Retrospective Analysis Of Personality

/in /by

Assignment 1: Retrospective Analysis of Personality
Due Week 9 and worth 220 points

In this assignment, begin by taking a retrospective look at your life history, to discuss which aspects of your personality have remained consistent and which aspects of your personality have changed over time. Then, analyze the roles of nature and nurture in shaping your personality. Subsequently, discuss possible sources of inaccuracy and bias in any retrospective analysis. Finally, discuss the reasons why systematic scientific studies are considered more valuable than individual accounts.

Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:

  1. Reflect on your life history and discuss which aspects of your personality have changed over time and which aspects have stayed consistent.
  2. Based on your retrospective analysis, describe the roles of nature and nurture in shaping your personality. Reflect on your justification for distinguishing between nature and nurture.
  3. Discuss the possible sources of bias and inaccuracy whenever a person looks back on their past history. Be sure to discuss factors related to memory and factors related to cognition.
  4. Describe why the science of psychology places more emphasis on results based on scientific studies than it does on personal experience and anecdotes.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format.  Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • To keep this essay short and manageable, your only sources for your paper should be your own experience and the Webtext. For this reason, APA citations and references are not required for this assignment.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date.  The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Relate psychological concepts to real-world situations.
  • Describe the major theories of personality development, learning, memory, cognition, consciousness, development and social psychology.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in psychology.
  • Write clearly and concisely about psychology using proper writing mechanics.

Click here to view the grading rubric.

 

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

 

Points: 220 Assignment 1: Retrospective Analysis of Personality
Criteria Unacceptable

Below 60% F

 Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

 Fair

70-79% C

 Proficient

80-89% B

 Exemplary

90-100% A
1. Reflect on your life history and discuss which aspects of your personality have changed over time and which aspects have stayed consistent.

Weight: 20%

 Did not submit or incompletely reflected on your life history and discuss which aspects of your personality have changed over time and which aspects have stayed consistent. Insufficiently reflected on your life history and discuss which aspects of your personality have changed over time and which aspects have stayed consistent. Partially reflected on your life history and discuss which aspects of your personality have changed over time and which aspects have stayed consistent. Satisfactorily reflected on your life history and discuss which aspects of your personality have changed over time and which aspects have stayed consistent. Thoroughly reflected on your life history and discuss which aspects of your personality have changed over time and which aspects have stayed consistent.
2. Based on your retrospective analysis, describe the roles of nature and nurture in shaping your personality. Reflect on your justification for distinguishing between nature and nurture.

Weight: 25%

 Did not submit or incompletely described the roles of nature and nurture in shaping your personality based on your retrospective analysis. Did not submit or incompletely reflected on your justification for distinguishing between nature and nurture Insufficiently described the roles of nature and nurture in shaping your personality based on your retrospective analysis. Insufficiently reflected on your justification for distinguishing between nature and nurture Partially described the roles of nature and nurture in shaping your personality based on your retrospective analysis. Partially reflected on your justification for distinguishing between nature and nurture Satisfactorily described the roles of nature and nurture in shaping your personality based on your retrospective analysis. Satisfactorily reflected on your justification for distinguishing between nature and nurture Thoroughly described the roles of nature and nurture in shaping your personality based on your retrospective analysis. Thoroughly reflected on your justification for distinguishing between nature and nurture
3. Discuss the possible sources of bias and inaccuracy whenever a person looks back on their past history. Be sure to discuss factors related to memory and factors related to cognition.

Weight: 25%

 Did not submit or incompletely discussed the possible sources of bias and inaccuracy whenever a person looks back on their past history. Did not submit or incompletely discussed factors related to memory and factors related to cognition. Insufficiently discussed the possible sources of bias and inaccuracy whenever a person looks back on their past history. Insufficiently discussed factors related to memory and factors related to cognition. Partially discussed the possible sources of bias and inaccuracy whenever a person looks back on their past history. Partially discussed factors related to memory and factors related to cognition. Satisfactorily discussed the possible sources of bias and inaccuracy whenever a person looks back on their past history. Satisfactorily discussed factors related to memory and factors related to cognition. Thoroughly discussed the possible sources of bias and inaccuracy whenever a person looks back on their past history. Thoroughly discussed factors related to memory and factors related to cognition.
4. Describe why the science of psychology places more emphasis on results based on scientific studies than it does on personal experience and anecdotes.

Weight: 20%

 Did not submit or incompletely described why the science of psychology places more emphasis on results based on scientific studies than it does on personal experience and anecdotes. Insufficiently described why the science of psychology places more emphasis on results based on scientific studies than it does on personal experience and anecdotes. Partially described why the science of psychology places more emphasis on results based on scientific studies than it does on personal experience and anecdotes. Satisfactorily described why the science of psychology places more emphasis on results based on scientific studies than it does on personal experience and anecdotes. Thoroughly described why the science of psychology places more emphasis on results based on scientific studies than it does on personal experience and anecdotes.
5. Writing / Support for ideas

Weight: 5%

 Never uses explanations, examples, and evidence that logically support ideas. Rarely uses explanations, examples, and evidence that logically support ideas. Partially uses explanations, examples, and evidence that logically support ideas. Mostly uses explanations, examples, and evidence that logically support ideas. Consistently uses explanations, examples, and evidence that logically support ideas.
6. Writing / Grammar and mechanics

Weight: 5%

 Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Numerous errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

The How And Why Of Well-Being

/in /by

According to Martin Seligman (2005), there are three basic positive psychology pillars. These are the following:

  • The pleasant life
  • The good life
  • The meaningful life

Seligman purports that experiencing these three pillars creates what is called “the full-life.” This assignment focuses on the first pillar: the pleasant life.

The pleasant life encompasses subjective well-being and happiness along with encouraging encounters with positive affect and experiences. The good life includes identifying signature strengths to facilitate flow. The meaningful life includes participating in activities for the good of society.

For this assignment, you will focus on the pleasant life. Do the following:

  • Design an ideal day for yourself. Include positive emotions and experiences that facilitate positive emotions.
  • Live your ideal day.
  • Summarize your experiences in a paper.

Address the following points in your paper:

  • What was your general emotional state during the day?
  • What helped to create this emotional state?
  • Was there anything that minimized or countered your positive emotional affect? If yes, then what could have been done differently to change this experience?
  • According to the positive psychology model, why is this activity important?

Include and discuss two scholarly references that support the idea of experiencing positive emotions to facilitate happiness.

Write a 3-page reflection paper in Word format. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. Use the following file naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M1_A3.doc. For example, if your name is John Smith, your document will be named SmithJ_M1_A3.doc.

By Wednesday, June 24, 2015, deliver your assignment to the M1: Assignment 3 Dropbox.

Duckworth, A. L., Steen, T. A., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Positive psychology in clinical practice. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 629–651. (ProQuest Document ID: 213100604)
http://search.proquest.com.libproxy.edmc.edu/
docview/213100604?accountid=34899

Assignment 3 Grading Criteria
Maximum Points
Described the general emotional state experienced throughout the ideal day.
16
Examined and analyzed reasons for the general emotional state experienced throughout the day. If the positive emotional effect was minimized or countered, then identified and analyzed what could have been done differently so that the positive emotional effect could be experienced.
28
Correctly applied the positive psychology model to explain the importance of this activity.
20
Reviewed and discussed two scholarly references that support the idea of experiencing positive emotions to facilitate happiness.
16
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
20
Total:
100

What did you learn about social psychology and the differences between styles of research? Explain.

/in /by

SOCL350

  • Revise and amend your Week 4 Key Assignment by adding what you learned in the Discussion Board posts following the task, as well as taking into consideration your instructor’s comments.
  • Address the following, and add your responses to your Key Assignment final draft:
    • Using your Week 4 Key Assignment, what behaviors did you observe that you would like to examine with experimental research? Explain.
    • What theories did you create or consider by doing this study, and how would you go about furthering your study of human behavior through this technique? Explain.
    • What did you learn about social psychology and the differences between styles of research? Explain.
    • Which do you think is most beneficial in studying group behavior? Why?
  • Be sure to reference all sources using APA style.

Critical Analysis Of Research Article

/in /by
Research Evaluation Worksheet

PSYCH/610 Version 1

 1

 

University of Phoenix Material

 

Research Evaluation Worksheet

Title:

 

Full Article Reference (APA style):

 

Abstract

 

Introduction

a. Is the need for the study clearly stated in the introduction? Explain by using information presented in the literature review.

 

b. What is the research hypothesis or question?

 

c. What are the variables of interest (independent and dependent variables)?

 

d. How are the variables operationally defined?

 

Method

 

a. Sample Size (Total): ________________ Size Per Group/Cell: _______________

 

b. Were the methods and procedures described so that the study could be replicated without further information? What information, if any, would you need to replicate or reproduce this study?

 

Participants

a. How were participants selected and recruited? b. Were subjects randomly selected? c. Were there any biases in sampling? Explain

d. Were the samples appropriate for the population to which the researcher wished to generalize?

e. What are the characteristics of the sample populations?

 

Research Design (check which design applies)

_______ Single group, time series study

_______ Multiple baseline (sequential) design: ______________

_______ Single group, no measurement

_______ Single group with measurement: Pre ______ During _____ Post _____

_______ Two groups classic experimental versus control group, randomly assigned

_______ (quasi-experimental) two groups experimental versus control group,

not randomly assigned

_______ Correlation research, not manipulated, degree of relationship

_______ Descriptive research (qualitative study)

_______ Natural observation

_______ Analytical research

_______ Interview research

_______ Historical study

_______ Survey research

_______ Legal study

_______ Ethnography research

_______ Policy analysis

_______ Fieldwork research

_______ Evaluation study

_______ Phenomenology

_______ Grounded theory

_______ Protocol analysis (collection and analysis of verbatim reports)

_______ Case study, no measurement

_______ Case study, with measurement: Pre _________ During _______ Post _________

_______ Developmental research

_______ Longitudinal (same group of subjects over period of time)

_______ Cross-sectional (subjects from different age groups compared)

_______ Cross-sequential (subjects from different age groups, shorter period of time)

_______ Correlation, more than two groups: control, treatment, and other treatment comparisons

_______ Factorial design, two or more groups: other treatment differences, no untreated controls

_______ Two or more dependent variables (MANOVA)

_______ Other design: __________________________________________________________

 

Consider the Following Questions:

a. Was a control group used? Yes ______ No ______ If yes, complete b, c, and d below. b. Was the “control” method for the study appropriate?

c. What variable was being controlled for?

d. In the case of an experimental study, were subject randomly assigned to groups?

 

Measures

 

a. Describe the Dependent Measure(s)/Instruments used:

b. Describe the Measurement/Instrument Validity Information:

 

c. Describe the Measurement/Instrument Reliability Information:

 

Consider the Following Questions:

a. For all measures (measures to classify subjects, dependent variables, etc..) was evidence of reliability and validity provided, either through summarizing the data, or by referring the reader to an available source for that information?

b. Do the reliability and validity data justify the use of the measure?

 

c. Are the measures appropriate (if not, why not)?

 

d. Are multiple measures used, particularly those that sample the same domains, or constructs but with different methods (e.g., self-report, rating scales, self-monitoring, or direct observation)?

 

f. If human observers, judges, or raters were involved, was inter-observer or inter-rater agreement (reliability) assessed? Was it obtained for a representative sample of the data? Did the two raters do their ratings independently? Was their reliability satisfactory?

 

Independent and Dependent Variables

 

a. What is/are the Independent Variable(s):

 

b. What is/are the Dependent Variable(s):

 

Data Analysis

 

Scales of Measurement (check those that apply):

Nominal _______ Ordinal _______ Interval _______ Ratio _______

 

a. What type of statistical techniques are used?

 

b. What type of tables and graphs are used?

Consider the Following Questions:

 

a. Were tests of significance used and reported appropriately (e.g., with sufficient detail to understand what analysis was being conducted)?

b. Do the researchers report means and standard deviations (if relevant) so that the reader can examine whether statistically significant differences are large enough to me meaningful? c. Other comments on the reported statistical analyses?

Discussion

 

Evaluate the Summary and Conclusions of the study (Usefulness):

Describe the Strength(s) and Limitation(s) of the Study:

 

Describe what you learned from the study:

 

List any remaining questions you have about the study:

 

 

*Adapted from form created by Dr. Randy Buckner, University of Phoenix Instructor