e.g., “In the Methods section, on page 32, in the second paragraph”). Providing insight into any deficiencies is important. You should explain and support your judgment so that both editors and authors are able to fully understand the reasoning behind your comments. You should indicate whether your comments are your own opinion or are reflected by the data.

Some points to consider are:

• Abstract: Does the abstract reflect the content of the article?
• Introduction: Does the Introduction describe what the authors hoped to achieve accurately and clearly state the problem being investigated? Is the hypothesis stated?
• Graphs/Tables: Are the graphs and tables necessary? Do they describe the data accurately? Are they easy to interpret? Are the captions useful?
• Method: Does the Method section accurately explain how the data were collected? Is the experimental design suitable for the research question? Is the planned analysis appropriate?
• Results: Are the results clear and in a logical sequence? Interpretation of results should not be in this section.
• Conclusion/Discussion: Are claims in this section supported by the results? Are the conclusions reasonable? Do the authors relate findings to earlier research? Do the conclusions advance scientific knowledge?

3.Recommendation (1 point)

When you make a recommendation regarding an article, it is worth considering the categories the editor most likely uses for classifying the article:

-Reject (explain reason in report)
-Accept without revision
-Revise (either major or minor). Clearly explain which revisions are required.

I attached the article that you must use it to do the Paper Review

Dynamic balance during walking adaptability tasks in individuals post-stroke

 

Submit Your Assignment and get professional help from our qualified experts!

---

be 521 paper review 1 was first posted on July 19, 2020 at 8:13 am.
©2019 "Submit Your Assignment". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at support@nursingessayswriters.com

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

---