Is ethical relativism correct?
Topic: Is ethical relativism correct?
Thread: After studying the Reading & Study materials, compose a 500-600 word argument that is objective, carefully-constructed, and free of emotion (and hence it should not contain any exclamation points) in support of your opinion about ethical relativism. First, explain exactly what ethical relativism is. Don’t simply re-state the reading, but provide an explanation of relativism using your own words but also showing that you did the reading and understand the issue. Second, argue either that ethical relativism is true or that it is false, explaining in detail why you think your opinion is correct. You may want to acknowledge some truths on the opposing side. Treat both sides with respect.
Be sure to carefully define your terms. You are encouraged to support your position with rational arguments, fitting examples, and expert sources. Any quotes or information used from sources other than yourself must be cited using footnotes in current Turabian format and will not count towards the total word count. You will be penalized for falling short or exceeding the word count. This is a university-level writing assignment and therefore it must be carefully proofread, free of grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Do not use slang, emoticons, or abbreviations (as if you are texting or sending an email to a friend).
Save your time - order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines
Order Paper NowETHC 101 Discussion Board “Thread” Grading Rubric
| Criteria | Levels of Achievement | |||
| Structure
15 pts. |
Advanced | Proficient | Developing | Not present |
| Spelling, Punctuation, and Grammar
10 pts. |
9 or 10 points
Post is written in paragraph form and is devoid of spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors. |
7 or 8 points
Post is not written in paragraph form and/or has occasional spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors. |
1 to 6 points
Post is not written in paragraph form and has numerous spelling, punctuation, and grammar problems. |
0 points
Not present |
| Turabian formatting
5 pts. |
5 points
Direct references and/or allusions to outside resources (such as the textbooks) are present and are cited using footnotes in current Turabian format. |
4 points
Direct references and/or allusions to outside resources (such as the textbooks) are present but are cited otherwise than using footnotes in current Turabian format. |
1 to 3 points
Direct references and/or allusions to outside resources (such as the textbooks) are present but the sources are not cited. (Note: if plagiarism is present, that requires additional corrective action.) |
0 points
No direct references and/or allusions to outside resources are present. |
| Content
35 pts. |
Advanced | Proficient | Developing | Not present |
| Word Count
15 pts. |
14 or 15 points
Word count is between 500 and 600 words. |
11 to 13 points
Word count exceeds 600 words. |
1 to 10 points
Word count is less than 500 words. |
0 points
Not present |
| Style
10 pts. |
9 or 10 points
All required components of the prompt are answered in a manner that is objective, rationally argued, and not overly emotional; major points are supported by thoughtful reasoning and good examples. |
7 or 8 points
All required components of the prompt are answered in a manner that aims at objective and dispassionate rationality, even if it doesn’t perfectly achieve this goal; a sincere attempt is made to support the major points with thoughtful reasoning and good examples. |
1 to 6 points
Most required components of the prompt are answered in a manner that is sometimes insufficiently objective, dispassionate, and/or logical; major points are insufficiently supported by arguments and/or examples. |
0 points
The required components of the prompt are not answered. |
| Understanding
10 pts. |
9 or 10 points
Post utilizes many of the concepts and technical vocabulary taught in the class in a manner that demonstrates accurate understanding. |
6 to 8 points
Post utilizes some of the concepts and technical vocabulary taught in the class in a manner that demonstrates accurate understanding. |
1 to 5 points
Post utilizes some of the concepts and technical vocabulary taught in the class but sometimes in ways that suggest that they are not correctly understood. |
0 points
Post does not utilize the concepts and technical vocabulary taught in the cla |
