Public Leadership in Times of Crisis: Mission Impossible?

Part1

Read Kettle (2006). He describes three characteristics of “wicked” problems and five pathologies that result in a failure of government to learn from previous errors in crisis response. Describe the characteristics of “wicked” problems and explain one or more of the pathologies that impact operations in the response phase of incidents.

Kettle, D. (2006). Is the Worst Yet to Come? The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,604, 273-287.  http://academic.udayton.edu/RichardGhere/emergency%20mngt/Annals%20Mar%202006/Kettl%20Worst.pdf

(Keep separate can be one document separated by references)

Part 2

There are two readings this week that examine Public Leadership in Crisis.  They both have issues that could be characterized as pre-incident, response phase, and post-incident issues.

Boin and t’Hart (2003) describe six public expectations that leaders are incapable of meeting in times of crisis.  Choose two to focus on and provide examples from the article, class, and your own research to illustrate.  (This was written before Hurricane Katrina…were their assertions proved correct?)

Boin & t’Hart. (2003). Public Leadership in Times of Crisis: Mission Impossible? Public Administration Review, 63 (5), 544-553 http://www.huizenga.nova.edu/course-materials/5463/Readings/Boin,%20A.%20&%20Hart,%20P.%202003.%20Public%20Leadership%20in%20Times%20of%20C.pdf

First Draft Self-Evaluation And Reflection

Name:

Course:

Date:

Instructor:

Topic 5: First Draft Self-Evaluation and Reflection

 

Part 1: Revising and Editing

Directions:

1. Go through each section below and self-evaluate your first draft by checking if you did or did not complete the task. You do not need instructor feedback from your first draft to complete this worksheet.

2. If you did not complete the task, give a brief explanation of why.

Revising and Editing Overall Tips

· Is your paper double spaced?

· Yes or No:

· Have you printed out a copy to read over?

· Yes or No:

· Did you visually scan your paper for paragraph length? Paragraphs that are either too long or shorter than the others may need some revision.

· Yes or No:

· Have you read your paper aloud to catch errors?

· Yes or No:

· Have you given your paper to a friend/instructor/CLA tutor to review?

· Yes or No:

 

 

Revising

· Did you reread the assignment details?

· Yes or No:

· Now that you have a draft, is your thesis statement clear, limited, and interesting, and is it supported in your draft?

· Yes or No:

· Does your thesis statement contain a main point and three subtopics?

· Yes or No:

· Are all your sources cited correctly? Does each parenthetical citation have a matching entry on the Reference page?

· Yes or No:

· Does every entry on the Reference page have matching parenthetical references?

· Yes or No:

· Review your introduction. Do you have a strong hook that engages the reader?

· Yes or No:

· Review the conclusion. Does it sum up your main points and restate the thesis?

· Yes or No:

 

Paragraph Revisions

· Does each paragraph have a strong topic sentence?

· Yes or No:

· Do all sentences support the topic sentence?

· Yes or No:

· Is the paragraph organized logically?

· Yes or No:

· Do the sentences transition smoothly and logically?

· Yes or No:

· Is each paragraph supported with sufficient details, examples, statistics, facts, research?

· Yes or No:

 

Editing

· Did you correct suggestions made by your word processing program’s spell check and grammar check?

· Yes or No:

· What errors have teachers most corrected on your past papers? Did you check for those same errors on this paper?

· Yes or No:

 

 

 

Did you check for some of the most common errors in your paper? Answer Yes or No:

Comma splices/Run-ons:

Sentence Fragments:

Subject/verb agreement:

Faulty parallelism:

Misplaced commas:

Misused colons, semicolons:

Commonly confused words (for example- there, their):

 

Are there any words that you use repeatedly in your paper?

 

 

 

Consider word choice. Can you identify any sentences/phrases which are awkward and need to be rephrased?

 

 

 

Could your sentence structure use more variety?

 

 

 

 

 

Part 2: Strengths and Weaknesses

Directions: Go through each component description below. Then give a brief explanation of what you did well, what you can improve upon, and your reasoning why – all boxes must be complete.

 

Organization: Proper heading in the upper left hand corner, five separated paragraphs, Reference Page What was done well: What can be improved upon:
  Reasons why: Reasons why:
Research : Proper topic that is supported with a peer reviewed article (research is included through in-text citations/paraphrased information from article(s) What was done well: What can be improved upon:
  Reasons why: Reasons why:
Conventions/Mechanics: Proof-read entire paper, no spelling, punctuation, or grammatical errors; double-spaced throughout entire paper; paragraphs indented; references are listed correctly on reference page; minimum word count has been met and maximum word count has not been exceeded What was done well: What can be improved upon:
  Reasons why: Reasons why:
Word Choice: Academic writing is met, correct words used in context; essay contains a variety of sentence structures and uses complete, detailed expressions within the writing. *No incomplete, incoherent, or fragment sentences are found. What was done well: What can be improved upon:
  Reasons why: Reasons why:
Voice/Tone: Essay is written in 3rd Person Point of View (there is no “I” statements in the writing); message is clear and original in thought from the writer’s perspective on the topic and arguments (research is only there to support these claims). What was done well: What can be improved upon:
  Reasons why: Reasons why:
Sentence/Paragraph Fluency: There is a smooth transitioning between paragraphs; sentences within the body paragraphs flow and are easy to read and follow; there is an unison of the topic chosen and the arguments presented in the essay; research enhances the paragraphs, and does not take the majority of the paragraph itself-again, research is to support, not create the essay. What was done well: What can be improved upon:
  Reasons why: Reasons why:

 

 

Part 3: Summary and Reflection

Directions: Please write a summary based on the guidelines given below; write your summary in the space provided.

In 250-300 words answer the following:

· After reviewing your strengths and weaknesses, what will you do the same and what will you do differently when completing your next college essay?

· What are some resources that you can use to help improve your areas of weakness?

· What advice would you give a new student to help with writing their first college essay?

Summary:

 

 

 

© 2016. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Role As A Teacher-Leader Or Teacher-Researcher? ( Feedback To Peers)

Guided Response:   Read your classmates’ posts and respond to at least three of them. Add to their reflections by making connections or suggestions. Share specific examples from your own personal and professional experiences.

David

  • Option B: According to Lieberman and Miller (as cited in Phelps, 2008), what are the three main roles of teacher/educational-leader? For each role, describe your own leadership capacity. Which role fits you the best and why? Which role is most foreign to you and why?

According to Lieberman and Miller (as cited in Phelps, 2008) emphasize three roles: advocates, innovators, and stewards.  To me, it is hard to separate these three into individual aspects.  I feel someone who advocates for their students, and others is also a steward of them.  Advocates voice their support of others and show support, while stewards are looking after others and showing support.  When looking at innovation, it is part and parcel of being part of a telecommunications industry.  We are always looking for innovative ways to pass training to others, improve our abilities, and provide better customer experience to those we serve.  While I cannot point to one that seems more foreign to me, I can say that I do feel I can always improve advocacy for those that I am training.  While I am a firm believer in voicing support and showcasing successes of those I teach, it is still something that can be improved upon — building those up that may be down on themselves because of a mistake or misunderstanding.  Looking for those opportunities that present themselves to show those under me how much they are appreciated for their hard work in a public setting is a great way to improve their self-confidence.

-David

Reference:

Phelps, P. H. (2008). Helping teachers become leaders. The Clearing House, 81(3), 119-122. DOI:10.3200/TCHS.81.3.119-122

 

Bisceglia White

  • Option A: According to Danielson’s framework (as cited in Phelps, 2008), what are the three areas of teacher-leaders’ influence? For each area, describe your leadership capacity. Which area do you see as your strength and why? Which area is your weakest and why?

According to Danielson’s framework the three areas of teacher-leader influence are school wide policies and programs, teaching and learning, and communications and community relations. For my role in leadership in the area of school wide policies and programs I sit on the policy council. Our Head Start policy council reviews the policies at the end of the year and revises the policies for the up and coming school year. For my role in leadership in the area of teaching and learning I help to coordinate our PLC. I took this role on last year because I wanted to enhance my leadership skills and help new teachers in the process. In the area of learning I assist new teachers in teaching strategies, creating their lateral entry binder or any other area they may need. I also love to learn new strategies as well because new ideas are coming out daily and I like to try to learn about new technology or a new way of doing things. For my role in leadership in the area of communication and community relations I try to attend events that Head Start has out in the community so that our program has a presence in our area. I also help with recruitment. The teachers go out into the community and help the family advocates get applications for new enrollees. My area of strength is recruitment and communication and community relations because I have been at Head Start for 16 years so the community knows me. I grew up in this community and my mother was a Head Start teacher as well, so It helps. My area of weakness school wide policies and programs because the board only meets once a year and I could do more to try to help change or update policies.

 

Randall Joseph Partee

Responding to option B:

According to Lieberman and Miller, the three roles teacher-leaders can fulfill are advocates, innovators, and stewards (2004). Innovators are creative in what they do, they go beyond just thoughts by taking action. Advocates are those who do exactly that, they advocate for their students by giving them the voice they may not have. Lastly, stewards, those are the individuals in teaching who aim to shape the profession and give it the position positivity it needs by the outward public, and perhaps even more so, by those within it.

From my own perspective, I can attest to being all three of these, and not to sound cocky, but because I waited a long time (too long for me) to become a teacher and I take great pride in my job. In the way of innovation, I like to put things into motion and try them, maybe they work, maybe they take time, maybe they fail, but I wouldn’t know if I did not try. An example of this would be a classroom money reward system I envisioned called “Partee-Bucks” this was something I decided to do when I was told I could not use snacks or treats, it was a slow run to get these in place but now my students love them and I would not have the same classroom environment without them. As for advocacy, I had a situation just today, a class of mine that has nine exceptionalities, I wanted to see about having a para-professional (student aide) made available for my kids on the occasions we do written finals; the district advisor to this shot it down via email. I pushed back, route on the behalf of the betterment of my students, and wouldn’t you know it, I had a para in my classroom today! For the sake of being a steward, I think this just goes with being positive to other teachers -not spreading gossip, enjoying my job, and always praising my role as an educator to others, which I do. If I had to pick the most foreign, it’d be steward, and only because of my short time in the profession but I aim to change that continually over time.

Parent Letter

Identifying students’ readiness for learning guides teachers to create learning activities and strategies that are unique to the various aspects of elementary students’ approaches to learning. It is equally important for families to be aware of readiness indicators as they have an opportunity to encourage learning in the home environment.

For this assignment, write a letter to the parents of your future students that you will have the following year, describing readiness for learning indicators, applicable to a specific age, grade level, and developmental stage. This letter would be given to parents at the end of the school year to help students over the summer get prepared for the following school year. Be sure to clearly define the key goals for success in preparation for the grade level (K-8) the student will be entering.

The letter to parents should include:

An introduction.

A description of the developmental stage related to the grade level of the students.

How to identify readiness for learning indicators applicable to grade level.

Key activities and strategies to get students ready for learning the next year.

Support readiness indicators and selected activities with major principles, concepts, and learning theories.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide.