Establish the purpose(s) of the executive summary.
Preparation
- Research any of following websites as you prepare this assignment: Governmental Accounting Office, located at www.gao.gov , Public Agenda located at www.publicagenda.org: RAND Corporation located at http://www.rand.org/; Policy Library located at http://www.policylibrary.com/; American Enterprise Institute located at http://www.aei.org; Cato Institute located at http://www.cato.org; Economic Policy Institute located at http://www.epi.org/; The Heritage Foundation located at http://www.heritage.org; or other similar website.
Scenario
Use the policy you selected from Assignment 2 (Attached) to research a published study related to your chosen area of focus. Then, prepare an Executive Summary with the following criteria listed for this assignment.
Write a five to six (5-6) page paper in which you:
(Note: Refer to Appendix 2 Attached: The Executive Summary for explanation of all criterions listed below.)
1. Establish the purpose(s) of the executive summary.
2. Provide the background to the issue.
3. Discuss the results of the research, identifying the models used to obtain the results.
4. Provide available federal data.
5. Discuss appropriate economic predictors.
6. Propose at least three (3) reliable, implementable recommendations.
7. Appropriately incorporate at least four (4) quality sources. A quality source can be either grey literature, such as a news article, or scholarly, such as peer reviewed works. In the case of public administration, government websites are appropriate quality resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
- Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
Running head: STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS 2
STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS 2
Stakeholder Analysis
Dr. Timothy Smith
Darrin Clanton
PAD 520: Policy Analysis and Program Evaluation
August 2, 2019
Stakeholder Analysis
Obamacare’s Precarious Fate
President George Bush and Trump’s legislature settled on one of the most preservationist solicitations courts in the nation to fall for the conceivable real test that the Reasonable Consideration Act has stood up to. The two Republican-designated chose the three-judge leading body of the U.S. Court for the Fifth Circuit Jennifer Elrod (named by George W. Greenery) and Kurt Engelhardt (assigned by President Trump) (The Washington Post, 2013). Hence, this seemed to have little diligence for the conflicts concerning Obamacare shown by lawful consultants for the Spot of Specialists and a social event of blue-slanting states. The third judge on the board, a Jimmy Carter appointee, remained quiet during the disputes. The 2010 social protection law is bearing a surge in fact by choice by an administrative judge in Texas in December, in which he reported the law unlawfully. Genuine experts transversely over ways of thinking investigated that decision. The Trump association, which has since a long time before combat against President Barack Obama’s imprint ultimate achievement, has mostly gotten a handle on the lower court’s choice. The case is the third Republican undertaking to pulverize Obamacare by the legitimate act (Schwartz, 2008). Authorities have not had the alternative to fix the law entirely, and the Unique Court has kept up it twice.
However, Mr. Trump marked in late 2017 the Tax breaks and Occupations Act which gutted Obamacare’s order by eliminating the expense penalty that the human services law forced on Americans who decide not to purchase medical coverage. However, a few Republicans formulated a lawful hypothesis under which an individual command without an assessment punishment could be rendered illegal, damning the remainder of Obamacare. This incorporates Obamacare’s marquee (and well known) securities for prior conditions and decides that enable individuals to remain on their folks’ protection plans until age 26. The speculation goes, in the Preeminent Court’s milestone 2012 decision maintaining the law, the court announced the duty punishment a pivotal segment holding the resolution together. That is what the governors and lawyer’s general testing the code all of who hail from red-inclining states are contending. For these Obamacare adversaries, it isn’t sufficient to extract the individual order from the law (Gun Violence Prevention, 2013).
Loss of Occupation by The New York Times
The Republican-drove effort to abrogate the Reasonable Consideration Act (ACA) joins two huge monetary changes: a duty decreases and a spending cut. Since the U.S. economy still has some productive slack, these considerable financial changes will impact the pace of business advancement. This adequate slack is realized by families, associations, and governments that are spending not as much as what the economy could convey if all benefits were used altogether. This lack of spending is, therefore, the present confining fundamental to the economy’s improvement rate. In this condition, the surprising withdrawal of the consumption from the commercial center from ACA cancelation would add work mishap to the loss of prosperity and cash related security for a significant number of Americans. This report gives a cruel check of how the mix of tax reductions and spending cuts in the ACA invalidation will impact work in U.S. states. The blend of duty decreases and spending cuts introduced in ACA invalidation would reduce national occupation improvement by for all intents and purposes 1.2 million out of 2019, all else proportional. That is because the spending cuts would harm position improvement more than the tax reductions would bolster it.
The preferred position would, for the most part, fallen off the pockets of cash-constrained families that will likely significantly lessen their spending in light of lower additional money. While the expense decreases would unreasonably go to high-pay families, who will come when all talked about in done extra a massive piece of additions in disposable pay, besides, States can in like manner be situated by their relative compensation weight originating from ACA repeal. This practically identical weight measure sees increments arising from assessment decreases little incidents originating from spending cuts, scaled to each a great deal of the under-65 masses. This person picked as a scalar because the incorporation augmentations of the ACA were pointed absolutely at the under-65 masses. Generally, communicates that took up the ACA Medicaid augmentation see a higher relative weight, as they have more to lose from dissolution. Moreover, states with a low part of national top 1 percent nuclear families will similarly watch a higher relative weight, as they will get lower-than-ordinary points of interest from the tax reductions embedded in ACA repeal.
Argumentations
Obamacare Precarious Fate
The New York Times argues that the two-government decided on one of the most traditionalist interests’ courts in the country. Therefore, this seemed prepared on Tuesday to fall for the most credible lawful test that the Moderate Consideration Act has confronted, which is stating something. Nonetheless, I believe there’s a significant piece of possibility arranging that Republicans have failed to do. Neither in the White House nor on Legislative centre slope are they arranged for the likelihood that their claim against Obamacare will succeed. Most spectators do not anticipate that the courts should strike down the law. Therefore, Tuesday’s oral contentions in Another Orleans government court did not change personalities. If that the suit is fruitful, in any case, it will make a severe issue for many individuals. Guarantors will again have the option to oppress individuals with constant conditions. Several states’ financial limits tossed into the disturbance. The reason is when Washington quits covering the majority of the tab for the extension of Medicaid inclusion to family units directly over the neediness line. Individuals who get their protection through Obamacare’s trades will quit getting the duty credits that make it reasonable.
Cancelling the Affordable Care Act would cost Jobs.
The case, between Texas and Azar, was brought by lawyers general or governors from Texas and 19 other Republican states, just as two people, in February 2018. Texas contended that when Congress decreased, the individual command punishment adds up to focus on the 2017 Tax reduction and Occupations Act (Coalition to Stop Gun Violence, 2013). These rendered the particular order illegal and the rest of the ACA invalid. In April, the offended parties asked Judge O’Connor to enter a directive, or court request, obstructing the activity of the ACA. The U.S. Division of Equity reacted to the amazement of everybody including evidently its lawyers by concurring that the previous condition insurances of the ACA were invalid. The organization, be that as it may, protected the remainder of the law. California’s lawyer general and 16 other Popularity based lawyer officers at that point interceded to defend the bill completely. However, I believe that the reality of the situation could prove that other, non-ACA components of the future monetary plan. Therefore, this will give such a substantial financial lift to the economy that the ACA cancelation will be overpowered and no business misfortune encountered. If, for instance, framework spending plans is passed by Congress and the president, this could give a sufficient monetary lift to assimilate the ACA repeal without huge macroeconomic impacts.
Most Conceivable Argument
The most conceivable contention is on the revoking the Moderate Consideration Act would cost employments in each state. There is an argument that the examinations look at multipliers estimating the impact of monetary stuns in an economy. Wherein the Central bank is eager to suit financial help, for instance, the Federation agency does not react to government spending increments by rate climbs intended to fight off expansion. This absence of any countervailing financial arrangement response is the reason the monetary change yields such huge impacts (or high multipliers). The present joblessness rate is generally equivalent to what won before the Incomparable Subsidence. However, such a significant number of have contended that the U.S. economy is currently at full work. Thus, the federation agency will balance any enormous financial changes.
Further, the full monetary effect of ACA cancelation customarily, expected to happen in a couple of years. In the brains of many, this implies the economy and national work market will be considerably more tightly than it is today. As indicated by this line of speculation, projections of work misfortunes in 2019 dependent on substantial financial changes need to represent a profound and critically, powerful countervailing money related approach change.
List of the Gun Policy Control Stakeholders
1. Gun owners
2. Associations of gun owner
3. The gun traders
4. The government department of Defense
5. The non-governmental organizations on human protection
Calculation the Cumulative Frequency
Order Most Important (Frequency) Relative frequency Cumulative Frequency
1 4 0.8 0.8
2 2 0.4 1.2
3 5 1 2.2
4 3 0.6 2.8
5 1 0.2 3.0
Even though guidelines fluctuate from state to express, the partners set up essential conditions for getting firearms in the US. The Gun Control Association of 1968 (GCA) directs guns at the government level, necessitates that natives and legitimate inhabitants that, must be at any rate 18 years old to buy firearms or rifles and ammo.
In this activity, the line diagram did not level as far as the arrangement issues concerning “weapon control” is required to be a two-sided thing. To completely violate political slant, there are at present different bills before the 113th Congress to fortify weapon control. Government is attempting to gain ground on this front through both marking 23 official requests and advancing an arrangement concentrated on “all-inclusive historical verifications for all firearm purchasers, a crackdown on weapon dealing, a prohibition on military-style ambush weapons, and a restriction on ammo magazines holding in excess of 10 projectiles,” as indicated by the Washington Post. However, this arrangement’s probabilities seem to be unfavorable despite Congress which, typically, is centered around ending its encouraging. To deal with these activities, both the official requests and president’s proposed plan have become difficult because there has been a clamor from Republicans, either discrediting government as a despot for attempting to remove their firearms. Congress’ difficult adherence to the guideline of no advancement as being superior to anything bargain is sickening, and this firearm discussion might be the keep going issue on which they can pull it off.
References
Coalition to Stop Gun Violence. (2013). Guns, Democracy, and Freedom. Retrieved on May 9, 2013; from:
Gun Violence Prevention. (2013). Congressional Digest, 92(3), 1.
Schwartz, E. (2008). In Congress, the Uphill Battle for Gun Control. U.S. News & World Report, 144(8), 41-43.
The Washington Post. (2013). Obama’s far-reaching gun-proposals face uncertain fate in divided Congress. Retrieved on May 10, 2013; from: – 16/politics/36384024_1_gun-violence-gun-buyers-universal-background-checks
