Name three estimates of a test’s inter-item consistency.

PSY 550 Midterm
Short Answers
The 25 questions below are worth 4 points each.
1. What is the key difference between psychological testing and psychological assess-

ment?
2. Name three estimates of a test’s inter-item consistency.

3. From the intelligence test data he gathered at Ellis Island, Henry Goddard concluded

that many of the people attempting to immigrate to the United States were “feebleminded.” What was this claim based on?
4. What do test developers do to address test-taker guessing?
5. In order to conduct research using human subjects, a university requires re-

searchers to complete an online ethics course and then correctly respond to all of
the items of the test on that material. What kind of test could this BEST be characterized as?

6. As compared to one-on-one and face-to-face assessments, what is one disadvan-

tage of CAPA?

7. According information presented in the modules, what are at least two characteris-

tics about psychological traits?

8. The U.S. Navy is highly selective when it comes to applications for Navy SEAL train-

ing. What kind of distribution of test scores on a Navy SEAL Qualifying and Screening Examination administered to a class of high school seniors would be expected to
yield?
9. Describe an anchor protocol.

10. What is a halo effect?

11. Why is a normal distribution of scores desirable?

12. Give an example of an incidental sample.

13. What kind of utility analysis is most likely to be utilized when the purpose is the an-

swer some finance-related question with a dollars-and-cents?

14. What need did the first group intelligence testing fulfill?

15. What is the relationship between test reliability and standard error of measurement?
16. Jana takes a personality test administered by the True Compatibility Dating Service.

According to the personalized, computerized personality profile that results, Jana
learns that her need for exhibitionism is much greater than her need for stability.
Since the test analyzes data only with regard to Jana, and no other client of the dating service, what kind of scoring was utilized?
17. What kinds of concerns or issues arise if accommodation is made for the purpose of

administering a test?

18. What is the ultimate purpose or end point of a utility analysis?

19. The directions for scoring a particular motor ability test instruct the examiner to “give

credit if the child holds his or her hands open most of the time.” Because what
constitutes “most of the time” is not specifically defined, directions such as these
could result in lowered reliability estimates for what kind of reliability?

20. Give an example of convergent evidence of construct validity.
21. What is coefficient alpha an expression of?
22. If someone tells you what their recently measured “IQ” is, what value is that person

most likely giving you?

23. You are interested in developing a test for social adjustment in a college fraternity or

sorority. You begin by interviewing persons who had graduated from college after
having been a member of a fraternity or sorority for at least two years. What stage of
test development are you in and what would you do next?
24. What factors affect the generalizability of findings from a particular test?

25. Describe the relationship between the cut score and the selection ratio.

Essay Questions
The essay questions below are worth 10 points each.
26. Identify at least three different tools of psychological assessment and review the

benefits and liabilities of utilizing these tools.

27. Consider issues of diversity reviewed thus far in the course. Identify and discuss the

issues of diversity related to psychological assessment and rights of test-takers with
someone of a different culture, language background, and ability.

28. Describe the forms and sources of error and how error contributes to reliability.

29. Part of test utility includes cut scores. Describe two kinds of cut scores, two ways

that cut scores are established, and at least two different problems that can arise
with cut scores.

30. Compare and contrast what makes a good test with what makes a good test item.

Analyze the role of perception in cognitive psychology.

PSY/360 Week 3 – Learning Team Assignment – Visual Ambiguity Presentation  – A+ & Original Guaranteed!

 

PSY/410

University of Phoenix, Axia College

Original, cited, no plagiarism

Use as a guide!

 

If you purchase this: Thanks for purchasing my tutorial! Open the attached file to get the paper/solutions. If you have any questions, comments, or concerns, please let me know! I can help you with future courses. Thanks again! Free feel to PM me, or send me a message at:

 

algebraexpert @ homeworkmarket.com

 

LEARNING TEAMS

 

Due Day 6 (Sunday):  Visual Ambiguity Presentation (10 points)

 

Locate an example of a visual ambiguity or distortion.

 

Prepare an 8- to 12-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation with presenter notes in which you present your example to the rest of the class.

 

Discuss the following:

 

o    Discuss how the visual system resolves ambiguities by making different types of assumptions and describe these assumptions.

o    Analyze the role of perception in cognitive psychology.

 

o    Discuss the importance of visual perception in cognitive processes.

 

Define language and lexicon.

PSY/360 Week 5 – Individual Assignment – Language Paper  – A+ & Original Guaranteed!

 

PSY/410

University of Phoenix, Axia College

Original, cited, no plagiarism

Use as a guide!

 

If you purchase this: Thanks for purchasing my tutorial! Open the attached file to get the paper/solutions. If you have any questions, comments, or concerns, please let me know! I can help you with future courses. Thanks again! Free feel to PM me, or send me a message at:

 

algebraexpert @ homeworkmarket.com

 

Due Day 7 (Monday):  Language Paper (12 points):  This paper should be posted as a Word attachment in the Assignment Section and should be consistent with APA guidelines.  Prepare a 1050 to 1400-word paper in which you examine language as it relates to cognition.  Address the following:

 

o    Define language and lexicon.

o    Evaluate the key features of language.

o    Describe the four levels of language structure and processing.

o    Analyze the role of language processing in cognitive psychology.

 

o    Be sure to include your Certificate of Originality which can be found either as a Word document in the Course Materials or also accessed through the Center for Writing Excellence.

Assignment 2: Ethical (Moral) Relativism

Assignment 2: Ethical (Moral) Relativism

In America, many are comfortable describing ethics as follows: “Well, what’s right for me is right for me and what’s right for you is right for you. Let’s just agree to disagree.” This is an affirmation of what philosophers call individual or subjective moral relativism. In this understanding of relativism, morality is a matter of individual feelings and personal preference. In individual moral relativism, the determination of what is right and wrong in a situation varies according to the individual. Moral relativists do not believe in natural law or universal truths.

Cultural moral relativism puts culture at the forefront of relative ethical decision-making.  It says the individual must include the precepts of his or her culture as a prominent part of the relativistic moral action.

Lawrence Kohlberg, a prominent psychologist known for recognizing moral stages of development, takes it a step farther saying cultural relativists are persons stuck in the “Conventional Stage” of ethical development.

In your paper, please define individual moral relativism and cultural moral relativism in detail, noting how they differ from each other, their strengths and weaknesses, and give your position on Kohlberg’s stance on ethical relativism.
What aspects of ethical relativism do you identify and agree with? What aspects do you disagree with?  Give a personal example that illustrates your stance on ethical relativism, describing how you made a moral decision in an ethical dilemma.  Include at least two references to support your thoughts.

Post a 500-word paper to the M4: Assignment 2 Dropbox by due Wednesday, July 9, 2014. All written assignments and responses should follow proper citation rules for attributing sources. Please use Microsoft Word spelling/grammar checker. Be mindful of plagiarism policies.

Assignment 2 Grading Criteria
Maximum Points
Significant critical analysis of individual ethical relativism, cultural ethical relativism, and Kohlberg’s position; including definitions, strengths, and weaknesses.
36
Described personal ethical stances on each form of relativism in relation to own personal ethical system, including whether and how personal ethical system is compatible or incompatible with relativism.
24
Used a personal example to illustrate and support stance on ethical relativism in relation to own ethical system.
16
Justified ideas and responses by using appropriate scholarly examples and at least two references from texts, Web sites, and other references.
4
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
20
Total:
100