Review the Sample Discharge Report located on page 105

  1. Write a 1000-word essay summarizing each of the Four reports below, how they will be used in your chosen career, is there information missing from the reports, proposed improvements and better ways this information could be conveyed. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least one (1) citation in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.
  2. Rewriting Four Reports – Each report task requires a minimum of 300 words. Separate each report with the proper heading and follow the proper formatting for each.
    1. Review the Sample Radiology Report located on page 102, Figure 4-2 Sample Radiology Report of the text “Grammar & writing skills for the health professional (3rd Ed.)”, copy the entire format and rewrite the; Primary Diagnosis, Clinical Information, and Impression sections of the report into common language that the normal patient would understand. Make sure any medical terminology is explained.
    2. Review the Sample Pathology Report located on page 103, Figure 4-3 Sample Pathology Report of the text “Grammar & writing skills for the health professional (3rd Ed.)”, copy the entire format and rewrite the; Preoperative and Postoperative Diagnosis, Gross Description, and Microscopic Diagnosis sections of the report into common language that the normal patient would understand. Make sure any medical terminology is explained.
    3. Review the Sample Discharge Report located on page 105, Figure 4-4 Sample Discharge Summary of the text “Grammar & writing skills for the health professional (3rd Ed.)”. Use the seven (7) bulleted items on page 104 under “Discharge” summary, write short paragraphs using the non-medical terms that you would use to explain the information on the Discharge Summary Report to the patient or their representative. Not every one of the seven points may be needed.
    4. Review the Sample Operative Report located on page 106, Figure 4-5 Sample Operative Report of the text “Grammar & writing skills for the health professional (3rd Ed.)”. Copy the entire format and rewrite the; Preoperative and Postoperative Diagnosis, Operative Procedure, Anesthesia, and Description sections of the report into common language that the normal patient would understand. Make sure any medical terminology is explained

Describe the roles of the nurse for the program you are currently enrolled

Prepare a two to three page written assignment that includes the following:

Content:

  • Introduction to the assignment (sections of the assignment; roles of the nurse, scope of practice, compare and contrast scope of practice)
  • Describe the roles of the nurse for the program you are currently enrolled
  • Identify the scope of practice for the nurse in the state where you intend to practice
  • Using the Nurse Practice Act for the state where you intend to practice, compare and contrast the scope of practice for the LPN and RN
  • Conclusion (reflect on the assignment including how you will use the scope of practice to support your role)
  • Use at least two credible resources to support your findings. For example, one of the resources could be the State Board of Nursing website, and another resource could be a textbook. These resources must be integrated into the body of your paper using at least two in-text citations. Be sure to use proper APA format and style.

Format:

  • Standard American English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.)
  • Logical, original and insightful
  • Professional organization, style, and mechanics in APA format and style
  • Run your paper through Grammarly and make corrections to identified errors before submission. Note: You must use the following link to create your Grammarly account. You must use your Rasmussen student email address: https://www.grammarly.com/signin?page=edu1

     

    4

     

     

     

    Title of Paper

     

    Your Name

    Rasmussen College

    COURSE#: Course Title

    Professor’s Name

    Assignment Due Date

     

    Title of Paper

    Title of Paper

    NO LONGER THAN 2-3 PAGES written work, excluding title and reference page

    Introduction (leave all these headings on paper)

    (Your introduction paragraph goes here, indent paragraphs and make sure

    paragraphs are 3-5 sentences or longer. Double space entire paper. Add literature support)

    Roles of the Nurse

    (Your Role of the Nurse paragraph (s) goes here. Add literature support)

    Scope of Practice for the Nurse

    (Your Scope of Practice for the Nurse paragraph (s) goes here. Add literature support)

    Compare and contrast the scope of practice for the LPN and RN

    (Your Compare….paragraph (s) goes here. Add literature support)

    Conclusion

    (Your Conclusion paragraph (s) goes here)

     

    · Use at least two credible resources to support your findings. For example, one of the resources could be the State Board of Nursing website, and another resource could be a textbook. These resources must be integrated into the body of your paper using at least two in-text citations. Be sure to use proper APA format and style.

    · Run your paper through Grammarly and make corrections to identified errors before submission. You need to manually select plagiarism on the bottom right of Grammarly (make sure plagiarism is less than 15%). Please submit Grammarly report with this paper to the dropbox. Note: It is very important that you use the following link to create your Grammarly account. You must use your Rasmussen student email address: It is free and found here:  http://rasmussen.libanswers.com/faq/32707 . It will be the expectation to use Grammarly on all written assignments through the remainder of the program.

     

    · References need to be in APA format.

     

     

    References

    Author’s Last Name, First initial. Middle initial. (Year). Title of article. Journal Title, Volume Number(Issue number), Page numbers.

Evaluation And Management (E/M)

The Assignment
  • Assign DSM-5 and ICD-10 codes to services based upon the patient case scenario.

Then, in 1–2 pages address the following. You may add your narrative answers to these questions to the bottom of the case scenario document and submit altogether as one document.

  • Explain what pertinent information, generally, is required in documentation to support DSM-5 and ICD-10 coding.
  • Explain what pertinent documentation is missing from the case scenario, and what other information would be helpful to narrow your coding and billing options.
  • Finally, explain how to improve documentation to support coding and billing for maximum reimbursement.

 

Instructions

Use the following case template to complete Week 2   Assignment 1. On page 5, assign DSM-5 and ICD-10 codes to   the services documented. You will add your narrative answers to the   assignment questions to the bottom of this template and submit altogether as   one document.

 

Identifying Information

Identification was verified by stating of their name and     date of birth.

Time spent for evaluation: 0900am-0957am

 

Chief Complaint

“My other provider retired. I don’t think I’m doing so     well.”

 

HPI

25 yo Russian female evaluated for psychiatric     evaluation referred from her retiring practitioner for PTSD, ADHD,     Stimulant Use Disorder, in remission. She is currently prescribed     fluoxetine 20mg po daily for PTSD, atomoxetine 80mg po daily for ADHD.
Today, client denied symptoms of depression, denied anergia, anhedonia,     amotivation, no anxiety, denied frequent worry, reports feeling     restlessness, no reported panic symptoms, no reported obsessive/compulsive     behaviors. Client denies active SI/HI ideations, plans or intent. There is     no evidence of psychosis or delusional thinking. Client denied past episodes of hypomania,     hyperactivity, erratic/excessive spending, involvement in dangerous     activities, self-inflated ego, grandiosity, or promiscuity. Client reports     increased irritability and easily frustrated, loses things easily, makes     mistakes, hard time focusing and concentrating, affecting her job. Has low     frustration tolerance, sleeping 5–6 hrs/24hrs reports nightmares of     previous rape, isolates, fearful to go outside, has missed several days of     work, appetite decreased. She has somatic concerns with GI upset and     headaches. Client denied any current     binging/purging behaviors, denied withholding food from self or engaging in     anorexic behaviors. No self-mutilation behaviors.

 

Diagnostic Screening Results

Screen of symptoms in the past 2 weeks:
PHQ 9 = 0 with symptoms rated as no difficulty in functioning
Interpretation of Total Score
Total Score Depression Severity 1-4 Minimal depression 5-9 Mild depression     10-14 Moderate depression 15-19 Moderately severe depression 20-27 Severe     depression
GAD 7 = 2 with symptoms rated as no difficulty in functioning
Interpreting the Total Score:
Total Score Interpretation ≥10 Possible diagnosis of GAD; confirm by     further evaluation 5 Mild Anxiety 10 Moderate anxiety 15 Severe     anxiety
MDQ screen negative
PCL-5 Screen 32

 

Past Psychiatric and Substance Use Treatment

· Entered mental health system when she was     age 19 after raped by a stranger during a house burglary.

· Previous Psychiatric     Hospitalizations:  denied

· Previous Detox/Residential treatments: one     for abuse of stimulants and cocaine in 2015

· Previous psychotropic medication trials:     sertraline (became suicidal), trazodone (worsened nightmares), bupropion     (became suicidal), Adderall (began abusing)

· Previous mental health diagnosis per     client/medical record: GAD, Unspecified Trauma, PTSD, Stimulant use     disorder, ADHD confirmed by school records

 

Substance Use History

Have you used/abused any of the     following (include frequency/amt/last use):

 

Substance

Y/N

Frequency/Last Use

 

Tobacco products

Y

½

 

ETOH

Y

last drink 2 weeks ago, reports drinks 1-2 times       monthly one drink socially

 

Cannabis

N

 

Cocaine

Y

last use 2015

 

Prescription stimulants

Y

last use 2015

 

Methamphetamine

N

 

Inhalants

N

 

Sedative/sleeping pills

N

 

Hallucinogens

N

 

Street Opioids

N

 

Prescription opioids

N

 

Other: specify (spice, K2, bath salts, etc.)

Y

reports one-time ecstasy use in 2015

Any history of substance     related:

· Blackouts: +

· Tremors:   –

· DUI: –

· D/T’s: –

· Seizures: –

Longest sobriety reported     since 2015—stayed sober maintaining sponsor, sober friends, and meetings

 

Psychosocial History

Client was raised     by adoptive parents since age 6; from Russian orphanage. She has unknown     siblings. She is single; has no children.

Employed at local     tanning bed salon

Education: High     School Diploma

Denied current     legal issues.

 

Suicide / HOmicide Risk Assessment

RISK FACTORS     FOR SUICIDE:

· Suicidal Ideas or plans – no

· Suicide gestures in past – no

· Psychiatric diagnosis – yes

· Physical Illness (chronic, medical) – no

· Childhood trauma – yes

· Cognition not intact – no

· Support system – yes

· Unemployment – no

· Stressful life events – yes

· Physical abuse – yes

· Sexual abuse – yes

· Family history of suicide – unknown

· Family history of mental illness – unknown

· Hopelessness – no

· Gender – female

· Marital status – single

· White race

· Access to means

· Substance abuse – in remission

PROTECTIVE     FACTORS FOR SUICIDE:

· Absence of psychosis – yes

· Access to adequate health care – yes

· Advice & help seeking – yes

· Resourcefulness/Survival skills – yes

· Children – no

· Sense of responsibility – yes

· Pregnancy – no; last menses one week ago,     has Norplant

· Spirituality – yes

· Life satisfaction – “fair amount”

· Positive coping skills – yes

· Positive social support – yes

· Positive therapeutic relationship – yes

· Future oriented – yes

Suicide Inquiry:     Denies active suicidal ideations, intentions, or plans. Denies recent     self-harm behavior. Talks futuristically. Denied history of     suicidal/homicidal ideation/gestures; denied history of self-mutilation     behaviors

Global Suicide     Risk Assessment: The client is found to be at low risk of suicide or     violence, however, risk of lethality increased under context of     drugs/alcohol.

No required     SAFETY PLAN related to low risk

 

Mental Status Examination

She is a 25 yo     Russian female who looks her stated age. She is cooperative with examiner.     She is neatly groomed and clean, dressed appropriately. There is mild     psychomotor restlessness. Her speech is clear, coherent, normal in volume     and tone, has strong cultural accent. Her thought process is ruminative.     There is no evidence of looseness of association or flight of ideas. Her     mood is anxious, mildly irritable, and her affect appropriate to her mood.     She was smiling at times in an appropriate manner. She denies any auditory     or visual hallucinations. There is no evidence of any delusional thinking.     She denies any current suicidal or homicidal ideation. Cognitively, She is     alert and oriented to all spheres. Her recent and remote memory is intact.     Her concentration is fair. Her insight is good.

 

Clinical Impression

Client is a 25 yo Russian female who presents with     history of treatment for PTSD, ADHD, Stimulant use Disorder, in remission.

Moods are anxious and irritable. She has ongoing     reported symptoms of re-experiencing, avoidance, and hyperarousal of her     past trauma experiences; ongoing subsyndromal symptoms related to her past     ADHD diagnosis and exacerbated by her PTSD diagnosis. She denied vegetative     symptoms of depression, no evident mania/hypomania, no psychosis, denied     anxiety symptoms. Denied current cravings for drugs/alcohol, exhibits no     withdrawal symptoms, has somatic concerns of GI upset and headaches.

At the time of     disposition, the client adamantly denies SI/HI ideations, plans or intent and     has the ability to determine right from wrong, and can anticipate the     potential consequences of behaviors and actions. She is a low risk for     self-harm based on her current clinical presentation and her risk and     protective factors.

 

Diagnostic Impression

[Student to provide DSM-5 and ICD-10 coding]

Double click inside this text box to add/edit text.     Delete placeholder text when you add your answers.

 

Treatment Plan

1) Medication:

· Increase fluoxetine 40mg po daily for PTSD     #30 1 RF

· Continue with atomoxetine 80mg po daily for     ADHD. #30 1 RF
Instructed to call and report any adverse reactions.
Future Plan: monitor for decrease re-experiencing, hyperarousal, and     avoidance symptoms; monitor for improved concentration, less mistakes, less     forgetful

2) Education: Risks and benefits of     medications are discussed including non-treatment. Potential side effects     of medications discussed. Verbal informed consent obtained.
Not to drive or operate dangerous machinery if feeling sedated.
Not to stop medication abruptly without discussing with providers.
Discussed risks of mixing medications with OTC drugs, herbal, alcohol/illegal drugs.     Instructed to avoid this practice. Praised and Encouraged ongoing     abstinence. Maintain support system, sponsors, and meetings.
Discussed how drugs/ETOH affects mental health, physical health, sleep     architecture.

3) Patient was educated about therapy and     services of the MHC including emergent care. Referral was sent via email to     therapy team for PET treatment.

4) Patient has emergency numbers: Emergency     Services 911, the national Crisis Line 800-273-TALK, the MHC Crisis Clinic.     Patient was instructed to go to nearest ER or call 911 if they become     actively suicidal and/or homicidal.

5) Time allowed for questions and answers provided.     Provided supportive listening. Patient appeared to understand discussion     and appears to have capacity for decision making via verbal conversation.

6) RTC in 30 days

7) Follow up with PCP for GI upset and     headaches, reviewed PCP history and physical dated one week ago and include     lab results

Patient     is amenable with this plan and agrees to follow treatment regimen as     discussed.

 

 

Narrative Answers

 

[In 1-2 pages, address the following:

· Explain   what pertinent information, generally, is required in documentation to   support DSM-5 and ICD-10 coding.

· Explain   what pertinent documentation is missing from the case scenario, and what   other information would be helpful to narrow your coding and billing options.

· Finally,   explain how to improve documentation to support coding and billing for   maximum reimbursement.]

Add your answers here. Delete instructions and placeholder   text when you add your answers.

What is the definition of bacteriuria?

Discussion Question/Prompt [Due Wednesday]

Case #1:  A 55-year-old woman presents to the office with bloody urine and dysuria
of 12-hour duration. She was recently married and has never had similar
symptoms. She denies chills and fever. On physical examination she is afebrile, has normal vital signs, and has mild tenderness in the midline above the pubis. Her urinalysis shows too many to count (TNTC) red blood cells.se

  1. What is the definition of bacteriuria?
  2. What additional history do you need to make a diagnosis?
  3. What diagnostic studies would you order and why?

Case #2:  A 23-year-old woman was married a year ago. Since then, she has experienced five attacks of acute cystitis, all characterized by dysuria, increased frequency, and urgency. Each infection responded to short-term treatment with trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole. The recurrences occurred at intervals of 3 weeks to 3 months following completion of antibiotic therapy. For the past two days, the woman has been experiencing acute flank pain, microscopic hematuria, dysuria, increased frequency, and urgency.

Her vital signs are T = 37.9°C, P = 106, R = 22, and BP = 130/75 mm Hg. Physical examination reveals costovertebral tenderness, mild tenderness to palpation in the suprapubic area, but no other abnormalities.

  1. What are possible reasons for this woman’s pain? List possible differential diagnosis and explain each?
  2. What diagnostic tests should you order to confirm diagnosis?
  3. What are the possible causes of recurrent lower UTIs?
  4. What are the differences when comparing prerenal acute renal failure, intrarenal acute renal failure, and postrenal acute renal failure? Give examples of each.

Cite current research findings, national guidelines, and expert opinions and controversies found in the medical and nursing literature to support your position.

Responses need to address all components of the question, demonstrate critical thinking and analysis, and include peer reviewed journal evidence to support the student’s position.

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

Please review the rubric to ensure that your response meets the criteria.

4

 

Assignment Rubric Detailsclose

Rubric

NU621 Unit 7 Discussion

NU621 Unit 7 Discussion
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

NU621-CO1; NU621-CO2; NU621-CO3; PRICE-P; PRICE-I

12 pts

100%

Initial post addresses all of the required prompt elements in the discussion and demonstrates an exemplary understanding of course content and topic.

11 pts

92%

Initial post addresses all of the required prompt elements in the discussion and demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of course content and topic.

10 pts

83%

Initial post is missing one important prompt element and/or demonstrates a basic understanding of course content and topic.

9 pts

75%

Initial post is missing more than one important prompt element and/or demonstrates a limited understanding of course content and topic.

8 pts

67%

Initial post does not address discussion prompt elements, and/or does not demonstrate understanding of course content and topic and/or initial post is poorly paraphrased even if accompanied by in-text citations.

0 pts

0%

Initial post was not submitted and/or not submitted on time and/or initial post demonstrates copying and pasting with or without proper use of quotations or supporting in-text citations.

 

12 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

NU621-CO1; NU621-CO2; NU621-CO3; PRICE-P; PRICE-I

12 pts

100%

The analysis of the topic includes breadth and depth, is aligned to the unit topic, relates to the course content and personal analysis is supported by exemplary references and examples.

11 pts

92%

The analysis of the topic is justified, and aligned to the unit topic, and personal analysis is supported by comprehensive references and/or examples.

10 pts

83%

There is a basic analysis of the topic and personal analysis is supported by basic references and/or examples.

9 pts

75%

There is minimal evidence of analysis of the topic and/or personal analysis is supported by limited references and/or examples.

8 pts

67%

There is no evidence of analysis of the topic and/or personal analysis is not supported by references and/or examples.

0 pts

0%

Initial post was not submitted and/or not submitted on time and/or analysis had no relationship to the topic and/or initial post demonstrates copying and pasting with or without proper use of quotations or supporting in-text citations.

 

12 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCollaboration

PRICE-C; PRICE-E

12 pts

100%

Collaborates with fellow learners at an exemplary level relating the discussion to relevant course concepts and extending the conversation with substantive content.

11 pts

92%

Collaborates with fellow learners at a comprehensive level relating the discussion to relevant course concepts and extending the conversation with substantive content.

10 pts

83%

Collaborates with fellow learners at a basic level relating the discussion to some course concepts and extending the conversation with basic content and/or postings are not submitted on a minimum of 3 separate days.

9 pts

75%

Limited collaboration with fellow learners and makes little connection to course content and/or does not extend the conversation.

8 pts

67%

Collaborates with fellow learners but only one response post was submitted and/or response post(s) are poorly paraphrased even if accompanied by in-text citations.

0 pts

0%

No response posts were submitted and/or not submitted on time and/or there is no relationship between the response posts and the discussion prompts and/or one or more response posts demonstrate copying and pasting with or without proper use of quotations or supporting in-text citations.

 

12 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

PRICE-P; PRICE-I

2 pts

100%

Posts in this discussion are well written and well organized demonstrating exemplary scholarly writing. Mechanics (spelling and punctuation) and grammar are excellent.

1.8 pts

92%

Posts in this discussion are well written and well organized demonstrating comprehensive scholarly writing and/or have 1-2 errors in mechanics and/or grammar.

1.7 pts

83%

Posts in this discussion are basic examples of scholarly writing and/or have 3 errors in mechanics and/or grammar.

1.5 pts

75%

Posts in this discussion are not clear and/or lack organization and/or have 4 or more errors in mechanics and/or grammar.

1.3 pts

67%

Posts in this discussion lack evidence of clear, organized scholarly writing. Errors interfere with reading and/or understanding of content.

0 pts

0%

Posts were not submitted and/or one or more posts demonstrate copying and pasting with or without proper use of quotations or supporting in-text citations.

 

2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA

PRICE-P; PRICE-I

2 pts

100%

Posts in this discussion demonstrate in-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style and formatting.

1.8 pts

92%

Posts in this discussion demonstrate in-text citations of sources and references but have 1-2 minor APA errors.

1.7 pts

83%

Posts in this discussion demonstrate in-text citations of sources and references but have 3-4 APA errors.

1.5 pts

75%

Posts in this discussion demonstrate in-text citations of sources and references but have 5-6 APA errors.

1.3 pts

67%

Posts in this discussion do not provide sufficient in-text citations and/or references and/or have 7 or more APA errors.

0 pts

0%

Posts were not submitted and/or one or more posts demonstrate copying and pasting with or without proper use of quotations or supporting in-text citations.

 

2 pts
Total Points: 40