Apply ethical codes and standards to support the plan of action.

Instructions

Write a 6–8 page report in which you complete the following:

  1. Brainstorm several alternatives for resolving the ethical dilemma in the case.
  2. Analyze alternatives for resolving the ethical dilemma and come to a conclusion.
  3. Analyze and document the possible ramifications for at least three alternatives. Then, choose a course of action.
  4. Apply ethical codes and standards to support the plan of action.
  5. Explain the research methods used in multiple research studies relevant to the case, and present the findings.
  6. Explain your course of action, using research findings from at least two studies to support your plan. You can use (but are not required to use) additional research beyond the two studies to support your plan.

The following is the recommended structure for organizing your assessment:

  • Create a title page: Write a title that reflects the purpose of your work. It is suggested that you use the APA Paper Template [DOCX] to format your paper according to the APA manual (current edition).
  • Write an introduction: For the introduction section of your paper, include the title at the top of the first page. (In APA format, the word Introduction is not used as a heading.) Briefly summarize:
    • The ethical issue in the case you have chosen.
    • How professional standards and other resources, in general terms, point toward solutions.
    • How the issue in general relates to larger societal problems.
  • Create a heading titled Applied Ethical Principles and Standards: Use the APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct to assess which of the principles and standards relate to the particular ethical issue in this case, and analyze how they do so.
  • Create a heading titled Alternative Solutions:
    • Brainstorm several alternatives for resolving the ethical dilemma in the case. Thoroughly analyze the possible ramifications for at least three alternatives and document them. Then, choose a course of action.
    • Explain your chosen course of action and support it based on both ethical principles and current psychological research (published within the past decade).
  • Create a heading title Research: Present at least two research studies that support your thinking and approach to ethics in the case. Present the research methods and findings and analyze the relevance of the findings to the case.
  • Create a heading titled Conclusion: Briefly summarize the importance of the problem and make a compelling appeal for implementation of your action plan.

Keep in mind that while your writing must conform to APA standards, you must explain all information in a manner that can be understood easily by a nonacademic or nonscientific audience.

Refer to the Ethical Issue and Action Plan Scoring Guide to ensure you meet the grading criteria for this assessment.

Additional Requirements

Your assessment should meet the following requirements:

  • Written communication:Written communication is well organized and free from errors that detract from the overall message.
  • APA style: Comply with current APA style and formatting.
  • Number of resources: A minimum of three academic resources.
  • Length: 6–8 typed, double-spaced pages, excluding the cover page and references.
  • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

CASE STUDY FOR ASSIGNMENT

Hannah Kennard, High school counselor

Adara Watson, High school student

Hannah and Adara

Hannah, a 36-year old African American woman, moved to Riverbend City ten years ago. She loves her work as a school counselor and, although she does not have children of her own, she says that “children are my life.” The principal and teachers at Cargill Academy appreciate her hard work with the students. She often puts in long hours.

Hannah is working with Adara, a 15-year old Muslim-American. Her parents immigrated to Detroit, Michigan from Iraq in 1999. She and her siblings were born and grew up in Dearborn, a suburb of Detroit. They moved to Riverbend City when Adara was 11 years old.

Adara is feeling depressed but isn’t sure why. Lately she has been wishing she wasn’t alive. She decided to talk to Hannah.

She talks about feeling “different” from others in school. She has friends at school, with whom she spends some time outside of school; however, she is acutely aware that she is the only Muslim-American among all the people she knows. She is the only person to wear a headscarf that her parents require her to wear, following their cultural and religious traditions. She often feels other kids staring at her, and sometimes they make rude comments. She has been bullied on social media, with other kids accusing her of being a “terrorist.”

She has enjoyed her conversations with Hannah and feels better after she leaves her office. Hannah has encouraged her to talk with her parents about seeing a therapist. Adara has resisted, and says her parents will not support her seeing a therapist.

During their last visit, Adara told Hannah that she wishes she was dead. Hannah called her parents to let them know. Now Adara is angry with Hannah and feels her trust has been violated. She says, “My counselor told my mother about everything. Now I feel like I can’t trust her. Doesn’t she have to keep what I say to herself?”

Consider the individual, family, societal, cultural, and ethical issues that Hannah must think about as she interacts with Adara and her parents.

1200 Words And Three Scholarly References

1. In a narrative essay format for the Complete section, discuss the key facts and critical issues presented in the case as part of your essay. Your response will be an overview of the case and will also need to address each question or statement listed below in an essay format using at least three scholarly sources and at least a minimum of 1200 words.

You are working in a setting where an office has many conflicts and behavioral problems. How would you use the scientific method of Psychology to analyze these problems and develop a solution to address these problems? Describe what sources you would use to back up your findings and help you with your discovery. What types of questions would you ask different individuals in this setting? What are you going to do with your finding? What principles of Psychology can you apply to the analysis and solution to these problems?

Laura A.Freberg

John T. Cacioppo University of Chicago

Australia • Brazil • Japan • Korea • Mexico • Singapore • Spain • United Kingdom • United States

California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Discovering Psychology

The Science of Mind

9781305461994, Discovering Psychology: The Science of the Mind, Cacioppo/Freberg – © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. No distribution allowed without express authorization.

F O S T E R , C E D R I C 1 6 9 2 T S

 

 

© 2013 Wadsworth, Cengage Learning

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this work covered by the copyright herein may be reproduced, transmitted, stored, or used in any form or by any means graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including but not limited to photocopying, recording, scanning, digitizing, taping, Web distribution, information networks, or informa- tion storage and retrieval systems, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without the prior written permission of the publisher.

Unless otherwise noted, all art is © Cengage Learning.

Library of Congress Control Number: 2011940901

Student Edition: ISBN-13: 978-0-618-18550-4 ISBN-10: 0-618-18550-X

Loose-leaf Edition: ISBN-13: 978-1-111-83627-6 ISBN-10: 1-111-83627-2

Wadsworth 20 Davis Drive Belmont, CA 94002-3098 USA

Cengage Learning is a leading provider of customized learning solutions with office locations around the globe, including Singapore, the United Kingdom, Australia, Mexico, Brazil, and Japan. Locate your local office at www.cengage.com/global.

Cengage Learning products are represented in Canada by Nelson Education, Ltd.

To learn more about Wadsworth, visit www.cengage.com/Wadsworth

Purchase any of our products at your local college store or at our preferred online store www.CengageBrain.com.

Discovering Psychology: The Science of Mind John T. Cacioppo and Laura A. Freberg

Publisher: Jon-David Hague

Sr. Development Group Manager: Jeremy Judson

Assistant Editors: Kelly Miller and Lauren Moody

Editorial Assistants: Sheli DeNola and Travis Holland

Media Editor: Mary Noel

Marketing Manager: Jessica Egbert

Marketing Assistant: Janay Pryor

Sr. Marketing Communications Manager: Laura Localio

Content Project Manager: Charlene M. Carpentier

Design Director: Rob Hugel

Art Director: Vernon Boes

Print Buyer: Karen Hunt

Rights Acquisitions Specialist: Tom McDonough

Production Service: Lachina Publishing Services

Text Designer: Diane Beasley

Developmental Art Editor: Lisa Torri

Photo Editor: Trina McManus

Photo Researcher: Stephen Forsling

Text Researcher: Karyn Morrison

Copy Editor: Carolyn Crabtree, Lachina Publishing Services

Illustrators: Argosy Publishing, Inc., and Lachina Publishing Services

Cover Designer: Irene Morris

Cover image: Stefano Tiraboschi/Fotolia

Compositor: Lachina Publishing Services

For product information and technology assistance, contact us at Cengage Learning Customer & Sales Support, 1-800-354-9706

For permission to use material from this text or product, submit all requests online at www.cengage.com/permissions

Further permissions questions can be e-mailed to permissionrequest@cengage.com

Printed in Canada 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 15 14 13 12

WCN: 02-200-240

y g

StuStuStuStuStuStuStuStudddddedenddent Et EEEEEEt Eddditionnn: ISSSSSBSSS N-13: 978-00–6618618618186 -18-1818188550-44 ISSSSBSSSSS N-10: 0-6188–1888550-X

LooLoooooooooooose-se-e–sesee lealeaaealealeafff Editttttionionionion:::: ISBN-13: 978-1-111-83627-6 ISBISBSBSS N-10: 1-111-83627-2

WadWaWaWW sworthrthrthrthrtththtth 20 2020200 Daviss s DriDriDDriDDriveveveve BelBelBelBelBele monmonmonmonmont, t CA CA CACA CA CACACA 94094040409404940400002222-22-2-3090930930930933 98888 88 8 USA

vice: Lachina Pubbliblibbbblibb shishishinngngg g nggg Services

Diane Beasley

l Art EEdEdEdiEEEEdiE tor: LLLLLLisa Tooooooorri

rina McManus

heheeheeeerrr: Steepheppppppp n Forsling

rrr: K: K: K: K: KK: KKaaaaararyn Morrison

arolyn CCrCrCraCrabtttrrttt ee, Laaaaaachichic na aaa PubPubPuPuPPu lishing

gosy Pubblilishhihing, Inc., and Lachina ervices

r: Irene Morris

9781305461994, Discovering Psychology: The Science of the Mind, Cacioppo/Freberg – © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. No distribution allowed without express authorization.

F O S T E R , C E D R I C 1 6 9 2 T S

 

 

Taste buds contained in the papillae of the tongue are far more responsive to bitter tastes than to sweet tastes.

9781305461994, Discovering Psychology: The Science of the Mind, Cacioppo/Freberg – © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. No distribution allowed without express authorization.

F O S T E R , C E D R I C 1 6 9 2 T S

 

 

The Science of Mind

The Discipline of Psychology

1 Explain the subject matter that psychologists study, addressing the meaning of mind and psychology’s role as a hub science.

2 Analyze the respective contributions of philosophy and the physical sciences as the “roots” of modern psychology.

3 Compare and contrast the early movements in psychology—structuralism, Gestalt psychology, functionalism, behaviorism, psychodynamic theory, and humanism—in terms of leading figures, core principles, and contributions to modern psychology.

4 Differentiate the seven major perspectives of modern psychology in terms of typical research questions, research methods, and focal causes of behavior.

5 Analyze the ways in which the seven major perspectives can be integrated to address a single psychological problem or topic.

6 Explain why psychology’s role as a “hub science” allows psychologists to pursue a wide range of career paths with respect to professional specialties and research areas.

Learning Objectives

3

Studying the science of psychology can lead you to see yourself and other people in completely new

ways. A lifetime of observation teaches us many things about our own behavior and about the behavior of others,

but psychological science can uncover new and exciting explanations for behavior that we otherwise might miss. Let’s begin with a seemingly simple and familiar example: our ability to taste. We all know a lot about taste—what we like or dislike, the different qualities of taste, and so on. You might even be aware that some

types of taste seem stronger than others. Most of us can taste sweetness in a solution of one part sugar in 200

parts water; this ability shows an impressive taste

© Masterfile/Radius Images

© A

rg os

y Pu

bl is

hi ng

, I nc

.

psychology s role as a hub science.

2 Analyzyzee ththe rer sppectitivee conntrtribi utionss of phphililossopophy andd ttheh physisicacall scs ieiencees as thth modederrn psychologogy.y

3 Compmpaare and conttrast the earlyy mmovovemmennts iinn pssychoholologygy——strtruccturaralilismm, GeGest lalt functitiononalalisismm, behehavavioiorismm, psychohoddynamimicc ththeoeoryy,, anand huummaniismsm—i—inn tetermms ofof llee figures, core principles, and contributions to modern psychology.

4 Differrentiate the seven major perspectives ofof mmodern psychology in terms of typi questtioons, reseseaearcrch memeththodo s,, aandnd ffococalal caauseess off bbehehavavior.r.

5 Analyyzee thee wawaysys iin whwhicich the seveen maajoor peperspepectivves ccanan bbe e integrated to add psychoholologigicacall prprobobleem m oror ttoppicic.

6 Explain why psychology’s role as a “hub science” allows pspsycychoholologists to pursue abli sh

in g,

In c.

g,

9781305461994, Discovering Psychology: The Science of the Mind, Cacioppo/Freberg – © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. No distribution allowed without express authorization.

F O S T E R , C E D R I C 1 6 9 2 T S

 

 

Chapter 1 4

Introspection is the personal observation of our own thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. Because we are not perfect observers of the operations of our own minds, psychologists developed other methods that provide truly scientific insight into the mind. In this functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scan, areas of the brain that were activated when the participant was hungry are highlighted. Through technology, researchers can better understand how the brain regulates hunger. From D. Fuhrer, S. Zysset, & M. Stumvoll, “Brain

Activity in Hunger and Satiety: An

Exploratory Visually Stimulated fMRI

Study,” in Obesity (2008) 16: 945–950.

© Nature Publishing Group.

sensitivity, to be sure. As remarkable as this sensitivity appears to be, however, people can detect one part bitter substance (like quinine) in 2 million parts water. This contrast in taste sensitivity between sweet and bitter does not reflect the actual difference between sweet and bitter sub- stances—that is, bitter tastes are not 10,000 times stronger than sweet tastes, but that is how we experience them. Why would we have such a vast difference in sensitivity between these tastes?

Our observations of taste do not help us out much in answering this question, but psychology can. As it turns out, our greater sensitivity to bit- ter tastes is highly adaptive: Most poisons or toxins taste bitter, and if you want to stay alive, it is more important to avoid swallowing poison than to enjoy something sweet. Being far more sensitive to tastes that are bitter is a trait that has served our species well, because it helps us avoid eating things that could potentially kill us. Psychology helps us understand why

we do the things we do by providing a context for understanding behavior. To gain that understanding, psychology has to act like the zoom feature in Google Earth. In some parts of this textbook, we will be zooming in on human behaviors, like looking at the highly magnified image at the beginning of the chapter of the tongue, which allows us to taste, and tracing the messages about taste sent from the tongue to the brain. At other times, we’ll zoom back out again to take in the

larger picture, to better understand why the boy on the previous page is giv- ing his bitter-tasting broccoli a skeptical look. Psychologists zoom in to the study of the mind using in-depth per- spectives, which we will be describing in this chapter. For example, we can look at the little boy’s reaction to his broccoli from a developmental perspective, which tells us that taste sensitivity decreases over the life- span. Or, using the social perspective, we can think about social influences like culture on food preferences. Cottage cheese, enjoyed by many Ameri- cans, is viewed with disgust in some other parts of the world. Fruit bat pie, a delicacy in Palau, might not be a popular item for a campus dining facility in the United States. Although single perspectives can tell us a lot about a phenomenon like our sensitivity to bitter tastes, no one perspective can give us a com- plete answer. The best view of all comes from zooming back out again by putting multiple perspectives together into a whole. You can learn a lot about your house from Google Earth by zooming in, but when you see how your home fits into the larger scene of city, state, country, and planet, that viewpoint adds something special to your understanding. We’ll start by learning more about psy- chology’s main perspectives, along with a little background about their origins. At that point, we’ll be in a better position to understand how these perspectives come together to give us the big picture.

© N

A SA

/k ut

ay ta

ni r/

iS to

ck ph

ot o

n is the personal offf ooour ooownw thoughts,s,, bebb hahaavviors. Because

erfef ct oobsbsbseree vers ions offf our ownn ologistsss devvelee opedd ds that provide c insight into the functional magnetic

to taste, and tracing the messages about taste sent from the tong toto tthehe brrainin.. AtA ooththere timmes, wewe’l’ll l zozoom bbacack out agagaiain n tot takakee inin

largerr ppiicture, too bbetettet r unundedersr taannd wwhyhy the boyy oonn tht e prprevious pagagee isis ing hiis s bbitter-tasstiinng bbroccccoli i a a skskepptiticcal l lolookk.

Psycychoholologig sttss zozooom iinn to tthehe stuudydy oof f ththe e mmindd uusingng iin-n-dedeptthh peperr spectives, which we will be describing in this chapter. For example, w can lookok at the little boyy’s reaction to hhisis broccoli from aa developmen perspeecttive,, wwhihichch ttelellsls uuss ththat tasastete senensittivivityty ddececrereasaseseses over the life span. OrOr, usining g hthe sosociciaal ppeerspecectivve, wewe ccann thihinkk aabobout social influe like culultuturere onn fofo dod pprereffererenncess. Coottttagagee chcheesese, ennjojoyeyed by many Am cans is viewed with disgust in some other parts off ththee world Fruit ba

9781305461994, Discovering Psychology: The Science of the Mind, Cacioppo/Freberg – © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. No distribution allowed without express authorization.

F O S T E R , C E D R I C 1 6 9 2 T S

 

 

WHAT IS PSYCHOLOGY? 5

What Is Psychology? The study of the mind is as fascinating as it is complex. Psychological sci- entists view the mind as a way of talking about the brain and its activities, including thought, emotion, and behavior. A quick look at this textbook’s table of contents will show you the variety of approaches to mind that you will encounter along this voyage, such as the thinking mind (cognitive psy- chology) and the troubled mind (abnormal psychology).

The word psychology is a combination of two Greek words: psyche (or psuche), or “soul,” and logos, “the study of.” For the ancient Greeks, the use of the word “soul” was closer to our modern view of a spirit or mind. Logos is the source of all our “ologies,” such as biology, anthropology, and so on. Literally translated, therefore, psychology means “the study of the mind.”

Contemporary definitions of psychology refine this basic meaning. Most psychologists today define their field as the scientific study of behavior and mental processes—that is, the scientific study of the mind.

The phrase behavior and mental processes has undergone several changes over the history of psychology. Behavior refers to any action that we can observe. As we will see in our chapter on research methods, obser- vation has been an important tool for psychologists from the very early days of the discipline. Notice, too, that our definition does not specify whose behavior is to be examined. Although the bulk of psychology focuses on human behavior, animal behavior has been an essential part of the dis- cipline, both for its own sake and for the sake of comparison with human behavior.

The study of mental processes has been highly dependent on the meth- ods available to psychologists. Early efforts to study mental processes were generally unsatisfactory, as they relied on the use of introspection, or the personal observation of your own thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. Because it is difficult for others to confirm an individual’s introspections, this subjective approach does not lend itself well to the scientific method. If you say that you are feeling hungry, how can anyone else really know if your observation is accurate or not? In the last 30 years, however, revolutions in the methods used to observe brain activity have allowed psychologists to revisit the question of mental processes with much greater objectivity and success.

As you learn more about psychology, some conclusions will seem obvi- ous to you. After all, we already know a great deal about the mind from our own experiences. In other cases, the conclusions of psychological research might challenge your firmly held beliefs. You may be surprised to learn that having a “good cry” can make you feel worse instead of better, or that people are less likely to come to another person’s aid when they are part of a crowd of observers than when they are the only ones available to help. Sometimes, we even believe ideas that contradict each other. Everyone knows that opposites attract and that birds of a feather flock together. It takes the science of psychology to determine when and under what condi- tions these beliefs are actually correct.

mind The brain and its activities, including thought, emotion, and behavior.

psychology The scientific study of behavior and mental processes.

introspection Personal observation of your own thoughts, feelings, and behavior.

of the discciplinne. Notice, too,, that our definition does not spep cifyy se beehahaviv or iis to bbe examinedd. AlAlththooughgh tthhe buulk k ofo psysycholologogy fofocuseess umanan bbeehavvioior,r, aanimam l behahavvior has bbeen an eessssenentit alal parart ofof ttheh disis– ne,, bboth for its owown saake andnd ffor ttheh ssaake of ccoompaarir sson n wiwith hhumumanan vivior.

How does perceptual constancy help us to organize our sensations into meaningful perceptions?

Assignment Instructions

Assignment Instructions

For your Final essay exam, you will complete 10 short answer essay questions which focus on the course readings and videos. Final essay answers must be attached as Word documents to the appropriate assignment page, not typed into the assignment student comments boxes. In addition to APA formatted citations and references with each answer, an APA title page and reference page are required. Each question should be answered clearly and numbered. Students will answer each question thoroughly and completely (approximately 300 words for each question, more if needed), providing examples where required.

Answer the questions below in your Final exam.

  1. How do we experience taste? Be sure to discuss the composite of the five basic taste sensations. After you have fully and completely answered this question from a biological perspective, include a relevant example which illustrates your answer.
  2. How does our sense of smell work? Discuss the concept that our sense of smell is directly connected to the brain. After you have fully and completely answered this question from a biological perspective, include a relevant example which illustrates your answer.
  3. How do our senses  monitor our body’s position and movement? Discuss factors which may influence our vestibular senses. After you have fully and completely answered this question from a biological perspective, include a relevant example which illustrates your answer.
  4. What did the Gestalt psychologists contribute to our understanding of how the brain organizes sensation into perceptions? After you have fully and completely answered this question from a biological perspective, include a relevant example which illustrates your answer.
  5. How do the principles of figure-ground and apparent movement contribute to our perception of form? Discuss how the roles of proximity, similarity, continuity, connectedness, and enclosure impact the order and form of stimuli during the organizational process.
  6. How do we see the world in three dimensions? Be sure to discuss the research on visual cliffs, binocular cues, retinal disparity, and monocular cues.
  7. How does perceptual constancy help us to organize our sensations into meaningful perceptions? Include a discussion of how perceptual constancy helps explain several well known visual illusions, such as the Moon and the Ames Room illusions.
  8. What does research on sensory restriction and restored vision reveal about the effects of experience on perception? After you have fully and completely answered this question from a biological perspective, include a relevant example which illustrates your answer.
  9. How adaptable is our ability to perceive the world around us? Discuss the biological components involved in vision and the brain’s ability to adapt to body movement. After you have fully and completely answered this question from a biological perspective, include a relevant example which illustrates your answer.
  10. Describe the following, which are related physiological mechanisms that are involved in determining cognitive and experiential aspects of pain perception: gate-control model; opiates and pain: the physiology of the placebo effect.

Supporting Materials

  •  PSYC304 Final Exam Paper rubric.docx (16 KB)

Submission

Hull Theory Vs Tulman Theory

Hull’s theory is based around associations and Tolman’s theory is based around purposive elements. Discuss the foundations with each theory and how each theory directs motivation and learning for academic success; comparing the two theories. Then respond to the following 2 scenarios based upon the facts of each theory.

1. Alan drinks a couple of beers while watching sports on television. Cynthia has a glass of wine with dinner. Explain both of their behaviors using key points of Hull’s theory.

2. Tim believes that studying leads to good grades. Gerald assumes that good grades depend on whether or not an instructor grades on the curve. Explain the difference in Tim and Gerald’s personal beliefs based upon key points of Tolman’s theory.

Create a chart similar to the one posted below to address the comparative points of each theory with at least 2 factual points for each theory and explanation to explain how each specific point directs motivation and learning. Create a word document and upload your submission. Your responses should be substantial to explain the facts and your thought. A guide of overall word count to establish a solid understanding is approximately 350-550 min word count.

Hull’s theory is based around associations and Tolman’s theory is based around purposive elements. Discuss the foundations with each theory and how each theory directs motivation and learning for academic success; comparing the two theories. Then respond to the following 2 scenarios based upon the facts of each theory.

1. Alan drinks a couple of beers while watching sports on television. Cynthia has a glass of wine with dinner. Explain both of their behaviors using key points of Hull’s theory.

 

 

2. Tim believes that studying leads to good grades. Gerald assumes that good grades depend on whether or not an instructor grades on the curve. Explain the difference in Tim and Gerald’s personal beliefs based upon key points of Tolman’s theory.

 

Create a chart similar to the one posted below to address the comparative points of each theory with at least 2 factual points for each theory and explanation to explain how each specific point directs motivation and learning. Create a word document and upload your submission. Your responses should be substantial to explain the facts and your thought. A guide of overall word count to establish a solid understanding is approximately 350-550 min word count.

TOLMAN’S THEORY HULL’S THEORY
Fact 1 Fact 1
Explanation of fact 1 Explanation of fact 1
Fact 2 Fact 2
Explanation of fact 2 Explanation of fact 2
  Reasoning for scenario 1:
Reasoning for scenario 2: