Comparison Paper: Crabb
PACO 617
Comparison Paper Grading Rubric
| Criteria | AdvancedSave your time - order a paper!Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines Order Paper Now(A- to A) Satisfies criteria w/ excellence |
Proficient
(B- to B+) Satisfies Most Criteria |
Developing
(C- to C+) Satisfies Criteria Incompletely |
Below Expectations
(F to D+) Does not satisfy criteria |
Not Present | Points
Earned |
| Content: 105% (105pts) | 97-105 pts | 88-96 pts | 87-80 pts | 1-79 pts | 0 pts |
|
| Concise Summary
|
19-20 pts
Demonstrates a solid understanding of the material presented Adequately synthesizes the whole of the text in a concise manner Presents an organized interaction that specifically addresses the assignment with clarity and coherency
|
17-18 pts
Demonstrates an understanding of the material presented Adequately synthesizes the whole of the text in a concise manner Presents an organized interaction that specifically addresses the assignment with clarity and coherency
|
16 pts
Does not Demonstrate a solid understanding of the material presented Does not Adequately synthesizes the whole of the text in a concise manner Presents a disorganized interaction that specifically addresses the assignment with a lack of clarity and coherency
|
1-15 pts
Does not Demonstrate anunderstanding of the material presented Does not Adequately synthesizes the whole of the text in a concise manner Work is disorganized interaction that specifically addresses the assignment with a lack of clarity and coherency
|
||
| Evaluation of the Strengths and Weaknesses
|
33-35 pts
Provides clear, insightful, rich interaction with subject matter Integrates material from the course lectures and assigned reading Demonstrates critical thinking in the analysis and critique of the material
|
30-33 pts
Provides interaction with subject matter Integrates material from the course lectures and assigned reading Demonstrates critical thinking in the analysis and critique of the material
|
27-29 pts
Provides incomplete interaction with subject matter Integrates material from the course lectures and assigned reading Demonstrates critical thinking in the analysis and critique of the material
|
1-26 pts
Provides minimal interaction with subject matter No Integraion of material from the course lectures and assigned reading No critical thinking in the analysis and critique of the material . |
|
|
| Personal Reflection and Application
|
28-30 pts
Personal example(s) offered which sufficiently relate to the content of the text Clear connections are made between the life episode and the reading
|
26-27 pts
Personal example(s) offered which partially relate to the content of the text Connections are made between the life episode and the reading
|
23-25 pts
Personal example(s) offered which are incomplete and do not relate to the content of the text Connections are made between the life episode and the reading
|
1-22pts
No personal example(s) offered which are incomplete and do not relate to the content of the text Connections are made between the life episode and the reading are not made
|
|
|
| Conclusion
|
19-20pts
Conclusions drawn reveal thoughtful summarization and personal application |
16-18 pts
Conclusions partially reveal thoughtful summarization and personal application |
13-15 pts
Conclusions partially reveal summarization and personal application. |
1-12 pts
The assignment does not provide onclusions that reveal summarization and personal application. |
||
| Structure: 30% = 30 | ||||||
| Organization/Form
Presentation, Headings, and APA |
28-30 pts.
· The assignment is presented with appropriate headings and organizational clarity. · The assignment reflects correct APA form · There are clear transitions between paragraphs and sections. · The paper meets the page length |
26-27 pts.
· The assignment is presented with most headings but slightly lacking in organizational clarity. · The assignment reflects minor APA form errors · There are transitions between paragraphs and sections. · The assignment length is short one page |
23-25 pts.
· The assignment is presented with partial headings and is lacking in organizational clarity. · The assignment reflects APA form errors · Transitions between paragraphs and sections are unclear. · The assignment length is short more than one page |
1-22 pts.
· The assignment is presented without headings and lacks organizational clarity. · The assignment reflects numerous APA form errors · Transitions between paragraphs and sections are missing. · The assignment length is short multiple pages |
0 pts | |
| Spelling and Grammar | 15 pts.
· The assignment is without spelling and grammar related errors · The assignment reflects a graduate level construction (voice and vocabulary). |
12-14 pts.
· The assignment is contains very few spelling and grammar related errors · The assignment reflects a general graduate level construction (voice and vocabulary). |
8-11 pts.
· The assignment is contains spelling and grammar related errors · The assignment reflects an inconsistent graduate level construction (voice and vocabulary). |
1-7 pts.
· The assignment is contains numerous spelling and grammar related errors · The assignment does not reflect a graduate level construction (voice and vocabulary). |
0 pts | |
| Total | 0/150 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instructor’s Comments:
Updated: 01/03/2018
