Effects of Aging on Cognitive Development

After reading Chapter 1 through 4, you should be familiar with quality improvement initiatives including NCQA’s HEDIS® measures. Health plans and physicians must ensure they are meeting standards set by the accreditation agencies, such as NCQA. As a physician practice manager for Dr. Jones, you have just conducted a mock survey of the patient chart data. The data shows that your physician practice is not meeting standards for two HEDIS® measures.

  • Choose two HEDIS® measures (from the list below either a, b, c, d, e or f) that must be implemented in a physician practice to improve patient outcomes.
  • Describe the sources of data needed to conduct the two measures.
  • Using one of the quality improvement models (Lean, PDSA, or Six Sigma), explain how you would use the model to implement the two chosen HEDIS® Measures.

Your initial post should be 250-300 words and utilize at least one scholarly source from the Library to justify your choice of improvement models. Cite all sources in APA format as outlined in the

HEDIS® Measures

Hypertension/Cardiovascular:

a. Patients who were hospitalized and discharged alive after an acute Myocardial Infarction (heart attack) who received treatment with beta-blockers for six months after discharge.

b. Patients 18-85 with a diagnosis of hypertension whose most recent blood pressure reading was controlled.
Age 18-59 whose BP was <140/90
Age 60-85 with a diagnosis of diabetes whose BP was <140/9
Age 60-85 without a diagnosis of diabetes whose BP was <150/90

Smoking Cessation:

c. Current smokers seen by a physician during the year who were advised to quit, and cessation medications were recommended and discussed. Different   cessation methods were discussed.

Weight Assessment:

d. Patients between the ages of 3-17 who had been examined for body mass index (BMI, received counseling on nutrition. Counseling or referral for physical activity or indication physical activity was addressed during an outpatient visit either by a claim or as a medical record entry during the measurement year.

Mammograms:

e. Women age 50-74 years, who have had a mammogram during the preceding 24 months. Exclusion of those women who have undergone bilateral mastectomy.

Prostate Screening:

f. Male 50 years and greater who have received an annual PSA and/or Digital Rectal Exam.

Guided Response: Choose two classmates’ posts and respond to the following question: Do you agree or disagree with their choice of CQI Model? Give rationale why you either agree or disagree, and give one example that illustrates your answer. List at least one scholarly source to support your rationale.

Dq2
The Department of Health and Human Services has oversight of several agencies (i.e., FDA, CDC, AHRQ, NIH, CMS) that regulate health care in the United States. Regulation encompasses insurance plans, cost, research, safety, all in the name of delivering quality care in a cost effective manner. These agencies are responsible for monitoring compliance and enforcing legislative mandates. However, the debate continues on government regulation and its effect on ensuring quality care. After completing this week’s reading, review the following articles listed below, which were published 11 years apart. Analyze the cost-quality paradigm noted in the articles. Considering the many governmental mandates and regulations to reduce costs and ensure the delivery of quality care that have been implemented over the years, discuss your opinion regarding why costs have continued to rise without improving quality. List two examples that illustrate your point.

  • DHHS Article related to Cost and Quality (2002)
  • Institute of Medicine article (2013)

Your initial post should be 250-300 words and utilize at least one scholarly source from the Ashford University Library that supports your point. Cite all sources in APA format as outlined in the

Guided Response: Choose two classmates and respond to this question: Do you agree or disagree with their rationale for the disparity between cost and quality in health care. Explain your answer. List at least one scholarly source that justifies your statements.

Psychodynamic Theorist Paper

Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper discussing Freud, Erikson, and two other psychoanalytic or neo-psychoanalytic theorists.

Answer the following questions in your paper:

  • Why was Freud’s work so influential?
  • How did the analysts that followed Freud dissent from his viewpoint?
  • What links the theorists in the psychoanalytic theory group?
  • What are three or more psychoanalytic concepts that are relevant to today’s culture? Explain their relevance and provide an example of each.

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

ADHD          Assignment 1: Course Project Part II—Practice

You have researched the theoretical writings related to your selected mental disorder in the second part of the course project. In the third part, you will examine the practice related to the disorder.

You have conducted field research on practice related to the disorder, including the interview with a health professional. Based on the information you have gathered, develop a paper that includes the following:

  • Describe the extent and nature of the disorder, such as number of people diagnosed and under treatment, demographics, and other factors of interest.
  • Explain how the selected disorder is diagnosed.
  • Explain how the selected disorder is treated. Be sure to include all the views on appropriate treatment and comment on diversity of views or dissent.
  • Differentiate the diagnosis of this disorder from those of the other disorders within the same diagnostic category.
  • Comment on culturally bound syndromes, cultural biases, or the interplay between assessment and diagnosis and culture.

Write a 4–5-page paper in Word format. Make sure to review the rubric so as to address all necessary criteria. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. Use the following file naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M5_A1.doc.

B

Assignment Criteria Max Points
Describe the extent and nature of the disorder, such as number of people diagnosed and under treatment, demographics, and other factors of interest. 44
Explain how the selected disorder is diagnosed. 40
Explain how the selected disorder is treated. Be sure to include all the views on appropriate treatment and comment on diversity of views or dissent. 64
Differentiate the diagnosis of this disorder from those of the other disorders within the same diagnostic category. 44
Comment on culturally bound syndromes, cultural biases, or the interplay between assessment and diagnosis and culture. 44
Organization (16 points): Introduction, Thesis, Transitions, Conclusion

Usage and Mechanics (16 points): Grammar, Spelling, Sentence Structure

APA Elements (24 points): Attribution, Paraphrasing, Quotations

Style (8 points): Audience, Word Choice

Evaluate the effectiveness of Officer Stone’s efforts.

You are a police officer in Centervale. While on patrol, you are dispatched to investigate a theft from a local retail store where the loss prevention representative has made an apprehension of a suspect. You are also notified that there are several employee witnesses and the suspect has other people with him in the store. All of these people may or may not be involved in this crime. Additionally they may be witnesses and have critical information needed for successful prosecution of this case.

Click here to read the transcript of your interactions at the retail store.

Tasks:

Prepare a 9- to 10-page Microsoft Word document which accommodates the following:

  • Compare and contrast the fundamental concepts of communication in an investigatory interview and an interrogation. Analyze and explain whether the communication in this scenario would be classified as an interview or an interrogation. Apply the comparison and contrast information, the script, and external resources to support your position, and rationale.
  • Analyze and discuss at least two different confession elicitation tactics that were used by Officer Stone in an effort to get Marty to confess. Contrast one of these tactics with a tactic that might have been less effective in this situation.
  • Evaluate the effectiveness of Officer Stone’s efforts. Analyze and discuss a key area of strength and weakness in his approach. Identify any fundamental legal issues that Officer Stone may encounter related to how he handled this situation and his choice of tactics.
  • Evaluate how you would have executed this communication in order to achieve the confession? Use empirical research in support of your evaluation; suggest how to improve an area of weakness and how to overcome any other obstacles you can identify in this situation.
  • Predict what would happen if Marty implicated his friend Joe? Identify the questions that should be asked to provide evidence to Marty’s claim?