Case Analysis – Integrating Theoretical Orientations

/in /by

Prior to beginning this assignment, read the PSY650 Week Two Treatment Plan ,Preview the document Case 16: Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Gorenstein and Comer (2014), and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorders in Hamblin and Gross (2012).

Assess the evidence-based practices implemented in this case study by addressing the following issues:

Explain the connection between each theoretical orientation used by Dr. Remoc and the four interventions utilized in the case.
Consider Dr. Remoc’s utilization of two theoretical frameworks to guide her treatment plan. Assess the efficacy of integrating two orientations based on the information presented in the case study. Describe some potential problems with prescribing medication as the only treatment option for children with ADHD.
Identify tasks and positive reinforcements that might be included in Billy’s token economy chart given the behavior issues described in the case. (There are articles in the recommended resources that may assist you in this portion of the assignment.)
Evaluate the effectiveness of the four treatment interventions implemented by Dr. Remoc and support your statements with information from the case and two to three peer-reviewed articles from the Ashford University Library.
Recommend three additional treatment interventions that would be appropriate in this case. Use information from the Hamblin and Gross “Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorders” chapter to help support your recommendations. Justify your selections with information from the case.

The Case Analysis

Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of paper
Student’s name
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Date submitted
Must use at least two peer-reviewed sources from the Ashford University Library.
Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Graduate Level Ethics Psychology Help

/in /by

This is an Ethics in Psychology Class!!!

 

Chapter 7 Confidentiality and involvement of parents…

 

Directions: This is a group assignment and I am only responsible for 1 slide. My slide is highlighted below. You must include detailed speaker notes and it must be APA formatted. I’ve attached the team assignment, so please look at the other slides to see how the assignment should be completed .

Please attach references!

 

 

Develop a 1 slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation on your topic. Include the following:

 

A properly formatted title slide

An agenda for your presentation

 

 

1. A definition of which ethical aspirational principle and enforceable standards are relevant

 

2. An explanation of how the clients in this case study would be affected by unethical disclosure of client information Johnny

 

3. An explanation of how the issues affect the practice of professional psychology, in regards to professional supervision

 

4. An analysis of what the APA Ethics Code would suggest as a resolution to the dispute

 

5. A discussion on how your research into the dilemma affected your prior views and assumptions

Frankenstein’s Monster

/in /by

If you were creating Frankenstein’s monster and you found that there were no ‘whole’ brains that could be used, only parts of various brains, what 5 ‘parts’ of the brain would you include? Be sure to give your explanation of ‘why’ you chose these parts rather than others.

Important guidelines to follow: Write at least a 300-word, well-developed and well-written response.  Use APA Formatting Guide to create accurate citations and documentation to give credit for any resource material used in your response.

Discusion Question: Definitions And Principles Of Power

/in /by

Unit 1: Definitions and Principles of Power
follow all the instructions ,No plagiarism ,good  grammar , minim 350 words

Upon successful completion of this unit, students will be able to:

  1. categorize power relations as positive sum, zero sum, and negative sum;
  2. recognize the “three faces of power”;
  3. identify the close relationship between power and freedom;
  4. compare influence as a quasi-form of power to other forms of power;
  5. recognize power as an instrument versus as an end; and
  6. assess the influence of historical and mythical precedents to power.

DISCUSION QUESTION:

Positive-, Zero-, and Negative-Sum Power Relations

Give examples from the last month or so where you participated in a positive-sum, a zero-sum, and a negative-sum power relation.  Describe what motivated you to participate in a negative-sum or a zero-sum relation?  Are there factors other than “power” that we should be considering?

Resources & Readings

Textbook

  1. Boulding, K. E. (1989). The nature of power. In K. E. Boulding, Three faces of power (pp. 15-34). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  2. Other research information