Using Personality Theory To Craft A Cover Letter

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, review the Cover Letters PDF  provided by the Ashford University Office of Career Services and the What Is a Cover Letter?  and Writing the Dreaded Cover Letter  online resources. It is recommended that you also review the e-book by Noble (2004) and the How to write cover letters (examples) video which include more information and a number of sample cover letters to assist you.

For this discussion post, you will use the knowledge you have gained about personality, the career specific reports you have created in the previous weeks’ discussions, and assessments associated with various fields of psychology you have studied to help you to choose and develop a cover letter for a job in the human services sector. To begin, determine what type of job within the human services sector related to personality psychology is of interest to you. Using career websites, including those listed on the Ashford Career Services Job Search website, and/or other third-party search engines such as the American Psychological Association’s PsycCareers website, Monster.com , Indeed.com , and SimplyHired.com. Once you have found a suitable job posting, carefully review the requirements and note these for inclusion in your cover letter. Before you begin designing your cover letter, review the required readings, videos, and websites to help you determine how best to formulate it. Within the letter, you will address the person or title of the person that is listed as the contact for the job in the job posting. As you draft your cover letter, consider the elements within the job post and use your knowledge of personality theory to make yourself appear to be the best candidate for the job. Assess the various types of personality measurements that might be most effective in the position listed and mention how you might use these on the job. Once you have developed your letter, save it as a document and attach it to your discussion post. In the discussion post itself, copy and paste the link to the job posting for which you wrote your cover letter. Describe your experience(s) writing the cover letter including the ways in which you may have attempted to manipulate the reader to get the best response. Analyze and describe any ethical issues that could be associated with this process.

Guided Response:  Review several of your colleagues’ posts and respond to at least two of your peers by 11:59 p.m. on Day 7 of the week. You are encouraged to post your required replies earlier in the week to promote more meaningful interactive discourse in this discussion.

Review the job posting and cover letter created by your colleague.

    • Was your colleague’s cover letter appropriate for the job indicated?
    • What were the strengths of the cover letter?
    • What area(s) could have used more detail?
    • Suggest changes to the letter that would make it more effective for the job as listed. Include specific rationales for any recommended changes.
    • Address the potential ethical issues your colleague mentioned as well as any you see that were not mentioned.

Continue to monitor the discussion forum until 5:00 p.m. MST on Day 7 of the week and respond to anyone who replies to your initial post.

Carefully review the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate this Discussion Thread.

Ceteris – Allport Case Study

Allport Case Study

 

Student Name: Date:

Read the following case study and thoroughly and completely answer the questions that follow. Remember to use full sentences and cite sources to support any contentions that you make, using proper APA formatting.

CASE STUDY:

Mary is a 36-year-old stay-at-home mother of four children. She is starting to become a bit bored with staying home, having done that for the past 15 years. Prior to having children, Mary worked in a credit union and enjoyed her job. She especially liked the precision of number crunching. She has carried this characteristic into her housekeeping chores. She tries to keep her home spotless, even with four children. She cleans the two bathrooms every day, vacuums, dusts, picks up toys, and performs various and sundry cleaning chores. Clutter and messiness bother her, and she is almost neurotic about cleaning. She is a perfectionist and knows it. All of her friends agree, but she is able to laugh at this quirk and not take herself too seriously.

Although maintaining a house with four children might seem overwhelming to others, Mary handles these chores fine and has time (sometimes while cleaning) to keep in close touch with her friends, especially with phone calls. Mary is continuously on the phone. Her friends are a very important part of her social support network, especially since she does not have coworkers with whom to interact and because her husband travels a lot for his job. Often, her friends seem more important to her than her spouse and she seems to have a better relationship with them than her husband. They describe her as being fiercely loyal, supportive, and talkative. They also know that she has a good heart. She is always willing to help another mom whose babysitter got sick by watching their child while she goes to work. If a friend is feeling overwhelmed about preparing for an upcoming party, she is willing to cook or bake something for them. You would never know from looking at her that Mary is such a warm and caring person. She actually looks a bit intimidating and angry, but that is just because her age is starting to show with somewhat deep lines between her eyes, which is mistaken for a frown. She is aware of this contradiction and is a bit self-conscious of her frown lines.

Mary is also insecure about not having attended college. Many of her friends graduated from college. Some even have doctorate degrees, but Mary never did. She does not think of herself as unintelligent, but she sees herself as uneducated and defers to others with a better education. Her friends see her as very intelligent, and they encourage her to pursue at least an associate’s degree mainly so she will feel better about herself. Mary is considering this possibility. It is something that she has always wanted to do. In particular, she is thinking about getting an associate’s degree in legal business studies and becoming a legal assistant after all of her children are in middle school. They will be old enough to not need her as much, but that is still two years away and she is nervous about this prospect because she has been out of school for so long.

Mary is a good mother. She takes care of her children’s physical and emotional needs. She has one child, Jennifer, who has a severe learning disability, and she is a consistent advocate for her. She makes sure that Jennifer’s needs are met, but she is realistic. She knows that Jennifer will probably not go as far as her other three children in whatever career she chooses. Mary is pragmatic that way, even though it is painful for her.

Mary also makes sure that her children have fun. Their family usually purchases a Six Flags amusement park season’s pass, and they frequently go during the summers and even into the fall. At first, she went on some of the more exciting roller coasters just because her children wanted to try them out, but now she is an avid roller coaster fan and would ride on them even if her children were not with her. This sense of fun can likewise be found in her ability to laugh at herself. She is able to see humor in her need for order and cleanliness and in her tendency to not be able to recall a word she wants to use (the notorious tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon) and her occasional feelings of frustration as she takes care of her children. She sometimes loses her temper, especially when she is tired, but she is always aware of her fatigue being a factor in how she reacts to her children. She can later joke about this with friends who also have children and sometimes even with her own kids.

Application Questions:

Using Allport’s trait theory approach, describe Mary’s personality by answering the following questions. Answer thoroughly and completely, using full sentences and citing to sources to support any contentions and analyses.

1. Allport suggested seven criteria that demonstrate that a person is psychologically healthy (mature). What are they? Find examples of them in the case.

2. What are the differences between cardinal, central, and secondary traits? What are some of Mary’s central traits?

3. What is functional autonomy? Find at least one example of preservative functional autonomy in the case.

4. What is proprium according to Allport? What is Mary’s proprium?

5. What is propriate striving? Find at least one example of it in the case.

Theory Comparison Questions:

Answer thoroughly and completely, using full sentences and citing sources to support any contentions and analyses.

1. Compare Allport’s criteria for mental health to each of the following theorists and theories:

a. Freud’s Psychodynamic Theory of Personality

b. Rogers’s Person-Centered Theory of Personality

c. Cattell’s Factor-Analytic Trait Theory of Personality

2. How does Allport’s propriate striving compare to Jung’s concept of self-realization? To Maslow’s concept of actualization? To Rogers’s concept of actualization?

3. Compare Allport’s concept of the proprium to Rogers’s concept of the self.

 

Reference

Ashcraft, D. (2012). Personality theories workbook (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Motivation & Leadership 1

1. Do you think communication is more important to leaders now than it was in Hitler’s and FDR’s time? Explain why you think so or why you disagree. Who is a more current charismatic leader that you know of, and how are they similar to Hitler or FDR in their communication style?

 

2.
Consider the findings from the Ohio State and Michigan studies: Good leadership requires effectiveness on two dimensions – initiating structure, commonly called task orientation, and showing consideration, commonly called employee orientation. Evaluate a leader you know using those two dimensions of good leadership. Describe how well that leader manages both those dimensions. What is the outcome of their strengths or weaknesses in those dimensions?

a. Describe a situation that would call for a more task oriented leader.
b. In what situations would a more employee oriented leader be more successful?

Which orientation do you reflect in your style of leadership? Why do you tend to lean toward that style?

 

ndividual assignment: McFarlane Case, p. 65 (Manning & Curtis): “Part One Video Case, Toying with Success: The McFarlane Companies”

 

3. After reading the case, answer “Questions for Discussion” 1 and 2 SEE ATTACHED, providing evidence for points you make. Then, include a well thought-out and reflective 6 to 10-line personal conclusion.

Learning Team Theory Table Week 4

MUST BE NEW AND ORIGINAL WORK NOT GIVEN TO OTHER STUDENTS. Write in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrate ethical scholarship in the accurate representation and attribution of sources; and display accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Include citations in the text and references at the end of the document in APA format. ONLY NEED WEEK 1 AND THE SECTION BELOW COMPLETED.PLEASE READ INSTRUCTION CAREFULLY. IN TEXT CITATION AND MUST CITE ALL REFERENCE IN APA FORMAT–ORIGINAL WORK ONLY   

Reliable sources only and each section must have an intext ciatiation.

 

Social Cognitive THEORY

1.     Key Figures:

2.     Key concepts of personality formation:

3.     Scientific Credibility

4.     Comprehensivness

 

Please be sure to answer/address the highlighted areas below for the appropriate sections include the following things for each section:

  1. Key figures: who are the main theorists associated with the theory? (This should be like a mini-biography, not just a listing of names.)
  2. Key concepts: what are the key components and concepts that make up the theory?
  3. Explanation of disordered personality: how is this theory used to explain the causes of a personality disorder?  What are some of parts used in the explanation? How would a theorist explain the development of a personality disorder based on this theory?
  4. Scientific credibility: is this theory testable?  If yes, what are some of the ways that it is tested?  What are some of the tests used? If not, why is it not testable?
  5. Comprehensiveness: does this theory look at the whole person?  Does it address all parts of personality, or does it look at only various components?
  6. Applicability: how is this theory used in the world of psychology in a professional manner?  Think about different types of psychology that the theory might be used in, and talk about how (i.e. counseling, educational, I.O.). Provide specific examples here.

Note: the information provided in the tables should not just be a listing.  I would like to see explanations and applications of the concepts that you are discussing for each theory. With that in mind, your sections should be similar to a substantive posting. Make sure that you are utilizing in-text citations.

 

When providing information in the table, make sure to format it using APA guidelines, which includes having the same font size and type and using in-text citations