Create A Pros And Cons List

To create a pros and cons list regarding 50–50 joint custody parenting from various perspectives and to evaluate your list.

Scenario:
You are a first-year teacher who has just learned that the parents of Kyla, a child in your class, have divorced. Kyla’s mother tells you that she and Kyla’s father are working out the details of a 50–50 joint custody parenting arrangement for Kyla and her two older brothers. You imagine that this new arrangement will be stressful for everyone concerned and would like to have a deeper understanding of the possible implications. Your director suggests you watch the video Divorce and Children. After watching the video, you decide to clarify your thinking about what the pros and cons of 50–50 shared parenting might be from the perspectives of Kyla and her brothers. Next, you think about the possible implications for Kyla’s parents. Last, you consider the pros and cons from your point of view as well as that of the people who interact with Kyla at school.

Focus Assignment

1. Create a two-column pros and cons list to help clarify your thinking about 50–50 joint custody parenting. List three possible pros and three cons from Kyla and her brothers’ perspectives. Add a few sentences to elaborate on your thinking about each pro and con. Now, list three possible pros and three cons from Kyla’s parents’ perspectives. Finally, list three possible pros and three cons from your perspective as Kyla’s teacher and from the standpoint of the larger school community.

2. Be sure to read the SELF-EVALUATION section below to guide your thinking. Write your self-evaluation after you have completed your pros and cons list.

Self-Evaluation

1. For each item on your pros and cons list:
a. Explain how this item addresses the issues in the scenario.

2. Describe and justify how your pros and cons list would improve teaching and learn in the scenario.

Lesson Plan: Functional/Life Skills Assignment

EDSP 370

Lesson Plan Assignment Instructions

Overview

The lesson plan is the key component to effective instruction in the classroom. Studies have shown that teachers who are well prepared with exciting and interesting lesson plans have to deal with far fewer behavior issues in their classrooms. That is why it is so important for you to learn the basics of designing a lesson plan. To begin, use the following list to choose a grade level and core content area for which you would like to develop a lesson plan. It would be wise to create your plan for the age level and content area you are currently teaching or planning to teach. You may not use a lesson plan you have created for another course for this Lesson Plan Assignment.

Instructions

Elementary (K–5) Middle School (6–8) High School (9–12)
Math Math Math
Science Science Science
Social Studies Social Studies Social Studies
Geography Geography Geography
History History History
Reading Reading Literature
Phonics/Grammar Grammar Grammar
Writing Writing Writing

After you have selected your grade level and subject area, you will need to consult the Virginia State Department of Education’s website to locate the state standards for your particular grade and subject area (see Resources section). Virginia’s SOLs. You will also need to locate the Common Core Standard for your particular grade level and subject area (see Resources section).

Once you have located the standards for the grade level and subject area for your plan, choose one around which you want to develop your lesson plan. Keep in mind that this is a single lesson plan, not an entire unit, so you will have to narrow down your topic to one that can easily be taught in a single lesson. For example, if you want to cover addition for Kindergarten, you will narrow that to one specific concept of addition that is to be taught to kindergarteners.

Complete your Lesson Plan Assignment using the provided Lesson Plan Template document.

· Name: You must put your first and last name on the lesson plan so it can be easily identified by the instructor.

· Grade/Subject: You will identify what grade level and subject area is the focus for your lesson plan (e.g., 3rd grade science).

· Topic: You will choose a specific topic within your grade/subject area that your state standards require you to teach (e.g., addition in math, nouns in grammar, plants in science, Mexico in geography, comprehension in reading, etc.).

· Lesson Subtopic: Narrow down your specific topic to one particular concept on which your lesson plan will focus. For example, if you choose addition in math for first grade, you will further narrow that to a specific concept of addition that is taught to first graders, like double digits; addition within 10; or adding two-digit numbers. Remember, this needs to be very focused and must be covered in the standards for your grade and subject area.

· State Standard and Common Core Standard: You will need to identify which state standard aligns with the grade, subject, topic, and subtopic you have chosen. Provide the following information: a working link your instructor can open to check the VA standard and Common Core standard with the verbatim wording of the standard for each (e.g., VA SOL 1.5 “The student will recall basic addition facts with sums to 18 or less and the corresponding subtraction facts.”

Objective: Create a learning objective to go with the topic, subtopic, and standard you have chosen. The learning objective must contain a condition, a performance/practice, and a criterion (CPC).

In order to successfully complete this stage, you will need to do the following:

· Identify a specific condition (a tool that you will give the students to complete the performance.) For example, “Given a list of 10 double-digit addition problems…”

· Identify a measurable performance (identify, list, recite, draw, etc.) that you want your students to be able to complete when the lesson is over. For example, “…each student will be able to solve…”

· Identify a criterion (an acceptable level of performance). For example, “….9/10 of the double-digit problems correctly.”

Here is a helpful template you can use:  “Given ____________, each student will be able to _____________  ___/___times correctly.” (Note: This should be one simple and concise sentence.)

Your objective should be written to match the Summative Assessment at the end of the Lesson Plan.

Biblical Integration

Now that you have created an objective for your subtopic, consider how to integrate biblical or character principles into your lesson. Find Scripture verses/principles or character principles that relate to your subtopics. Be sure to explain how the verse or character principle you chose specifically fits in with the lesson and how it relates to your students. In other words, how are you going to connect the principle with the rest of the lesson so the students have a better understanding of God and who He is? The point of this section is to be creative and to include the opportunity to reinforce biblical values and moral character into daily lessons. For example, if you are teaching a lesson on money, you can bring out Scripture verses that teach how important it is to handle our money in a way that is honoring to the Lord. You can emphasize honesty, tithing, saving, borrowing and lending, etc., using different Scripture references. For this stage, fill in only the Character/Biblical Principle section on the lesson plan.

Procedures

The next section to complete on your Lesson Plan Template is the procedures section.

You will be filling in the procedures section of the Lesson Plan Template. This is the main part of your lesson plan and should be the most detailed. This is where you are going to discuss how you will teach the lesson using each of the procedures listed. Here are some guidelines for each section:

· Anticipatory Set: The anticipatory set is to be a very brief activity that gains the attention of the students. It may be a book, a song, a poem, a short news article, etc., that catches the attention of your students and sparks an interest in the topic of the lesson. This will be no more than 5 minutes.

· Instruction: This is the direct instruction portion of your lesson plan and must, therefore, be the most detailed. Use numbers or bullets to write out step-by-step what you will actually teach the students about this topic. Only include the steps of how you will teach the lesson in this section. PowerPoint presentations, interactive notebooks, graphic organizers, Smart Board presentations, etc., are all acceptable things to use to help teach your lesson. However, this is not the place to include instructions for completing activities used in your guided or independent practice. The time spent on this section will vary depending on the grade level for which the plan is designed.

· Guided Practice: In this section, students will practice as a group or small groups what has been taught in the instruction section. You will give immediate feedback to allow students to self-correct if necessary. Depending on the time frame of your activity, you may be able to complete 2 or 3 guided practice activities before you have the students complete the independent practice. The time spent on this section will vary depending on the grade level for which the plan is designed.

· Independent Practice: The Independent Practice is designed to allow the students to practice without the help of their peers. The teacher can still walk around and assist students with this activity. (Note that this should not be a group activity, nor should it be a repeat of the Guided Practice.) This assignment must be completed in class and before the Closure. This assignment can’t be used as the Summative Assessment.

· Closure: How will you tie your lesson together and bring it to a close? This will be a short summary/review of the material taught in the lesson. This section will take only a few minutes.

· Summative Assessment: This section should include your assessment. The assessment should match the objective that you wrote at the beginning of the lesson plan. Students should complete the assessment on their own. The results from the Summative Assessment provides information to the teacher and helps determine whether the lesson was mastered, needs to be retaught, or whether individual students may need additional help. These results will guide future planning.

Materials, Technology, and Diversity/Differentiation

· Materials: Continue to correct any mistakes within the Lesson Plan and highlight them in yellow so they are easy to identify. Then, fill in your Materials and Technology sections. First, decide what materials you are going to need to teach your lesson; list them in the space provided. Beside each material listed, give a brief explanation of how that material is to be used within the lesson.

· Technology: Next, you will be adding various technology options to the lesson. This section would include the use of computers, smart boards, overhead projectors, video or audio clips, etc. Again, there is a lot of technology available to use if you are willing to search for it; be creative and diverse with your technology integration. Explain how you would incorporate the technology you chose into the lesson, and explain how the technology will benefit the teacher, the students, and the lesson itself. Be sure to include viable links for any websites, online video or audio clips, games, etc., that you find on the Internet.

· Diversity/Differentiation: Think about how you are going to differentiate your lesson to meet the needs of all learners in your classroom (this includes physical and learning disabilities, behavior disorders, gifted students, and ESL students, as well as the different learning modalities: visual, auditory, and kinesthetic). Explain how you will modify your instruction, activities, or assignments to meet the needs of each type of learner. (Do not depend on having aids or tutors to help you). Be specific in the description of your differentiation so it is clear why you are doing this and how it will benefit each learner. Follow the tips below for each type of learner:

· Gifted: Gifted students resent having more work to do just because they understand the concepts more readily. Instead, try giving them an alternate activity/assignment that is more challenging and allows them to reach the higher order thinking skills.

· LEP: These students typically have language barriers. Think about how you can adjust your instruction, activities, or assignments to better help them understand.

· LD, ED, ADD: Many times, students in this group are dealing with behavior issues. How can you align your instruction, activities, or assignments to best meet their needs?

· Multicultural Connections: The students in your class will most likely represent more than one culture. How can your lesson, activities, or assignments help include the value of all cultures?

· Learning Styles (Auditory, Visual, Kinesthetic): Each one of these has specific needs. Think through what you could modify in your lesson to accomodate them.

· Multiple Intelligences: How will you modify your instruction, activities, or assignments to best enhance these important areas?

· Impact on Instructional Design: How is the lesson differentiated to meet the specifici needs of students with Intellectual Disabilities? What accommodations can be provided?

Page 6 of 6

Discussion Thread: Transition Partners

EDSP 370

Discussion Assignment Instructions

 

The candidate will complete 4 Discussions in this course. The candidate will post one thread of at least 400 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. The candidate must then post 2 replies of at least 250 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the assigned Module: Week. For each thread, candidates must support their assertions with at least 1 scholarly citation in APA format. Each reply must incorporate at least 1 scholarly citation in APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include educational websites, journal articles, the textbooks, and the Bible

Education philosophy and the curriculum 1 2

Administrator
File Attachment
2000c600coverv05b.jpg

 

Curriculum Development in Nursing

Process and Innovations Education for nurses and allied health professionals is being radically overhauled both in the UK and overseas. Curriculum Development in Nursing offers nurse educators a single text that covers curriculum development processes, and highlights case study examples of innovation in approaches to nurse education. The book has been written by internationally well-known authors, who take a truly international perspective looking at education in the UK, Europe and the US, as well as in Africa and the Middle East.

This book will be an essential guide to curriculum development and will be an invaluable resource for nurse educators and postgraduate nursing students internationally.

Leana R.Uys is Deputy Vice Chancellor of the University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa and also Head of the College of Health Sciences at the same university.

Nomthandazo S.Gwele was Professor and Head of the School of Nursing, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa during the preparation of this book, but is currently Executive Dean of Health Sciences at the Durban Institute of Technology in South Africa.

 

 

Curriculum Development in Nursing Process and Innovations

Leana R Uys and Nomthandazo S Gwele

 

LONDON AND NEW YORK

 

 

First published in 2005 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN

Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001

Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005.

“ To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to http://www.ebookstore.tandf.co.uk/.”

© 2005 selection and editorial matter, Leana R Uys and Nomthandazo S Gwele; individual chapters, the contributors.

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanlcal, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including

photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.

British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library

Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book has been requested

ISBN 0-203-31334-8 Master e-book ISBN

ISBN 0-415-34629-0 (hbk) ISBN 0-415-34630-4 (pbk)

 

 

Contents

 

Preface v

Contributors vii

Abbreviations ix

Glossary x

1. Education philosophy and the curriculum 1 2. An overview of the process of curriculum development 20 3. Establishing the context and foundations 30 4. Developing a macro-curriculum 40 5. Developing a micro-curriculum 61 6. Implementing a new curriculum 82 7. Curriculum evaluation 98 8. A problem-based learning curriculum 112 9. A case-based curriculum 128

10. Developing problem scenarios and cases 140 11. Developing a community-based nursing education 153 12. Developing an outcomes-based curriculum 176 13. A curriculum for interprofessional learning 195 14. Conclusion 204

Index 207

 

 

Preface

 

Nurse educators always have a dual role—they are both nurses and educators. As nurses they often have a specialty, such as psychiatric nursing or nephrology nursing, and they need to keep up with developments in that specialty, both in terms of the literature and the practice. When such nurses become educators, they also have to master the field of education, and keep up with what is new in the field of education, both in terms of theory and practice. We therefore believe that such nurse educators need constructive, stimulating and up-to-date texts to assist them in their task as educators of the new generation of nurses.

Nursing and midwifery are facing increasing demands the world over, but especially in developing countries. Healthcare quality is often dependent on the quality of nurses and midwives, since they provide the bulk of the human resource capacity. Their traditional hospital-based, lecturer-dependent and narrowly focused training often does little, however, to prepare them for the realities they face in practice in under-served areas, where they need to work and think independently, and where they need to lead the health team and the community. The fact that resources are often scarce, and support for nursing education compares poorly with that for medical education, does not help. The challenge is therefore often how to do more with less.

We, Leana and Thandi, have been active in our own country, and internationally, assisting nurse educators to interrogate their own curricula, their own teaching practice and their own views on nursing education. In many places we have found enthusiastic colleagues who want to deliver quality nursing education, but who are caught in old paradigms, and outdated methods. Often they have had limited exposure to higher education settings, but are expected to develop new nursing schools in universities. In such circumstances they often carry poor educational practices from other settings into new programmes and schools. Under pressure to develop new curricula fast with limited resources, and implement these curricula for groups of students used to traditional teaching/learning, they fall back on what they have been used to in their own school and nursing education.

As we worked in such settings over time, we often felt the need for a book that we could leave with them to assist them when we had left. We could find nothing that articulated our belief in innovative process-outcome curricula, based on solid preparation of the curriculum, staff and students. There was nothing that gave the simple information one needs when leading a nursing programme: how you plan for clinical learning experiences, how you decide how much clinical learning is enough, how you balance process with content and outcomes.

 

 

The purpose of this book is to offer nurse-educators a single textbook that brings together two aspects:

• the generic process, outlining each step carefully to support faculty who actually have to develop a curriculum, and

• innovative approaches which have developed over the last 20 years, and are still new to most nurse-educators.

This book gives enough detail to enable a group of nurse educators to use it to work through the process of developing a curriculum. It is a ‘how to’ guide, but it outlines adequately the theoretical and philosophical reasoning behind the decisions made. It also gives more detail of specific types of innovative curricula, to support groups who want to implement such models. Since most of the authors are second-language English speakers, the writing is usually easy to understand, and is also illustrated with examples, both in the text and in the form of recommended readings.

Chapter 1 provides a philosophical basis for the process of curriculum development, and anchors the more practical chapters which follow.

Chapters 2–7 deal with the process of curriculum development, implementation and evaluation. In each chapter one step of the process is described, explaining what it entails, and how the educators should go about completing the tasks.

Chapters 8–13 give examples of the more common types of innovative curricula. In each case the author deals with the characteristics of the specific type of curriculum, the advantages and disadvantages, and then describes the specific tasks involved in developing such a curriculum. The specifics about the implementation of each kind of curriculum are also given, and often the author refers to a real life curriculum as an example. Since more than one type of curriculum uses cases of problem-scenarios, one chapter (Chapter 10) is dedicated to the development of such components. Problem- based, case-based, outcomesbased, community-based and interprofessional learning are all innovations that have built up some credibility over the last 20 years, but can still all be seen as innovative.

At the end of each chapter we recommend a few readings which give examples of either research done in the topic covered by the chapter, or give a description of implementation of the topic of the chapter. For instance, at the end of Chapter 6 on the implementation of a new curriculum, one article describes an example of such an implementation process, while the other describes a research project on staff concerns during the implementation project. We also list one or two points for discussion, to assist groups to engage around the issues raised in the chapter. Having read and studied the chapter the reader might be stimulated by these points to apply the new knowledge, or search further for answers.

Curriculum development is something all the authors of this book feel passionately about. We hope that the book will stimulate readers to create something new in nursing and midwifery education, and to facilitate the creation of a new cadre of nurses and midwives who can confidently lead us towards the ideal of ‘Health for All’.

Leana Uys and Nomthandazo Gwele Durban, March, 2005

 

 

Contributors

 

Henry Y Akinsola is a registered nurse and a registered nurse tutor. He trained in Nigeria as a diploma nurse in 1973. He did his first degree (B.Sc. in Nursing, 1978) and PhD in Community Health (1991) at the University of Ibadan, Nigeria. He holds the degree Master of Science in Community Medicine from the University of Manchester, England (1983). He has been involved in the training of nurses and doctors for the past 21 years, having worked in Universities in several African countries, including Nigeria, Kenya and Botswana. Currently he is the team leader of project designed to integrate quality assurance principles in the nursing training curricula of the College of Nursing and Health Technology, Ministry of Health, Asmara, Eritrea.

Nomthandazo S Gwele (Thandi) is a registered nurse and midwife, and a registered nurse educator. She started her nursing career in a Diploma programme at Frere Hospital in East London, South Africa. While working as a midwife and a community health nurse, she obtained her BA (Nursing) in 1984 from the University of South Africa. In 1985 she travelled to the USA on a bursary, and obtained both the M Education and the MS (Nursing) at the University of Missouri-Columbia before returning to South Africa. Having worked at the University of Transkei, she joined the staff of the University of Natal (now KwaZulu-Natal) in 1992, where she obtained her PhD in 1994. Over the last 10 years she has acted as curriculum consultant to numerous nursing colleges and universities in South Africa, she also worked closely with the Nursing Institute of the United Arab Emirates. She was Head of the School of Nursing at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.

Marilyn R Lee began her nursing career in 1971 as a Staff Nurse after completing her Diploma in Nursing at the Barnes Hospital School of Nursing in St. Louis, Missouri, USA. She was Head Nurse, Clinical Nurse and Inservice Instructor there over the next 10 years. She subsequently obtained BSN (1976) and BA (1975) from the University of St. Louis and her M Nursing (1982) from the University of South Carolina. In 1983 she taught in the School of Nursing at McMaster University, where for the next 16 years she taught nursing students using problem- and case-based approaches to learning in Canada and later in Pakistan. While in Pakistan, she was coordinator and team leader in two projects in nursing education and leadership development. She received her PhD in Nursing from Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA in 1996. In 1999 she moved to the University of Botswana (in Gabarone), where she is currently the first Deputy Director in the new Academic Programme Review Unit.

Fikile Mtshali is a registered nurse and midwife, and also registered operating room nurse, nurse educator and nurse administrator. She has worked in a range of clinical

 

 

settings for many years before embarking on an academic career. She obtained her PhD in 2003 with a study on Community-based Education in nursing in South Africa. She has been working as a consultant in different African countries, including Rwanda and Tanzania, as part of the work of the School of Nursing at the University of KwaZulu-Natal. She is currently Post-graduate Programme Director in the School of Nursing, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.

Mouzza Suwaileh graduated from the B.Sc Nursing programme in the College of Health Sciences in 1987, and also has a qualification in health professional education from the same institution. She obtained an M.Sc in Adult Health Nursing from the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston in 1990 and then a PhD in Nursing from the University of Texas in Austin, USA. She also did a Diploma in Health Care Management from Royal College of Surgeons, Ireland in 2002. She worked in various units in Bahrain hospitals, and is a certified haemodialysis nurse. She is currently the Chairperson of the Nursing Division at the College of Health Sciences, Kingdom of Bahrain, and the Director of WHO Collaborating Center for Nursing Development, Kingdom of Bahrain.