: What is Economic Development

Overview

This module/week will present the foundations of economic development and explain its vital importance. Communities in rural, suburban, and urban areas have differing needs when addressing the challenges of economic development. This module/week will frame the conversation that this course will address in identifying methods and means for local economic development across the span of community needs.

Reading & Study

  • Textbook Readings
  • Presentation: What is Economic Development
  • Presentation: Introduction to Community Economic Development
  • Article: A Brief History of Community Economic Development

Learning Outcomes

Upon successful completion of this module, you will be able to:

  • Justify the existence of local economic development planning.
  • Give examples of the types of assets available to economic developers.
  • Explain how national and state policies impact local economic development.
  • Identify challenges and opportunities inherent in local economic development.
  • Compare and contrast various theories, models, and fads in local economic development

     Brief History of Community Economic Development Clay, Roger A, Jr; Jones, Susan R . Journal of Affordable Housing & Community Development Law ;

    Chicago  Vol. 18, Iss. 3,  (Spring 2009): 257-267.

    ProQuest document link

    ABSTRACT

    There is no standard definition of community economic development (CED). From theoretical and practical

    perspectives, CED has been commonly described as a quintessentially local project, one in which communities

    reconstruct dysfunctional markets as a way of reconstituting social relations and building political strength. As

    social policy, CED emphasizes local participation in the design and implementation of affordable housing, job

    creation, and financing programs. Regardless of its characterizations, the modern CED movement is making

    strides to revitalize both urban and rural communities. Significantly, community lawyers and others specializing in

    CED have worked in partnership with community organizers and other advocates. The Civil Rights era, from the

    1950s to the 1970s, is another important juncture in the CED movement. Community organizations and community

    development corporations act as financial intermediaries, providing technical assistance to local entrepreneurs

    and developing shopping centers, supermarkets, and other real estate projects. The history of CED is the history of

    social movements. FULL TEXT

    Introduction: What Is CED?

    There is no standard definition of community economic development (CED). It has been described as a strategy

    that includes a wide range of economic activities and programs for developing low-income communities such as

    affordable housing and small business development

    from creation and expansion of neighborhood businesses to larger commercial and retail services – and job

    creation, some of which has been accomplished by financing and operating shopping centers, industrial parks,

    retail franchises, and other small businesses. CED also includes many other initiatives and services to fight

    homelessness, lack of jobs, drug abuse, violence and crime,1 and to provide quality child care and medical care as

    well as homeownership opportunities.2

    As a concept, economic development emerged in response to tenacious poverty and the need for affordable

    housing, good jobs, affordable health care, and other quality-of-life matters needed for human existence. CED is

    broader than economic development because it includes community building and the improvement of community

    life beyond the purely economic.3

    From theoretical and practical perspectives, CED “has been commonly described as a quintessentially local

    project, one in which communities reconstruct dysfunctional markets as a way of reconstituting social relations

    and building political strength. As social policy, CED emphasizes local participation in the design and

    implementation of affordable housing, job creation, and financing programs.”4

    Regardless of its characterizations, the modern CED movement is making strides to revitalize both urban and rural

    communities. Community development corporations (CDCs) have been reported to be the largest producers of

    affordable housing in the United States.5 At the same time, “for a field that performs a significant function in our

    society, we do not have much information regarding the important aspects of how it functions.”6 Moreover,

     

    http://ezproxy.liberty.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/218409794?accountid=12085
    http://ezproxy.liberty.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/218409794?accountid=12085

     

    “[rjecent community development research explains that this lack of empirical knowledge is a by-product of a field

    that is more art than science.”7 And, today, the industry is experiencing a number of challenges – a human capital

    crisis that limits its organizational capacity; an aging leadership; and pressure on CDCs to expand their reach while

    responding to the demands of funders, intermediaries, and neighborhood residents faster than they can respond.

    Many industry observers view community organizing as the primary hope for community revitalization

    nationwide.8

    CED emerged in the 1960s in response to calls by activists in lowincome communities to incorporate local

    residents into the process of revitalizing their own communities. Supported primarily by the federal government

    and the Ford Foundation, the movement expanded in the 1970s to address further deterioration of urban and rural

    communities. The deindustrialization of the 1970s and 1980s intensified public antipoverty and social welfare

    efforts, and community organizations became the major vehicles for delivery of housing and job programs in

    lowincome communities. The 1990s ushered in the demise of welfare, devolution from federal to state

Comparative Critique Of Seven Articles

You are required to review a minimum of seven articles (published within 8 years) which describe the public relations role of school leaders. You must write a single essay that compares and contrasts the elements of the seven articles. You will include a title page, abstract, and reference page in APA format that lists the seven articles used for this assignment. This critique needs to be 5–8 pages not including the title page, abstract, and reference page.

This assignment is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 2

Assignment UDL/CAST Instructional Plan Analysis

This assignment provides the opportunity for you to apply the principles of universal design for learning (UDL) in the design of instruction and assessment. Recall that UDL provides access to the curriculum for students with a wide variety of abilities and background. Therefore, UDL aligns with inclusionary practices found in today’s schools. Furthermore, assistive technology supports the UDL framework to provide a means of learning for students with disabilities. To prepare for this assignment, review the CAST (2010) video, UDL at a Glance  (Links to an external site.)and review the Explore model UDL lesson plans (Links to an external site.) (2011) web page, both of which are listed in the Week Three Required Resources. Be sure to also review the Week Three Instructor Guidance page for additional intellectual elaboration on UDL and assistance with this assignment.

Begin preparing for this assignment by selecting a specific model lesson from the Explore Model UDL Lesson Plans (2011) page of the CAST.org website. Analyze the lesson for the points described in the Content Instructions included with this assignment, below. Click on the “UDL Connections” buttons located at various points in the lesson to analyze how UDL principles have been integrated. Next, create your assignment to meet the content and written communication instructions below. Use the Grading Rubric to review your assignment before submission to ensure you have met the distinguished performance for each of the components described below. For additional assistance with this assignment, review the Week Three Instructor Guidance page and, if needed, contact the instructor for further clarifications.

Refer to: SEE ATTACHED
Week 3 Assignment Template

Content Instructions

· Lesson Description (1 point): Include the title of the model lesson, the subject, and grade levels, and a one-paragraph introduction of the lesson.

· Principle 1 (1 point): In one to three paragraphs, describe ways that multiple means of representation are included in the model lesson.

· Principle 2 (1 point): In one-to-three paragraphs, describe ways that multiple means of action and expression are included in the model lesson.

· Principle 3 (1 point): In one to three paragraphs, describe ways that multiple means of engagement are included in the model lesson.

· Reflection (2 points): Close your essay with a personal reflection that addresses the following four areas:

o A description of at least two concepts or strategies from the lesson that serve as a means to motivate learners

o A description of how, overall, the lesson models differentiated instruction

o A discussion of how your understanding of and appreciation for instructional planning has changed as a result of your analysis,

o At least one specific concept or strategy from the lesson that you would consider applying to your own practice and the potential impact it may have on the population you serve.

Written Communication Instructions

· Length Requirement (0.5 point): Four to seven pages including the title and references pages.

· Syntax and Mechanics (0.5 point): Display meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar.

· Source Requirement (0.5 point): Utilize at least two sources in addition the model lesson plan and the Edyburn (2013) textbook. All sources on the references page need to be used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

· APA Formatting (0.5 points): Use APA formatting consistently throughout the assignment. Refer to the Ashford University Writing Center for assistance with APA style and formatting or your copy of the APA Style Manual.

· Week Three Instructor Guidance

Welcome to Week Three of EDU620: Meeting Individual Student Needs with Technology.  Please be sure to review the Week Three homepage and review the specific learning outcomes for the week, the schedule overview, the required and recommended resources for the week, the introduction to the week, and a listing of the assessments for the week. Next, be sure to read this entire Instructor Guidance page.

·

· Overview

Knowledge gained in Weeks One and Two prompted you to consider how technology integration promotes and sustains student motivation. This week, you will learn about the practice  and principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) as it relates to technology integration into the classroom. Keep reading for intellectual elaboration about UDL and for additional assistance with excelling in the Week Three assessments.

·

· Intellectual Elaboration

· Universal Design for Learning

UDL characterizes efforts to create universal access to education for all students, including those with cognitive, physical, and emotional disabilities. Universal Design for Learning (UDL) can be defined as

· “a set of principles for curriculum development that give all individuals equal opportunities to learn. UDL provides a blueprint for creating instructional goals, methods, materials, and assessments that work for everyone–not a single, one-size-fits-all solution but rather flexible approaches that can be customized and adjusted for individual needs” (CAST, 2014).

·
Thus, UDL is an approach to designing instruction that benefits all students of all learning styles, preferences, and abilities. UDL is not about adapting lessons for a few students; rather, it is about removing barriers and allowing all students to control the methods of accessing information.
There are three essential principles to UDL: Representation, Engagement and Expression. Let’s consider all three in greater depth and explore examples of how to remove barriers without adapting or retrofitting lessons.
Representation – Universally designed course content provides alternative representations of essential concepts.  For example, during the instructional component of a math lesson on fractions, the teacher might represent the information in multiple ways—through a linguistic overview of the related mathematical vocabulary; a hands-on opportunity constructing and deconstructing whole-to-part and part-to-whole using manipulatives; and visually, by modeling fractions on an overhead projector or Promethean board (Smartboard).
Engagement – Universally designed course content addresses varied skill levels, preferences, and interests. By having flexible teaching strategies and course content, students are able to choose methods that support their interest and skill levels. For example, when teaching a reading lesson, students could choose from a variety of options that would allow them to practice reading fluency and comprehension at a reading level that is appropriate for them, such as a web-based game, an interactive storybook, or other digital options.

· Expression – Universally designed course content allows for alternative methods of expression, which means the student has opportunity for multiple means of demonstrating mastery of the material. For example, in lieu of a traditional writing assignment, students could be allowed to demonstrate knowledge on a subject by doing an oral presentation or creating an artistic representation  that could include a performance-based activity, such as a role play scenario. Students with speech impairments may be unable to present the information orally while students with a visual disability may have difficulty taking a written exam. Expression in UDL means each student has the ability to express their learning in a method that is most aligned to their strengths and preferences.
Therefore, UDL is not about creating different lessons for each learning style; it is about creating opportunities for multiple methods of learning.  For a look at UDL being implemented in the classroom, select a video from the following collection of videos  (Links to an external site.)(examples of classrooms using UDL from Grade 1 to Grade 6) provided by the National Center on Universal Design for Learning website. From these videos you will notice how UDL is incorporated into daily lessons that do not create barriers for learning.
The three essential principles of UDL, representation, engagement, and expression, are based on scientific understanding of how the human brain works best when learning new knowledge and skills.

·

· UDL and Brain Research

UDL is based on three brain networks: affective, recognition and strategic. The affective networks address our emotional connection and ultimate ownership of learning. The recognition networks address our ability to take in information and ultimately become resourceful learners. And the strategic networks address our ability to demonstrate our knowledge and ultimately become both strategic and goal-directed learners. To learn more about these three networks, review this module  (Links to an external site.)provided by the CAST website, which provides a more in depth look at the three brain networks in relationship to UDL. The module provides information in video, text and audio format, which is a variable demonstration of content adhering to the principle of representation in UDL.

·

· UDL and Differentiate Instruction

As you have learned through your readings in Week Three, the concept of barrier-free design can be applied to the instructional methods and materials that are used to teach students. Recall, UDL characterizes efforts to create universal access to education for all students, including those with cognitive, physical, and emotional disabilities.  Therefore, UDL focuses on the entire educational process, including how information is taught, which materials are used, how students engage in the learning activities, and how progress is assessed.  UDL is flexible and is based on the premise that there is no “one size fits all” approach to student learning; teachers must create and provide experiences for instruction in multiple ways to allow students multiple ways of expressing mastery of their learning (Thoma, Bartholomew & Scott, 2009).
To effectively use the UDL approach, educators need to understand the abilities of the students they teach and create an environment that allows learning opportunities for all students.  Teachers therefore must use a variety of instructional approaches to effectively break down barriers to learning that are inherent in one-size-fits-all approaches (Thoma, Bartholomew &  Scott, 2009).
It is common for educators to talk about modifying instruction and characterize it as differentiated instruction. Differentiating instruction is a specific form of instruction that seeks to maximize each student’s growth by recognizing that students have different ways of learning, different interests and different ways of responding to instruction (Tomlinson & Allan, 2000). Relatedly, UDL is a set of principles for curriculum development.  It is important to understand that UDL and differentiated instruction are very similar; they are someone interdependent. Therefore, you can think of UDL as a category of design thinking that informs and guides differentiated instructional methods. As a visual, imagine that UDL is an umbrella and differentiated instructional methods are protected by that umbrella against the elements of instruction that could otherwise cause barriers to learning. By practicing the principles of UDL, instruction can be designed to be more effective for all learners.

·

· Assessment Guidance
This section includes additional specific assistance for excelling in the discussions and assignment for Week Three beyond what is given with the instructions for the assessments. If you have questions about what is expected on any assessment for Week Three, contact your instructor before the due date.
Discussion 1: Introduction to UDL
This discussion is an opportunity to demonstrate your mastery with the third course learning outcome: Apply the principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) in the design of instruction and assessment.
You will have the opportunity to discuss your understanding of UDL and the impact of UDL in your current or anticipated teaching or professional role. This discussion also includes how UDL can partner with technology in the classroom to ensure every student is provided with the opportunity to learn. Be sure to take the time to view the CAST video listed in the discussion overview as it presents fundamental information that will not only inform your response to this week’s discussion and assignment, but will set the foundation for what you will continue learning and practicing in the coming weeks concerning UDL. Additionally, it is important to make a conscious connection with what you learn this week and what you will be constructing during Week Six in the Final Project: Community Event.
Remember to follow the Guided Response prompt for this and every Discussion each week.
 Assignment: UDL/CAST Instructional Plan Analysis
This assignment is another opportunity to demonstrate your mastery with the third course learning outcome; apply the principles of universal design for learning (UDL) in the design of instruction and assessment. For this assignment you will select a specific model lesson from the Explore Model UDL Lesson Plans  (Links to an external site.)page of the CAST.org website. Next you will use the information provided in the content instructions to analyze how the lesson you viewed represents the three principles of UDL (representation, action and expression and engagement). You will also provide a reflection on the video and how the information gleaned can be applied to your own practice and the potential impact it may have on the population you serve or plan to serve in your professional practice.
The value of this assignment is two-fold; you gain exposure to the CAST Lesson Builder website where actual lesson plans that follow the principles of UDL are shared and there is the connection with student motivation. Exploration of the lessons gives you direct insight as to how principles of UDL and technology can be effectively incorporated. You will specifically focus on these principles during your analysis by expanding your understanding of the intent and value of UDL. Take the necessary time to explore a variety of sample lessons making sure you click on the UDL Connections icon located within each lesson so as to get a breakdown of how each principle is incorporated into the lesson. It is recommended also that you give attention to the discussion points you will include in the reflection component of the assignment as each concept has a relationship to each other and to your own personal relevancy as it pertains to your current or anticipated professional role.

· References

Center for Applied Special Technology. (2007). Principles of universal design. Retrieved from http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/udlguidelines_theorypractice
CAST (2011). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.0. Wakefield, MA: Author. Retrieved from http://udlonline.cast.org/page/module1/l134/
CAST. (n.d.). UDL online modules: Module 1: Introduction. Retrieved from http://udlonline.cast.org/page/module1/l134/
Explore model UDL lesson plans. (2011) Retrieved from http://lessonbuilder.cast.org/explore.php
Thomas, C. A., Bartholomew, C., Scott, L. (2009). Universal design for transition: A roadmap for planning and instruction. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Tomlinson, C. A. and Allan, S. D. (2000) Reasons for optimism about differentiation: Its basis in theory and research. In Tomlinson and Allan. Leadership for differentiating schools and classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

·

Week 3 Assignment UDL/CAST Instructional Plan Analysis

This assignment provides the opportunity for you to apply the principles of universal design for learning (UDL) in the design of instruction and assessment. Recall that UDL provides access to the curriculum for students with a wide variety of abilities and background. Therefore, UDL aligns with inclusionary practices found in today’s schools. Furthermore, assistive technology supports the UDL framework to provide a means of learning for students with disabilities. To prepare for this assignment, review the CAST (2010) video,  UDL at a Glance  (Links to an external site.) and review the Explore model UDL lesson plans (Links to an external site.) (2011) web page, both of which are listed in the Week Three Required Resources. Be sure to also review the Week Three Instructor Guidance page for additional intellectual elaboration on UDL and assistance with this assignment.

Begin preparing for this assignment by selecting a specific model lesson from the Explore Model UDL Lesson Plans (2011) page of the CAST.org website. Analyze the lesson for the points described in the Content Instructions included with this assignment, below. Click on the “UDL Connections” buttons located at various points in the lesson to analyze how UDL principles have been integrated. Next, create your assignment to meet the content and written communication instructions below. Use the Grading Rubric to review your assignment before submission to ensure you have met the distinguished performance for each of the components described below. For additional assistance with this assignment, review the Week Three Instructor Guidance page and, if needed, contact the instructor for further clarifications.

Refer to:  Week 3 Assignment Template

Content Instructions

· Lesson Description (1 point): Include the title of the model lesson, the subject, and grade levels, and a one-paragraph introduction of the lesson.

· Principle 1 (1 point): In one to three paragraphs, describe ways that multiple means of representation are included in the model lesson.

· Principle 2 (1 point): In one-to-three paragraphs, describe ways that multiple means of action and expression are included in the model lesson.

· Principle 3 (1 point): In one to three paragraphs, describe ways that multiple means of engagement are included in the model lesson.

· Reflection (2 points): Close your essay with a personal reflection that addresses the following four areas:

· A description of at least two concepts or strategies from the lesson that serve as a means to motivate learners

· A description of how, overall, the lesson models differentiated instruction

· A discussion of how your understanding of and appreciation for instructional planning has changed as a result of your analysis,

· At least one specific concept or strategy from the lesson that you would consider applying to your own practice and the potential impact it may have on the population you serve.

Written Communication Instructions

· Length Requirement (0.5 point): Four to seven pages including the title and references pages.

· Syntax and Mechanics (0.5 point): Display meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar.

· Source Requirement (0.5 point): Utilize at least two sources in addition the model lesson plan and the Edyburn (2013) textbook. All sources on the references page need to be used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

· APA Formatting (0.5 points): Use APA formatting consistently throughout the assignment. Refer to the Ashford University Writing Center for assistance with APA style and formatting or your copy of the APA Style Manual.

· Week Three Instructor Guidance Welcome to Week Three of EDU620: Meeting Individual Student Needs with Technology.  Please be sure to review the Week Three homepage and review the specific learning outcomes for the week, the schedule overview, the required and recommended resources for the week, the introduction to the week, and a listing of the assessments for the week. Next, be sure to read this entire Instructor Guidance page.

·

· Overview Knowledge gained in Weeks One and Two prompted you to consider how technology integration promotes and sustains student motivation. This week, you will learn about the practice  and principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) as it relates to technology integration into the classroom. Keep reading for intellectual elaboration about UDL and for additional assistance with excelling in the Week Three assessments.

·

· Intellectual Elaboration

· Universal Design for Learning  UDL characterizes efforts to create universal access to education for all students, including those with cognitive, physical, and emotional disabilities. Universal Design for Learning (UDL) can be defined as

· “a set of principles for curriculum development that give all individuals equal opportunities to learn. UDL provides a blueprint for creating instructional goals, methods, materials, and assessments that work for everyone–not a single, one-size-fits-all solution but rather flexible approaches that can be customized and adjusted for individual needs” (CAST, 2014).

· Thus, UDL is an approach to designing instruction that benefits all students of all learning styles, preferences, and abilities. UDL is not about adapting lessons for a few students; rather, it is about removing barriers and allowing all students to control the methods of accessing information.   There are three essential principles to UDL: Representation, Engagement and Expression. Let’s consider all three in greater depth and explore examples of how to remove barriers without adapting or retrofitting lessons.  Representation – Universally designed course content provides alternative representations of essential concepts.  For example, during the instructional component of a math lesson on fractions, the teacher might represent the information in multiple ways—through a linguistic overview of the related mathematical vocabulary; a hands-on opportunity constructing and deconstructing whole-to-part and part-to-whole using manipulatives; and visually, by modeling fractions on an overhead projector or Promethean board (Smartboard).  Engagement – Universally designed course content addresses varied skill levels, preferences, and interests. By having flexible teaching strategies and course content, students are able to choose methods that support their interest and skill levels. For example, when teaching a reading lesson, students could choose from a variety of options that would allow them to practice reading fluency and comprehension at a reading level that is appropriate for them, such as a web-based game, an interactive storybook, or other digital options.

· Expression – Universally designed course content allows for alternative methods of expression, which means the student has opportunity for multiple means of demonstrating mastery of the material. For example, in lieu of a traditional writing assignment, students could be allowed to demonstrate knowledge on a subject by doing an oral presentation or creating an artistic representation  that could include a performance-based activity, such as a role play scenario. Students with speech impairments may be unable to present the information orally while students with a visual disability may have difficulty taking a written exam. Expression in UDL means each student has the ability to express their learning in a method that is most aligned to their strengths and preferences. Therefore, UDL is not about creating different lessons for each learning style; it is about creating opportunities for multiple methods of learning.  For a look at UDL being implemented in the classroom, select a video from the following collection of videos  (Links to an external site.)(examples of classrooms using UDL from Grade 1 to Grade 6) provided by the National Center on Universal Design for Learning website. From these videos you will notice how UDL is incorporated into daily lessons that do not create barriers for learning.  The three essential principles of UDL, representation, engagement, and expression, are based on scientific understanding of how the human brain works best when learning new knowledge and skills.

·

· UDL and Brain Research  UDL is based on three brain networks: affective, recognition and strategic. The affective networks address our emotional connection and ultimate ownership of learning. The recognition networks address our ability to take in information and ultimately become resourceful learners. And the strategic networks address our ability to demonstrate our knowledge and ultimately become both strategic and goal-directed learners. To learn more about these three networks, review this module  (Links to an external site.)provided by the CAST website, which provides a more in depth look at the three brain networks in relationship to UDL. The module provides information in video, text and audio format, which is a variable demonstration of content adhering to the principle of representation in UDL.

·

· UDL and Differentiate Instruction  As you have learned through your readings in Week Three, the concept of barrier-free design can be applied to the instructional methods and materials that are used to teach students. Recall, UDL characterizes efforts to create universal access to education for all students, including those with cognitive, physical, and emotional disabilities.  Therefore, UDL focuses on the entire educational process, including how information is taught, which materials are used, how students engage in the learning activities, and how progress is assessed.  UDL is flexible and is based on the premise that there is no “one size fits all” approach to student learning; teachers must create and provide experiences for instruction in multiple ways to allow students multiple ways of expressing mastery of their learning (Thoma, Bartholomew & Scott, 2009).  To effectively use the UDL approach, educators need to understand the abilities of the students they teach and create an environment that allows learning opportunities for all students.  Teachers therefore must use a variety of instructional approaches to effectively break down barriers to learning that are inherent in one-size-fits-all approaches (Thoma, Bartholomew &  Scott, 2009).  It is common for educators to talk about modifying instruction and characterize it as differentiated instruction. Differentiating instruction is a specific form of instruction that seeks to maximize each student’s growth by recognizing that students have different ways of learning, different interests and different ways of responding to instruction (Tomlinson & Allan, 2000). Relatedly, UDL is a set of principles for curriculum development.  It is important to understand that UDL and differentiated instruction are very similar; they are someone interdependent. Therefore, you can think of UDL as a category of design thinking that informs and guides differentiated instructional methods. As a visual, imagine that UDL is an umbrella and differentiated instructional methods are protected by that umbrella against the elements of instruction that could otherwise cause barriers to learning. By practicing the principles of UDL, instruction can be designed to be more effective for all learners.

Early Childhood Case Short Answer

image1.png

PV001 History and Evolution of the Early Childhood Field

Short-Answer Assessment Submission Form

Contact Information

Please provide your contact information and date of submission below.

Your Name: First and Last

Your E-mail address: Your Email Here

Date: Click here to enter a date

Instructions

This Competency includes a Short-Answer Assessment. Write your response to each prompt below in the space provided. Beneath the prompts is the Rubric which will be used by the Competency Assessor to evaluate your responses. Carefully review the Rubric rows associated with each prompt to provide a complete response.

When writing your response, begin typing where it reads “Enter your response here.” There are no space limitations; you can write as much as needed to satisfy the requirements of the prompt (as defined in the Rubric).

Save this file as PV001_firstinitial_lastname, and upload it to this Assessment within the learning platform.

Short Answer 1

For each of the names listed below, write a 1-paragraph response that describes the individual’s contribution to the early childhood field.

· John Amos Comenius

Your Response

Enter Your Response Here

· Johann Pestalozzi

Your Response

Enter Your Response Here

Friedrich Froebel

Your Response

Enter Your Response Here

· Maria Montessori

Your Response

Enter Your Response Here

· Susan Blow

Your Response

Enter Your Response Here

· John Dewey

Your Response

Enter Your Response Here

· Patty Smith Hill

Your Response

Enter Your Response Here

Caroline Pratt

Your Response

Enter Your Response Here

Lucy Sprague Mitchell

Your Response

Enter Your Response Here

McMillan Sisters

Your Response

Enter Your Response Here

Rubric

  0

Not Present

1

Needs Improvement

2

Meets Expectations

3

Exceeds Expectations

Sub-Competency 1: Describe the contribution of prominent researchers, early childhood professionals, and advocates to the early childhood field.
Learning Objective 1.1:

Describe the contribution of prominent researchers, early childhood professionals, and advocates to the early childhood field.

 

Description is missing. Response vaguely or incompletely describes the key contributions of each individual. Response accurately describes the key contributions of each individual. · Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:

Response describes the contributions of an additional individual to the early childhood field.

Short Answer 2

· For each of the significant events or research named below, write a 1-paragraph response that describes its impact on the early childhood field.

The Kindergarten Movement

Your Response

Enter Your Response Here

The Inclusion Movement

Your Response

Enter Your Response Here

The Progressive Education Movement

Your Response

Enter Your Response Here

Founding of National Association for Nursery Education (NANE)/ National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)

Your Response

Enter Your Response Here

The Bureau of Education Experiments

Your Response

Enter Your Response Here

Works Progress Administration Nurseries

Your Response

Enter Your Response Here

The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act

Your Response

Enter Your Response Here

The Economic Opportunity Act and the Founding of Head Start

Your Response

Enter Your Response Here

Hart and Risley’s Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children

Your Response

Enter Your Response Here

Perry/High Scope Preschool Project

Your Response

Enter Your Response Here

Rubric

  0

Not Present

1

Needs Improvement

2

Meets Expectations

3

Exceeds Expectations

Sub-Competency 2: Describe the impact of significant events and research on the early childhood field.
· Learning Objective 2.1:

Describe the impact of significant events and research in the history of the early childhood field.

Description is missing. Response vaguely or incompletely describes the impact of each event and/or research on the early childhood field. Response accurately describes the impact of each event and/or research on the early childhood field. · Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:

Response describes an additional significant event and/or research and its impact on the early childhood field.

Short Answer 3

In a 4- to 6-paragraph response, identify at least three early childhood professional organizations. Describe the purpose of each organization and explain its significance to the early childhood field. Provide a citation for each organization.

Your Response

Enter Your Response Here

Rubric

  0

Not Present

1

Needs Improvement

2

Meets Expectations

3

Exceeds Expectations

Sub-Competency 3: Describe key professional organizations that inform early childhood practice.
Learning Objective 3.1:

Describe early childhood professional organizations and their purposes.

Description is missing. Response incompletely or vaguely describes three or fewer early childhood organizations.

Response includes a partial or inappropriate citation for each organization.

Response describes three relevant and appropriate early childhood organizations and their purposes.

Response includes a citation for each organization.

Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:

Response describes more than three relevant and appropriate early childhood organizations.

Short Answer 4

· In a 2- to 3-paragraph response, identify at least one organization that advocates for children and families. Describe the purpose of the organization and describe one current advocacy issue this organization is working on today. Provide a citation for the organization.

Your Response

Enter Your Response Here

Rubric

  0

Not Present

1

Needs Improvement

2

Meets Expectations

3

Exceeds Expectations

Sub-Competency 4: Describe research and advocacy organizations that support children, families, and early childhood professionals.
Learning Objective 4.1: Describe early childhood research and advocacy organizations and their purposes. Description is missing. Response is vague or irrelevant.

Citation is missing or incomplete.

Response describes one relevant early childhood research and advocacy organization.

Response includes a citation for the organization identified.

Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:

Response describes more than one relevant and appropriate early childhood research and advocacy organization.

Short Answer 5

Identify at least two peer-reviewed publications that inform early childhood practice and expand the professional knowledge base. In a 4- to 6-paragraph response, summarize the main focus of each publication, and explain how it informs early childhood practice and/or expands the professional knowledge base. Provide an APA citation for each publication.

Your Response

Enter Your Response Here

Rubric

  0

Not Present

1

Needs Improvement

2

Meets Expectations

3

Exceeds Expectations

Sub-Competency 5: Describe peer-reviewed professional journals and other publications that inform early childhood practice and expand the professional knowledge base.
Learning Objective 5.1:

Describe the main focus of peer-reviewed publications that inform early childhood practice and expand the professional knowledge base.

Description is missing. Response describes irrelevant publications or is incomplete.

APA citations are missing or incomplete.

Response thoroughly describes the focus of two relevant and appropriate peer-reviewed publications that inform early childhood practice and expand the professional knowledge base.

APA citations are mostly accurate.

Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:

Response identifies more than two relevant and appropriate peer-reviewed publication.

©2014 Walden University 7

image2.png