Article Analysis And Evaluation Of Research Ethics

Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics

Search the GCU Library and find one new health care article that uses quantitative research. Do not use an article from a previous assignment, or that appears in the Topic Materials or textbook.

Complete an article analysis and ethics evaluation of the research using the “Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics” template. See Chapter 5 of your textbook as needed, for assistance.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Business Communication Skills For Health Care Professionals

Wk 5 Individual: Preparing for Working in Teams [due Day#]

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Assignment Content

1.

Top of Form

Collaboration is everywhere, especially in the health care industry. It is important to learn how to work and communicate in a collaborative environment. As you progress through your program, you will experience learning teams in your courses. Learning teams provide you with valuable experiences that will prepare you for working collaboratively in the health care industry.

 

Navigate to the University Library homepage.

 

Locate the Learning Team Toolkit on the upper right side of the homepage.

 

Create a 7- to 10-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation that identifies the Learning Team resources provided by the University and the importance of working effectively in a team. A presentation format has been provided for this assignment; however, you may choose to format your presentation in another professional manner.

 

Include the following in your presentation:

 

Slide One: Title Slide

· Title of presentation

· Your name

· Course abbreviation and course number

· Due date

· Your facilitator’s name

 

Slide Two: Introduction

· Describe what the Learning Team Toolkit is.

· Provide screenshots of the Learning TeamToolkit.

 

Slides Three and Four: Review the Learning Team Charter

· Explain the importance of the Learning Team Charter.

· Why is it created?

· Why is it important in collaborative environments?

· How can it be used during team conflicts?

· Why is it important to communicate with your faculty?

 

Slides Five and Six: Review the Learning Team Evaluation

· Explain the importance of the Learning Team Evaluation form.

· Why is it important to rate the members of your team?

· Why is it important that your faculty know how you would rate your team members?

 

Slide Seven: Learning Team Toolkit Resources

· Explain the resources available in the LearningTeam Toolkit.

 

Slide Eight: Importance of Team Work

· Explain the importance of team work in education and the workplace.

· Identify some strategies you would use when working in a team.

· Identify effective communication you would use when working in a team.

 

Slide Nine: References

· Cite 3 peer-reviewed, scholarly, or similar references.

· Format your references according to APA guidelines.

 

Note: Speaker notes are to be provided for each slide. Refer to the “Tutorial: Adding Speaker Notes to Microsoft® PowerPoint® Presentations” document for more information on how to add speaker notes to your presentation.

 

Note: The University’s Center for Writing Excellence provides samples of different deliverables. Under Samples, you will find a sample Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation to use as a reference while creating your presentation.

 

Cite 3 peer-reviewed, scholarly, or similar references to support your presentation.

 

Format your assignment according to APA guidelines. Include a title slide, detailed speaker notes, and a reference slide.

 

Submit your assignment.

Bottom of Form

English Composition Essay 2

CalendarEnglish Composition 1Details

Discussion 4.2 (B)

Step 1: Respond to the prompt in 250 words or more:

Prompt: Share the essay topic you are exploring for the argumentative essay. Describe why you think it is an arguable topic. What is your position in the topic? Why do some people disagree with this position? Remember that the topic must be related to a topic of interest within the medical field.

Step 2: After you make your initial post, make two additional response posts to earn full credit.

Health Policy And Ethics

NR 503 Week 8 – Health Policy and Ethics

 

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

1. Inspect the relationship between environment and global health (CO5).

2. Appraise global health problems considering WHO SDG’s as well as related epidemiological data (CO5).

 

Assignment Requirements 

1. Go to your state (FLORIDA) government web page. Find one health policy enacted within the last two (2) years at the state level. Write down the bill number and the sponsors of the bill and include this information in your initial post.

2. Write a minimum of a one-page critical analysis summary of the policy. (250 words double spaced, APA). Your summary should integrate the concepts of advocacy, population health, and the ANA ethical statements (“The Code”), and course readings (will include at the bottom), to include a minimum of one course scholarly article (provided within the course). Be sure to speak to the role of advocacy and population health.

3. Respond to a minimum of two (2) peers/faculty posts with one (1) paragraph of 4-5 sentences integrating one scholarly source utilized in an in-text citation/APA.

Kaiser: Beyond Health Care: The Role of Social Determinants in Promoting Health and Health Equity. (Links to an external site.)

**To see view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric.

DISCUSSION CONTENT
Category Points % Description
Scholarly  13 22% · The student actively stimulates and sustains inquiry by making reflective insightful comments, asking thoughtful questions and/or engaging in a scholarly discussion.

· The student expresses a clear idea of the topic under discussion and sustains inquiry in order to explore relevant issues.

· The student recognizes values or values conflict as things that form the assumption basis of arguments and recognizes when it is important to acknowledge these values.

· The student recognizes the accuracy, logic, relevance, or clarity of statements.

· The student asks clarifying questions and knows when clarifying questions need to be asked.

· The student distinguishes fact from opinion.

Application  20 33% · All components of discussion prompt addressed (met) in initial posting.

· The student’s writing conveys an understanding of significant ideas relevant to the issue under discussion. This is indicated by integration of course and weekly objectives, as well as readings from text and articles.

· All posts should make correct use of terminology, precise selection of the pieces of information required to make a point, correct and appropriate use of examples and counterexamples, demonstrations of which distinctions are important to make, and explanations that are concise and to the point.

· Information and knowledge are accurate.

· The student elaborates statements with accurate explanations, reasons, or evidence from the course and/or weekly objectives.

· All postings integrate scholarly sources to support points consistently.

Interactive Dialogue 10 16.6% · Responds to ideas in a way that advances discussion with engagement, depth, rigor, and application.

· Interacts with a professional tone and is able to express opinions with ownership and without judgement.

· Chooses to include professional experience to the discussion board mindful of appropriateness and boundaries. Experience is integrated as it supports the discussion board topic and utilizes scholarly references to support overall topic.

  43 72% Total CONTENT Points= 43 pts
DISCUSSION FORMAT
Category Points % Description
APA 12 20% · In text citations are formatted per APA 6th ed.

· Reference list is formatted per APA 6th ed.

· Spelling, grammar, and scholarly tone are per APA 6th ed.

Spelling / Grammar etc. 5 8% · Posts should utilize correct spelling and grammar (sentence structure and avoidance of slang or casual language).
  17 28% Total FORMAT Points=17 pts
  60 100% DISCUSSION TOTAL=60 points

 

 

 

 

 

Course Readings

Week 1

Fawcett, J. & Ellenbecker, H. C. (2015). A proposed conceptual model of nursing and population health. Nursing Outlook, 63(3), 288-298.

Vakkalanka, P. J., Hardison, S. L. & Holstege, C. P. (2014). Epidemiological trends in electronic cigarette exposures reported to U.S. poison centers. Clinical Toxicology, 52, 542-548.

Marmot, M. (2017) Social justice, epidemiology and health inequalities. European Journal of Epidemiology, 32; 537-536.

Levy, N. (2018). Legal issues…patient advocacy and the nursing role. CINAHL Nursing Guide. EBSCO Publishing.

Pearson, S. G. (2012). The concept of social justice for our psychiatric nursing practice. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 48, 185-186.

Week 2

Meyer, H. I., Brown, T. N. T., Herman, L. J., Reisner, L. S, & Bocketing, O. W. (2017). Demographic characteristics and health status of transgender adults in select U.S. regions: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2014. American Journal of Public Health, 107(4), 582-589.

Parikh, B., Mathai, A., Parikh, S., Sekbar, C., & Thomas, R. (2008). Understanding and using sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 56(1), 45-50

Subramaniam, S, Nirwana-Ima. S., Chin, K-Y. (2018). Performance of osteoporosis self-assessment tool (OST) in predicting osteoporosis-a review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15, 1445.

Week 3

Arbach, K. & Bobbio, A. (2018). Intimate partner violence risk assessment in community health facilities: A multisite longitudinal study. Psychosocial Intervention, 27(2), 105-112.

Holst, C., Tolstrup, S. J., Sorensen, J. & Becker, U. (2017). Alcohol dependence and risk of somatic diseases and mortality: a cohort study in 19002 men and women attending alcohol treatment. Society for the Study of Addiction 112, 1358-1366.

Week 4

Erie, C. J., Pueringer, R. M., Brue, M. S., Chamberlain. M. A. & Hodge, O. D. (2016). Statin use and incident cataract surgery: A case-control study. Ophthalmic Epidemiology, 23(1), 40-45.

Moukaddem, A., Chaaya, M., Jaffa, M., Sibai, A., Slim, Z., & Uthman, I. (2017). Fibromyalgia: Epidemiology and risk factors, a population-based case-control study in Lebanon. International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases, 20(2), 169-176.

Gawlik, K., Melnyk, B., & Tan, A. (2018). An epidemiological study of population health reveals social smoking as a major cardiovascular risk factor. American Journal of Health Promotion, 32(5), 1221-1227.

Week 5

Resource: American Academy of Nursing: Vulnerable Populations http://www.aannet.org/initiatives/edge-runners/vulnerable-populations (Links to an external site.)

Gonzalez, M. K., et al. (2018). The healthcare of vulnerable populations within rural societies: A systematic review. Online Journal of Rural Nursing & Health Care, 18(1), 112-147.

Morgan, A. S. & Stokes, L. (2017). Overcoming marginalization in the transgender community. American Nurse Today, 12(5), 34-35.

Law, K. & John, W. (2012). Homelessness as culture: How transcultural nursing theory can assist caring for the homeless. Nurse Education in Practice, 12, 371-374.

Week 6

Belsky, W. D., Moffitt, E. T., & Caspi, A. (2013). Genetics in population health science: Strategies and opportunities. American Journal of Public Health, 103(1), S73-S83.

Week 7

Angelini, K. (2017). Climate change, health, and the role of nurses. Nursing for Women’s Health, 21(2), 79-83.

Kurth, E. A. (2017). Planetary health and the role of nursing: A call to action. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 49(6), 598-605.

Kooienga, A. S. & Carryer, B. J. (2015). Globalization and advancing primary health care nurse practitioner practice. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 11(8), 804-811.