Describe a research question in human relations that is of interest to you, with specific dependent and independent variables.

All 3 Parts are Separate

Journal of Experiential Education 2016, Vol. 39(4) 370 –385

© The Authors 2016 Reprints and permissions:

sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/1053825916668901

jee.sagepub.com

Article

Preventing Academic Disengagement Through a Middle School–Based Social and Emotional Learning Program

Amanda Moore McBride1, Saras Chung2, and Anne Robertson1

Abstract Behaviors that warrant school discipline (e.g., fighting, victimizing peers) is detrimental to school climate and the learning process. This study examines the effectiveness of preventing school disciplinary incidents in middle school through an experiential, social and emotional learning (SEL) program. A community youth development organization, two public middle schools in low-income communities and a local university collaborated to design and deliver the program to all seventh- grade students in social studies curricula. This article describes the design of the intervention and its effect on students’ suspensions, skipping class, and failing grades. The results of this study indicate that a school-based SEL service-learning program may reduce disciplinary incidents for middle school students. Other attitudes and skills, however, did not change significantly in the anticipated direction. This research demonstrates the effect of SEL curricula and service-learning programs embedded in school coursework. Implications for practice and research include understanding mechanisms of change in SEL processes.

Keywords service learning, experiential learning, school discipline, social and emotional learning, middle school

1University of Denver, CO, USA 2Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA

Corresponding Author: Saras Chung, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1196, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA. Email: saraschung@wustl.edu

668901 JEEXXX10.1177/1053825916668901Journal of Experiential EducationMcBride et al. research-article2016

 

 

McBride et al. 371

Introduction

Many public schools in economically vulnerable communities are constrained by a lack of resources available to help students learn increasingly difficult academic con- cepts, while also preparing them for a successful launch into society. For resource- depleted schools, the primary mission of education is often complicated by the urgent need to address student behaviors, which can be exacerbated by the effects of poverty (Wadsworth et al., 2008). Poverty-related stress can manifest itself in adolescent inter- nalizing and externalizing problems, deviant behavior, and school dropout (Wadsworth et al., 2008), further complicating the already difficult task of educating.

These types of stressors can create vicious cycles for vulnerable schools. Instead of proactively encouraging positive student behaviors, schools are left with little choice but to spend their limited time and resources addressing highly disruptive and often- times dangerous behaviors. On an individual level, paying the consequences of one’s actions can reduce time that a student remains in the classroom to learn. Fragmented attendance in the classroom further diminishes a student’s exposure to instruction, which may increase academic disengagement, causing students to fall farther behind academically (American Academy of Pediatrics, 2013). Lack of academic motivation may further exacerbate their participation in disruptive behaviors, creating a negative reinforcing loop of behaviors for schools to address.

The purpose of this study was to examine whether a universal social and emotional learning (SEL) curriculum delivered through a service-learning program could reduce school disciplinary incidents and increase academic engagement for middle school stu- dents. Specifically, this study included the following objectives: (a) work with an urban middle school to deliver an SEL program to an entire grade of seventh-grade students as part of their weekly social studies curricula, and (b) determine whether the interven- tion could reduce middle school disciplinary incidents and increase academic engage- ment, as found in previous replications of the program with high school students.

The intervention design tests a range of academic and social outcomes. First, this study tests whether the intervention could enhance academic efficacy, civic attitudes, and engagement in schools. To our knowledge, few SEL programs have been coupled with service learning and embedded in school curricula in this way. In addition, this study examines whether delivering the intervention in school curricula could reduce negative school behaviors when embedded in school curricula during the school day.

SEL as an Intervention to Prevent Negative School Behaviors

SEL is defined by the most widely used definition from the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL) and Zins, Bloodworth, Weissberg, and Walberg (2004) as follows:

SEL is a process for helping children develop the fundamental skills for life effectiveness. SEL teaches the skills we all need to handle ourselves, our relationships and our work effectively and ethically. These skills include recognizing and managing our emotions,

 

 

372 Journal of Experiential Education 39(4)

developing caring and concern for others, establishing positive relationships, making responsible decisions, and handling challenging situations constructively and ethically. They are the skills that allow children to calm themselves when angry, make friends, resolve conflicts respectfully, and make ethical and safe choices. (Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning [CASEL], 2014, http://www.casel.org/ social-and-emotional-learning/)

Similarly, Zins et al. (2004) define SEL as the process through which children and adolescents enhance their ability to incorporate thinking, feeling, and behaving to achieve important life tasks. These skills include recognizing and managing emotions, developing caring and concern for others, establishing positive relationships, making responsible decisions, and handling challenging situations constructively and ethically (Zins et al., 2004).

The American Academy of Pediatrics (2013) has recommended that early interven- tion programs identifying students at risk of suspensions and expulsions should also teach age-appropriate behaviors. SEL programs seem to align with this need. Previous research suggests that SEL programs can influence the development of appropriate emotion regulation techniques and positive peer interactions, encouraging young peo- ple to follow positive and productive trajectories (Anderson-Butcher, Stetler, & Midle, 2006; Durlak, Weissberg, Dymnicki, Taylor, & Schellinger, 2011; Zins & Elias, 2006).

In schools, SEL interventions have been used to reduce a variety of negative behav- iors and increase positive development for youth. In a meta-analysis of SEL programs, successful programs included components that (a) use a connected or coordinated set of activities to achieve objectives related to skill development, (b) use active forms of learning to help youth learn new skills, (c) have at least one component devoted to developing personal or social skills, and (d) targets specific SEL skills rather than targeting skills in general terms (Durlak et al., 2011).

Social and emotional skills taught and demonstrated during childhood have been tied to numerous positive behaviors and qualities. A 3-year longitudinal study of a universal SEL program for elementary school students indicated that students who engaged in the program experienced preventive effects on population-level rates of aggression, social competence, and school engagement (Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group, 2010). In adolescence, there is evidence of indirect effects on the reduction of anxiety and depression or emotional distress (Durlak et al., 2011; Neil & Christensen, 2009); decreased incidence of conduct problems, such as drug use (Diekstra, 2008; Durlak et al., 2011); and improved performance in school (Diekstra, 2008; Durlak et al., 2011; Wilson, Lipsey, Jo, & Mark, 2006).

Although there are many different types of SEL programs, experiential activities embedded in service learning within a positive youth development framework may be one way to build social and emotional skills in early adolescence (Chung & McBride, 2015). Service learning is a pedagogy that is used to describe structured learning opportunities that engage students in service from research to reflection. These types of experiences have an explicit student learning focus integrated with an equally fun- damental community focus, providing hands-on opportunities for students to research,

 

http://www.casel.org/social-and-emotional-learning/
http://www.casel.org/social-and-emotional-learning/

 

McBride et al. 373

Part 1. Factorial Research Design

 

Respond to the following–250 words

a. Describe a research question in human relations that is of interest to you, with specific dependent and independent variables.

b.  How would you utilize a factorial research design to address this question?

 

 

Part 2.  Analyzing and Interpreting Data

Respond to the following: 250 words

a.  What do you take to be the most important thing about analyzing and interpreting data in a study?  Why?

b.  How are data often misused in our culture?

c.  Can you think of examples?

d.  How would you utilize a factorial research design to address this question?

 

 

Part 3. Using the attached article, propose a research methodology that you might use to conduct a study or experiment.

  1.  Identify the hypothesis and null hypothesis.
  2. Identify all independent, dependent, and intervening variables.
  3. Identify the instruments of measurement to be used.
  4. Present the methodology or procedures for the study.

Most important highlighted. No word limit, just ensure enough detail is provided.

Identifying A Population And Clinical Area Of Concern-Peer Responses

1st Peer Posting

 

Childhood anxiety is a prevalent disorder affecting several children of all ages. The population being served will be in children between the ages of 3 and 12 years old who suffer from anxiety disorders.
The treatment of anxiety in children is dependent on the developmental level of a child and those factors need to be assessed in assessing and treating the child (Barrett, 2000). Additionally, anxiety disorders among children can also lead to lifetimes of different issues or disorders if not treated effectively (Bittner, Egger, Erkanli, Costello, Foley, and Angola, 2007).
As I continue researching, I may narrow down the type of anxiety or have anxiety disorders due to trauma.

References
Barrett, P. M. (2000). : Treatment of childhood
anxiety: developmental aspects. Clinical
Psychology Review, 20(4), 453-471.

Bittner, A., Egger, H. L., Erkanli, A., Costello,
J., Foley, D. L., & Angold, A. (2007). What
do childhood anxiety disorders predict?
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,
48(12), 1174-1183

 

 

 

2nd Peer Posting

 

Population: Caucasian, female, between age of 13-17

 

Concern: depression, self-harm

 

It is found that 3 teenagers will self-harm within an hour. Self-harm includes cutting or burning themselves or taking an overdose of some form of drug to deal with difficult emotions. Some of these teens may feel suicidal and wish to die while others are trying to express their pain (Teenage self-harm ‘soars’, 2000). Self-harm is the fourth most common problem that teenagers are facing (Naughton, 2013). “Self-harm is a clear sign of immense psychological and emotional distress, and that person cannot cope” (Naughton, 2013; 16).

 

There is a belief that the child may not get the idea of self-harm by themselves. There is a possibility that they go to the internet looking for some way to express how they are feeling and they find that there are other children whom are causing self-harm to express themselves (Naughton, 2013). Self-harm can be used to distract oneself from intense emotional pain, release bad feelings; it could follow trauma, bereavement or abuse or learned from older siblings or peers among many other reasons.

 

Bullying is a trigger, this is something that is very difficult to prevent. Even several schools that are enforcing no bullying rule, students still find ways to bully one another (Naughton, 2013). Self-harm can also meant that an individual has an unmet mental health need; depression or personality disorder. It is very difficult to know if the individual is self-harming due to psychological difficulties or if the individual is trying to cope with something they are going through.

 

 

 

 

 

Naughton, L. (2013). Too much, too young. Community Practitioner, 86(5), 16-9.

 

15 Questions Interpersonal Dynamics And Processes

1.       What are team norms, and what role do they play in behavior and cohesiveness of the group? How does the diversity of a group affect its performance?

 

 

 

2.       Goes through Tuckman’s five stages of team development, what impact does this have on the three characteristics of effective teams? Provide examples to support your response.

 

 

 

3.       What are examples of effective techniques for team decision making? What are examples of strategies for avoiding potential liabilities in team decision making (e.g., groupthink)?

 

 

 

4.       What role does effective interpersonal communication play within organizations?

 

 

 

5.       Using a practical example, what are the benefits and potential problems associated with conflict? What are examples of strategies that can be applied for resolving conflict?

 

 

 

6.       What is negotiation? What are the common negotiation pitfalls? What are the strategies to overcome them?

 

 

 

7.       Explain power bases. How does one build power within an organization? How are power and politics related within an organization?

 

 

 

8.       Discuss a time when you have been a good follower. What did it entail? What theory most applied to the dynamic of your role as a good follower?

 

 

 

9.       It has long been a dictum of management theory that leaders must adapt their behavior to fit the specifics of a situation. Discuss whether transformational leadership is appropriate for all occasions. In which situations might it not be effective? Which theories might be effective instead?

 

 

 

10.   In what ways does human resource management process align human capital with organizational strategies?

 

 

 

11.   In what ways are the HR function and governmental legislation designed to protect against employee discrimination? Provide specific examples of U.S laws in place to protect against employee discrimination.

 

 

 

12.   How does an individual’s faith or worldview inform personal management practices?

 

 

 

13.   Identify the formal structure of an organization. Using an organization of your choice as an example, how is the organization’s structure and design a reflection of its environment, goals, and competencies?

 

 

 

14.   Using an organization with which you are familiar, identify its corporate culture and the elements of its observable culture. What do you think would need change in order to facilitate innovation? What role would organizational development play in overcoming resistance to change?

 

 

 

 

 

15.   Using an organization with which you are familiar, identify ways through which feedforward, concurrent, and feedback controls can be used to assure the high quality of a final outcome. How do these controls lead to effective management?

 

Each question MUST have a cite in it MUST PASS TURN IT IN WITH LESS THAN 5% and be about 100-200 words.

Evidence And Non-Evidence Based Treatment Options

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, please read both “Limitations to Evidence-Based Practice” and “Rationale and Standards of Evidence-Based Practice,”and listen to the Case Studies in Non-evidence Based Treatment Part One. On the last day of Week 5, listen to Case Studies in Non-evidence Based Treatment Part Two.

For your initial post, you will choose one of the case studies from this week’s audio file selection on which to base your remarks. Based on the available information, evaluate the symptoms and presenting problems for the patient in the chosen case study and propose a provisional diagnosis. Describe one evidence-based treatment for this diagnosis and provide a rationale for your choice. Research at least two peer-reviewed articles to support your evidence-based treatment selection.

Guided Response: Review several of your colleagues’ posts, and respond to at least two of your peers by 11:59 p.m. on Day 7 of the week. You are encouraged to post your required replies earlier in the week to promote more meaningful interactive discourse in this discussion.

Examine your colleague’s initial post, and assume the proposed evidence-based treatment was ineffective. Using a sociocultural perspective, provide an explanation for why the evidence-based treatment may have been ineffective in this case. Describe at least one non-evidence-based treatment option as an alternative to evidence-based treatment in this case. Compare and contrast the failed evidence-based treatment with the proposed non-evidence-based treatment option. Justify the use of the proposed non-evidence-based treatment option for this patient (i.e., How does this treatment option meet the patient’s unique sociocultural needs?).

Continue to monitor the discussion forum until 5:00 p.m. Mountain Standard Time (MST) on Day 7 of the week, and respond to anyone who replies to your initial post. Be sure to indicate whether your diagnosis and conceptualization has changed based on your colleague’s feedback.

Carefully review the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate this Discussion Thread.