How can a “researcher acting as an instrument” in a qualitative study best ensure the trustworthiness of the data analysis and the conclusions?

1.  How can a “researcher acting as an instrument” in a qualitative study best ensure the trustworthiness of the data analysis and the conclusions?

2.  The study of how ideas developed over time is a type of conceptual or psychological historical research. Identify a key concept in your own discipline and describe in detail the types of primary sources you could use to understand its history, explaining what each source might add to the study.

3.  A medical researcher is concerned about mistakenly concluding that a new medication is effective when it really is not. What type of error is the researcher concerned about making (Type I or Type II)? Describe what the researcher might do to decrease the likelihood of making that type of error. Discuss ramifications of your suggested approach for other types of error in the study.

4.  Throughout your textbook the authors return to the importance of interpreting the findings of a research project. Explain why this is an essential element in a high-quality research report.

5.  What impact might research methods have on the future of the field of psychology?

Directions: Questions 1-4 are to be answered in 150 words or more with references under each question.

The Development Of Experimental Psychology In Mexico

Book: Schultz, D.P., & Schultz, S.E. (2012). A History of Modern Psychology, (Ed. 10th)

Background Information:

From a historical perspective, the discipline of psychology was not developed or practiced in a non-western world. Or was it? Though the authors of our textbook describe in great detail the history of modern psychology from a western perspective, they virtually ignore the development of psychology outside of Europe and the U.S. Contrary to Schultz & Schultz (2012) historical worldview, the psychological discipline was flourishing in places outside Europe and the U.S., particularly in Latin America. However, due to the dominant western culture in the field of psychology, research conducted in societies, such as Latin America, has been virtually ignored. Therefore, for the Discussion Forum, we are going to take a glimpse into experimental psychology in Mexico and how this compares to Wundt’s experimental psychology.

Instructions:

  1. Read the journal article by Rogelio Escobar (2014). Attached Below
  2. Read Chapter 4 in your textbook.
  3. Include all of the following in your Discussion Forum post:
    1. In a few sentences summarize the history of psychology in Mexico.
    2. Briefly describe the development of experimental psychology in Mexico.
    3. Identify the main founders of experimental psychology in Mexico.
    4. Summarize the main differences between Wundt’s experimental psychology and experimental psychology in Mexico.
    5. Briefly discuss why it is important to understand psychology and its development outside of a western context. 
      • Make initial post
      • 250-300 words

        HE INSTRUMENTS IN THE FIRST PSYCHOLOGICAL LABORATORY IN MEXICO

        Antecedents, Influence, and Methods

        Rogelio Escobar National Autonomous University of Mexico

        Enrique O. Aragón established the first psychological laboratory in Mexico in 1916. This laboratory was inspired by Wundt’s laboratory and by those created afterward in Germany and the United States. It was equipped with state-of-the art instruments imported from Germany in 1902 from Ernst Zimmermann who supplied instruments for Wundt’s laboratory. Although previous authors have described the social events leading to the creation of the laboratory, there are limited descriptions of the instru- ments, their use, and their influence. With the aid of archival resources, the initial location of the laboratory was determined. The analysis of instruments revealed a previously overlooked relation with a previous laboratory of experimental physiology. The influence of the laboratory was traced by describing the careers of 4 students, 3 of them women, who worked with the instruments during the first 2 decades of the 20th century, each becoming accomplished scholars. In addition, this article, by identifying and analyzing the instruments shown in photographs of the psychological laboratory and in 1 motion film, provides information of the class demonstrations and the experiments conducted in this laboratory.

        Keywords: psychological laboratory in Mexico, psychology in Latin America, history of exper- imental psychology, National Autonomous University of Mexico, brass instruments

        When Wundt established the first psycholog- ical laboratory in Leipzig in 1879, psychology took the crucial step toward becoming an ex- perimental science. Soon afterward, psycholog- ical laboratories resembling the one in Leipzig were established in many countries. In Latin America, for example, laboratories were created in Argentina, Chile, Mexico, and Brazil be- tween 1898 and 1923 (e.g., Ardila, 1986). These laboratories accompanied the first courses in

        experimental psychology in the region and set the foundations for societies, institutes, and schools of psychology (Sánchez-Sosa & Val- derrama-Iturbe, 2001). In Mexico, for example, the history of the Faculty (Department) of Psy- chology of the National Autonomous Univer- sity of Mexico (UNAM) can be traced back to the establishment of the first psychological lab- oratory.

        This article narrates the history of the first psychological laboratory in Mexico focusing on the scientific instruments in the laboratory, how they were used, and how their use affected the development of psychology in Mexico. It de- scribes how the psychological laboratory was related to a previous laboratory of experimental physiology in which instruments similar to those in the psychological laboratory were used. The influence of the psychological laboratory on the development of psychology in Mexico was determined by examining the careers of four students, three of them women, who used the instruments in the first courses of experi- mental psychology. Furthermore, an attempt was made to identify the instruments shown in

        The author is indebted to Andy Lattal, Armin Stock, and Alicia Roca for their comments on previous versions of this article. This article was possible thanks to the staff of the Library and the Documentation Center of the Faculty of Psychology of UNAM, to Jesica Martínez Rosas and the staff of the Historical Archives of UNAM, to Rafael Malagón Becerril (Archive of the General Direction of Personnel of UNAM), and to Isabel Chong de la Cruz (Antique Repository and Special Collections, Central Li- brary, UNAM).

        Correspondence concerning this article should be ad- dressed to Rogelio Escobar, Facultad de Psicología, Uni- versidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Av. Universidad 3004. Col. Copilco-Universidad. C.P. 04510. E-mail: rescobar@unam.mx

        T hi

        s do

        cu m

        en t

        is co

        py ri

        gh te

        d by

        th e

        A m

        er ic

        an Ps

        yc ho

        lo gi

        ca l

        A ss

        oc ia

        tio n

        or on

        e of

        its al

        lie d

        pu bl

        is he

        rs .

        T hi

        s ar

        tic le

        is in

        te nd

        ed so

        le ly

        fo r

        th e

        pe rs

        on al

        us e

        of th

        e in

        di vi

        du al

        us er

        an d

        is no

        t to

        be di

        ss em

        in at

        ed br

        oa dl

        y.

        History of Psychology © 2014 American Psychological Association 2014, Vol. 17, No. 4, 296–311 1093-4510/14/$12.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0038038

        296

         

        http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0038038

         

        the five known photographs of the laboratory and in one motion film, which are part of the collection of the Faculty of Psychology of UNAM. For some of these instruments, there is no historical evidence other than brief descrip- tions in the trade catalogs of the suppliers, most of them in German. By describing the instru- ments in the first psychological laboratory in México and analyzing their use and influence, this article attempts to extend the knowledge of the instruments and how laboratories were or- ganized around their use during the “brass in- strument era” of psychology, the period when the tradition of experimentation in psychology arose. Because most previous descriptions of the first psychological laboratory in Mexico are in Spanish (but see Colotla & Jurado, 1983; Sánchez-Sosa & Valderrama-Iturbe, 2001, for brief descriptions of the psychological labora- tory in Mexico in English), this article also attempts to broaden knowledge of the labora- tory in Mexico to non-Spanish-speaking psy- chologists.

        The Psychological Laboratory in Mexico

        The first psychological laboratory in Mexico was established in 1916 by Enrique O. Aragón1

        in the National School of High Studies (ENAE) that, at the time, was part of the National Uni- versity of Mexico, now UNAM. This laboratory was mainly dedicated to course demonstrations but some basic and applied projects also were conducted (Aragón, 1939/1943). The instru- ments used in this laboratory arrived in Mexico 14 years earlier, at which time the National University of Mexico was not even estab- lished.2 These instruments were imported from Germany in 1902 under the government of Pres- ident Porfirio Diáz3 and were planned to be used in the courses of psychology in the National Preparatory School and the Normal School for Teachers (Informe leído por el presidente de la republica, 1902). Although these instruments were most likely requested by Ezequiel A. Chávez,4 there are no records of the use of the instruments until 1916.

        By 1902, Chávez, considered consensually to be the first Mexican psychologist (see Baldwin, 1906; Díaz-Guerrero, 1976), was teaching ex- perimental psychology in the National Prepara- tory School. Based on his readings of James, Dewey, Ribot, Titchener, and Spencer, among

        others, he prepared the courses that started in 1897, and convinced the school authorities of the importance of experimental psychology lab- oratories in Germany and the United States5

        (see Álvarez Díaz de León, 2011). Chávez translated Titchener’s A Primer of Psychology (Titchener, 1902, 1904/1907) into Spanish and used it as a textbook for his courses. Aragón was a student in this course in 1897. It is unclear why there are no records of the use of the instruments in the courses in the National Pre- paratory School. One explanation is that the instruments never reached the Preparatory School. According to 19166 archival records, the instruments were assigned to the Normal School for Teachers, where demonstrations of psychological phenomena were not a priority, and the instruments thus remained in storage for several years. Furthermore, in 1903 Chávez, following the leadership of Justo Sierra,7 fo- cused on the project of creating the National University of Mexico.

        It is worth mentioning that although it was suggested that James Mark Baldwin set up the psychological laboratory during his visits to Mexico (Kitson, 1953), the instruments were obtained 3 years before his first visit in 1905. Baldwin returned to Mexico to teach psychoso- ciology courses in 1910 and in 1913, but the instruments apparently were not used until 1916. Therefore, Baldwin’s contribution to the foundation of the laboratory in Mexico is un- clear (Gallegos, 1980, 1983). What is apparent is that Baldwin and Chávez had a close rela- tionship after Baldwin’s visits to Mexico (see, e.g., Baldwin’s dedication of his book, History of Psychology [1913], to Chávez).

        According to Valderrama-Iturbe (2004), some of the instruments suffered from a lack of use and in 1914 were transferred to the National Preparatory School. There they were partially repaired by the head of the physics laboratory, Alberto S. Cardenas, who had experience re- pairing related instruments. Two years later, Aragón was selected to teach courses in Exper- imental Psychology at ENAE, which in 1910 had become part of the newly created National University of Mexico. The main purposes of ENAE, today the Faculty of Philosophy and Literature, were to develop research in special- ized fields and to train new researchers and teachers. Therefore, Aragón requested the equipment in 1916 for research and course dem-

        297PSYCHOLOGICAL LABORATORY IN MEXICO

        T hi

        s do

        cu m

        en t

        is co

        py ri

        gh te

        d by

        th e

        A m

        er ic

        an Ps

        yc ho

        lo gi

        ca l

        A ss

        oc ia

        tio n

        or on

        e of

        its al

        lie d

        pu bl

        is he

        rs .

        T hi

        s ar

        tic le

        is in

        te nd

        ed so

        le ly

        fo r

        th e

        pe rs

        on al

        us e

        of th

        e in

        di vi

        du al

        us er

        an d

        is no

        t to

        be di

        ss em

        in at

        ed br

        oa dl

        y.

         

         

        onstration8 and, thanks to the support of the head of the School, Miguel Schultz,9 he re- ceived those instruments on April 23, 1916.10

        Further details of the location of the labora- tory are in order given some previous inaccurate descriptions (Curiel-Benfield, 1962; Jurado, 1983). Based on a series of reports of the con- cierge of ENAE,10,11, it was determined that the instruments were installed in two rooms in the ground floor of the building known as El Pala- cio de la Autonomía (Palace of the Autonomy), which is an emblematic building in the history of UNAM.

        The Palace of the Autonomy is located in downtown Mexico City in the corner formed by Licenciado Verdad Street and República de Guatemala Street. It was built in 1890 and originally housed the Normal School for Teach- ers. In 1910, it housed ENAE and the main offices of the National University of Mexico. The building was renamed Palace of the Auton- omy in 2004 to commemorate that in 1929, in this building, the National University of Mexico became autonomous, thus gaining control over the curricula and the budget without interven- tion of the government.

        The concierge of the Palace of the Auton- omy, Maclovio Vega, who reported daily inci- dents, on April 23, 1916, observed that the instruments for Aragón’s class arrived to the building on a moving truck:

        At noon, a truck arrived carrying several drawers with apparatus and loose apparatus for the Psychology class. There was a large apparatus, two large tables, and a sort of cupboard with a large marble stone top. The apparatus were too big to place inside Classroom 3 so they were placed inside Classroom 410 (adapted and translated by the present author).

        Some days later the concierge reported that the instruments were moved to the ground floor and occupied two rooms previously used by the library of public instruction and the bulletin of public instruction.

        The location of the laboratory was important for, at least, three reasons: The building was originally used for the National School for Teachers; therefore, it was probably considered a place in which teachers, a profession accept- able for women at the time, were educated. The second was that the laboratory shared location with the offices of the National University of Mexico. When the laboratory was inaugurated in 1916, a conference for the authorities of the

        university, demonstrating how the instruments were used, was scheduled. Third, the centrally located building was used to the advantage of the Mexican army during the Mexican revolu- tion. According to the concierge reports, the classes were often interrupted or cancelled be- cause of military exercise.10 These continuous interruptions could have determined that, during the first years, the laboratory was mainly used for class demonstrations. Around 1935, the lab- oratory and ENAE were relocated to the colo- nial style building known as Casa de los Mas- carones (house of the masks; Ruiz-Gaytan, 1954). Afterward, the location of the laboratory alternated between the Palace of the Autonomy and Casa de los Mascarones (Curiel-Benfield, 1962; Ruiz-Gaytan, 1954). These changes were probably the origin of a confusion of the initial location of the laboratory.

        Aragón prepared the instruments11 and the electrical connections (many of the instruments operated on DC) and lectured for the first time using some of the instruments on June 9, 1916.12 After the instruments were properly set up, on October 27, 1916, a conference intended for the authorities of the University, took place.13 Three newspaper articles were pub- lished describing some of the demonstrations that were presented (Conferencia, 1916; Cre- ación y funcionamiento del gabinete, 1916; Cre- ación y funcionamiento del g., 1916). An Eng- lish translation of one of the press articles from El Nacional is shown in the Appendix. The description of the experiments, which is similar in the three articles, was important for identify- ing some of the instruments and their use in the laboratory.

        Antecedents of the Laboratory

        Before Aragón was assigned to teach exper- imental psychology classes, he graduated as a physician in 1904. In 1905, he was in charge of the laboratory of medical physics and medical natural science in the National School of Med- icine, where he was responsible for preparing the instruments for demonstrations (Menéndez- Menéndez, 1994). It is unclear how Aragón started working with instruments, but most likely his interest was piqued by his courses on anatomy and experimental physiology, taken when he was a medical student from 1897 to 1904.14

        298 ESCOBAR

        T hi

        s do

        cu m

        en t

        is co

        py ri

        gh te

        d by

        th e

        A m

        er ic

        an Ps

        yc ho

        lo gi

        ca l

        A ss

        oc ia

        tio n

        or on

        e of

        its al

        lie d

        pu bl

        is he

        rs .

        T hi

        s ar

        tic le

        is in

        te nd

        ed so

        le ly

        fo r

        th e

        pe rs

        on al

        us e

        of th

        e in

        di vi

        du al

        us er

        an d

        is no

        t to

        be di

        ss em

        in at

        ed br

        oa dl

        y.

         

         

        In 1900, several instruments from France and Germany arrived at the laboratory of experi- mental physiology at the National School of Medicine and were set up by Daniel Vergara- Lope,15 a physician specialized in experimental physiology (Cházaro-García & Rodríguez de Romo, 2006). In 1896, Vergara-Lope, largely inspired by Claude Bernard’s work, visited lab- oratories in Europe where he collected informa- tion that enabled him to organize his own (Ver- gara-Lope, 1897a, 1897b). The instruments, which would have been familiar to experimen- tal psychologists of the time, like cardiographs, pletysmographs, inductoriums (induction coils), and several kymographs, were used for demon- strations and research (La escuela de medicina, 1900).

        It is unclear whether Aragón assisted Ver- gara-Lope in the experimental physiology classes, but his being named assistant in the laboratory of medical physics and of history of medical science, only 1 year after graduation, suggests that he had experience working with instruments. In addition, during these years Aragón wrote and published the notes that he had taken during his psychology courses with Chávez (Aragón, 1902) in which Chávez em- phasized the importance of Wundt’s physiolog- ical psychology. Aragón noted that his physiol- ogy and anatomy classes in the National School of Medicine were important for supplementing the notes that were the basis for his book. Al- though Vergara-Lope’s laboratory of experi- mental physiology is an antecedent to Aragón’s laboratory, this relation was overlooked in pre- vious articles describing the foundation of the laboratory of experimental psychology in Mex- ico (but cf. Kagelmann & León, 1992).

        Most likely because of his experience in the experimental physiology laboratory, Chávez asked Vergara-Lope to replace him as professor of psychology at the National Preparatory School in 1903 (Díaz y de Ovando, 1972, p. 235; Parra, 1910). Vergara-Lope only replaced Chávez temporarily and, in 1906, the position of professor of psychology was granted to Aragón.

        Aragón started his laboratory courses on ex- perimental psychology in the National Prepara- tory School in 1908 (Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, 1942) using, as Chávez did before, Titchener’s A Primer of Psychology (Titchener, 1902, 1904/1907) as a textbook, but the lack of

        precision instruments was a drawback (Díaz y de Ovando, 1972, pp. 531–532). These events, nevertheless, represented an important turning point in the history of psychology in Mexico. Following Wundt’s concepts, Chávez took psy- chology from its initial place in philosophy and relocated it as an experimental science, where it was adopted by medical doctors interested in physiology, anatomy, and human behavior, like Vergara-Lope16 and Aragón.

        Influence of the Laboratory

        Similar to other laboratories following Wun- dt’s tradition, in the psychological laboratory in Mexico, demonstrations of psychological phe- nomena were combined with physiological psy- chology courses. The topics of theses written by the students in the laboratory during its first years suggest, however, that these courses in- cluded numerous discussions of evolutionary theory and psychometrics. The combination of Wundt’s methods and evolutionary theory, which characterized functional psychology in the United States, served to train the first gen- eration of psychologists in Mexico. For deter- mining the importance of the laboratory in the history of psychology in Mexico the careers of students that were trained, at least partially, in Aragón’s laboratory, were analyzed.

        David P. Boder

        In 1919, Boder, born in Latvia in 1886, ar- rived in Mexico. After having studied for 6 months with Wundt and for 5 years with Bech- terev (Rosen, 2010), he enrolled in Aragón’s psychology courses (Jurado, Colotla, & Gal- legos, 1989). Some months later, he was in charge of preparing and calibrating the instru- ments in the psychological laboratory. It is per- haps during this time that Boder was attracted to psychological instruments, an attraction that would be useful throughout the rest of his ca- reer. According to Jurado et al., Boder started teaching in ENAE in 1923, and at that time he also became the director of the first department of applied psychology (Psychotechnics Depart- ment) created by the Government of Mexico City. Two years later, Boder translated and adapted the Binet-Simon intelligence test into Spanish. Boder also translated Freud’s The in- terpretation of dreams into Spanish in 1921.

        299PSYCHOLOGICAL LABORATORY IN MEXICO

        T hi

        s do

        cu m

        en t

        is co

        py ri

        gh te

        d by

        th e

        A m

        er ic

        an Ps

        yc ho

        lo gi

        ca l

        A ss

        oc ia

        tio n

        or on

        e of

        its al

        lie d

        pu bl

        is he

        rs .

        T hi

        s ar

        tic le

        is in

        te nd

        ed so

        le ly

        fo r

        th e

        pe rs

        on al

        us e

        of th

        e in

        di vi

        du al

        us er

        an d

        is no

        t to

        be di

        ss em

        in at

        ed br

        oa dl

        y.

Discussion: Diagnosis Of Anxiety And Obsessive Compulsive And Related Disorders

Social workers take particular care when diagnosing anxiety due to its similarity to other conditions. In this Discussion, you carefully assess a client with anxiety disorder using the steps of differential diagnosis. You also recommend an intervention for treating the disorder.

To prepare: Read “The Case of Emily P.” Review the decision trees for anxiety and OCD in the Morrison (2014) text and the podcasts on anxiety. Then access the Walden Library and research interventions for anxiety.

By Day 3

Post a 300- to 500-word response in which you address the following:

  • Provide the full DSM-5 diagnosis for Emily. Remember, a full diagnosis should include the name of the disorder, ICD-10-CM code, specifiers, severity, and the Z codes (other conditions that may be a focus of clinical attention).  Keep in mind a diagnosis covers the most recent 12 months.
  • Explain the diagnosis by matching the symptoms identified in the case to the specific criteria for the diagnosis.
  • Discuss other disorders you considered for this diagnosis and eliminated (the differential diagnoses).
  • Describe an evidence-based assessment scale that would assist in ongoing validation of your diagnosis.
  • Recommend a specific intervention and explain why this intervention may be effective in treating Emily. Support your recommendation with scholarly references and resources. sis of Anxiety and Obsessive Compulsive and Related Disorders

Social workers take particular care when diagnosing anxiety due to its similarity to other conditions. In this Discussion, you carefully assess a client with anxiety disorder using the steps of differential diagnosis. You also recommend an intervention for treating the disorder.

To prepare: Read “The Case of Emily P.” Review the decision trees for anxiety and OCD in the Morrison (2014) text and the podcasts on anxiety. Then access the Walden Library and research interventions for anxiety.

By Day 3

Post a 300- to 500-word response in which you address the following:

  • Provide the full DSM-5 diagnosis for Emily. Remember, a full diagnosis should include the name of the disorder, ICD-10-CM code, specifiers, severity, and the Z codes (other conditions that may be a focus of clinical attention).  Keep in mind a diagnosis covers the most recent 12 months.
  • Explain the diagnosis by matching the symptoms identified in the case to the specific criteria for the diagnosis.
  • Discuss other disorders you considered for this diagnosis and eliminated (the differential diagnoses).
  • Describe an evidence-based assessment scale that would assist in ongoing validation of your diagnosis.
  • Recommend a specific intervention and explain why this intervention may be effective in treating Emily. Support your recommendation with scholarly references and resources. 

    The Case of Emily P. Emily is a 62-year-old, single, heterosexual, African American female who seeks treatment for anxiety. She says she is very concerned since she recently has been pulling her hair out, and it has become noticeable on top of her head. She is taking to wearing hats, which she finds acceptable. She worries about many things, which is not new to her, and she finds that scrubbing her home clean is her best therapy to ease her anxiety. Emily reports that germs have been a regular concern of hers since adolescence, when she learned in health classes about the risks of serious diseases including sexual transmittable disease. Emily presented with meticulous grooming, although the knees of her pants were noted as worn. She has arthritis in her spine and knees and uses a walker to help her manage mobility safely. With her physical disabilities it is challenging sometimes to scrub clean the house daily. This worries her should she get a visitor and the house is not in order as she would like it. She is no longer working, so the amount of time it takes her to scrub the house clean doesn’t delay her daily schedule as it used to. Emily receives Social Security income and is not employed. Although the Social Security is acceptable, her living expenses are always a concern to her. She lives alone in a subsidized apartment in the same building as her 72-year-old, unmarried sister, so rent should not increase. Emily and her sister shared an apartment for over 30 years, beginning when each of their marriages dissolved. Emily reported that when her sister began a romantic relationship 5 years ago, Emily began to feel very anxious and started to cry often. Emily moved into an apartment down the hall in the building and began to pull the hair from her head, hiding her hair loss by wearing wigs. This behavior occurred at different times and resulted in scabbing. Emily said she feels better after but does not always notice how much she is pulling. Her sister learned of Emily’s hair pulling after her wig slipped off one evening to reveal bald spots. She set up a schedule over the past few months with her sister to help stop the hair pulling. Sometimes it works and sometimes it does not. She is worried that she will be disappointing her sister by not sticking to the schedule to reduce her hair pulling. Her sister encouraged Emily to seek treatment rather than “hiding her ways.” Emily is reliant upon her sister for transportation and for a sense of social and emotional connection. Emily worries about bothering her sister due to her transportation needs, and she worries that without her sister she would be helpless. She knows she is edgy with her sister often and worries that might be from a lack of good sleep. She agreed to this session even though she is pessimistic about anything working. During our initial visit at our local mental health center, Emily shared that when she was 2 years old her mother died from tuberculosis, and the following year her father, an army officer, died from colon cancer. After his death, Emily lived with her paternal aunt, from whom she felt no love. Her older brother and sister were placed in an orphanage and Emily was permitted to see them on Sundays. When it became apparent that the children were entitled to death benefits, Emily’s aunt agreed to take custody of all three

     

     

    siblings. The household then consisted of Emily’s paternal aunt, her husband (who Emily described as an alcoholic), their three children, and Emily and her two older siblings. Emily was briefly married in her early 20s (4 years) but was disappointed and hurt by her husband’s infidelity. She moved in with her sister at that time. Emily reported it as an “anxious” time but denied hair pulling then. Emily also enrolled in a cosmetology school and liked her work. She had to stop working “for health reasons” when she was 58 years old. With all this going on in her life now, Emily feels tired a lot from trying to keep up with the cleanliness of the house, especially with her lack of mobility. She finds herself napping often. This then interferes with a restful sleep at night. When asked about her behaviors concerning her hair pulling, Emily reluctantly admitted that if she cannot get to her hair she will pick at a scab or skin. Generally, she avoided social situations so that her behavior is not exposed and worried what others would think of her. She denied other behavior rituals but became noticeably anxious at this question. When asked about “goals” if treatment was to be effective for her, Emily stated that she wanted to “cope better. Emily was collaborative during this assessment and engaged after a reluctant start. Adapted from: Plummer, S.-B., Makris, S., & Brocksen, S. (2013). Social work case studies: Concentration year. Baltimore, MD: Laureate Publishing.

Theories of Counseling and Psychotherapy

Reply to 2 classmates for each forum. You must explain briefly (200-250 words) why you agree or disagree with your classmate’s view. Your replies must be in response to classmates who answered a different question than you and significantly add to the discussion. Include a biblical worldview.You are required to include at least one reference in each reply. Remember to use APA formatting.

Cognitive Behavior Theory

Classmate #1 Victor

Cognitive therapists believe that it is important to socialize the client to therapy. What are some examples of this goal in the session? How effective do you believe this technique was? Would you have done anything differently?

Teaching a client, the ability to associate their thoughts and establishing how it relates to their emotions is a powerful tool.  The example Dr. Lundgren used about seeing Sally walking across the street and not speaking was simple, yet it made the point. Many times, people jump to the wrong conclusion simply by how their day has been going. And what they are feeling within the moment. Helen immediately walked the cognitive path of socialization as she began to relate to wondering what she had done to make Sally mad, stating she would be spending way too much time in this thought process assuming, and wondering if she should call Sally. (Pearson, n.d.). Some of the examples that stood out to me were the way Dr. Lundgren continued to reinforce the session by walking Helen down the path of what was the situation, her thoughts, emotions, the behaviors that could be a possible outcome of the scenario, and what results could be a possibility. Helen was able to use the three automatic thought process’s: verbally and visually, validity and their utility, and evaluating if the thoughts were dysfunctional (Murdock, 2017, p.310).

I believe this layout is very effective. It allows the counselor to help the client to become socialized within a cognitive model by following a script. Automatic thoughts take the client to an emotion, allowing them to relate to an incident they have previously experienced. Behaviors are generated from the feelings that have been experienced. The emotion will delegate how a client will respond to the situation. The one thing that I may have done differently is to encourage Helen perhaps to talk to her husband about her feelings of missing her writing, and working on plays. Connecting with him once more over a cup of coffee and allowing him to see her not just as his wife or the mother of his children. But, as the women he married, who had a zeal for writing before the married life. Once this line of communication was on the table, he would have a better understanding of why it was so important to her to take a class over the weekend. It would allow him to be supportive with a more rational understanding of why Helen wanted to take a course. Then when she came to the question of asking if he would be willing to watch the children so that she may take the class, he could answer her with more facts to base his answer.

Cognitive Session Theories in action. [Video file]. (n.d.). Pearson. Retrieved September 5, 2019, from http://media.pearsoncmg.com/pcp/21270572125/index.html?wf=1&item=2

Murdock, N. L. (2017). Theories of Counseling and Psychotherapy: A Case Approach [Pearson e Text] (4th ed.). Retrieved from        https://etext.pearson.com/eplayer/pdfbook?

Classmate #2 Raven

Helen identifies the automatic thought “he will resent me,” and Dr. Lundgren extends this thought to include “and it will be horrible if he resented you.” What other automatic thoughts can you identify? Explain which of the 3 automatic thought types each thought relates to. How would you work with these thoughts? 

Helen expressed additional AT (automatic thoughts) throughout her therapy session such as “It’s a waste of my time to do a weekend class” referring to her interest in attending a playwriting class. This statement relates to the AT type of a distorted thought that is contrary to available evidence (Nancy, 2017). As a counselor, I would work to help Helen identify why she thinks that this is true. Helen expresses that she feels as though attending this class would be a waste of time due to her having a master’s degree and additional experience in her field and having anxiety about asking her husband to watch the kids. Helen also expresses the AT of “I don’t know what is going to happen” “If he held it over my head could I live with it”. These AT’s where in reference to her asking her husband to watch the kids. These relate to the AT type of accurate but distorted thought. She is right in that she does not know how her husband is going to react to her asking him, but her thought is distorted because she does not know if he will hold it over her head or not. Her AT of “If he held it over my head could I live with it” is also an AT type of dysfunctional thought because her fear of the “what if” is holding her back.

If you were counseling Helen from the Cognitive framework, what additional technique(s) could you employ in the session? What would you hope to accomplish? 

In addition to CBT with the AT technique I would incorporate the use of REBT described as the “premise that whenever we become upset, it is not the events taking place in our lives that upset us; it is the beliefs that we hold that cause us to become depressed, anxious and enraged” (REBT Network, 2006). With this technique, I would hope to accomplish helping Helen overcome believing how she thinks her husband will react to alleviate her anxiousness. The REBT technique allows people to “control their own thoughts, feelings, and behaviors (Murdock, 2017). If Helen can begin to control her thoughts and feelings in situations, she may be less worried about what the outcome might be and focus on her initial reasoning for asking her husband to watch the kids.

References 

Murdock, Nancy 2017. Theories of Counseling and Psychotherapy. Library of Congress Publication https://etext.pearson.com/eplayer/pdfbook?bookid=101994&platform=1030&scenario=1&invoketype=et1&page.

REBT Network (2006). Retrieved from http://www.rebtnetwork.org/whatis.html