ConflicConflicting Viewpointsting Viewpoints

Assignment 1.2: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Part II
Synthesizing and Writing

When looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own point of view? This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking.

The assignment is divided into two (2) parts.
For Part I of the assignment (due Week 2), you read a book excerpt about critical thinking processes, reviewed the Procon.org Website in order to gather information, and engaged in prewriting to examine your thoughts.
* Remember that in the Week 2 Discussion, you examined the biases discussed in Chapter 2 of the webtext.

In Part II of the assignment (due Week 4), you will write a paper to synthesize your ideas.
Part II – Writing
Write at three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:
1. State your position on the topic you selected for Assignment 1.1.
2. Identify (3) three premises (reasons) from the Procon.org website that support your position    and explain why you selected these specific reasons.
3. Explain your answers to the “believing” questions about the three (3) premises opposing your position from the Procon.org website.
4. Examine at least two (2) types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated the premises for and against your position.
5. Discuss the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have influenced your biases.
6. Discuss whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the “Believing Game,” even if your position on the issue has stayed the same.

The paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing:

  • Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph.
  • Address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.
  • Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA Style format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

You must follow these submission guidelines:

  • Submit the essay to Turnitin.com and then submit the originality report and final essay with any needed revisions to Blackboard.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Identify the informal fallacies, assumptions, and biases involved in manipulative appeals and abuses of language.
  • Create written work utilizing the concepts of critical thinking.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in critical thinking skills and informal logic.

Comparing And Contrasting The MMPI And The Rorschach Inkblot Technique

Controversy surrounds the validity of certain personality tests, including the Rorschach Inkblot Test.  Pundits argue that the Rorschach test results in over-identifying mental problems and is unreliable and invalid. Scholars in favor of the Rorschach test argue that it is one piece of evidence in the whole battery, and criticisms are unfounded or controllable.

 

Compare and contrast the use of the Rorschach, a projective measure, with the MMPI, an objective measure. Construct a scenario, and present both sides of the argument, where the Rorschach test could be used to help and to hurt the individual being tested. How might a clinical interview influence the interpretation of test results for each? Would you need to make any special accommodations if you were testing an 8 year old? 16 year old? 85 year old? If so, describe and explain. If not, justify your answer.

 

Search for at least 1 reference that discusses the validity concerns of personality tests. You can use relevant Web sites or journal articles in your argument to comment on the sources of validity, but make sure that they are from reputable Web sites and print sources such as the AU online library, or information from.org, .net, or .edu sites as opposed to .com. Please avoid Wikipedia.

Your paper should be double-spaced and in 12 point, Times New Roman or Arial font with normal one-inch margins, written in APA style, and free of typographical and grammatical errors.  It should include a title page with a running head and a reference page. The body of the paper should be between 3-5 pages in length.

Submit your response to the: Assignment by Wednesday, August 5, 2015.

 

Assignment 2 Grading Criteria
Maximum Points
Compared and contrasted Rorschach and MMPI
15
Constructed a scenario and presented both sides of the given argument
20
Cited relevant Web sites or journal articles in your argument
10
Commented on the sources of validity
10
Discussed influence of interview
10
Examined the use of the tests across ages
15
Used APA Standards
20
Total:
100

Estimation and Hypothesis Testing for Two Samples

Estimation and Hypothesis Testing for Two Samples

 

Complete problems 7, 10, 12, 13, 15, 17, and 21 from chapter 12 of the textbook.

 

Submit the assignment in one of these two forms:

  1. Handwritten and scanned, inserted into a single Word document.
  2. Typed as a Word document. Necessary drawings can come from Paint or any other appropriate source, but must be inserted in the Word document.

Applying Models For Addictions Case Management In A Power Point Presentation

Due tomorrow Sunday at 8 pm no exceptions or excuses..Any questions please ask.. This needs to be exceptional please!!

 

Threre our four models of case management practice (brokerage, assertive, strength-based, and clinical). Think about how each case management model addresses aspects of addiction treatment. Consider the strengths and limitations of each model. Look at the core aspects of practice outlined in the NAADAC scope of practice to consider how the model incorporates service delivery. Then, review the SAMHSA website and consider trends in the field of addictions for treatment and case management.

 

Prepare a PowerPoint presentation of 5–8 slides.(Use this template to create powerpoint presentation which will be provided) In your presentation, review the four models. Then, select one that you believe would be most effective for Harry’s situation (see attached story). Review how the NAADAC framework would apply to the model you selected. Justify why you believe this model to be the most effective for Harry’s situation. Also, identify one or two emerging trends in the field of case management in addictions and explain how each of the emerging trends you cite might determine the use of one particular model over another.

 

References:

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (n.d.).  Retrieved September 12, 2012 from http://www.samhsa.gov/