Extend or constructively challenge your colleagues’ work.

Post an analysis of the role of theory within the context of your quantitative doctoral business research. In your analysis, do the following:

· Describe the central role theory plays in deductive reasoning when conducting quantitative business research.

· Explain the critical relationship between the theory, specific business problem, purpose statement, and research question for a DBA applied Doctoral Study.

· Provide at least one example from your own DBA doctoral research that illustrates the impact of theory on the development of an applied Doctoral Study.

Be sure to support your work with a minimum of two specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and at least one additional scholarly source.

 

 

 

Juan

 

Describe the central role theory plays in deductive reasoning when conducting quantitative business research.

According to Dr. Taylor (Laureate Education Producer, 2016h) in quantitative studies, theories provide opportunities for researchers to explore a phenomenon and measure the underlying construct. Saunders, Lewis, and Thornhill (2015) noted that researchers test and draw conclusions using theories as a framework for their studies. Hence, theories are the premises that business researchers utilize to validate causal relationships. As an example, if a company needs to increase sales to reach quarterly sales targets, a researcher could measure the number of sales per employee per month. The approach could reveal how much more sales each employee would have to make to meet the quarterly sales goal.

 

Explain the critical relationship between the theory, specific business problem, purpose statement, and research question for a DBA applied Doctoral Study.

            As described in Walden University DBA doctoral handbook (2019), researchers use a theoretical framework in their DBA doctoral study to identify variables which could be manipulated to solve an existent business problem. The approach facilitates the discovery process necessary to identify how businesses operate, what is causing not to achieve specific organizational goals, and how to overcome the shortfall. Accordingly, Saunders et al. (2015) noted that theories helped researchers formulate research questions, select variables, and evaluate the chosen topic of research from a known and accepted proposition. Lastly, in establishing a relationship between a theory and a DBA doctoral study, the researcher increases the reliability and validity of the research.

 

Provide at least one example from your own DBA doctoral research that illustrates the impact of theory on the development of an applied Doctoral Study.

As an example, in selecting a researchable business problem my approach was to identify existent theories which describe a relationship between business performance and supply chain management. The effort led to the discovery of several theories which became the basis for my specific business problem, purpose statement and research question. I selected just in time (JIT) and the theory of constraints.

 

References

 

Laureate Education (Producer). (2016h). Theoretical/conceptual framework [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2015). Research methods for business students (7th ed.). Essex, England: Pearson Education Unlimited

Walden University. (2019). DBA doctoral study rubric and research handbook. Available from http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/researchcenter/osra.dba

 

 

 

Dustin

 

Deductive Reasoning

Saunders, Lewis, and Thornhill (2015), described deductive reasoning in a six-step process, where the researcher would develop an aspect, infer a testable recommendation, ensure what is being examined makes since, culminate the information regarding the variables, and examine the results for failure or acceptance.  The ability to use this deductive reasoning within quantitative approaches, is reasonable, as the researcher would follow each of these steps to reach an outcome, defined in steps five or six, which signifies if it is conclusive or non-conclusive/failed.  At the point of failure or being found inconclusive, the approach, must either be accepted as a failure or modified in some manner and retested.

Relationship

            The relationship between the theory, specific business problem, purpose statement, moreover, the research question is essential to ensure it conveys a clear and concise understanding to the reader of what is discussed within the research study.  The Walden University Research Handbook (2019), gives details for ensuring the constancy of the specific business problem, purpose statement, and research question, the theory is established, to ensure it further aligns within the study also.  This is proven by ensuring the appropriate type of research question is asked, which allows for the appropriate methodology to be pursued.

Example

In the specific problem statement of some cultural heritage organization, executive leadership teams may not understand the best-practices to strategically align revenue targets with CSR goals; it is specified the theory being examined is strategic alignment and CSR, which are known theorems.  These theorems, allow for the examination, which is then translated within the purpose statement, which allows for the continuance of detailing the type of research methodology being pursued.

 

References

Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2015). Research methods for business students (7th ed.). Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited.

Walden University. (2019). DBA doctoral study rubric and research handbook. Retrieved from http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/researchcenter/osra/dba

Visualisation/Infographic

Select any visualisation/infographic and looking at any individual chart included. Try to extract and write down in language terms what this chart shows across the angle, the framing, and (where relevant) the focus?

Does it feel that the definition you have arrived at is consistent with the aims/claims of the chart as it is published? In other words does the chart show and include what you think it is actually supposed to be doing or is there a disconnect?

Assignment Link: http://book.visualisingdata.com/chapter/chapter-5

. Why is ANCOVA often used in situations that involve nonequivalent control groups?

IMPORTANT: AFTER PURCHASE, LOG IN TO YOUR ACCOUNT AND SCROLL DOWN BELOW THIS PAGE TO DOWNLOAD FILES WITH ANSWERS.

1. Generally speaking, statistical control using ANCOVA is as powerful as using experimental control in dealing with confounding participant characteristics

2. A quasi experimental study was performed to assess the effects of different types of models for aggressive behavior on spontaneously occurring aggressive behavior in children.  A baseline measure of aggressiveness was obtained for each child prior to treatment.  Children were non-randomly assigned to the three treatment groups and participants in each group saw a film with a different type of aggressive actor.  Group 1 saw an aggressive cartoon animal, participants in Group 2 saw a human female, and participants in Group 3 saw a human male. The assumption of Homogeneity of Slopes was tested, F(2,18) = .349,  = .71. Was the assumption tenable?

3. A researcher collected data on married couples to see whether counseling helps marital satisfaction. Each married couple filled out a pretest that measured their level of marital satisfaction. The researcher randomly assigned the couples to either a control group or a marital counseling group. At the end of six months the couples filled out a posttest that measured their level of marital satisfaction. What is the best analysis for this study?

4. When reporting the “adjusted means” of an ANCOVA, you should also report their corresponding:

5. What is a quantitative measure of some pre-existing participant characteristic (such as body weight, anxiety, motivation, mental ability, or baseline heart rate) that may differ between groups prior to the administration of any interventions or treatments?

6. Why is ANCOVA often used in situations that involve nonequivalent control groups?

7. What information is needed to assess whether scores on the covariate X are strongly linearly related to Y (the dependent variable)?

8. Interpret the effect size ( η2) for the ANCOVA: F(2, 57) = 7.9,  = .001, partial η2 = .43.

9. Prior to conducting an ANCOVA, the researcher conducted assumption testing. The assumption of Linearity was conducted between the treatment group’s pretest and posttest scores using a scatter plot. The scatter plot showed a curvilinear relationship. Was the assumption tenable?

10. Prior to conducting an ANCOVA, the researcher conducted assumption testing. The assumption of Normality (Kolmogorov-Smirnov) was conducted on the treatment group’s posttest were (p = .68). Was the assumption tenable?

11. Which is not a reason for using ANCOVA:

12. An ANCOVA makes the assumption that the slope that relates scores on Y to scores on Xc is equal (homogenous) across the groups compared in the study.  The slope that is used to adjust Y outcome scores is essentially the pooled or averaged regression slope to predict Y from Xc, separately at each level of the A treatment factor.  If the slope that relates Y to Xc is actually different across levels of the A treatment variable, then it does not make sense to average the slopes together across groups and to use the same slope to make a correction within each group.  What is this assumption called?

13. Prior to conducting an ANCOVA, the researcher conducted assumption testing. The assumption of homogeneity of variances was tested , Levene’s Test, F(2, 432) = .45, p = .08. Was the assumption tenable?

14. An experimental study was performed to assess the effects of different types of teaching models of creativity on pre-school children. A pretest/posttest measure of creativity was obtained during the experiment. Children were randomly assigned to treatment group 1, treatment group 2, or a control group. Results of the ANCOVA were reported as F(2, 57) = 7.9,  = .001, partial η2 = .43. Should Post Hoc analysis be conducted?

15. The primary goal of analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) is to:

BUY MORE MATERIALS FOR THIS COURSE:

How You Might Proceed As Her Therapist Within A Person-Centered Framework. Judith Case

This case application exercise serves to provide students practice in applying person-centered theories, practices and techniques to case practice. The purpose of this assignment is to help you practice the following skills: reflecting on the following question: The essay must be 1 full page in length. Make this personal.

This is a psychotherapy course. Based on a therapist works and skills.

Give specific and personal examples

Your paper must include reflection and application of the course material for this chapter. If references are used, citations should be written in APA format

Formatting Requirements:

• Margins – 1 Inch

• Font – Times New Roman, (12pt)

• Spacing – Double

number responses

  • Imagine self in the role as counselor and apply techniques commonly used in person-centered practice to a specific case. (Application)
  • Exploration and reflection of your personal counseling style. (Caring & Learning How to Learn)

The Case of Judith: Judith is a 25-year-old White female who works as a receptionist at a law firm. Six months ago she began dating Shawn, a 27-year-old man who lives in her apartment complex. Their relationship has deepened, and they now see each other two or three times a week, despite their heavy work schedules. Recently, they began to talk about getting married.

Judith came to therapy because she is concerned about what she describes as her “sexual problem.” Judith told her therapist, “When Shawn and I make love, I get turned on at first but then I just shut down. It’s like my sexual feelings evaporate into thin air. Shawn is very understanding but I know it’s difficult for him.” Judith went on to say that she thought her strict religious upbringing was part of the problem. She said, “I grew up in a small southern town, and my family was almost fanatically religious. My parents thought sex was shameful and dirty and that premarital sex was a horrible sin. If they knew that Shawn and I were having sex, they would be appalled. I left the church when I was in college, and I no longer believe many of the things my parents and church taught, but I think my upbringing has caused me to block out my sexual feelings.”

Person-centered theory posits that children, because they need the love of their parents, tend to “deny to awareness” experiences, including their own feelings, that do not fit their parents’ value system. Judith’s parents considered sex “shameful and dirty” and believed that premarital sex was a “horrible sin.” Thus, it is understandable that Judith, as a child growing up in such an environment, might learn to block out or “deny to awareness” feelings related to sexuality. Although person-centered therapists do not focus on the past in therapy, they do understand that childhood experiences often explain why adults “block out” certain feelings or other aspects of themselves. Person-centered theory says that in order to reclaim previously denied aspects of their experiences, clients must be provided with a therapeutic environment characterized by empathy, congruence, and unconditional positive regard. To the degree the therapist is able to provide this environment and to the degree clients perceive it, they will begin to grow. Their growth will include a natural tendency to explore and gradually allow into awareness feelings that were previously denied.

Using this theoretical structure, it becomes obvious what I need to do in working with Judith from a person-centered perspective: I must provide her with a therapeutic relationship in which she feels deeply understood and accepted. As she begins to realize that I understand how she feels, that I accept and do not judge her, and that I, too, am trying to be open and honest in my relationship with her, Judith will increasingly feel free to be her real self in therapy and to explore and access parts of herself that she had previously blocked out or denied to awareness. As a person-centered therapist, I would not use techniques in my work with Judith nor would I push, cajole, or try to persuade her to do what I thought was best. Person-centered therapists believe that human beings grow naturally when they are provided with empathy, honesty, and acceptance—just as a flower grows naturally when it is provided with sunshine, water, and soil. Thus, based on my own clinical experience and a great deal of research that supports the effectiveness of a deeply human therapeutic relationship, I would predict that Judith, if she stays with the therapeutic process, will not only recover her sexual feelings but will also grow as a person, perhaps in ways that she has not even imagined.

Questions: Answer the following questions on how you might proceed with Judith within the person-centered framework:

(1) Suppose Judith is referred to you for continued person-centered therapy. Would you find it easy to give her empathy and not judge her? What if you are religious and agree with Judith’s parents that premarital sex is wrong? Would you still be able to give Judith empathy and acceptance? At a more general level, do you think it’s possible to accept and support someone even when you disagree with their values or actions? Explain your answer.

(2) Person-centered therapists do not use therapeutic techniques. Instead, they try to create a therapeutic relationship characterized by empathy, acceptance, and genuineness. Would you feel comfortable working with clients in this way, or would you want to use techniques in your work? Why or why not?

(3) Suppose that after working with Judith for a few sessions you come to suspect, despite her physician’s assurance to the contrary, that part of Judith’s problem could be physiological in nature. How would you handle this? What specifically would you do?

63727_fm_rev02.indd 6 18/09/15 11:54 AM

 

 

Engaged with you. www.cengage.com

Source Code: 14M-AA0105

Tap into engagement MindTap empowers you to produce your best work—consistently.

MindTap is designed to help you master the material. Interactive videos, animations, and activities create a learning path designed by your instructor to guide you through the course and focus on what’s important.

Tap into more info at: www.cengage.com/mindtap

“MindTap was very useful – it was easy to follow and everything was right there.” — Student, San Jose State University

“I’m definitely more engaged because of MindTap.” — Student, University of Central Florida

“MindTap puts practice questions in a format that works well for me.” — Student, Franciscan University of Steubenville

MindTap helps you stay organized and efficient by giving you the study tools to master the material.

MindTap empowers and motivates

with information that shows where you stand at all times—both individually and compared to the highest performers in class.

MindTap delivers real-world activities and assignments

that will help you in your academic life as well as your career.

Flashcards

readspeaker

progress app

MyNotes & highlights

selF QuizziNg & practice

63727_Insert 2_ptg01_hr.indd 1 05/10/15 2:10 PM

Copyright 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

 

 

Theories at-a-Glance The tables in this book compare theories over a range of topics, thereby providing you with the ability to easily compare, contrast, and grasp the practical aspects of each theory. These tables also serve as invaluable resources that can be used to review the key concepts, philoso- phies, limitations, contributions to multicultural counseling, applications, techniques, and goals of all theories in this text.

The following chart provides a convenient guide to the tables in this text.

Pages

6–7 Table 1.1 Overview of Contemporary Counseling Models

62–63 Table 4.1 Ego-Defense Mechanisms

65–66 Table 4.2 Comparison of Freud’s Psychosexual Stages and Erikson’s Psychosocial Stages

432 Table 15.1 The Basic Philosophies

433–434 Table 15.2 Key Concepts

438 Table 15.3 Goals of Therapy

441–442 Table 15.4 The Therapeutic Relationship

443–444 Table 15.5 Techniques of Therapy

444–445 Table 15.6 Applications of the Approaches

446 Table 15.7 Contributions to Multicultural Counseling

447 Table 15.8 Limitations in Multicultural Counseling

448–449 Table 15.9 Contributions of the Approaches

449–450 Table 15.10 Limitations of the Approaches

63727_Insert 3_ptg01_hr.indd 1 30/09/15 10:13 AM

Copyright 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

 

 

Overview of Focus Questions for the Theories For the chapters dealing with the different theories, you will have a basic understand- ing of this book if you can answer the following questions as they apply to each of the eleven theories:

Who are the key figures (founder or founders) associated with the approach?

What are some of the basic assumptions underlying this approach?

What are a few of the key concepts that are essential to this theory?

What do you consider to be the most important goals of this therapy?

What is the role the therapeutic relationship plays in terms of therapy outcomes?

What are a few of the techniques from this therapy model that you would want to incorporate into your counseling practice?

What are some of the ways that this theory is applied to client populations, settings, and treat- ment of problems?

What do you see as the major strength of this theory from a diversity perspective?

What do you see as the major shortcoming of this theory from a diversity perspective?

What do you consider to be the most significant contribution of this approach?

What do you consider to be the most significant limitation of this approach?

63727_Insert 3_ptg01_hr.indd 2 30/09/15 10:13 AM

Copyright 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

 

 

Australia • Brazil • Mexico • Singapore • United Kingdom • United States

Gerald Corey California State University, Fullerton Diplomate in Counseling Psychology,

American Board of Professional Psychology

Theory and PracTice of counseling and

PsychoTheraPy Tenth Edition

63727_fm_rev02.indd 1 20/10/15 10:25 AM

Copyright 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

 

 

63727_fm_rev02.indd 6 18/09/15 11:54 AM

This is an electronic version of the print textbook. Due to electronic rights restrictions, some third party content may be suppressed. Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. The publisher reserves the right to remove content from this title at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it. For valuable information on pricing, previous editions, changes to current editions, and alternate formats, please visit www.cengage.com/highered to search by ISBN#, author, title, or keyword for materials in your areas of interest.

Important Notice: Media content referenced within the product description or the product text may not be available in the eBook version.

Copyright 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

 

 

Printed in the United States of America

Print Number: 01 Print Year: 2015

© 2017, 2013, Cengage Learning

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this work covered by the copyright herein may be reproduced, transmitted, stored, or used in any form or by any means graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including but not limited to photocopying, recording, scanning, digitizing, taping, Web distribution, information networks, or information storage and retrieval systems, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without the prior written permission of the publisher.

Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy, Tenth Edition Gerald Corey

Product Director: Jon David Hague

Product Manager: Julie Martinez

Content Developer: Kyra Kane

Product Assistant: Stephen Lagos

Marketing Manager: Margaux Cameron

Content Project Manager: Rita Jaramillo

Art Director: Vernon Boes

Manufacturing Planner: Judy Inouye

Production Service: Cenveo® Publisher Services

Text and Cover Designer: Cheryl Carrington

Cover Image: ©Purestock/Getty Images

Compositor: Cenveo® Publisher Services

For product information and technology assistance, contact us at Cengage Learning Customer & Sales Support, 1-800-354-9706.

For permission to use material from this text or product, submit all requests online at www.cengage.com/permissions.

Further permissions questions can be e-mailed to permissionrequest@cengage.com.

Library of Congress Control Number: 2015948206

Student Edition: ISBN: 10- 1305263727

Loose-leaf Edition: ISBN: 978-1-305-26372-7

Cengage Learning 20 Channel Center Street Boston, MA 02210 USA

Cengage Learning is a leading provider of customized learning solutions with employees residing in nearly 40 different countries and sales in more than 125 countries around the world. Find your local representative at www.cengage.com.

Cengage Learning products are represented in Canada by Nelson Education, Ltd.

To learn more about Cengage Learning Solutions, visit www.cengage.com.

Purchase any of our products at your local college store or at our preferred online store www.cengagebrain.com.

63727_fm_rev02.indd 2 18/09/15 11:54 AM

WCN: 02-200-203

Copyright 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

 

 

To the founders and key figures of the theories presented

in this book—with appreciation for their contributions

to contemporary counseling practice.

63727_fm_rev02.indd 3 18/09/15 11:54 AM

Copyright 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

 

 

iv

abouT The auThor

gerald corey is Professor Emeritus of Human Services and Counseling at California State University at Fullerton. He received his doctorate in counseling from the University of Southern California. He is a Diplomate in Counseling Psy- chology, American Board of Professional Psychology; a licensed psychologist; and a National Certified Counselor. He is a Fellow of the American Psychological Associa- tion (Division 17, Counseling Psychology; and Division 49, Group Psychotherapy); a Fellow of the American Counseling Association; and a Fellow of the Association for Specialists in Group Work. He also holds memberships in the American Group Psychotherapy Association; the American Mental Health Counselors Association; the Association for Spiritual, Ethical, and Religious Values in Counseling; the Asso- ciation for Counselor Education and Supervision; and the Western Association of Counselor Education and Supervision. Both Jerry and Marianne Corey received the Lifetime Achievement Award from the American Mental Health Counselors Associ- ation in 2011, and both of them received the Eminent Career Award from ASGW in 2001. Jerry was given the Outstanding Professor of the Year Award from California State University at Fullerton in 1991. He regularly teaches both undergraduate and graduate courses in group counseling and ethics in counseling. He is the author or coauthor of 15 textbooks in counseling currently in print, along with more than 60 journal articles and book chapters. Several of his books have been translated into other languages. Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy has been trans- lated into Arabic, Indonesian, Portuguese, Turkish, Korean, and Chinese. Theory and Practice of Group Counseling has been translated into Korean, Chinese, Spanish, and Russian. Issues and Ethics in the Helping Professions has been translated into Korean, Japanese, and Chinese.

In the past 40 years Jerry and Marianne Corey have conducted group counsel- ing training workshops for mental health professionals at many universities in the United States as well as in Canada, Mexico, China, Hong Kong, Korea, Germany, Belgium, Scotland, England, and Ireland. In his leisure time, Jerry likes to travel, hike and bicycle in the mountains, and drive his 1931 Model A Ford. Marianne and Jerry have been married since 1964. They have two adult daughters, Heidi and Cindy, two granddaughters (Kyla and Keegan), and one grandson (Corey).

Recent publications by Jerry Corey, all with Cengage Learning, include:

ŠŠ Theory and Practice of Group Counseling, Ninth Edition (and Student Manual) (2016)

ŠŠ Becoming a Helper, Seventh Edition (2016, with Marianne Schneider Corey)

ŠŠ Issues and Ethics in the Helping Professions, Ninth Edition (2015, with Mari- anne Schneider Corey, Cindy Corey, and Patrick Callanan)

ŠŠ Group Techniques, Fourth Edition (2015, with Marianne Schneider Corey, Patrick Callanan, and J. Michael Russell)

ŠŠ Groups: Process and Practice, Ninth Edition (2014, with Marianne Schnei- der Corey and Cindy Corey)

iv

63727_fm_rev02.indd 4 18/09/15 11:54 AM

Copyright 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

 

 

v

ŠŠ I Never Knew I Had a Choice, Tenth Edition (2014, with Marianne Schneider Corey)

ŠŠ Case Approach to Counseling and Psychotherapy, Eighth Edition (2013) ŠŠ The Art of Integrative Counseling, Third Edition (2013)

Jerry Corey is coauthor (with Barbara Herlihy) of Boundary Issues in Counseling: Multiple Roles and Responsibilities, Third Edition (2015) and ACA Ethical Standards Case- book, Seventh Edition (2015); he is coauthor (with Robert Haynes, Patrice Moulton, and Michelle Muratori) of Clinical Supervision in the Helping Professions: A Practical Guide, Second Edition (2010); he is the author of Creating Your Professional Path: Les- sons From My Journey (2010). All four of these books are published by the American Counseling Association.

He has also made several educational DVD programs on various aspects of counseling practice: (1) Ethics in Action: DVD and Workbook (2015, with Marianne Schneider Corey and Robert Haynes); (2) Groups in Action: Evolution and Challenges DVD and Workbook (2014, with Marianne Schneider Corey and Robert Haynes); (3) DVD for Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy: The Case of Stan and Lecturettes (2013); (4) DVD for Integrative Counseling: The Case of Ruth and Lecturettes (2013, with Robert Haynes); and (5) DVD for Theory and Practice of Group Counseling (2012). All of these programs are available through Cengage Learning.

63727_fm_rev02.indd 5 18/09/15 11:54 AM