what are the most important differences between ‘everyday thinking’ and critical thinking?

Instructions==>Please reply to post in 300 words. You may agree or disagree with the post on which you are commenting. Did they present an objective viewpoint?

*Remember, when responding to others do not judge. Simply state your position, backed by the evidence you found.

This is what the person you are responding to is writing about===> Three questions:

1) what are the most important differences between ‘everyday thinking’ and critical thinking?

2) Is critical thinking important at all (if it is indeed a thing)? Why? Why not?

3) In Europe, critical thinking is generally referred to as philosophy. Why? And what is philosophy in its broadest term and should we even care about it? Why? Why not?

The post that you are suppose to reply to==>Everyday thinking “is the mental process, the act and the ability to produce thoughts (Celine, 2017).” We tend to think about everything for example, what are we going to have for dinner or what we want to wear. Now, critical thinking “it means that you are using reason and logic to come to a conclusion about an issue or decision you are tangling with (Sieck, n.d.).” With that said critical thinking not many can achieve or accomplish. Critical thinking is very important, one of the places we use critical thinking is when we are driving to scrutinize on the consequences that could happen. It is important to keep in mind that we use critical thinking not as frequent as everyday thinking, but we do use it. “European and American philosophers decided to approach the world with a rational eye, rejecting blind faith and questioning traditional authority (Stanford Encyclopedia, n.d.).” Philosophy “Philosophy is a way of thinking about certain subjects such as ethics, thought, existence, time, meaning and value… The aim is to deepen understanding. (The Philosophy Foundation, n.d.).” Personally, I think we should care for philosophy. Because with philosophy we can expand our understanding of the things happening around us and I also believe it will help us be better human beings in the long run. It will help us comprehend things like thoughts & existence or even time in a profounder form. I believe that the more we know about everything that surrounds us the more we will come to use our critical thinking skills to make assessments in any situation that we might come across at any given time. This is a great example on of what we think is and is not important, because many people believe that philosophy is a joke or that we do not need critical thinking when in reality both are a great starting point to understanding our past and our present and those around us.

Relevance of Research in Educational Practice

Discussion 1

 

 

Analyzing a Quantitative Research Report

Read Gammon and Morgan-Samuel’s 2005 quantitative research report, “A Study to Ascertain the Effects of Structured Student Tutorial on Student Stress, Self-esteem and Coping.” which is attached below. Describe how this research report would be useful to a professional in higher education.

Discussion 2

Relevance of Research in Educational Practice

 

Share your thoughts on the multimedia piece titled Research and Relevance to the Field which is uploaded below. What is the most important concept you learned? What is the benefit to using research to inform your professional practice?

Be sure to support your responses with references from course readings or multimedia resources. Remember to use APA citations and references when referring to perspectives that are not your own.

Discussion 3

Using Research to Inform Professional Practice

 

Describe a strategy for determining whether a research report is relevant and useful to professional practice.

TEXTBOOK

 

Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2015). Applying educational research: How to read, do, and solve problems of practice (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc If you wish to print this document, pull down the “File” menu and select “Print”. Capella University logo Print Credits

ED5006

Research and Relevance to the Field

Caroline Ward Oda, PhD

Have you read research reports associated with your field of professional practice as an educator?

Well, you know before I went to Capella I was not in the practice of reading research studies. Probably because I did not have access to data bases, but ever since my doctoral studies I really read a lot of research articles. I am very interested in the instructional design ones, ones on peer feedback and especially the research that Garrison has done on online education. I follow him and a number of other instructors who are doing research that’s pertinent to my work. I develop online courses for an international non-profit and in order to do that I actually have to work through instructors who develop the courses. So I need to persuade them that the structure that is most beneficial to students is based on research and that motivates them to incorporate that in their course planning. So the research that I read is very helpful.

What is one or more discoveries you made reading research which applied to your field of professional practice as an educator?

Okay there is two main discoveries that I’ve made as a result of reading the research and one has to do with the research by Garrison, Anderson, and Archer. They talk about developing a community of inquiry when you do an online course and they mention three essential aspects; social presence, cognitive presence, and teaching presence. And I have found that when I make sure that my instructors incorporate each of those. A social presence is what enables students to feel comfortable online with each other and their teacher. And cognitive presence is that ability that a teacher has to stimulate them to grow from where they are to where the instructor wants them to be. And then teaching presence is the instructor’s ability to plan the course a head of time and then to guide the course online so that he or she can reach the teaching goals. So I use that with every course that I plan and with every instructor I work with and it has been very helpful.

Have you attempted to apply a research based best practice in your field as an educator?

For my comp exam I did a review of synchronous and asynchronous approaches to online courses and it has really helped me with building student retention in the courses that I plan. Initially my courses were all asynchronous, but as a result of the research which shows that it is important to have face to face or go to meeting or even Skype or even chat aspects in an asynchronous course. I have incorporated that and what I found is that student retention has gone up by 50% when they have this opportunity to really talk in real time to each other and with their instructor.

What were the results of applying a research based practice in your field as an educator?

The results have been great. In fact, I am starting a new series of seminars which are 100% go to meeting kinds of courses and I am doing that as an experiment in terms of going to the opposite extreme to actually fully synchronous for one of the courses that I have just mounted and we have over 100 students in that class. And we are on session three and I am getting continual enrollment because the word of mouth must be out there that this is a very satisfying way to do an online course. So it has been good. It has been good to experiment, to read the studies to see what they have to say and to experiment with they have found.

Laurel Stanley, EdD

Have you read research reports associated with your field of professional practice as an educator?

I actually read research reports all the time. I have read many research reports associated with my field of professional practice. As a college educator teaching online, up to date, relevant, high quality research is valuable to me for several reasons. I have found that research provides me with information so I can improve my teaching strategies and techniques to enhance learner success. I can collaborate with my peers more effectively with the knowledge and information that I gain from keeping abreast of current research. I also conduct and publish my own research in peer-reviewed journals that contribute to scholarly research in my field. Reading peer reviewed original recent research is essential to making a contribution in my field of professional practice.

What is one or more discoveries you made reading research which applied to your field of professional practice as an educator?

One discovery is that online college students are engaged more in their courses when they have active learning activities and plenty of positive interpersonal interactions with the instructor and with each other. For example, Marcia Dixson’s 2010 research article, Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? from the Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, indicated that active learning was engaging and both learner-instructor and learner-learner interactions were engaging.

Have you attempted to apply a research based best practice in your field as an educator?

Yes, I apply research based best practices to my teaching by emphasizing active learning and increasing personal interactions with students and among students. Active learning is applied by using student’s background knowledge and experiences within the structure of course discussions and assignments. This helps create engaged learners who actually accomplish a more in depth and better comprehension and retention of the content of the course. Sharing with the instructor and with other students helps also in creating a good learning experience.

What were the results of applying a research based practice in your field as an educator?

I have had positive results with active learning and increased interpersonal interactions. Active learning helps make the course content relevant to learners in a personal way, thus enhancing the learning taking place. Online teaching should be used to enhance communication, not to track from communications simply because it is internet based. I suppose that social media has helped change our perceptions of the digital universe in the way that thoughtful instructors might use. I plan to conduct more research on the literature to investigate this possibility thoroughly.

Gordon Graham, PhD

Have you read research reports associated with your field of professional practice as an educator?

I very often read education research. And for about two decades now I have been interested in two topics in particular. One is self esteem and the other is self efficacy. Now I like the parallelism between those two topics. Self esteem and self efficacy. They sound similar, but they are very, very different. So self esteem, generally, is defined as how we value ourselves. It is associated with our beliefs about our value in the social word that we are a part of. But self efficacy is different. It is self belief about our abilities. Our skills. Our capacity to reach goals. Sometimes we just use the word competence. Same thing as self efficacy. But there is a lot of difference when it comes to sorting out how to be an effective educator. Now I cannot just rattle off all the research I have read about these two topics because it has been. As I said, it has been an interest of mine for a couple of decades. Best I can do is point out a couple of articles that I read fairly recently. I had to look up their titles so I could be sure I had this right. First one is entitled “Cultural Norm Fulfillment, Interpersonal Belonging or Getting Ahead a Large Scale Cross Cultural Test of Three Perspectives on the Function of Self Esteem. And there were seven authors to that particular research report. Now the reason I remember it is because when they say it was a large scale research project, they were not kidding. It was over a million participants which was astonishing. And a recent article that I read about self efficacy and I actually could remember the title of this one was, it was entitled “I Think I Can, I Think I Can, Self Efficacy and Performance”. It was by a couple of authors Park and Rotor. So that is just a small sample of the kind of stuff I am interested in reading.

What is one or more discoveries you made reading research which applied to your field of professional practice as an educator?

ne of the reasons I became interested in self esteem research is because I gradually came to realize it is not nearly as important as it is assumed to be. It is not a particularly helpful construct when it comes to promoting learner success. Now that might seem strange to a lot of people. But I would encourage those that wonder about that statement, you know, and maybe begin reading about self esteem research themselves. Not just articles and editorials about self esteem because they are all pretty positive about its importance. But the actual research does not support the level of importance we have assigned to self esteem. Now as a small example, I remember reading research many years ago that pointed out bullies and thieves tend to have very high telephone esteem. Well that was kind of a wakeup call for me. I mean, we think self esteem is this wonderful thing, but, you know, bullies and thieves. They have high self esteem. Also, there is quite a bit of research evidence that when we as instructors and professors try to enhance the self esteem of our learners, it does not necessarily improve their academic performance. And, in fact, I remember reading one research report that pointed out that simply offering praise out of concern for self esteem does not have any impact whatsoever on the learner. And that the reason probably it does not is because when you are all that concerned about self esteem of your students, you might not link your praise to very real and measurable performance improvement. And so it does not seem to help. But also, like I said, I like the parallelism between self esteem and self efficacy. When I was, well whenever I get a chance to read an article about self efficacy, I keep coming to the same conclusion. That building self efficacy in a student does seem to improve performance. It is a different thing than just praising a student for. Well, in general, right? You are a wonderful person, glad to have you, that sort of thing. Self efficacy as a target during feedback and teaching means that you are linking your praise to very real and measurable improvements in the students’ progress. Now, there is evidence that self efficacy is built by enabling a learner to achieve a series of small but very real victories as they go through the course. You know, small steps. And when they take the next step, if it is an authentic victory on their part, it begins to lead to their self belief in their capacity to succeed. Now that word belief is very important when it comes to building self efficacy. Everything has to be authentic. It has to be measurable. It has to be visibly real to the learner or it does not enhance their self belief. And so I find that to be quite a fascinating difference between these two constructs.

Have you attempted to apply a research based best practice in your field as an educator?

I can give you an example of a difference in my overall approach as a consequence of reading this research. When I have come to understand the difference between and the importance of self esteem and self efficacy. It has revolutionized my teaching style. You know, I now understand it is quite important not to just offer praise to learners. They need to know if they are making very real progress. And so feedback has to be brutally honest. Now that does not mean it has to be, you know, administered in a brutal fashion. You can still be positive in the way you do it. But any progress that is made, you have to point it out and do so in an honest way sewing that there is improvement. The degree of improvement. How much more to be achieved and so on. Honesty, authenticity, very, very important. I don’t think you think nearly as much about honesty and authenticity of feedback if you are concerned about self esteem of students. But if you are concerned about building their self efficacy, then honesty and authenticity are extremely important. Because you have to alter their beliefs about themselves. And whether they recognize it consciously or not, that they have to somehow internally perceive, this is real. I am actually achieving this stuff. I am going to be able to do this. And so that has been an overall revamping of my teaching philosophy and my teaching approach. Having read, as I said, research on self efficacy and self esteem for a couple decades. I’m pretty solidly committed now for making sure all feedback is real and authentic. I try to provide students for learners to have a series of small victories. Very real victories. Very measurable victories. So they come to believe that they can do this.

What were the results of applying a research based practice in your field as an educator?

In order to do that in any sort of a credible way, I would have to launch my own research project. And maybe I will someday, I have not had a chance to do so, do that so far. What I would be trying to do is compare a teaching philosophy based on the importance of self esteem versus [inaudible] based on self efficacy. Those kind of research projects are quite challenging in the field of research. Because any educational environment is a very socially robust environment. There is all kinds of things going on. There is numerous confounding variables that affect the results. But, you know, if I can figure out a way to control for all of that, maybe one day I can actually do that and get some substantial, credible evidence to show that what I am talking about is a really important adjustment to teaching styles. But, I tell you what, I can tell you what I have had happen. I have had feedback from my learners indicating a very high level of satisfaction with the course. And I have had feedback where there has been self disclosures by learners that they feel more confident about their future journey now after finishing the course that I have taught in the manner I have scribed. But I think one of the most important things I have seen as a result, I have had some feedback from students that have told me because they feel more confident now, they also feel more motivated. And, in fact, some of them have even inquired, you know, I am not only going to do this degree. I now believe I can do an even higher degree using that transition from master’s to doctorate. So those things have been very satisfying. I mean, this is, you know, only perceptions, it is not real, hard evidence. And maybe one day, I will be able to produce the hard evidence which support what I have been talking about.

Credits

Subject Matter Expert:
Laurel Stanley, EdD
Expert Speakers:
Caroline Oda, PhD, Laurel Stanley, EdD, Gordon Graham, PhD
Interactive Design:
Marc Ashmore
Instructional Design:
Nancy Ackerman
Project Management:
Julie Greunke

Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Clinical Field Experience B: Behavior Plan Review

The manner in which a teacher responds to a student’s challenging behavior can result in positive and negative outcomes. Often students have been conditioned that by engaging in certain behaviors their needs or wants will be met, thus making the challenging behavior an adaptive behavior. Teachers need to be aware of how they respond to challenging behavior to avoid inadvertently reinforcing the challenging behavior. However, by teaching and positively reinforcing replacement behaviors, students will learn to engage in more appropriate behaviors to get what they want and need.

 

Coordinate with a certified special education teacher to work with a student or small group of students who have behavior plans in place. Teach an activity of your mentor teacher’s choice to the students and observe the following:

  1. Setting: What is the setting like surrounding where the students are participating in the activity?
  2. Interventions/Plans: What are the interventions, replacement behaviors, and/or goals in place for the students?
  3. Crisis Plan in place by mentor/district: Refer to Topic 6 assignment. What plans are in place to ensure students’ safety?
  4. Activity: What is the activity you are facilitating? How does it support the behavior needs of the students? If it does not fully support the student behavior needs, how could it be adapted?
  5. General behavior during activity: How did the students engage with the activity, you (as the teacher), and any other students?
  6. Misbehavior or disruptive behavior: Did the students display any misbehavior or disruptive behavior? Why do you think they did or did not behave appropriately? Or, if they behaved appropriately, what do you feel contributed to them following the expectations without misbehavior?

Use any remaining field experience hours to assist the teacher in providing instruction and support to the class.

Part 1

In 250‐500 words, summarize and reflect upon the above observation points in your clinical field experience. 

Part 2

In an additional 250‐500 words, explain how you will use what you have learned from the clinical field experiences in this course in your future professional practices relating to behavior management and addressing any crisis situations observed or discussed with mentor. Cite the Ethical Principles and Professional Practice Standards in your response.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

image1.jpg

Proposal for Behavior Change Template

Part 1: ABC Chart

ABC Chart

Student Name: Joseph

Class

Activity

What was the activity or task during the time of the behavior?

Antecedent

What was the trigger or situation right before the behavior occurred?

Behavior

What was the observed behavior?

Consequence

What happened because of the behavior?

Reading It was during a one-hour science reading lesson. The teacher told all students to stay inside their seats and read. Joseph went out of his seat fifteen times and in total, he went out of his seat 25 times. Asking the teacher several off-topic questions, drinking water and sharpening pencils.
Reading During science class reading hours. The teacher tells everyone to pay attention and read. Tapping his foot against the desk to attract other student’s attention. Does not complete his classwork on time.
Science During afternoon science class reading hours. The teacher tells everyone to pay attention and read.

Joseph only went out of his seat four times in 40 minutes. More engaged.
Science During afternoon science class reading hours.

The teacher tells everyone to pay attention and read.

Joseph sharpened his pencils twice and gets a Kleenex once. More engaged.

Science During afternoon science class reading hours.

The teacher tells everyone to pay attention and read.

Get another lab worksheet once.

More engaged.

Operational definition for Joseph’s target behavior

Operational definition for Joseph’s target behavior: Joseph asks irrelevant questions in class without seeking permission from the science teacher. He also went out of his seat fifteen times and in total, he went out of his seat 25 times.

Analysis: Joseph is not finishing his classwork on time because he does not stay on his seat most of the time. Also he loves tapping his foot against the desk thus unnecessarily attracting other student’s attention. Nonetheless, he sometimes during science class only went out of his seat four times in 40 minutes, and started engaging in classwork unlike previously.

Operational definition for Joseph’s target behavior: Moreover, Joseph asking the teacher several off-topic questions, drinking water and sharpening pencils.

Analysis: The above description of Joseph’s behavior shows that Joseph sometimes loses his senses and asks the teacher meaningless questions. Therefore, asking unnecessary questions would mean that Joseph is partly mentally affected and needs proper mental assessment and invention.

Operational definition for Joseph’s target behavior: Joseph starts concentrating on what is being taught in class and improves overall performance. This means that he begins to mental improvement and reduce the suffering loss of memory during science class.

Part 2: Analysis of Data

Hypothesis of target behavior including the function of behavior:

The insufficient dopamine transporter or lack of magnesium due to hyper-excretion may be the major cause of the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (Blanco‐Vieira et al., 2019). But most likely ADD will not really be understood till it is broken out into multiple sub-groups. Some forms of ADD are, arguably, towards the normal end of the autism spectrum which would mean that things like ubiquinol which help improve anti-oxidant status in some people with autism might also help people with ADD.

Analysis of case study:

Unfortunately, an accurate diagnosis of ADHD is sketchy in younger children under the age of six (Ferreira et al., 2019). As observed with Joseph in the case study, the inability to focus, lack of concentration, lack of social skills, executive function disorders are among the symptoms of ADHD, and babies exhibit it because they have not had time to develop these traits/skills, yet. While we are now able to diagnose ADHD earlier than say ten years ago, it is still not an exact science.

Considering the case of Joseph, the first 5-minutes, the child is so focused on the science class reading, a team of class members could not dislodge their focus. Fast forward 15-minutes and trying to get them to sit still until a fish bites are like trying to herd cats. Add a couple of years, being overstimulated from the age of 6-months, by the Electronic Babysitter, and anyone would exhibit signs of ADHD (Leon, Sharma & Kaur, 2019), and the best thing their teacher can do is to start them early by having dedicated “learning” time”, when they must sit for periods to learn something. At first, it is perhaps 1-minute and then over time, working up to 30-minutes as they approach Kindergarten. By the time they are six or so, any signs of ADHD will be much more pronounced and distinguishable from normal childhood behavior.

Medication is a beautiful advantage, if/when it is needed, but if it is not required, your child is much better off without it (Marx, Reis & Berger, 2019). While ADHD medications in adults are a well-studied concept, understand that the first medicated kids are just now entering working age, so long-term effects of stimulant medications on children are just now beginning to be published and even then it is only on one or two generations. Don’t be too eager to medicate your child because you “think” they might have ADHD. If you are concerned, take your child to see a reputable mental health professional who specializes in ADHD AND Holistic approaches to ADHD (Marx, Reis & Berger, 2019). Once they get into school, there will be plenty of teachers who will suggest stimulant medications to calm normally active kids. From my experience, there could be anywhere from 15–50% of kids on Stimulant Meds who shouldn’t be (This is my opinion and not based on recent research). Will stimulant medications on younger children affect their chances later in life? Only time will tell.

Part 3: Intervention Ideas and Replacement Behaviors

Motivational and Instructional Intervention Ideas
1 Mention the student’s name when giving instructions and they may also stand nearby.

 

2 Remove distractions. Have the student sit alone or with studious kids.
3 Break down the assignment to smaller parts and ensure that each section is done on schedule.

 

4 Use encouragement and positive statements especially when the student stays on task for longer periods of time.
5 Schedule breaks during class times, especially if it is a block scheduled day.

Part 4: Proposed Intervention Plan

Goal 1 (Identify one functional behavior focus: attention, tangible, or escape):

Replacement behavior: Attention.

Specific steps to change behavior (antecedent modifications): Schedule breaks during class times, especially if it is a block scheduled day. Evidence-based shows that, there are a few different ways to deal with heavy study habits and breaks. A student can set a timer to focus on a particular subject for 30–45 minutes and then take a break for 10 minutes. Then, they can switch to a different subject afterward to help break up the monotony. If they are studying multiple subjects, they need to do a little “review” session at the end of the time period to see what they have retained. Another option is to commit to a few hours on the same subject and insert 10–15 minute breaks every hour. Anything less than 30 minutes does not really merit the effort. It usually takes your brain 5–8 minutes to tune into what you’re studying and the rest is actual input time.

Strategies to manage situations (to reduce target behavior) using collaboration with general educators and other colleagues:

Attentive, obedient students and hardworking will always get along with others in the first place. The regular feedbacks- good and bad is a strategy to draw students’ attention. Tell them that they are appreciated, this goes both ways. Badly treated students will take it out on one another and to the customers. Not micromanaging them, and being completely fair to all students. No favoritism because it destroys any kind of morals when one student is treated better and is unfair to others. Therefore, the teacher should be friendly and kind, but not too informal.

Rewards and reinforcements: a reward in the classroom is part of the feedback from the environment. When a student interacts with the classroom environment, he can observe the changes in the state and reward signal through his actions, if there is change. He can then use this reward signal-can be positive for a good action or negative for a bad action-to draw conclusions about how to behave in a class. The goal, in general, is to solve a given task with the maximum reward possible. That is why many algorithms have a very small negative reward for each action the student takes to animate him to solve the task as fast as possible.

Progress monitoring (what data will be collected and in what manner, including data from colleagues and student’s family): a teacher can inquire about an assignment’s progress or give feedback via the task’s assigned comments or dedicated discussions area. The best part is that Paymo is free for 1 year for anyone – be it a student, teacher, or academic staff – who is currently enrolled at a university or college. They need to learn more about other features that can help you manage marketing and curricula.

Steps to resolve any escalation:

1. Follow the school procedure.

2. If the school does not have a procedure, then ask for one in writing.

3. If the procedure is not sufficient then point out the issues to management in writing.

4. If you fear for your safety (since you cannot legally defend yourself) or the safety of the students make the school aware of the issue in writing.

5. Be clear about what is expected from management (a panic button) with an expected response time in writing.

6. Finally, if it comes to it let the school know in advance that if certain conditions happen then you will call the police and press charges.

Part 5: Reflection

I think one of the major causes of ADHD in students is the teacher’s teaching style. Some teachers take a liking to a few classmates over others. This may leave the rest of the class feeling left out, and which will cause some to be more motivated than others. I have had teachers who single others out as the “lazy” student. They make jokes about them laughing in front of the class saying “Devin! Where is that homework? You did do it right?” And it was only them called out, and this happened frequently. That made these students value the teacher less and be less interested in what he said while others felt he was disrespecting them. If a teacher makes everything about work and speed, it can decline student interest. If you come in, hand in lengthy homework, say “go, we have a lab to do not much time!!”, then briefly mention next assignment over all the commotion, speed through a PowerPoint that you are slowly reading line by line, it is just going to make students tune out during lectures and feel overwhelmed. They will lose interest in the subject and do the work for the grade; half assign most of it because of the quantity of work.

I like when a teacher steps away from all the strictness and seriousness and talks from his own point of interest to teach. Makes jokes that do not involve students, I like that. I like just hearing him/her talk about the subject they are passionate about, and being honest with students and talking to them as equals, teaching with empathy (i.e. the teacher being aware of what it’d be like to be in the shoes of a student in his/her own class). It also helps if the teacher teaches with a simple view of their subject, breaking it down to bite-sized bits that would make sense to anyone. When a teacher focuses on how complex something is or how difficult it is to understand, the students feel more stressed as if understanding it will be near impossible. When the teacher has the mindset of “this is easy, just start small here, we’ll build to here,” it really helps students have less stress and quicker learning.

It is important for teachers to address students in their class that is prone to talking just to hear their own voice. Some individual persons will take up half the class telling personal stories or asking questions that tangent off the subject. This is because it is taking away learning time for 20+ students in the class. While a student is talking aloud toward the teacher, wasting class time, going on and on, it will take the student’s focus away from the subject that the teacher had worked so hard to get.

Big auditorium classes in university that hold hundreds of students per class really need to test volume levels before the beginning of a semester. I’ve been in one of those classes before and was unable to hear much and wasn’t sure what the teacher was teaching. I started skipping classes and trying to learn on my own from the books. The first test I flunked and I was really discouraged. As well my professor was extremely monotone pointing to a screen and reading line by line. It was very boring. I feel like the professor did not have much awareness for the students’ perspective in that situation and was thinking of how he could sound very intellectual instead. Students aren’t there to hear the professor get his dander upon how smart he is. He can be a good professor by getting the students to know what he knows and not drift off in his own thoughts aloud, confusing everyone.

References

Blanco‐Vieira, T., Santos, M., Ferrão, Y. A., Torres, A. R., Miguel, E. C., Bloch, M. H., … & do Rosario, M. C. (2019). The impact of

attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in obsessive‐compulsive disorder subjects. Depression and anxiety.

Ferreira, S., Zeron, R., Carvalho, G., Gandra, L., Carestiato, V., Bastos, A., … & Mujanović, A. (2019, May). Therapeutic Aspects and

Diagnosis of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder—ADHD in Adults. International Conference on Medical and Biological

Engineering (pp. 769-773). Springer, Cham.

Leon, C., Sharma, R., & Kaur, S. (2019). Attention-deficit/hyperactive disorder: missing the bull’s eye. Evidence-based mental

health, 22(1), e1-e1.

Marx, I., Reis, O., & Berger, C. (2019). Perceptual timing in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) as

measured by computer-based experiments versus real-life tasks: protocol for a cross-sectional experimental study in an ambulatory

setting. BMJ Open, 9(4), e027651.

© 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

CIP Reference List Chart Assignment

CIP: Reference List Chart Assignment Instructions

Overview

The candidate will select an issue directly related to conflict resolution, write a paper and present a professional PowerPoint presentation appropriate for faculty in-service, parents, students, administrators, at conferences, or related venues that gives an overview of the topic, summary of the key issues surrounding the topic, and a strategic plan utilizing the conflict resolution strategies and skills presented throughout the course in the textbook and scholarly journal articles. This project is designed to give the candidate an opportunity to present a training for a targeted audience that deals with helping the audience utilize the conflict resolution strategies that have been gleaned from the course. It would be highly beneficial to select a topic that the candidate is familiar with through observations within the professional or personal settings. Candidates will be required to utilize at least 15 scholarly sources and will not be permitted to use direct quotes on the outline, paper, or presentation.

Reference List Chart Assignment

1. Select a topic for the Conflict Issue Project (CIP).

2. Download the Reference List Chart Template from Blackboard.

3. Use the Jerry Falwell Library (JFL) to research your selected topic.

4. Identify at least 15 articles on your selected topic that have been published within the last five years.

5. Complete the Reference List Chart Template.

6. The Main Points of the Article section needs to include at least three bulleted main ideas gleaned from the article that assists in developing the overview of the topic, key issues surrounding the topic, and/or conflict resolution strategies to utilize in the outline, paper, and/or presentation.

Submit your CIP: Reference List Chart Template by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of the Module/Week 2.

CIP: Reference List Chart Grading Rubric

 

Criteria Levels of Achievement
Content 70% Advanced Proficient Developing Not present
Title of Article, Authors, and Year of Publication 10 points

 

All parts of the chart are complete with the title of the article, authors, and year of publication. All articles are published within 5 years.

9 points

 

All parts of the chart are complete with the title of the article, authors, and year of publication. At least 12 of the 15 articles are published within 5 years.

1 to 8 points

 

Most of the parts of the chart are complete with the title of the article, authors, and year of publication. Fewer than 12 articles are published within 5 years.

0 points

 

Not present

Topic of Article and Intended Audience 10 points

 

All topics of the articles and intended audience sections are identified on the chart for at least 15 references.

9 points

 

All topics of the articles and intended audience sections are identified on the chart for at least 14 references.

1 to 8 points

 

All topics of the articles and intended audience sections are identified on the chart for 13 or fewer references.

0 points

 

Not present

CIP Proposed Topic and Main Points of Article 33 to 35 points

 

Candidate identifies a topic for the CIP and fully explains three main points from each article utilizing bullet points or complete sentences. The main ideas identified address the proposed CIP topic and assists in developing the overview of the topic, key issues surrounding the topic, and/or conflict resolution strategies to utilize in the outline, paper, and/or presentation.

30 to 32 points

 

Candidate identifies a topic for the CIP and fully explains three main points from each article utilizing bullet points or complete sentences. The main ideas identified mostly address the proposed CIP topic and assists in developing the overview of the topic, key issues surrounding the topic, and/or conflict resolution strategies to utilize in the outline, paper, and/or presentation.

1 to 29 points

 

Candidate identifies a topic for the CIP and fully explains three main points from each article utilizing bullet points or complete sentences. The main ideas identified somewhat address the proposed CIP topic and assists in developing the overview of the topic, key issues surrounding the topic, and/or conflict resolution strategies to utilize in the outline, paper, and/or presentation.

0 points

 

Not present

Structure 30% Advanced Proficient Developing Not present
Mechanics, Sentence Structure, Template, and Reference Page 19 to 20 points

 

Candidate utilizes the provided template. The writing is free of errors. Reference section is correctly formatted.

17 to 18 points

 

Candidate utilizes the provided template. The writing has less than two errors. Reference section is correctly formatted with less than two errors.

1 to 16 points

 

Candidate utilizes the provided template. The writing has more than two errors. Reference section is correctly formatted with more than two errors.