Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.

/in /by

 

Your quest to purchase a new car begins with an identification of the factors important to you. As you conduct a search of cars that rate high on those factors, you collect evidence and try to understand the extent of that evidence. A report that suggests a certain make and model of automobile has high mileage is encouraging. But who produced that report? How valid is it? How was the data collected, and what was the sample size?

In this Assignment, you will delve deeper into clinical inquiry by closely examining your PICO(T) question. You also begin to analyze the evidence you have collected.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.
  • Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment. This PICOT question will remain the same for the entire course.
  • Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available.
  • Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research.

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews

Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

  • Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.
  • Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.
  • Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
  • Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article.
  • Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.

Concept Map

/in /by

Patient Information

(1)

Name:

Age:

Gender:

Code Status:

DPOA:

Living Will:

Cultural considerations, ethnicity, occupation, religion, family support, insurance. (1) (14) Socioeconomic/Cultural/Spiritual Orientation & Psychosocial Considerations/Concerns, to include the following Social Determinants of Health

❋Economic Stability ❋ Education

❋Social and Community Context ❋ Health and Health Care ❋ Neighborhood and Built Environment

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chief Complaint

 

 

 

 

Admitting Diagnosis

 

Medical Management/ Orders/ Medications & Allergies (2)

 

 

 

 

Erickson’s Developmental Stage Related to pt. & Cite References (1)

 

 

Patient Education (In Pt.) & Discharge Planning (home needs)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

History of Present Illness (HPI), Pathophysiology of Admitting Dx (Cite References) Medical, Surgical, Social History (1).

 

 

 

 

Medical History

 

 

 

 

Surgical History

 

 

 

 

Social History

 

Diagnostic Test/ Lab Results with dates and Normal Ranges (3)

 

 

 

Concept Map

Student Name:

Instructor:

 

 

 

 

 

PC Outcomes/Goal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Priority nursing diagnosis #2

 

 

Respiratory (7)

 

Vital Signs (4)

 

Integumentary (12)

 

 

Interventions # 2

 

Assessment/ Evaluation #1

 

Assessment/ Evaluation #2

 

 

PC Evaluation Plan

 

Potential Complications/ at risk for

 

PC Interventions

 

Psychosocial (14)

 

Cardiovascular (6)

 

 

Endocrine (13)

 

Misc. (Ht/Wt)

 

GU (10)

 

GI (9)

 

Nutrition/Hydration

(8)

 

Rest/ Exercise (11)

 

Neurological (5)

 

Outcome/Goal #1

 

Priority nursing diagnosis #1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outcome/Goal #2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interventions #1

Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.

/in /by

PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTION BELOW & THEIR IS A TEMPLATE

ZERO PLAGIARISM

FIVE REFERENCES

Clearly, diagnosis is a critical aspect of healthcare. However, the ultimate purpose of a diagnosis is the development and application of a series of treatments or protocols. Isolated recognition of a health issue does little to resolve it.

In this module’s Discussion, you applied the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory to diagnose potential problems with the civility of your organization. In this Portfolio Assignment, you will continue to analyze the results and apply published research to the development of a proposed treatment for any issues uncovered by the assessment.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
  • Review the Work Environment Assessment Template.
  • Reflect on the output of your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues.
  • Select and review one or more of the following articles found in the Resources:
    • Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski (2011)
    • Clark (2018)
    • Clark (2015)
    • Griffin and Clark (2014)

The Assignment (3-6 pages total):

Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)

  • Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion.
  • Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
  • Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.
  • Explain what the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace.

Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)

  • Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.
  • Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
  • Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.

Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages)

  • Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
  • Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.

    image1.emf

    Work Environment Assessment Template

    Use this document to complete the Module 4 Workplace Environment Assessment .

    Summary of Results – Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory  
    Identify two things that surprised you about the results. Also identify one idea that you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.  
    What do the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace?  
    Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.

    Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.

    		  
    Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.  
    General Notes/Comments  

    Work Environment Assessment

    Template

     

     

    © 2018 Laureate Education Inc. 2

Discussion: Evidence Base in Design

/in /by

** See attachment document with complete instructions**

**THIS DISCUSSION IS DIVIDE IN TWO PARTS – 

1. MAIN DISCUSSION POST BY TUESDAY 01/12/2021 BEFORE 8:00 PM EST

2.  TWO REPLIES BY FRIDAY 01/15/2021 BEFORE 8:00 PM EST

Discussion: Evidence Base in Design

When politics and medical science intersect, there can be much debate. Sometimes anecdotes or hearsay are misused as evidence to support a particular point. Despite these and other challenges, however, evidence-based approaches are increasingly used to inform health policy decision-making regarding causes of disease, intervention strategies, and issues impacting society. One example is the introduction of childhood vaccinations and the use of evidence-based arguments surrounding their safety.

In this Discussion, you will identify a recently proposed health policy and share your analysis of the evidence in support of this policy.

**THIS DISCUSSION IS DIVIDE IN TWO PARTS –

 

0. MAIN DISCUSSION POST BY TUESDAY 01/12/2021 BEFORE 8:00 PM EST

 

0. TWO REPLIES BY FRIDAY 01/15/2021 BEFORE 8:00 PM EST

 

Discussion: Evidence Base in Design

 

When politics and medical science intersect, there can be much debate. Sometimes anecdotes or hearsay are misused as evidence to support a particular point. Despite these and other challenges, however, evidence-based approaches are increasingly used to inform health policy decision-making regarding causes of disease, intervention strategies, and issues impacting society. One example is the introduction of childhood vaccinations and the use of evidence-based arguments surrounding their safety.

In this Discussion, you will identify a recently proposed health policy and share your analysis of the evidence in support of this policy.

 

To Prepare:

 

· Review the Congress website provided in the Resources and identify one recent (within the past 5 years) proposed health policy.

Resources:

https://www.congress.gov/

 

· Review the health policy you identified and reflect on the background and development of this health policy.

 

Instructions:

Post a description of the health policy you selected and a brief background for the problem or issue being addressed. Explain whether you believe there is an evidence base to support the proposed policy and explain why. Be specific and provide examples.

 

** At least 3 References on each post**

 

**THIS DISCUSSION IS DIVIDE IN TWO PARTS

–

 

 

 

1.

 

MAIN DISCUSSION POST BY TUESDAY 01/12/2021 BEFORE

8:00 PM EST

 

 

2.

 

 

TWO REPLIES BY FRIDAY 01/15/2021 BEFORE 8:00 PM EST

 

 

Discussion: Evidence Base in Design

 

 

When politics and medical science intersect, there

can be much debate. Sometimes

anecdotes or hearsay are misused as evidence to support a particular point. Despite

these and other challenges, however, evidence

–

based approaches are increasingly

used to inform health policy decision

–

making regarding causes

of disease, intervention

strategies, and issues impacting society. One example is the introduction of childhood

vaccinations and the use of evidence

–

based arguments surrounding their safety.

 

In this Discussion, you will identify a recently proposed health

policy and share your

analysis of the evidence in support of this policy.

 

 

To Prepare:

 

 

·

 

Review the Congress website provided in the Resources and identify one recent

(within the past 5 years) proposed health policy.

 

Resources:

 

https://www.congress.gov/

 

 

·

 

Review the health policy you identified and reflect on the background and

development of this health policy.

 

 

Instructions:

 

Post a description of the health policy you selected and a

brief background

for the problem or issue being addressed. Explain whether you believe

there is an evidence base to support the proposed policy and explain why.

Be specific and provide examples.

 

 

** At least 3 References

 

on each post

**

 

 

**THIS DISCUSSION IS DIVIDE IN TWO PARTS –

 

1. MAIN DISCUSSION POST BY TUESDAY 01/12/2021 BEFORE

8:00 PM EST

 

2. TWO REPLIES BY FRIDAY 01/15/2021 BEFORE 8:00 PM EST

 

Discussion: Evidence Base in Design

 

When politics and medical science intersect, there can be much debate. Sometimes

anecdotes or hearsay are misused as evidence to support a particular point. Despite

these and other challenges, however, evidence-based approaches are increasingly

used to inform health policy decision-making regarding causes of disease, intervention

strategies, and issues impacting society. One example is the introduction of childhood

vaccinations and the use of evidence-based arguments surrounding their safety.

In this Discussion, you will identify a recently proposed health policy and share your

analysis of the evidence in support of this policy.

 

To Prepare:

 

 Review the Congress website provided in the Resources and identify one recent

(within the past 5 years) proposed health policy.

Resources:

https://www.congress.gov/

 

 Review the health policy you identified and reflect on the background and

development of this health policy.

 

Instructions:

Post a description of the health policy you selected and a brief background

for the problem or issue being addressed. Explain whether you believe

there is an evidence base to support the proposed policy and explain why.

Be specific and provide examples.

 

** At least 3 References on each post**