Capstone: Master’s Project

EDUC 6960: Capstone: Master’s Project

Week 3: Discussion: Project Outline

Use this week’s Discussion to share your progress and concerns as you develop your project outline and select stakeholders to review your project. It may be helpful to discuss roadblocks and problems, finding background material, questions on deliverables, target audience, and possible models or best practices that are germane to your project.

 

By Day 3

Post your draft project outline in the Discussion Board for feedback. Additionally, share concerns you have about your project. Use the Discussion Board to ask questions and make suggestions to assist each other with your project development.

 

One Page

 

Week 3: Assignment: Project Outline and Stakeholders

For your Capstone Project this week, you will complete an outline of your plan/proposal and describe the stakeholder audience to whom you will present your draft project.

 

A key element of your Capstone Project is presenting your project to a stakeholder audience and obtaining their feedback on your plan or proposal. In Week 6, you will informally present your draft project plan or proposal to a relevant stakeholder audience – an administrator, staff member, or faculty member at the institution you are targeting for your project, and/or an employer, alumni, or community representative. You may present your project to an individual, several individuals separately, or to a small group. Consider that the more people with whom you share your project, the more useful feedback you are likely to receive on the value and appropriateness of your project for that institution.

 

Using feedback from your colleagues and Instructor, revise your problem statement and rationale (submitted in Week 1), add your literature review, and develop an outline of your project plan or proposal. Your outline should include the following major elements:

 

· Goals for the project

· Description of the local context

· Activities, initiatives, or strategies to be used

· Deliverables or outcomes – what the project should accomplish

· How the project, if implemented, could be evaluated or assessed

· A proposed timeline that could be followed to implement the project

· A list of budgetary items – financial, human, or other resources – that would be needed to support the project

· The stakeholder audience to whom you plan to present your project plan/proposal, and reasons for their interest in the project

Assignment length: 1–2 pages for outline, ½ – 1 page for description of stakeholder audience. Also, include your revised problem statement and rationale from Week 1.

Educational Traing

1.Non linguistic  representations help us to recall and use information every day. Think  of a topic that you understand very well and notice how many images  related to this topic you can generate in your head. Now identify a  topic with which you are familiar but that you do not understand well.  Try to generate images and notice how difficult it is.

2. Research suggests that, especially for older students, homework seems to  be positively correlated with student achievement. Even when some  parents who are opposed to homework become aware of this research, they  express strong negative feelings about homework. What do you think are  some of the reasons for these feelings?

3. Research confirms that advance organizers are powerful when they help  students focus on what is important, not on what might be unusual. All  the different types of advance organizers described in this chapter,  however, require up-front planning on the part of the teacher. How would  you respond to a teacher who complains that there just isn’t time to  prepare the organizers?

4. Recall personal experiences that exemplify working toward clear  objectives and being provided with regular, valuable feedback. How would  you describe the type of feedback that you received and its influence  on you? What type of feedback was not valuable or had a negative effect  on your work?  For those of you who have been completing the “Should Do”  guided notes, how does the absence of guided notes for this unit impact  you?  What are your experiences with using the guided notes

 

Leaders Vs. Managers

SPT 111 Leaders vs. Managers Guidelines and Rubric

Overview: This short paper assignment involves comparing leaders versus managers in today’s sports industry. Prompt: Citing evidence from the course resources, respond to the following:

• What is your definition of a leader? How would you define a manager? Is there a distinction between the two in today’s sports industry? What are some qualities and characteristics you learned growing up in relation to leadership in sports? Have you ever led a team ? If so, were your leadership methods effective? In what ways, if any, did managing play a role?

• What is your assessment of leaders and managers in today’s sports industry? Can they coexist in today’s industry? Use specific examples to support your rationale.

• Do you consider yourself more of a leader or a manager? What are some of the traits and characteristics of a sports leader or manager that you possess? • Who is an effective sports leader in today’s industry? Who is an effective manager in sports? Do you model your own leadership/management traits

after this sports professional?

Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA format.

Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Leaders Versus Managers

Compares the difference between leaders and managers in today’s sports industry, citing evidence from scholarly sources

Insufficiently compares the difference between leaders and managers in today’s sports industry

Does not compare the difference between leaders and managers

20

Coexistence of Leaders and Managers

Explains if leaders and managers can coexist using specific evidence to support rationale

Explanation of the potential coexistence of leaders and managers is lacking in detail and does not include evidence

Explanation of the potential coexistence of leaders and managers is not evident

20

Reflection of Leadership and

Management Skills

Reflects upon personal characteristics of leadership and management abilities using examples

Reflects upon personal characteristics of leadership and management abilities but does not include examples

Does not reflect upon personal characteristics of leadership and management abilities

20

Effective Sports Leaders and Managers

Identifies an effective sports leader and an effective sports manager, using specific examples to support selection

Identifies an effective sports leader and an effective sports manager but does not include evidence or examples to support selection

Does not identify an effective sports leader and manager

20

 

 

 

Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Articulation of Response

Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization

Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas

Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas

20

Total 100%

Does Doing The Morally Right Thing Ever Make A Person’s Life Worse Off Than Doing The Wrong Thing?

Choose ONE of the prompts below as the basis for a clear argumentative and critical essay demonstrating your understanding of what we have considered thus far in our Ethics course. The essay should be MLA – formatted and should have a minimum of six (6 ) well – developed paragraphs, including the introduction, three substantive body paragraphs, and a thought – provoking conclusion. This should amount to around four (3) MLA – formatted pages. Include a Work Cited for your textbook. You should have an explicit thesis statement which states your essential claim. Stay in 3 rd – person formal point – of – view (no “I,” “you,” “we”). Provide a meaningful title for the essay, as well, which captures the overall significance of the analysis. As you make your argument, you will need to demonstr ate your careful attention to “E thics and the Examined Life” and “Theories of Morality,” in particular. You will need to include applicable quotes and/or references to material we have encountered bot h in our readings and class discussions. Also, refer to your notes from class. You can use your book as a source, but you are not expected to include any other secondary sources. Proof your essay c arefully. Submit your final essay as a MLA – formatted Word document into the respective assignment folder on the D2L course site. Turnitin.com will scan all essays. The professor will use the following rubric: • Accurate use of English including careful documentation (including ability to paraphrase and use quotations, MLA – formatting) and good organizational plan. 35 pts. • Adequate details to support thesis 20 pts. • Accurate and complete reflection and analysis of material read for assignment 45 pts. Writing Prompt: Does doing the morally right thing ever make a person’s life worse off than doing the wrong thing?