Assignment Paper Topic And Informaiton Literacy

 Due Date: 11:59 pm EST Sunday of Unit 4 Points: 100 Overview: In this assignment, you will select a topic for your “Models of Service Delivery Paper.” You will also include an annotated bibliography of two sources. Stay away from noncredible sources such as Wikipedia, blogs, etc. The Post Library is a great starting point. This assignment is part of your overall written assignment grade. Select a problem that is currently receiving the attention of the helping professions. • Topics ideas include: substance abuse, homelessness, domestic violence, psychological disabilities/mental health, veterans, etc.). • You are free to select any topic you are interested in so long as you can apply all three models to your topic Conduct research on that topic finding at least two credible sources, and provide background information about your topic: • What is the topic? • Who is affected by the problem you selected? • What are underlying causes of the problem? You should show a clear understanding of the topic you selected based on your research (not opinion). Instructions: Using the attached template, you will complete your literacy assignment chart, to include: • The 2 scholarly resources you found. • For each resource fill out the required information in each column: o Resource in APA Format: cite the resource in APA format o Summary of the Resource: Each resource must be described in about 150 words that addresses the main ideas, credibility, and reliability of the resource. HSV101 – Introduction to Human Services Unit 4 Assignment: Paper Topic and Information Literacy o How this Resource Relates to the Topic: In a short description, share how this resource connects to the topic you will be exploring for your Models of Human Services paper in order to justify your selection of this resource. Requirements: • Written work must follow the word count stipulation above (not including title and bibliography; typed and double spaced with 12 pt. font) and APA style In-text citations. • Use complete sentences with proper grammar and punctuation. • Clearly answer the questions in detail. • Support your topic with 2 resources,. • Carefully edit and proof read your work before submitting it via the Safe Assign link. Be sure to read the criteria by which your work will be evaluated before you write and again after you write. Evaluation Rubric for Unit 4 Assignment CRITERIA Deficient Needs Improvement Proficient Exemplary (0 Points) (5 Points) Topic Selection The topic selection is missing. N/A N/A The topic selection is fully presented. (0-14 Points) (15-19 Points) (20-24 Points) (25 Points) Resources in APA Format The first column contains little or no resources or APA formatting. is missing or poorly presented. The first column is partially filled out for all resources. N/A The first column is completely filled out for all resources in APA format. Summary of the Resources The summaries of the resources is missing or poorly presented. The summaries is present ,but key details are missing; word count is not met. The summaries is present, but minor details are missing; word count may or may not be met. The summaries of each resource is clearly and fully presented, in 150 words. How the Resources Relate to the Topic The relationship of the resource to the topic is missing or poorly presented. The relationship of the resource to the topic is present, but key details are missing. The relationship of the resource to the topic is present, but minor details are missing. The relationship of the resource to the topic is clearly and fully presented, including all details. (0-5 Points) (6-7 Points) (8-9 Points) (10 Points) Resources 0-1 resources used. N/A N/A 2 or more resources used. Clear and Professional Writing Errors impede professional presentation; guidelines not followed. Significant errors that do not impede professional presentation. Few errors that do not impede professional presentation. Writing and format are clear, professional, APA compliant, and error free.

What are some key similarities and differences between C.S Lewis book “A Grief Observed” and its Hollywood depiction?

What are some key similarities and differences between C.S Lewis book “A Grief Observed” and its Hollywood depiction? Original posts should be 200-250 words (please, no more than that!), and secondary posts (if used) must be limited to 200 words and should reflect engagement with what others have posted as much as possible. The film, Shadowlands, can be accessed through the following link; also posted in the Assignments Log.  The link is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frSxOadjioY  Shadowlands runs for 3 hours.  Anthony Hopkins and Debra Winger star.

Develop A Research Proposal Evaluating The Impact Of Leadership And Culture On The Sustainable Development Of The 21st Century Organizations.

1

 

How to write a good postgraduate research proposal

General Rules

Contents:

 Be clear, objective and realistic in your objectives

 Ask yourself why this research is important

 State and justify your objectives clearly

 Make sure you answer the questions: how will the research benefit the wider society

or contribute to the research community?

Styles:

 Provide a ‘catchy’ title

 Structure your text

 Present the information in short paragraphs rather than a solid block of text

 Write short sentences

 If allowed, provide images/charts/diagrams which may help break up the text

Structure for a Research Proposal

1. Title

2. Abstract (summary of the proposed researched 100-200 words)

3. Introduction (background information/brief summary of existing literature)

4. Hypothesis and main objectives

5. Methodology, research design, participants, procedure, material, analysis

6. Summary and conclusion

7. References

8. Appendices

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

Writing the Proposal

Important Components

Title:

Well-presented and clearly written proposals are more likely to stick in people’s mind. Avoid

long and convoluted titles. You will get an opportunity to give more detail in your

introduction

Plagiarism:

Make sure that you acknowledge the authors of ALL publications you use to write your

proposal. Failure to do so will be considered as plagiarism. Do not copy word to word what

an author has said. It is best to analyse and re-write all borrowed information in your own

words. If you absolutely have to quote an author, and then make sure that you use quotations

marks.

Abstract:

An abstract is a brief summary written in the same style as the rest of our proposal. It will

provide your reader with the main points and conclusions of your proposal.

Introduction and Literature Review:

A well-written introduction is the most efficient way to ‘hook’ your reader and set the context

of your proposed research. Get the reader’s attention early on and do no waste space with

obvious and general statements. The introduction is your opportunity to demonstrate that

your research has not been done before and that the proposed project will really add

something new to the existing body of literature. Your proposal does not have to

extraordinary, but it has to be based on sound hypotheses and reasoning.

You will have to provide background information in the form of a literature review which

helps you set the context for your research, to help the reader understand the questions and

objectives. You will also be expected to show that you have a good knowledge of the body of

literature, the wider context in which your research belongs and that you have awareness of

methodologies, theories and conflicting evidence in your chosen field.

Choose key research papers or public documents and explain clearly how your research will

either fill a gap, complete or follow on from previous research even if it is a relatively new

field.

Methodology:

The methodology identifies the data collection and analytical techniques that you intend to

use. You should propose a quantitative study.

 

 

 

 

3

For quantitative studies, the method section typically consists of the following sections:

 Study design -Is it a questionnaire study or a laboratory experiment? What kind of

design do you choose (descriptive, cross-sectional, case-control)?

 Selection of research location

 Subjects or participants – Who will take part in your study? What kind of sampling

method / procedure do you use? You will need to decide on the inclusion and

exclusion criteria

 Sample size – you need to calculate your sample size based on the type of study you

are conducting. There are several formulas for sample size calculation.

 Study instruments – What kind of measuring instruments or questionnaires do you

use? Why do you choose them? Are they valid and reliable?

 Data collection – How do you plan to carry out your study? What activities are

involved? How long does it take?

 Data analysis and interpretation – this includes plans for processing and coding data,

computer software to be used (eg Statistical Package for Social Sciences / SPSS, EPI-

INFO, etc), choice of statistical methods, significance levels etc.

 Ethical considerations – It is necessary to identify any ethical components especially

if you are using invasive procedures for human subjects. For instance:

o Consent forms (which state overall purpose and any risks or benefits of

participating).

o Potential risks that could be involved in any questioning (emotional distress,

dignity).

o Confidentiality of participants (anonymity).

o Feedback of results to participants.

 

Important Note:

o Make sure the research design or approach is appropriate for the stated

objectives

o Do not assume the reviewers are familiar with techniques to be used in your

study

o Provide a brief description of the study location, study design and flow of

activities

Summary and Conclusions:

Present an indication on how you envisage your research will contribute to debates and

discussions in your particular subject area. Will it make an original contribution? How might

it fill gaps in existing work or extend understanding of particular topics? Which are the

expected results? Summarize the research proposal’s main points.

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

For more information, please see the links below:

http://www.studygs.net/proposal.htm

http://www.psych.uncc.edu/pagoolka/writingAPA.pdf

 

http://www.studygs.net/proposal.htm
http://www.psych.uncc.edu/pagoolka/writingAPA.pdf

Research Outline, Abstract, Bibliography

Paper Outline, Abstract, and Full Bibliography

For this assignment you will turn in the outline for your paper (a version of it will become your Table of Contents in the final paper, with dot leaders and page numbers).   Your outline should be specific enough to guide you in your research and to show the reader how the paper will be structured.  It needs more detail than points that read merely  “Biblical Foundations” “Arguments in Favor” “Arguments Against” etc.  (such an outline indicates that you have not been reading and researching your topic–you don’t want to leave that impressions).  Be detailed.

The Abstract should be typed in Times New Roman, 12 point font, and double spaced.  (It need not have footnotes–and shouldn’t.) It should be a summary of the paper.  Here is an example of an abstract for a paper on another topic (not ethics):

This paper will begin with a survey of the historical background of Rastafarianism, in African and Traditional Caribbean Religions.  It will then set this religion within it context, focusing particularly on the influence of colonial domination on the development of Rastafarian belief.  The paper will end with a critical evaluation of key Rastafarian doctrines from a biblical perspective.

Notice how easy it is to tell what the paper will be about (though no details are found.  One can imagine what the outline might look like–an Introduction, a section on African religions, a section on Caribbean religions, a section on Rastafarian teaching in its modern context, and a biblically based evaluation.  If the researcher has worked diligently up to this point, each of those sections will have two to four main points under them in the outline.

Finally, you will include the full bibliography. By week six you should have found most, if not all, of the sources you intend to use in your paper.  List these in a properly formatted (Turabian style) bibliography.   (If, in fact you end up using a couple of other sources, as you complete the paper, it is alright to add those sources to the bibliography when you produce the final paper in week eight.).

All of this should be in a single document, in Times New Roman 12 point font.

  • THEO 650 Paper Outline, Abstract, and Bibliography Grading Rubric
    Criteria Levels of Achievement
    Content 70% Advanced 92-100% (A) Proficient 84-91% (B) Developing 1-83% (< C) Not present
    Outline and Abstract 81 to 88 points

     

    The assignment contains an outline of the paper developing from the student’s approved topic, along with an abstract explaining what the paper will argue or prove. The ideas outlined support the abstract and thesis of the paper.

     

    74 to 80 points

     

    The assignment contains an outline of the paper and an abstract. The abstract statement is cogent and generally aligns with the outline; however, some points are unclear and need revision.

     

    1 to 73 points

     

    The assignment contains an outline of the paper and an abstract. The abstract is unclear, and the topic is too broad, or the points of the outline do not support what the paper seeks to argue or prove.

     

    0 points

     

     

    Structure 30% Advanced 92-100% (A) Proficient 84-91% (B) Developing 1-83% (< C) Not present
    Grammar and Spelling 10 points

     

    Assignment contains fewer than 2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.

    8 to 9 points

     

    Assignment contains 3-4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.

    1 to 7 points

     

    Assignment contains 5 or more errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.

    0 points

     

     

    Bibliography and Turabian Requirements 25 to 27 points

     

    Bibliography contains a minimum of 10 scholarly, relevant sources.

    Minimal errors (1-2) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper Turabian format.

    23 to 24 points

     

    Bibliography contains 8-9 scholarly, relevant sources. Few errors (3-4) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper Turabian format

    1 to 22 points

     

    Bibliography contains 7 or fewer scholarly, relevant sources. Numerous errors (5+) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper Turabian format.

    0 p