Assignment: Community Presentation

For this Assignment, you will apply your knowledge and skills relative to experimental, quasi-experimental, and correlational research approaches to the development of a presentation for community members.

To prepare:

· Review all module Learning Resources. Pay particular attention to the characteristics of experimental, quasi-experimental, and correlational research designs. Think about how you might communicate the similarities and differences of each design to community stakeholders.

· Consider the following scenario:

A special education committee in your school district is interested in studying the effectiveness of a particular intervention. You have been asked to create a presentation to provide the committee with background information on the three types of quantitative studies they could use to study this intervention. Additionally, your presentation needs to compare the approaches for the committee in a concise, accurate, and meaningful way.

Create a 12–15 slide presentation (e.g., PowerPoint, Prezi, etc.) to inform a special education committee at your school district that is interested in studying the effectiveness of an intervention about the three quantitative research designs (i.e., experimental, quasi-experimental, and correlational). Consider the following as you develop your presentation:

· How do the designs differ?

· What elements do the designs share?

· What does each design contribute to the field of special education?

· How could validity threats be minimized for each of the designs?

Cite and compare experimental, quasi-experimental, and correlation study examples that further highlights each of these methodologies for your audience.

Support your presentation with specific reference to the Learning Resources, outside resources, and personal experience.

Note: For this Assignment and all scholarly writing in this course and throughout your program, you will be required to use APA style (6th edition). Please use the Walden Writing Center as a resource as you complete assignments.

Note: Since you will not be presenting your work in class, you may use the Notes feature to script out commentary for each slide or develop a narrated presentation.

Learning Resources

Note: To access this module’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.

Required Readings

Florian, L. (Ed.). (2014). The SAGE handbook of special education (2nd ed.). London, England: Sage.

  • Chapter 22, “The Applied Science of Special      Education: Quantitative Approaches, the Questions They Address, and How      They Inform Practice”(pp. 369–388)

    Focus on quantitative designs and why they are key for      research in the field of SPED

Rumrill, P. D., Cook, B. G., & Wiley, A. L. (2011). Research in special education: Designs, methods, and applications. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

  • Chapter 6, “Quantitative Research Designs”      (pp.136–152)

    Focus on the spectrum of relationship and descriptive studies.      Note correlational designs and causal comparative studies. Develop an      understanding of surveys, case studies, program evaluation, archival      research, longitudinal studies, empirical literature reviews, and      meta-analysis.

Consult the following readings for work on your Course Project Component Assignment during this module:

O’Neill, R. E., McDonnell, J. J., Billingsley, F. F., & Jenson, W. R. (2011). Single case research designs in educational and community settings. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

  • Chapter 6, “Withdrawal and      Reversal Designs” (pp. 79–98)

    Focus on the range of designs, beginning with the A-B and      progressing to reversal designs. Pay particular to the various adaptations      to reversal designs. Review approaches when comparing two or more      interventions, or two or more groups.

  • Chapter 7, “Multiple Baseline and Multiple      Probe Designs” (pp. 99–116)

    Focus on approaches to design that support measuring the      acquisition of new skills. Reflect on options when returning to a baseline      rate may be unethical. Consider the characteristics of multiple baseline      and multiple probe designs.

Aditional Resources

Although every Additional Resource is not required reading, it is highly recommended that you read all of the Additional Resources. Be sure to make note of the Additional Resources which align with the content and focus of Discussions and Assignments.

Note: The resources were selected for the quality of the information and examples that they contain and not the date of publication.

Experimental/Quasi-Experimental

Iftar, E. T., Kurt, O., & Cetin, O. (2011). A comparison of constant time delay instruction with high and low treatment integrity. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 11(1), 375–381.

Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

Focus on the description of the time delay procedure. Compare procedures for comparing treatments. Review the adapted alternating treatment design.

Thurston, L. P., & Navarette, L. A. (2011). Rural, poverty-level mothers: A comparative study of those with and without children who have special needs. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 30(1), 39–46.

Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

Focus on the differences in demographics, school experience, social support, and school involvement. Review differences by marital status. Reflect on differences in retention, special needs reports, homework, and writing notes to teachers.

Wehmeyer, M. L., Shogren, K. A., Palmer, S. B., Williams-Diehm, K. L., Little, T. D., & Boulton, A. (2012). The impact of the self-determined learning model of instruction on self-determination. Exceptional Children, 78(2), 135–153.

Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

Focus on the approach to this group-randomized, modified equivalent control group design. Note the use of multiple measures. Pay specific attention to the interpretation of findings.

Wei, X., Blackorby, J., & Schiller, E. (2011). Growth in reading achievement of students with disabilities, ages 7 to 17. Exceptional Children, 78(1), 89–106.

Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

Focus on reading growth trajectories. Consider the extent to which reading achievement increased with age. Recognize the characteristics of a longitudinal study.

Correlation

Mautone, J. A., DuPaul, G. J., Jitendra, A. K., Tresco, K. E., Junod, R. V., & Volpe, R. J. (2009). The relationship between treatment integrity and acceptability of reading interventions for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychology in the Schools, 46(10), 919–931.

Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

Focus on the relationship between treatment integrity and acceptability. Note the two consultation models. Pay particular attention to the relationship between reading interventions and ADHD.

Williamson, R. L., Robertson, J. S., & Casey, L. B. (2010). Using a dynamic systems approach to investigating postsecondary education and employment outcomes for transitioning students with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 33(2), 101–111.

Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

Focus on the interacting variables. Study the correlating characteristics. Read about the links to employment and postsecondary education.

Required Media

Laureate Education (Producer). (2012). The multiple baseline design [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 6 minutes.

In this media program, Dr. Terry Falcomata explains the Multiple Baseline Design.

Accessible player  –Downloads– Download Video w/CC Download Audio Download Transcript

Prominent Leaders

DUE IN 20 HOURS

 

MGT380

Prominent Leaders

Use the Ashford Library to research a prominent leader, living or deceased, who you admire. Explain whether the leader’s style is transactional or transformational. What type of leadership characteristics does the leader demonstrate? What aspects of servant leadership does the leader exhibit?  Provide relevant examples to support your claims.

The paper should be three pages in length (excluding title and reference pages).  At least two scholarly references (a minimum of one being from the Ashford Library) plus the course textbook must be utilized in the research. The paper should also reflect proper APA format and style and integrate resources with in-text citations to support the writing. Vocabulary and course content should be integrated throughout the paper.

Stimulating Creativity And Cultivating Adaptability

Instructions

Supporting Lecture:

Review the following lecture:

  • Stimulating Creativity and Cultivating Adaptability

Project

The project assignment provides a forum for analyzing and evaluating relevant topics of this week on the basis of the course competencies covered.

Introduction

Much of stimulating creativity and cultivating adaptability calls for an open-minded leader. As you continue to develop as a leader, you will be tasked with developing a culture that promotes creativity and adaptability.

Tasks

Read the following articles along with this week’s lecture and the associated chapters:

  • The Role of Stimulating Employees’ Creativity and Idea Generation in Encouraging Innovation Behaviour in Irish Firms 
  • Leading into the Next Frontier 

Using these articles and other resources, develop a plan to create a culture where creativity and adaptability is embraced. In doing so, be sure to address the following in your plan:

  • The four aspects of stimulating creativity
  • The three fundamental skills involved in cultivating adaptability

How you plan will provide opportunities for upcoming leaders.
To support your work, use your course and textbook readings. As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.

Paper should contain at least three (3) content pages plus title and reference.

pages with an introduction, headings, conclusion and references.

“Embracing a Vision of Social Justice in Early Childhood Education

Initial Post: To complete the Whole Teacher matrix, include each of the following components:

  • Column 1: Choose eight tips from the “Tips for Teachers” provided in figure 1.1, page 9 of your course text. The tips you choose should hold meaning to you and in your work with children.
  • Column 2: Reflect on ways in which you can uphold the NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct (Links to an external site.) for each teaching tip. You are required to reference and cite from the NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct for each section of this column.
  • Column 3: Explain specific strategies you can utilize to incorporate social justice into each of the teaching tips you chose in the first column. To help you organize your thoughts for this column, review the article, “Embracing a Vision of Social Justice in Early Childhood Education (Links to an external site.).”
  • Column 4: Organize the five suggested priorities (Just the topic) from Chapter 16 of the course text with each of the teaching tips you chose that they correlate with. Note that some priorities will fit into more than one category.
  • Summation: In a paragraph, summarize how you will use this matrix to develop your philosophy of education statement and why it is important to have a well-written philosophy of education statement.
  •  The matrix is simply a way of organizing your thoughts, values and knowledge when it comes to working with children. For this section, you will state how you plan to use your newly organized thoughts in the creation of or modification of your personal philosophy. Then, based on previous knowledge regarding philosophy, tell why it is important that you create a well-developed philosophy statement.  Mention some possible benefits of a successful philosophy statement.

Figure 1.1 and the five suggested priorities have been attached. Thank you so much!