Benchmark – Small Group Assessment Plan
Part 1: Pre-Assessment Using Non-Standardized Assessments
Begin this assignment by pre-assessing a small group of students as a continuation of your clinical field experience in Topic 4. In this field experience, you were asked to select a developmentally appropriate and engaging technology-based assessment that was implemented with your identified small group. After assessing the children, write a 250-500 word summary of the experience. Describe the academic area you assessed, the
assessment tool used, the results of the pre-assessment, and your considerations regarding differentiation (why you did or did not differentiate the assessment.) When recording the assessment results, keep the information confidential and use pseudonyms for the students.
Part 2: Design and Deliver a Lesson
In your Topic 5 field experience you were asked to design and deliver a lesson. Reflecting on your experience, you identified differentiations you would make to your lesson, assessment, and/or assessment procedures in the future. Revise and complete your lesson plan to reflect these differentiations.
Part 3 : Analyze Post-Assessment Data and Communicate the Assessment Results
After delivering the lesson and post-assessment, begin analyzing the pre- and post-assessment data. Select one student with exceptionalities to provide additional assistance at home. Write a 250-500-word letter to send home to the family of this student that provides feedback regarding his or her performance. This letter should include information regarding the assessment data and suggest a research-based at-home activity that the parents can facilitate to support their child’s development in the domain area. In addition provide the family a rationale as to why that specific activity is appropriate for meeting their child’s needs, including how the activity supports the child’s transition for the next grade level.
Submit the pre-assessment summary, the revised lesson plan, the post-assessment data, the family letter, and the rationale as one deliverable.
While APA style format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Rubic_Print_Format
Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | |||||
ECS-590 | ECS-590-O500 | Standardized Assessment Lesson Plan | 65.0 | |||||
Criteria | Percentage | 1: No submission (0.00%) | 2: Insufficient (69.00%) | 3: Approaching (74.00%) | 4: Acceptable (87.00%) | 5: Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
CRITERIA | 100.0% | |||||||
Lesson Plan: Planning | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Purpose and learning targets for the lesson plan are inappropriate for the student or for the domain. Planning section is not aligned and contains missing or inappropriate information. | Purpose and learning targets for the lesson plan are vague or do not adequately address the domain. Planning section is not well aligned, is missing information, or is not fully developed. | Purpose and learning targets for the lesson plan are broad, but appropriate. Planning section is generally aligned and complete. | Purpose and learning targets for the lesson plan are clear and well-crafted. Planning section is thorough, aligned, and well-developed. | 0.00/13.00 | |
Lesson Plan: Instruction on Developing Student Skills in Selected Assessment Domain [CEC 5.1, CEC Specialty Set S5.9, S5.10; NAEYC 3a, 3b, 4b; InTASC 6(c), 7(b), 7(d), 7(j)] | 30.0% | Not addressed. | Lesson plan activities are developmentally inappropriate, or will not build student skills in the selected assessment domain. | Lesson plan learning activities are not developed enough to be meaningful or to fully promote the building of student skills in the selected assessment domain. | Lesson plan includes clearly defined, developmentally appropriate learning activities that promote the building of student skills in the selected assessment domain. | Lesson plan includes well-crafted, creative, engaging learning activities that promote the building of student skills in the selected assessment domain. | 0.00/19.50 | |
Lesson Plan: Assessment to Gather Information about Student?s Level of Performance [CEC Specialty Set S4.3, S4.5; NAEYC 3a, 3b, 3c; InTASC 6(a), 6(b), 6(j), 6(k)] | 25.0% | Not addressed. | Lesson plan does not include developed formative and summative assessments in the domain area that are sufficiently aligned to the lesson learning targets, or are developmentally appropriate for the identified student. | Lesson plan does not include formative and summative assessments that are developed enough to be meaningful in the domain area. Formative and summative assessments are minimally aligned to the lesson learning targets. Assessment structures may not be ideal for the identified student. | Lesson plan includes one formative and one summative assessment in the domain area. Both assessments are adequately aligned to the lesson learning targets, appropriate for the developmental needs of the identified student, and engaging for the student. | Lesson plan includes one formative and one summative assessment in the domain area. Both assessments are well-aligned to the lesson learning targets, well-suited for the identified student needs, creative, and engaging for the student. | 0.00/16.25 | |
Rationale | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Rationale is incoherent or includes inaccurate or irrelevant support to describe why the lesson plan and assessments are appropriate for the selected student. | Rationale minimally supports why the lesson plan and assessments are appropriate for the selected student. | Rationale describes reasonable explanation for why the lesson plan and assessments are appropriate for the selected student. | Rationale describes convincing reasoning for why the lesson plan and assessments are appropriate for the selected student. | 0.00/9.75 | |
Mechanics | 10.0% | Not addressed. | The lesson plan contains inappropriate, incoherent language and/or sentence structures. | The lesson plan contains mechanical and conventional errors or non-relevant language that affect meaning and clarity. | The lesson plan has a few mechanical and conventional errors present that do not significantly affect meaning or clarity. Word choice reflects basic, consistent, appropriate use of practice and topic-related language. | The lesson plan is free of mechanical and conventional errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and topic-related language. | 0.00/6.50 | |
Total Weightage | 100% |