Please answer this prompt: In Employment Division v. Smith,(1990) the Supreme Co

Please answer this prompt: In Employment Division v. Smith,(1990) the Supreme Court held that the Native American religious ritual of ingesting peyote is not exempted from liability under US narcotics laws. But then in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission (2018) the Supreme Court held a baker could not be found guilty of unlawful sex discrimination for refusing to bake a wedding cake for same-sex couple because of the baker’s religious convictions opposing same-sex marriage. Are these cases consistent? Should the free exercise of religion clause accommodate the religious use of narcotics? Should free exercise excuse merchants from having to comply with Civil Rights Laws that prohibit discrimination against persons on grounds of sexual preferences? Explain

The post Please answer this prompt: In Employment Division v. Smith,(1990) the Supreme Co appeared first on homework handlers.