Form a thesis statement: – My Nursing Experts

Form a thesis statement:

If Peggy or Mary was a friend of yours, what advice would you give
them?  Are they bound by the limits of their genes?  Or can changing
their eating and exercise habits lead to sustainable weight loss? Why?

Note: Do not provide a synopsis of the story from the case study.  Assume we are all familiar with the story.

Support your thesis with evidence from the readings/videos

Develop an essay to support your thesis statement using information
from the previous reading/video materials.  It is important that you
utilize data from 3 or more of the sources that I have provided; the
more you use the better. Citing specific numerical and factual evidence
from these sources is imperative.

If you want to find more information because you are intrigued or if
you have more questions that need answering- please do so BUT only from
reputable sources.  They need to be cited!

Grading

Your write up should demonstrate that you can:

· Explain how specific hormones regulate appetite, hunger, fat storage and metabolic rate

· Analyze the role of genetics and environmental factors in maintaining an acceptable body weight.

· Explain how the body uses and stores energy from the food we eat

· Describe how feedback loops work to maintain homeostasis.

· Describe what comprises a healthy nutritional/exercise plan according to the guidelines of the new Food Pyramid.

Ties to earlier Module concepts:

· Understand that a cell’s function determines the proteins that it produces (Ch2)

· Recognize the chemical structure of the four classes of biological
organic macromolecules: carbohydrates,lipids, proteins, nucleic acids;
differentiate their function in cells and identify key molecules that
comprise each class.(Ch.2)

See the grading rubric for guidance on what is expected for full
credit. Click the Options icon ((3 vertical dots), then select “Show
Rubric.”

Rubric

Writing Assignment

Writing Assignment

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Writing

4.0 pts

Exemplary: Sentences are complete, grammar is excellent. No spelling
errors and organization is clear. Well written in student’s own words.
Appropriate use of quotes.

3.0 pts

Accomplished:Generally well written but there are a few errors in
punctuation & spelling or organization is a bit unclear.There was
excessive use of quotes rather than paraphrasing

2.0 pts

Developing:Some of sentences are incomplete. Some spelling &
punctuation errors; organization is muddled. One quarter of paper was
plagiarized and/or there was a lack of proper citations

1.0 pts

Beginning: More than half of sentences are incomplete. Paragraph
structure is largely missing and essay is difficult to read. More than
half of paper was plagiarized

0.0 pts

No effort: student plagiarized entire paper

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Analysis

4.0 pts

Exemplary: Not only successfully collects or analyzes data and
rigorously interprets the results but also finds other data or
information for consideration.

3.0 pts

Accomplished: Successfully collects or identifies relevant data and rigorously presents and interprets the results.

2.0 pts

Developing: Successfully collects or identifies relevant data but fails to thoroughly interpret the results

1.0 pts

Beginning: Fails to collect or analyze data and information or data collection is not thorough.

0.0 pts

No Effort: Fails to collect or analyze data

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScientific Concepts

4.0 pts

Exemplary: Answers reveal an accurate, sophisticated understanding of the underlying scientific concepts.

3.0 pts

Accomplished: Answers reveal an accurate understanding of most of the underlying scientific concepts

2.0 pts

Developing: Answers reveal a limited understanding of the underlying scientific concepts

1.0 pts

Beginning: Answers reveal an inaccurate understanding of the underlying scientific concepts.

0.0 pts

No effort: Fails to address any of the scientific concepts

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFrames Personal Response

4.0 pts

Exemplary: Not only formulates a clear and precise point of view with
3 or more pieces of supporting evidence but acknowledges objections and
rival positions and provides convincing replies to these.

3.0 pts

Accomplished: Formulates a clear & precise point of view with at
least 3 pieces of supporting evidence from reputable sources. Seriously
discusses its weakness as well as its strength.

2.0 pts

Developing: Formulates a vague point of view with less than 3 pieces
of evidence, some of which is not from reputable sources. Considers weak
but not strong alternative positions.

1.0 pts

Beginning: Fails to formulate & clearly express own point of view
and fails to consider other perspectives. Does not provide evidence
from reputable sources.

0.0 pts

No Effort: Fails to formulate & clearly express own point of view

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusions

4.0 pts

Exemplary: Conclusions are valid and well supported with experimental evidence. Data is accurately used.

3.0 pts

Accomplished: Conclusions are valid and consistent with some of the data that is referenced.

2.0 pts

Developing: Conclusions are attempted but may reflect some error or misinterpretation of data.

1.0 pts

Beginning: Conclusions are not attempted or are not based at all on data but may only be opinion without evidence.

0.0 pts

No Effort: Conclusions are not attempted

4.0 pts

Total Points: 20.0

Previous
Next

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.