Explanation Of Mis/Mal/Non/Feasance

Explanation of Mis/Mal/Non/feasance

Persons who are in authority, including teachers, have responsibilities to the public, to their profession and to those they serve. The Principles of Professional Conduct for the Education Profession in Florida  that was introduced in Module 1 outlines what is expected of teachers. Unfortunately, not all professionals live up to expectations. There are three basic types of infractions:

The Merriam Webster Dictionary defines malfeasance as “wrongdoing or misconduct especially by a public official.”  This refers to a deliberate decision to do something that is not permitted by the Code of Ethics of the profession or law.

· The teacher was disciplined for requiring students to sell her craft products in order to receive participation points in class.

· She was charged with malfeasance.

The Merriam Webster definition of misfeasance is “the performance of a lawful action in an illegal or improper manner.” The action is acceptable, however, the way in which the action was taken is NOT acceptable.

· Coach Vierra gave members of his track team higher grades on their essays than they earned.

· He was charged with misfeasance.

The Merriam Webster Dictionary defines nonfeasance as “failure to act; especially:  failure to do what ought to be done.”   Yes, doing nothing can be wrong!  Not following through with a responsibility is also an infraction of the Code of Ethics

· Ms. Garzola was not at her bus duty station when a child was injured.

· A student told Mr. Stolz that hazing was happening in the lunchroom. Mr. Stolz told the student to mind his own business and did no further investigation

· Either of these teachers could be charged with nonfeasance.

If reported and confirmed, any of these types of infractions can result in a spectrum of disciplinary actions. These disciplinary actions are determined by the School Board policy in place. Infractions can also result in criminal prosecution if they break a civil law.