Develop twelve assessment questions that assess organizational leadership.

/in /by

Assignment Content

Develop twelve assessment questions that assess organizational leadership.

Refer to these questions to help you write your assessment questions:

l What is the average employee’s appearance? How formal is it?

l What is the style of communication in the organization?

l What is the compensation structure (hourly, salary, bonuses, what are bonuses based on)?

l Is there flexibility in hours worked? Can employees work remotely?

l Do employees work in offices, cubicles, rotating desks? Are there lots of conference rooms or areas where employees can collaborate?

l How does the company use social media? How do employees use social media?

l Who are the official leaders of the organization like? How do they lead?

l Are there unofficial leaders in the organization or in individual departments?

l What are company policies like?

l What is the employee handbook like?

Create a 12- to 15-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation paragraphs that addresses a total of 12 questions for the cultural assessment. In your presentation, each question should include an explanation of how these factors contribute to:

l Job satisfaction

l Employee motivation

l Team culture

l Overall organizational culture

You must support opinions and any facts by citing credible sources in the body of the assignment and listing the references including at least one scholarly reference in APA style. Every slide needs at least 100 words of speaker notes in complete sentences.

Format your presentation according to APA guidelines.

***Please Include Introduction, Conclusion, and Subtitle Questions***

***At least 100 words per question***

***At least 4 scholarly references***

***Do not create slides, Only speaker notes***

***Please include bullet points of main points for slide at the beginning of the paragraph***

Relate the concept to personality development.

/in /by

Write an outline of your research paper. Refer to Topic 7 for details regarding the Research Project due at the end of Topic 7.

Your outline should be 500-750 words, not including the required APA-formatted reference page and cover page.

Use the following as a guide to your research:

  1. Affirm your thesis on the approved personality psychology topic you have selected. Why is it important?
  2. Evaluate relevant and valid research that reflects the ethical standards in the discipline of personality psychology.
  3. Relate the concept to personality development.
  4. Utilize research to validate your ideas and supporting claims.

The instructor will provide feedback with the expectation that feedback is incorporated into your final research paper due at the end of Topic 7.

Use only peer-reviewed, scholarly sources.

This assignment uses a scoring guide. Please review the guide prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

PSY-255 Personality Research Paper Outline

 

Topic:

Thesis Statement:

1st Main Point: That Serves to Prove Your Thesis:

· 1st piece of research That Supports this Main Point (citation)

· How does this article support this main point (key ideas)

 

· 2nd piece of research That Supports this Main Point (citation)

· How does this article support this main point (key ideas)

2nd Main Point: That Serves to Prove Your Thesis:

· 1st piece of research That Supports this Main Point (citation)

· How does this article support this main point (key ideas)

 

· 2nd piece of research That Supports this Main Point (citation)

· How does this article support this main point (key ideas)

3rd Main Point that Serves to Prove your Thesis

· 1st piece of research That Supports this Main Point (citation)

· How does this article support this main point (key ideas)

 

· 2nd piece of research That Supports this Main Point (citation)

· How does this article support this main point (key ideas)

Conclusion What Have You found in your research and how does this apply to your thesis:

Is there a confounding variable that the colleague did not detect? Provide your rationale.

/in /by

please create a discussion response fro the following post :

McCann and Holmes (1984) tested the hypothesis that exercise reduces depression. They randomly assigned depressed undergraduate women either to an exercise condition (attending an aerobics class a couple of times a week for ten weeks) or to a relaxation training condition (the individuals relaxed at home by watching a videotape over the same period of time). Although the results showed that the exercise group reported less depression at the end of the ten-week period than did the relaxation group, why can’t the researchers conclude that exercise reduces depression?

——————————————————-

I picked the scenario above because there were so many confounding variables. There is honestly no way that they could conclude that exercise reduces depression because there are too many unknown variables (Stangor 2014). Maybe this test occurred in spring when many people are coming out of their seasonal depression. Or maybe some of the subjects started antidepressants or began doing something that increases their happiness, like meeting a new person or getting a promotion. It also would make sense that a group that is forced to stay home would show higher rates of depression. This has been evidenced by the Coronavirus. The problem with this type of scenario is that it has demand characteristics because the subjects know what type of test they are in and can influence the data produced.

A possible way to limit the number of confounding variables might be a two-way factorial design. “Factorial designs involve the addition of new independent variables to one-way experiments, often with the goal of finding out whether the original results will hold up in new situations” (Stangor 2014). By adding onto the original test, or limiting the number of possible outcomes, they could narrow down the confounding variables. They could also use a repeated measure design, but the variables would likely change just as often as before so it would be difficult to limit.

Stangor, C. (2014). Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences. [MBS Direct]. Retrieved from https://mbsdirect.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781305981805/

please create a response to the above post, following the requirements below

Respond to at least one colleague who selected a different scenario than you did. Provide feedback by addressing one of the following:

  • Is there a confounding variable that the colleague did not detect? Provide your rationale.
  • Is there a variable identified that you do not agree to be a confounding variable? Provide your rationale.
  • Comment on your colleague’s proposed alternative method to eliminate the confounding variable(s). How might you remedy the confounding variable(s) differently?