Topic Gender Differences In Alzheimer Disease In USA

I want nice introduction that make my research interest the readers ( start with an interesting sentences).
Alzheimer is not a sociological problem ,so we have to add (prevalence).
people with Alzheimer in USA
Who are they? what they do?what are their socioeconomic statues , what is the problem with them, what seems to be a pattern in there situation all this I want to be from sociological stand of point .. please end the introduction by a topic sentence stating “this paper will examine…”
and discuss what you wrote as a topic sentence,,you have to explain what in the papers. get the pattern you discovered from the resources

Personal Reflection

Personal_Reflection_Journal_Entry
2 page paper
1. Reflect on how well you are adjusting to your life in terms of subjective well-being, diversity, contexts, and/or thinking critically.
Weight: 20%

2. Reflect on how well you are balancing your priorities, specifically home, work, school, family, and/or recreation.
Weight: 20%

3. Reflect on how well you are developing your identity, specifically self-esteem, self-concept, ethnicity, and/or gender.
Weight: 20%

4. Reflect on how well you are coping with stress, specifically social support, multiple coping strategies, and/or self-control
Weight: 20%

5. Writing / Support for ideas
Weight: 5%
6. Writing / Grammar and mechanics
Weight: 5%
7. Information Literacy / Crediting Sources in APA
Weight: 5%

Discuss the different strategies to reduce intergroup conflict found in your text and the Hewstone article.

You are a counselor in a detention center for delinquent adolescent boys. Your current project is to devise a way to reduce intergroup conflict that has been escalating between the boys at the center, many of whom were active in local gangs.

    • Discuss in detail the concepts that lead to the intergroup conflict, such as stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination. How have these attitudes and behaviors created and perpetuated the ongoing conflict?

 

    • Discuss the different strategies to reduce intergroup conflict found in your text and the Hewstone article.

 

    • Looking back at the course discuss 2 to 3 additional concepts that could be applied in helping a person overcome these negative attitudes and behaviors.

 

  • Keeping these strategies and concepts in mind, what activities and/or programs can you create that will help these boys overcome this conflict and learn to work together, respect each other, and come to see each other’s differences as valuable. Briefly summarize each program/strategy in 2 to 3 sentences each in preparation for part 2 of this project.

Answer the above points in a 3- to 4-page paper. Your paper should be double-spaced, typed in 12-point Times New Roman font with normal one-inch margins, written in APA style, and free of typographical and grammatical errors. It should include a title page with a running head, an abstract, and a reference page.

 

Part 2:

Create a 4- to 8-slide PowerPoint presentation (not including title and reference slides) to present to the board of directors for the detention center that will cover the following:

    • A detailed outline of each of the 3 to 4 programs/strategies that you would like to put into place at the center.

 

  • Discuss for each program/strategy why you believe it will be effective within the context of your detention center.

Review Argosy’s IRB Checklist.

Applicant Name / IRB Protocol Number ___________________________________________

The Application

FORMCHECKBOX Selected appropriate level of review (exempt = archival; expedited = minimal risk w/ general population; full = at risk population or more than minimal risk)

FORMCHECKBOX Included principal Investigator and Faculty Research Supervisor’s names and contact information

FORMCHECKBOX Provided a proposed start date for the project

FORMCHECKBOX Explained purpose of the study & purpose seems reasonable

FORMCHECKBOX Offered a brief but detailed summary of the project, including methodology

FORMCHECKBOX Proposed protocol’s time required, compensation provided and activities seem appropriate

FORMCHECKBOX Described participant demographics (Anticipated sample size & if members of special groups –institutionalized, protected, age, health status, etc.)

FORMCHECKBOX Indicated that deception will or will not be used in the study

FORMCHECKBOX Indicated that audio or videotapes will or will not be used in the study

FORMCHECKBOX Described the precautions that will be taken to insure the confidentiality, privacy or anonymity (cannot be both confidential and anonymous at the same time) of the participants

FORMCHECKBOX Described procedures where confidentiality may be broken by law (e.g., child abuse, suicidal intent).

FORMCHECKBOX Described where the research will take place

FORMCHECKBOX Provided a full example of the proposed Informed Consent and Assent (Attach copies of all relevant forms) or describes alternative methods where consent is not appropriate

FORMCHECKBOX Described any possible physical, psychological, social, legal, economic or other risks to participants

FORMCHECKBOX Described procedures implemented for correcting harm potentially caused by participating in the study

FORMCHECKBOX Explained the potential benefits of the study (to participant and to professional audience)

FORMCHECKBOX Noted any areas that may provide a conflict of interest or promote a coercive atmosphere

The Consent Form (information provided must match the claims in the application)

FORMCHECKBOX Consent is written at an appropriate level for the proposed participant pool (generally 8th grade level)

FORMCHECKBOX If non-English speakers are part of the participant pool, consent is in their native language

FORMCHECKBOX Participant is told clearly why he or she was selected

FORMCHECKBOX Participant is given a clear estimate of the number of expected participants

FORMCHECKBOX Participant is given a clear explanation of why the research is being done

FORMCHECKBOX The principal investigator clearly notes that the study is being done for doctoral studies or other applicable reasons (participant will want to know what the principal investigator gains by doing this study)

FORMCHECKBOX The principal investigator clearly explains if (or what) compensation will be provided (what does the participant gain by participating in this study – if monetary or other concrete benefit, how and when will it be distributed)

FORMCHECKBOX Participant is given a clear explanation of exactly what participation will involve (time required, type of activities expected, type of questions asked, etc.)

FORMCHECKBOX Participant is told that he or she has the right to choose not to participate, and can withdraw at any time without harm

FORMCHECKBOX Where applicable, participant is told that if child or dependent adult abuse is detected, abuse will have to be reported

FORMCHECKBOX Participant is given a clear explanation of potential risks or discomforts and an estimate of likelihood of same

FORMCHECKBOX As applicable, participants are told how to request results or how they will receive results, and these processes are appropriate and not unduly onerous

FORMCHECKBOX Participant is told exactly how privacy/confidentiality/anonymity will be maintained, including who will see the data

FORMCHECKBOX Participant is told if taping is possible or required and, if so, how those tapes will be kept safe (including who transcribes the materials – for example: principal investigator or a transcription service).

FORMCHECKBOX Participant is told that his or her decision to participate will not affect any relationship that seems relevant

FORMCHECKBOX Participant is given full contact information for principal investigator and faculty research supervisor

FORMCHECKBOX Participant is given IRB contact information including reason why one might use same

The Attachments

FORMCHECKBOX Attached an Institutional Permission Letter (where research is taking place if appropriate) or an Assurance of Adherence to Governmental Regulations concerning Human Subjects/Participants (if research project is conducted outside the US)

FORMCHECKBOX Attached a Letter of Informed Consent and (where necessary) Parent/guardian Permission Letter and Oral statement of Assurance (used with minors)

FORMCHECKBOX Provided all proposed data-gathering instruments (s): Observation, Interview, or Survey with clear permissions or documentation of ability to use

FORMCHECKBOX Where appropriate, provided receipt for payment of instrument or documentation of ability to use instrument (email permission, print out of public domain status, etc.)

FORMCHECKBOX Attached a conflict of Interest Disclosure Statement

FORMCHECKBOX Included the CRP or Dissertation Chairperson/Research Supervisor’s signature as well as the principal Investigator’s signature

FORMCHECKBOX Included CITI training forms for both applicant and research chair on project

FORMCHECKBOX Attached a copy of all recruitment materials