Need a research paper on Conflict Management in Public Administration. Follow the below instructions.

Need a research paper on Conflict Management in Public Administration. Follow the below instructions.

The paper topic should be related to leadership in public administration. Topics for the research paper need be approved by Professor Stephens by the end of the third-class meeting, July 14, 2020.  The paper will be at least 7 pages in length, double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12-point font with 1” margins. The paper should contain a Title Page, Body, Conclusion(s) and Reference Page(s). The Title Page and Reference Page(s) do not count towards the 7-page total. You should use at least 5 references from credible sources to support your paper / research. Wikipedia is not a credible source.  Proper in-text and reference page citations are expected and shall follow the APA guidelines.

Create an argument for why healthcare is best regulated at the federal or state/local level.

Create an argument for why healthcare is best regulated at the federal or state/local level. Explain the pros and cons of regulation at that level versus the other level, and consider aspects such as taxation, national standards versus local control, and the Constitution. Include recent examples in the news that support your argument. No plagiarism, will be submitted through Turnitin. Must be written in Turabian format.

Several sources should be cited and listed in the references to support points. These include the book, lessons, news articles, and relevant websites.

The task is to research, create, and support a scholarly argument using facts and evidence. Personal opinions are unnecessary and should be left out of the arguments. State facts and back them with citations. Phrases like “I feel” or “in my opinion” should appear nowhere in the essay. 

Please reference the attached rubric before beginning.

Writing Rubric

Exemplary
Accomplished
Developing
Beginning
Did not attempt
Criterion ScoreSynthesis Of Knowlegde
20 points

Submission exhibits a clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is well constructed to guide the reader through the assignment. Submission builds on the thesis with well-documented supporting facts, figures, and/or statements. 17 points

Submission demonstrates good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Thesis is effectively presented, with most statements and facts helping to support the key focus of assignment. 15 points

Submission exhibits a basic understanding of the assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported or is unclear. The reader may have difficulty seeing linkages between thoughts. Submission has included few supporting facts and statements. 13 points

Submission exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic of the submission. Thesis is not clearly evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements. 0 points

No submission or plagiarized submission. / 20Foundation of Knowledge
20 points

Submission demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter. Assignment shows an impressive ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Submission provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence. 17 points

Submission exhibit competent usage of subject matter in assignment. Submission provides satisfactory ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of current level of subject matter knowledge. 15 points

Submission demonstrates has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. There are areas of some concern in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Submission generally explains concepts, but it only meets the minimum requirements in this area. 13 points

Submission tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Submission presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas. 0 points

No submission or plagiarized submission. / 20Application of Knowledge
20 points

Submission demonstrates a higher-level of critical thinking and provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving. It draws conclusions which are not immediately obvious. Submission provides well-supported ideas and reflection with a variety of current and/or world views in the assignment. It presents a genuine intellectual development of ideas throughout assignment. 17 points

Submission exhibits a good command of critical thinking skills in the presentation of material and supporting statements. Assignment demonstrates above average use of relating concepts by using a variety of factors. There are adequate conclusions. 15 points

Submission takes a conventional approach in guiding the reader through various linkages and connections presented in assignment. There’s a limited perspective on key concepts throughout assignment. Submission appears to have difficulty applying information in a problem-solving manner. 13 points

Submission demonstrates a beginning understanding of key concepts, but overlooks critical details. Information is not applied in a problem-solving fashion. Submission presents confusing statements and facts in assignment. There is no evidence or little semblance of critical thinking skills. 0 points

No submission or plagiarized submission. / 20Organization and Format
10 points

Submission thoroughly explains all major points. An original, unique, and/or imaginative approach to overall ideas, concepts, and findings is presented. Overall format of assignment includes an appropriate introduction (or abstract), well- developed paragraphs, and conclusion. Finished assignment demonstrates ability to plan and organize research in a logical sequence. 8.5 points

Submission explains the majority of points and concepts in the assignment. It demonstrates a good skill level in formatting and organizing material in assignment. It also presents an above average level of preparedness, with few formatting errors. 7.5 points

Submission applies some points and concepts incorrectly. There are a variety of formatting styles, with some inconsistencies throughout the paper. Assignment does not have a continuous pattern of logical sequencing. 6.5 points

Assignment reveals formatting errors and a lack of organization. It is an incomplete attempt to provide linkages or explanation of key terms. 0 points

No submission or plagiarized submission. / 10Writing Skills
15 points

Submission demonstrates an excellent command of grammar, as well as presents research in a clear and concise writing style. It presents a thorough, extensive understanding of word usage. Submission excels in the selection and development of a well- planned research assignment. Assignment is error-free. 12.75 points

Submission provides an effective display of good writing and grammar. Assignment reflects an ability to select appropriate word usage and presents an above-average presentation of a given topic or issue. Assignment appears to be well written with no more than five errors. It is a good final product that covers the above-minimal requirements. 11.25 points

Assignment reflects basic writing and grammar, but with more than five errors. Key terms and concepts are somewhat vague and not completely explained by student. Submission uses a basic vocabulary in assignment and demonstrates a mediocre writing ability. It also demonstrates a basic understanding of the subject matter. 9.75 points

Topics, concepts, and ideas are not coherently discussed or expressed in assignments. Writing style is weak and needs improvement, along with numerous proofreading errors. Assignment lacks clarity, consistency, and correctness, and it needs significant revisions to reach an acceptable level. 0 points

No submission or plagiarized submission. / 15Research Skills
15 points

Submission provides sophisticated synthesis of complex body of information in the preparation of assignment. Research contributes significantly to the development of the overall thesis. Assignment incorporates five or more quality references, and it incorporates a variety of research resources and methodology. 12.75 points

Submission achieves an above average synthesis of research, but interpretation is narrow in scope and description within assignment. Assignment contains fewer than five valid resources, which are cited throughout to support statements. 11.25 points

Assignment demonstrates basic or borderline research abilities. Submission has incorporated fewer than three sources, and it does not attempt to support key elements of assignment with proper citations, although sources may be listed at the end. 9.75 points

Submission fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for assignment. The lack of appropriate citations or source materials demonstrates a need for additional help or training in this area. Assignment lacks proper citations to support statements The submission is not acceptable college-level work. 0 points

No submission or plagiarized submission. / 15Rubric Total ScoreTotal/ 100

Discuss the Holocaust or another genocide in terms of dehumanizing the enemy.

It has been argued that dehumanization of the enemy is a necessary step in convincing a society to accept killing in war as acceptable, while still believing that killing for other reasons is murder. Use Jojo Rabbit as an example of a fictional account of finding humanity in the enemy to discuss ways that war might be prevented by preventing dehumanization. Discuss the Holocaust or another genocide in terms of dehumanizing the enemy.

What components should be included in a comprehensive security policy related to a bomb threat?

Introduction to Security Ninth Edition. DOI: © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

435 2013

10.1016/B978-0-12-385057-7.00017-8

Computer Technology and Information Security Issues

OBJECTIVES

The study of the chapter will enable you to:

1. Identify various computer products.

2. Discuss possible attacks on computer systems and software.

3. Discuss options for protecting computers and information from fraudulent use and theft.

Introduction Computers and information systems have traditionally been treated as something that the security/loss-prevention director needs to consider as a vulnerability; however, the 21st century has brought about a revolution in security operations. The following discussion on computers and information systems security will focus primarily on the services provided by the traditional roles of security in protecting computers. However, the trend is for security technologies to rely on the very computers that they are designed to protect. For example, information technology has bought closed-circuit television (CCTV), primarily used for surveillance, of age. Technologies like biometrics1 have made possible video monitoring in the areas of facial and physical characteristics recognition, fire and smoke detection, and advanced alarm monitoring. With this growing integration of technology and the security operation, the traditional dichotomy associated with security and information technology often creates problems.

In 1946 the U.S. Army developed ENIAC (Electronic Numerical Integrator and Calculator), the first viable full-scale computer. At that time, computers were mysterious boxes utilized by scientists and thought to be the top-secret weapons of generals. Today, scientific pocket calculators have greater computing power than ENIAC, and most kindergarten kids know how to use a computer2 or some type of handheld personal digital assistant (PDA) computing device, particularly those designed for electronic games. Computers have become an important part of peoples’ lives, becoming an integral part of the way we work, teach, learn, and even play.

In government and business, computers are used to process, store and transmit vast amounts of information. Information processing tasks that used to take days or weeks for workers to compile are handled by today’s computers in mere minutes, translating into greater efficiencies and greater productivity. Moreover, information systems are becoming primary methods of communications. E-mail, instant messaging, voice-over Internet protocol

17

Fischer, R., Halibozek, E., & Walters, D. (2012). Introduction to security. ProQuest Ebook Central <a onclick=window.open(‘http://ebookcentral.proquest.com’,’_blank’) href=’http://ebookcentral.proquest.com’ target=’_blank’ style=’cursor: pointer;’>http://ebookcentral.proquest.com</a> Created from apus on 2020-08-16 13:13:21.

C op

yr ig

ht ©

2 01

2. E

ls ev

ie r

S ci

en ce

& T

ec hn

ol og

y. A

ll rig

ht s

re se

rv ed

.

 

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385057-7.00017-8

 

436 INTRODUCTION TO SECURITY

(essentially using computers and the Internet for voice communications, until recently the exclusive capability of telephones and telephone companies) are common and in many cases essential means of effective and efficient communications. Cellphones, smart phones (e.g.,  iPhone, Blackberry, Android) and laptops, along with tablet computers and electronic book readers, are virtually ubiquitous in today’s society.

The criminal justice sector also relies on computers. Since 1924 the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has been responsible for keeping the nation’s fingerprint and criminal history records. In 1967 the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) was established. Today the FBI has a computer system they call the Investigative Data Warehouse (IDW), described as one-stop shopping, giving FBI agents, from anywhere in the world, almost instant access to a database containing more than 650 million records. The search capability of this system has been described as an “Uber-Google.”3

In the private sector, banks, insurance agencies, and credit rating agencies also process enormous volumes of computer data. For example, in the early part of this decade it was estimated that TRW Data Systems of California collected, stored, and sold access to information containing the credit histories of more than 90 million Americans. Banks, depart- ment stores, jewelry stores, and credit card companies pay them a subscription fee to access such information on current and potential customers. Today, Choicepoint, acquired by Reed Elsevier in September 2008, is a leading information broker with personal files on more than 220 million people in the United States and Latin America. This data is for sale to government organizations and the private sector.4 Likewise, every major insurance company in America collects and stores information on past, current, and future policyholders.

Telemarketing and mail order professionals similarly buy, sell, and repackage such information like so many tangible products. The countless pieces of junk mail stuffed in Americans’ mailboxes each day attest to the proliferation of such information brokers. Information brokers sell personal data to companies who then target for mail campaigns people who might be interested in their products.

The Dow Jones News/Retrieval Service offers stock market quotations, reports on business and economic forecasts, plus profiles of companies and organizations. The Source not only pro- vides news and stock market indexes but also provides games and other forms of entertainment to its subscribers. Each of these information services is available to anyone with a computer, lap- top, iPad, smart phone or any other type of personal digital assistant (PDA) device.

However, as with all great advances, there is a downside. Computer technology is changing so fast that equipment and software are often outdated before or as soon as it is installed, having a negative impact on the profit margin of the company. This is especially true for microcomputers.5

Of greater importance for the security professional are the criminal activities associated with the misuse of computers and the technology supported by them. Early in the 21st century, one of the fastest growing problems in this arena is identify theft. Problems that did not exist 25 years ago are commonplace today. For example, 25 years ago, few people had any fear of computer viruses. Today several major firms are in the business of protecting not only company computers, but also the computers used at home, from destructive viruses.

Fischer, R., Halibozek, E., & Walters, D. (2012). Introduction to security. ProQuest Ebook Central <a onclick=window.open(‘http://ebookcentral.proquest.com’,’_blank’) href=’http://ebookcentral.proquest.com’ target=’_blank’ style=’cursor: pointer;’>http://ebookcentral.proquest.com</a> Created from apus on 2020-08-16 13:13:21.

C op

yr ig

ht ©

2 01

2. E

ls ev

ie r

S ci

en ce

& T

ec hn

ol og

y. A

ll rig

ht s

re se

rv ed

.

 

 

Chapter 17 l Computer Technology and Information Security Issues 437

CSO, CISO and CIO Interactions Information and information systems have become so critical to the efficient operation of business and government that organizations have in place senior executives to direct strate- gic and tactical operations associated with the creation, processing, transmission, storage and protection of information. Virtually all major corporations and government organizations have in place chief information officers (CIO) and chief information security officers (CISO). These executives either hold a seat in the C-suite (a term used to refer to corporate and organiza- tional positions of the chief executive level for a particular function, most commonly the chief executive officer (CEO), chief financial officer (CFO), chief technology officer (CTO) and in the security profession, the chief security officer (CSO)) or directly report to someone with “chief ” responsibilities.

The CIO and CISO work closely with the CSO and in most organizations have distinctively separate responsibilities. Where the CIO is responsible for the delivery of information services capabilities to the company, its workforce and other stakeholders, the CISO is responsible for the security of those information systems and the information contained within. In more  traditional companies, the CSO is responsible for determining the sensitivity of information and is responsible for the protection of information when it is not residing within information systems. More specifically, CSOs have been, and often still are, responsi- ble for the protection of information when it is in forms other than electronic. For example, much information exists in the form of documents. These documents, when containing pages of sensitive information, require protection. This protection usually is accomplished with more traditional security methods such as locked containers, files and safes kept in secure or protected company areas where unauthorized persons are not allowed physical access. These traditional security methods help prevent compromise or theft of sensitive company or organi- zation information. In some companies and organizations the CISO duties are assigned to the CSO; however, it is more common to see them separated or to see a CISO reporting to a CSO.

Furthermore, CSOs are often charged with the responsibility of working with the creators of information and intellectual property attorneys to determine and assign some level of sensitivity to information. Information has different degrees of value and sensitivity. Some information is routine business information with no particular sensitivity or value while other information may contain trade secrets or strategic data that possess high value to the organi- zation and perhaps even provide the organization with a unique competitive advantage. To properly protect sensitive information it is essential to be able to identify that information that is truly sensitive and separate it from less valuable information, by virtue of a physical separa- tion or a process of uniquely identifying (marking) that sensitive information so it is clear to the possessor just how sensitive that information is. Moreover, the CSO is generally charged with developing procedures for protecting information determined to be sensitive when not contained within information systems and with ensuring the workforce understands how to protect sensitive information.

Essentially, the CIO, CSIO and CSO are collectively responsible for protecting the confiden- tiality, integrity and availability of all company or organization information. Confidentiality

Fischer, R., Halibozek, E., & Walters, D. (2012). Introduction to security. ProQuest Ebook Central <a onclick=window.open(‘http://ebookcentral.proquest.com’,’_blank’) href=’http://ebookcentral.proquest.com’ target=’_blank’ style=’cursor: pointer;’>http://ebookcentral.proquest.com</a> Created from apus on 2020-08-16 13:13:21.

C op

yr ig

ht ©

2 01

2. E

ls ev

ie r

S ci

en ce

& T

ec hn

ol og

y. A

ll rig

ht s

re se

rv ed

.