Employee Development and Performance Continuing from Assignment 1,
FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS TO THE MAX IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE DO ASK!! I DO NOT WISH TO ARGUE IN THE END!!!!
PAPER INSTRUCTIONS
Assignment 2: Employee Development and Performance Continuing from Assignment 1, you were selected as the new HR director for the retail company and now have been in the position for approximately 6 months. Your approach to strategy, planning, and selection have been quite successful thus far, and now it is time to address the organization’s expectation for performance and development of employees since these components of HR strategy are critical in achieving business outcomes and success. (UTILIZE IN INTRODUCTION!!) Write a five to six (5-6) page paper in which you:
Save your time - order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines
Order Paper Now1. Critically analyze and discuss any researched (web or textbook) training process model you may consider for use in developing employees (here’s an idea: https://educationaltechnology.net/the-addie-model-instructional-design/ or exhibit 7-1, page 230 in the text book). Then, identify and discuss some possible challenges that might be faced in implementing a new training process in the company.
2. List and briefly discuss at least three (3) types or methods of training that can be used for employee training. Of the 3, which would you select to train the retail employees, and why? Be specific. ( Use OJT!!)
3. Differentiate the concept of performance management and performance appraisal with three (3) to four (4) key points. Then, make your case to leadership for using annual performance appraisals in the organization. Be specific with your perspective.
· Format your assignment according to these formatting requirements:
a. Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA format.
b. PAPER MUST HAVE AN INTRODUCTION, BODY, CONCLUSION!!!!
c. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment (with running head), the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.
d. Include a reference page. MUST USE AT MINIMUM 4 REFERENCES!! Citations and references must follow APA format. The reference page is not included in the required page length. NO WIKI REFS!!! THE TEXTBOOK MUST BE USED AS A REFERENCE!!!!!!
Lussier, R. N., & Hendon, J. R. (2019). Human resource management functions, applications, and skill development. Los Angeles: SAGE.
e. FOR EACH SECTION LISTED ABOVE 1-3 THE BEGINNING PARAGRAPH SHOULD HAVE A TITLE SIMILAR TO THE INSTRUCTIONS
SEE RUBRIC BELOW
| Unacceptable 0 – 69% F | Fair 70 – 79% C | Proficient 80 – 89% B | Exemplary 90 – 100% A | |
| HRM599-A2-1 1. Critically analyze and research (web or textbook) any training process model you may consider for use in developing employees, then identify and discuss some possible challenges that might be faced in implementing a new training process in the company. | Points Range:0 (0%) – 29.32 (17.25%)
Did not submit or incompletely critically analyzed and researched (web or textbook) any training process model you may consider for use in developing employees, then did not identify and discuss some possible challenges that might be faced in implementing a new training process in the company. |
Points Range:29.75 (17.5%) – 33.58 (19.75%)
Partially critically analyzed and researched (web or textbook) any training process model you may consider for use in developing employees, then partially identified and discussed some possible challenges that might be faced in implementing a new training process in the company. |
Points Range:34 (20%) – 37.82 (22.25%)
Satisfactorily critically analyzed and researched (web or textbook) any training process model you may consider for use in developing employees, then satisfactorily identified and discussed some possible challenges that might be faced in implementing a new training process in the company. |
Points Range:38.25 (22.5%) – 42.5 (25%)
Thoroughly critically analyzed and researched (web or textbook) any training process model you may consider for use in developing employees, then thoroughly identified and discussed some possible challenges that might be faced in implementing a new training process in the company. |
| HRM599-A2-2 2. List and briefly discuss at least three (3) types or methods of training that can be used for employee training. Of the 3, which would you select to train the retail employees, and why? Be specific. | Points Range:0 (0%) – 29.32 (17.25%)
Did not submit or incompletely listed and briefly discussed at least three (3) types or methods of training that can be used for employee training, and of the 3, did not select one to be used to train the retail employees, and specifically stated why. |
Points Range:29.75 (17.5%) – 33.58 (19.75%)
Partially listed and briefly discussed at least three (3) types or methods of training that can be used for employee training, and of the 3, partially selected one to be used to train the retail employees, and specifically stated why. |
Points Range:34 (20%) – 37.82 (22.25%)
Satisfactorily listed and briefly discussed at least three (3) types or methods of training that can be used for employee training, and of the 3, satisfactorily selected one to be used to train the retail employees, and specifically stated why. |
Points Range:38.25 (22.5%) – 42.5 (25%)
Thoroughly listed and briefly discussed at least three (3) types or methods of training that can be used for employee training, and of the 3, thoroughly selected one to be used to train the retail employees, and specifically stated why. |
| HRM599-A2-3 3. Differentiate the concepts of performance management and performance appraisal with three (3) to four (4) key points. Then, make your case to leadership for or against using annual performance appraisals in the organization. Be specific with your perspective. | Points Range:0 (0%) – 29.32 (17.25%)
Did not submit or incompletely differentiated the concepts of performance management and performance appraisal with three (3) to four (4) key points and did not make a specific case to leadership for or against using annual performance appraisals in the organization. |
Points Range:29.75 (17.5%) – 33.58 (19.75%)
Partially differentiated the concepts of performance management and performance appraisal with three (3) to four (4) key points and partially made a specific case to leadership for or against using annual performance appraisals in the organization. |
Points Range:34 (20%) – 37.82 (22.25%)
Satisfactorily differentiated the concepts of performance management and performance appraisal with three (3) to four (4) key points and satisfactorily made a specific case to leadership for or against using annual performance appraisals in the organization. |
Points Range:38.25 (22.5%) – 42.5 (25%)
Thoroughly used the Diversity or SexuaThoroughly differentiated the concepts of performance management and performance appraisal with three (3) to four (4) key points and thoroughly made a specific case to leadership for or against using annual performance appraisals in the organization. l Harassment Training Plan template located in Week 5 of your Blackboard course shell to develop a training plan to communicate one (1) of the policies you created (the diversity policy or the sexual harassment policy) to the company’s managers, staff, and employees. |
| HRM599-A2-4 4. 4 references | Points Range:0 (0%) – 5.86 (3.45%)
No references provided. |
Points Range:5.95 (3.5%) – 6.72 (3.95%)
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. |
Points Range:6.8 (4%) – 7.56 (4.45%)
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
Points Range:7.65 (4.5%) – 8.5 (5%)
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
| HRM599-A2-5 5. Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and Formatting | Points Range:0 (0%) – 5.86 (3.45%)
Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. |
Points Range:5.95 (3.5%) – 6.72 (3.95%)
Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. |
Points Range:6.8 (4%) – 7.56 (4.45%)
Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. |
Points Range:7.65 (4.5%) – 8.5 (5%)
Error free or almost error free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. |
| HRM599-A2-6 6. Appropriate Use of APA In-Text Citations and Reference | Points Range:0 (0%) – 5.86 (3.45%)
Lack of in-text citations and / or lack of reference section. |
Points Range:5.95 (3.5%) – 6.72 (3.95%)
In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style. |
Points Range:6.8 (4%) – 7.56 (4.45%)
Most in-text citations and references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in APA style. |
Points Range:7.65 (4.5%) – 8.5 (5%)
In-text citations and references are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted correctly in APA style. |
| HRM599-A2-7 7. Information Literacy/Integration of Sources | Points Range:0 (0%) – 5.86 (3.45%)
Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use in-text citations. |
Points Range:5.95 (3.5%) – 6.72 (3.95%)
Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing. |
Points Range:6.8 (4%) – 7.56 (4.45%)
Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing. |
Points Range:7.65 (4.5%) – 8.5 (5%)
Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing. |
| HRM599-A2-8 8. Clarity and Coherence of Writing | Points Range:0 (0%) – 5.86 (3.45%)
Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. |
Points Range:5.95 (3.5%) – 6.72 (3.95%)
Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. |
Points Range:6.8 (4%) – 7.56 (4.45%)
Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. |
Points Range:7.65 (4.5%) – 8.5 (5%)
Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. |
