Kindergarten Lesson Plan Step Template

STEP Standard 3 – Assessment and Data Literacy

Pre- and post-assessments are used to assess the learning that takes place from participating in a learning activity. The pre-assessment is given to students before instruction, in order to determine their prior knowledge of the topic, or inaccurate knowledge, which is sometimes the case. After students have participated in the unit, they are given the post-assessment, which can be the same as the pre-assessment, a modified version, or something comparable that measures the same concepts.

Formative assessment is acceptable, work with your mentor teacher to determine the best way to collect data in your classroom.

 

Pre-Assessment – Copy and paste the pre-assessment you plan to use to assess the students’ knowledge of the topic prior to implementing the unit lessons. Include the scoring criteria used to determine whether the student is Highly Proficient, Proficient, Partially Proficient, Minimally Proficient when it comes to meeting the learning goal and measurable objectives.
Teacher will assess a student’s ability to comprehend text, orally or aloud by another person by asking wh – questions. When answering questions, a student must understand the meaning of each question form and quickly discriminate between the question types. When a student is asked a “who” question they must quickly comprehend who means “person”, when means “date”, where means “location” etc. Assessment can be literacy text related, or just simple questioning of pictures and flashcards that fit the kindergarten level.

Highly Proficient will be able to answer all questions and give specific key details of the literacy text and proficient can answer the questions without necessarily having to give full detail of text or picture but be correct with answer. Partially proficient can answer some questions right and others not. Minimally proficient can somewhat grasp the concept but does not make sense entirely and may need to focus on one question format at a time.

For a student with poor comprehension picture cards can be used to aid question comprehension and have the student pair the correct picture with the response. For the lesson teachers must vocally emphasize the question to increase a student’s auditory attention to the type of question form being asked.

 

 

 

 

Pre-Assessment Data: Whole Class – Once you have assessed your students’ knowledge on the topic, collect and analyze the pre-assessment data to determine if you will need to modify the standards, learning goal, or measurable objectives that will be addressed during instruction.

Pre-Test: Administer, collect, and score the pre-test. Enter data in the Table for Whole Class Pre-Test Results by LG.Complete. Replace information with your information. Delete or add columns as needed by highlighting the area, right click, enter “De Delete” or Insert.”” “

(Bears Class Assessment Data) Number of Students
Highly Proficient (90%-100%)

 

5 – E. R, E. Vargas, J.T, L.O, M.G, N.S, S.D (recalled story events answering “wh” questions, used sequencing of key details “first, then, the end)
Proficient

(80%-89%)

 

10 – E. Villar, J.J, M.B, J.R. O, M. S, V.M, A.R, J.R, S. L, X. G
Partially Proficient

(70%-79%)

 

1- D.N (IEP – “piggy house, eat you, blow that, can answer “wh-questions 1 to 2-word answer)

 

Minimally Proficient

(69% and below)

 

 
Pre-Assessment Analysis: Whole Class
The IEP student will need picture prompts and one format of “wh questions” at a time to not confuse him. The class can all do the lesson and the IEP student will need additional support in which will need differentiated instruction of questioning techniques to one at a time same question format. All students can listen to the story and participate in the activity of Boom Cards, and then recording of story to recall key details of story.

 

 

 

Post-Assessment – Copy and paste the post-assessment you plan to use to assess the students’ knowledge of the topic after implementing the unit lessons. The post-assessment can be the same as the pre-assessment, a modified version, or something comparable that measures the same concepts. Include the scoring criteria used to determine whether students are Highly Proficient, Proficient, Partially Proficient, Minimally Proficient when it comes to meeting the learning goal and measurable objectives.
 

../Screen%20Shot%202020-10-03%20at%208.57.47%20PM.pngBoom Cards Learning “Wh Format” – Assessing students understanding of “wh” questions and if answering picture cards correctly.

 

../Screen%20Shot%202020-10-03%20at%209.02.15%20PM.png Students record themselves answering wh questions and retelling specific key details of the story that answer wh questions

 

 

 

 

 

© 2020. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Page 1 of 1

STEP Standard 4 – Unit and Lesson Planning

During the design phase, you will carefully construct activities that are geared toward improving learning outcomes in your specific disciplines. Each activity should align to instructional goals and demonstrate your understanding of the pre-assessment data results, contextual factors, student learning needs, and management strategies.

Collaborate with your Cooperating Teacher/Mentor to design a unit of instruction that aligns to state content standards. Be sure to include technology integration and demonstrate how you will differentiate your lessons to meet the needs of individual students.

Note: When implementing the unit of study, you will be choosing one of these activities to video record, review, and reflect on your teaching in the STEP process.

 

Grade Level: Kindergarten

Unit/Subject: Reading Comprehension

 

  Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
National/State Learning Standards

List specific grade-level standards that are the focus of the lesson being presented.

RL.K.10 Actively engage in group reading activities with purpose and understanding

SL.K.1. Participate in collaborative conversations with diverse partners

 

SL.K.4. Describe familiar people, places, things, and events and, with prompting and support, provide additional detail.

 

 

SL.K.2. Confirm understanding of a text read aloud or information presented orally or through other media

 

R.L.K.2 Retell familiar stories, including key details

SL.K.6. Speak audibly and express thoughts, feelings, and ideas clearly.

 

SL.K.5. Add drawings or the visual displays to descriptions as desired to provide additional detail

 

Specific Learning Target(s)/Objectives Based on state standards, identify what is intended to be measured in learning. SWBAT: actively participate in group reading activities that serve a purpose. SWBAT: describe people, places, things, and events (with support. SWBAT: ask questions when they are confused about a text or information that has been read aloud or shown. With support, SWBAT retell a story using important details. SWBAT identify the main topic and details of an informational text. SWBAT speak in a loud and clear voice.

 

 

 

SWBAT use pictures to send a clear message to their listener
Academic Language General academic vocabulary and content-specific vocabulary included in the unit. -group

-listen

-purpose

-events

-predictions

 

-conversation

-partner

-take turns

-listen carefully

-people

-places

-events

-describe

-happened

-information

-ask

-help

-media

-understanding

-presented

-retell

-details

-story

-sequence

-beginning, middle, end

-character

 

-audience

-topic

-share

-speaking

-hear

-think

-drawing

-visual display

-topic

-describe

-details

-describing words

Unit Resources, Materials, Equipment, and Technology

List all resources, materials, equipment, and technology to be used in the unit.

· E, Books

· Google Classroom

· Seesaw classroom activity literacy related activities

-SeeSaw

-Google Classroom

-Boom Cards

-EBooks

-Epic Learning

-YouTube

-Google Classroom

-Boom Cards Game

-Epic Learning

-YouTube

-Epic Learning

-Seesaw

-Boom Cards

-Seesaw

 

Depth of Knowledge Lesson Questions

What questions can be posed throughout the lesson to assess all levels of student understanding?

· Level 1: Recall

· Level 2: Skill/Concepts

· Level 3: Strategic Thinking

· Level 4: Extended Thinking

-Talk to your partner about.

-Talk to your group about.

-Tell your partner / group what you think about …

 

 

-Where did that happen?

-What else can you tell me about…

– What does a person, such as a farmer do?

-What / who was this about?

-What did you learn when we read the book?

-How do you know what happened?

· Talk to your partner about how you felt when …

· What was this book about?

· Can you tell me some key details of the story …?

 

· Can you find a picture that shows what you will share?

· Can you tell us more about your picture?

Anticipatory Set

How will students’ prior knowledge be activated as well as gain student interest in the upcoming content?

Have students participate in share time, and let students know to have listening ears because we are going to practice being good listeners and will have to repeat what one of our friends shared and what we liked about what they shared. This skill will prepare them with the assigned standard. Show students a picture of a birthday party and have them describe events, people they have had at their own birthday party including details. This skill will prepare them with the assigned standard. Read a short mystery who am I poem to students and have them try to figure out what you are describing. If they don’t know have them question or answer why they knew what it was by supporting detail. This skill will prepare students with assigned standard. Have students retell a favorite memory of theirs and let them know the same way they remember what happened and gave supporting details is the same way we must retell the literacy text assigned. Show students a picture assigned from a previous literacy text and show them how the picture provided detail and have them draw a quick picture of detail to prepare them for standard assigned.
Presentation of Content
Multiple Means of Representation

Describe how content will be presented in various ways to meet the needs of different learners.

Show struggling students a picture prompt to discuss with a friend to serve as a conversational starter. What they see in the picture etc.

 

Have struggling student listen / visually see a happy birthday auditory and then prompt them to discuss what happens at birthday parties to have them explain details. Show struggling student a visual of a flower have them hold it and describe it, prompt them to give detail. Ask them questions and have them answer. Try to teach student when we don’t know something, we ask questions. Have them try to ask a question about a flower or something they may not know. Show struggling student a quick clip of a literary book to see and hear. Prompt them to recall the story by showing them sequence cards in front of them to try to get them to use beginning, middle, and end. Give struggling student a hands-on item and prompt them to draw and then describe their drawing.
Multiple Means of Representation Differentiation

Explain how materials will be differentiated for each of the following groups:

· English Language Learners (ELL)

· Students with special needs

· Students with gifted abilities

Early finishers (those who finish early and may need additional sources/support)

 

· Enrichment: Challenge your students to sequence an unfamiliar story by completing the Story Flipbook activity.

· Support: Offer your students the Sequencing Your Day worksheet to improve their sequencing skills. The students’ routines are much more familiar to them than a story, so this worksheet will help them sequence something they know

· ELL – Have students see picture prompts and label sequencing of the story

· Enrichment – Have students draw a picture about an experience they had with their family involved. Have them try to label picture details with a beginning sound of the word or try to write the word

· Support: Students can draw visuals with supported detail prompt sentence structure for conversational purposes.

· ELL support students by allowing them to orally tell you their ideas before sharing the information with their peers. Help them form sentence structure.

     
Application of Content
Multiple Means of Engagement

How will students explore, practice, and apply the content?

         
Multiple Means of Engagement Differentiation

Explain how materials will be differentiated for each of the following groups:

· English Language Learners (ELL)

· Students with special needs

· Students with gifted abilities

Early finishers (those who finish early and may need additional sources/support)

 

 

       
Assessment of Content
Multiple Means of Expression

Formative and summative assessments used to monitor student progress and modify instruction.

Formative assessment will be observational if student participates in read alouds with repetitive story lines. Summative assessment is if student responds to texts by creating classroom story books, or fulfilling assignments based on topic. Formative assessment will be observational if student provides details with conversation. Summative will student recording details of a story or picture and making sure details are presented. For formative assessment monitor if student during class discussion ask questions about videos, or read alouds when the story may be unclear?

 

For summative assessment have the students form a kwl chart as the instructor you form the KWL chart and the student verbally completes it and answers questions they asked initially to see progress.

Have student retell a story using sequence board for formative assessment. Summative assessment will be having the student record their voice retelling the story. Formative Assessment: Have students draw a character from the story that provides their own detail

 

Summative Assessment: Have students as a class follow a how to video on how to draw an assign character and have them express details of the character

Multiple Means of Expression Differentiation

Explain how materials will be differentiated for each of the following groups:

· English Language Learners (ELL)

· Students with special needs

· Students with gifted abilities

Early finishers (those who finish early and may need additional resources/support)

 

 

       
Extension Activity and/or Homework
Identify and describe any extension activities or homework tasks as appropriate. Explain how the extension activity or homework assignment supports the learning targets/objectives. As required by your instructor, attach any copies of homework at the end of this template. Students will discuss how the big bad wolf can learn to be nice. What are some nice things he could have done for the pigs vs. destroying their houses they will share in class after whole group discussions. Students will be prompted to describe why the brick house was the strongest and why the sticks, and wood house fell (the pigs did not listen) Students record themselves confirming detail of the three little pigs by using visuals and story piece movement. Students will do a sequence activity of the three-little pig story. Have students draw pictures of the three little pigs and their houses to visually display their comprehension of the story by providing illustration detail “take-aways” from the literacy text.

Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of school-based health programs.

SCHOOL-BASED HEALTH PROGRAMS AND HEALTH CARE SERVICES

For this assignment, you will respond to questions regarding school health programs. Please answer these questions:

  1. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of school-based health programs. Be sure to distinguish the difference between a basic, expanded, and comprehensive school health program.
  2. List “the 8” components of coordinated school health programs. How are they interconnected and why are they important?
  3. Define the roles of Education and Public Health Departments. Should Public health departments provide primary medical care? How “bright” is the line between public health and personal health within the context of a public school district? Do they or should they overlap?
  4. Discuss the new directions of school-based health care services and the key programmatic characteristics of school-based health care services.
  5. Generally discuss how the Healthy People 2020 goal to “Increase the quality, availability, and effectiveness of educational and community-based programs designed to prevent disease and improve health and quality of life” impacts the role of education and public health departments to work with the schools.

Length: Your paper should be 4-5 pages, APA format, requires scholarly sources, use subheadings.

(see attachment for required sources to be used in the paper)

Must Use and Cite the following Resources :

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). Educational and community-based programs. Healthy People 2020. Retrieved from  http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/overview.aspx?topicid=11

Geary, R. S., Gomez-Olive, F. X., Kahn, K., Tollman, S., & Norris, S. A. (2014). Barriers to and facilitators of the provision of a youth-friendly health services programme in rural South Africa. BMC Health Services Research, 14(1), 259.

Hudson, P., Arenson, M., Lee, N., & Lai, B. (2019). The Evidence on School-Based Health Centers: A Review – Michael Arenson, Philip J. Hudson, NaeHyung Lee, Betty Lai, 2019. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2333794X19828745

Langford, R., Bonell, C., Jones, H., Pouliou, T., Murphy, S., Waters, E., Komro, K., Gibbs, L., Magnus, G., & Campbell, R. (2015). The World Health Organization’s Health Promoting Schools framework: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC public health, 15(1), 130.

Micha, R., Karageorgou, D., Bakogianni, I., Trichia, E., Whitsel, L. P., Story, M., Penalvo, J., & Mozaffarian, D. (2018). Effectiveness of school food environment policies on children’s dietary behaviors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one, 13(3), e0194555.

Steinberg, A., Griffin-Tomas, M., Abu-Odeh, D., & Whitten, A. (2018). Evaluation of a Mobile Phone App for Providing Adolescents With Sexual and Reproductive Health Information, New York City, 2013-2016. Public Health Reports, 133(3), 234-239.

Dissecting A Quantitative Research Report

5-7 page paper.

6-7 reference between 2015-2020, include reference page APA 7 style.

From a recent (past 5 years) peer-reviewed journal, find an article that utilized the quantitative method.   Read the article and be able to provide a short summary of the study. Use the following guidelines:

Introduction – Briefly discuss the purpose of the Introduction section of a manuscript.

  • Problem Statement – Identify the background/rationale and      research problem for the study.
  • Theory – Identify the theory the researcher(s) grounded the      study in and describe the major research findings that support the theory.      Next, list out the research questions or hypotheses.

Methods – Briefly discuss the purpose of the Methods section of a manuscript.

  • Population and Sample – Who or what was the population of interest and what sample      participated in the study.
  • Tools for Measurement – Present the assessment or survey tools      that were used to collect the data.
  • Design – Briefly describe the research design that was      utilized. Provide a definition of the design and a rationale as to why the      design was the most appropriate (i.e., connect the design back to the      research problem to be addressed).
  • Procedures – Briefly describe the data collection procedures.

Results – Briefly discuss the purpose of the Results section of a manuscript.

  • Identify the primary type      of statistical analysis that was used to analyze the data.

Discussion – Briefly discuss the purpose of the Discussion section of a manuscript.

  • Describe the findings of      the study and discuss how it supports or refutes the theory presented in      the literature review.

Limitations and Suggestions – Identify the potential reasons why one should “suspend trust” in the research. Offer potential suggestions for improvement.

Benchmark – Science/Health Mini-Unit Plan

For this benchmark, you will create a unit plan containing three individual lesson plans designed for the students outlined in the “Class Profile.” Choose a grade level for the students, then select an NGSS from the physical, life, or earth/space sciences, as well as a health/nutrition standard from your state, for the 3-lesson unit. You may adapt any previous assignments in the creation of this mini-unit plan, as long as the three lessons form a planned, cohesive unit.  Use the 5E lesson plan template for each of the three lesson plans.

In your unit, design the three lesson plans so that they:

1. Use a variety of teaching strategies and technologies that encourage the students’ development of critical thinking and problem solving.

2. Use strategies that create opportunities for students’ active engagement in their learning and promote a supportive learning environment.

3. Incorporate the use of digital resources to promote effective verbal, nonverbal, and media communication techniques while creating opportunities for active inquiry, collaboration, and supportive interaction in the elementary classroom.

4. Integrate formative and summative assessment techniques that measure all four DOK levels, and provide students feedback on their learning so that they can make adjustments; and

5. Use differentiated strategies to meet the needs of all students in the “Class Profile.”

Along with the unit, submit a 250-500 word rationale describing your reasoning for your instructional choices, your use of the 5E model, and how you connected the content to student learning needs.

Class Profile

 

 

Student Name ELL/

Proficiency Level

Socioeconomic Status Race/ Ethnicity Native Language Gender IEP/

504

Other Age Reading Performance Level/Score* Math Performance Level/Score*
Arturo  

Yes – 4

Low Mexican Spanish Male No Glasses Grade level One year below grade level/98  

At grade level/151

                     
Bertie  

Yes – 5

Low Vietnamese Vietnamese Female No None Grade level One year above grade level/210  

At grade level/108

                     
Beryl No Mid White English Female No None Grade level Two years above grade level/268  

At grade level/163

                     
Brandie Yes – 4 Low Liberian Liberian English Female No None Grade level At grade level/178  

One year below grade level/79

                     
Dessie Yes – 4 Mid Russian Russian Female No None Grade level At grade level/113  

One year below grade level/65

                     
Diana Yes – 4 Low Mexican Spanish Female No None Grade level One year below grade level/79  

At grade level/198

                     
Donnie No Mid African American English Female Yes Hearing Aids Grade level At grade level/150 At grade level/124
                     
Eduardo Yes – 5 Low Puerto Riccan Spanish Male No Glasses Grade level One year below grade level/88 At grade level/101
                     
Emma No Mid White English Female No None Grade level At grade level/124 At grade level/135
                     
Enrique No Low Mexican English Male ADHD None One year above grade level One year below grade level/45 At grade level/163
                     
Fatma  

Yes – 5

Low Mexican Spanish Female No Glasses Grade level One year below grade level/21  

One year above grade level/289

                     
Frances No Mid Mexican English Female No Diabetic Glasses Grade level At grade level/116 At grade level/114
                     
Francesca Yes – 5 Low Mexican Spanish Female No None Grade level At grade level/162 At grade level/178
                     
Fredrick No Low White English Male Learning Disabled None One year above grade level Two years below grade level/285 Two years below grade level/15
                     
Ines  

Yes – 4

Low Mexican Spanish Female Learning Disabled Glasses Grade level One year below grade level/50 One year below grade level/55
                     
Jade No Mid African American English Female No None Grade level At grade level/183 One year above grade level/224
                     
Kent No High White English Male ADHD Glasses Grade level At grade level/178 One year above grade level/208
                     
Lolita  

Yes – 5

Low Navajo Navajo Female No None Grade level At grade level/110 At grade level/141
                     
Maria No Mid Mexican Spanish Female No NOTE: School does not have gifted program Grade level At grade level/139  

Two years above grade level/296

                     
Mason  

Yes – 4

Low Vietnamese Vietnamese Male Yes High Func-tioning Autism Grade level At grade level/154 At grade level/138
                     
Nick No Low White English Male No None Grade level One year above grade level/205  

At grade level/180

                     
Noah No Low African American English Male No Glasses Grade level At grade level/193  

At grade level/177

                     
Sharlene No Mid White English Female No None Grade level One year above grade level/110  

At grade level/125

                     
Sophia  

Yes – 5

Mid Guatamalan Spanish Female No None Grade level At grade level/129  

At grade level/152

                     
Stuart No Mid White English Male No Allergic to peanuts Grade level One year above grade level/231  

At grade level/116

                     
Terrence No Mid African American English Male No None Grade level At grade level/189  

At grade level/192

                     
Wade No Mid White English Male No Glasses Grade level At grade level/179 One year above grade level/223
                     
Welington  

 

Yes – 3

 

Low Cuban Spanish Male Learning Disabled Glasses Grade level One year below grade level/82 Two years below grade level/24
                     
Wendell  

Yes – 2

Low Somalian Refugee Somali Male No None Grade level One year below grade level/51  

Two years below grade level/45

                     
Yung  

Yes – 4

Low Burmese Burmese Male No None One year below grade level One year below grade level/98  

Two years below grade level/65

                     

 

 

*Scaled Scores Key: Above Grade Level = 200 +, At Grade Level = 100-199, Below Grade Level = 0-99

 

 

 

© 2018. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.