How can law enforcement fight gang formation without using racial profiling?

Assignment Details

On the Discussion Board, respond to this scenario with scholarly answers: Many youth gangs are racially and ethnically homogeneous. With that in mind, address the following questions:

  • What legal, constitutional, or social dilemmas are created for police departments that use racial profiling to fight gang formation?
  • How can law enforcement fight gang formation without using racial profiling?

Compile the information into the Target Market Section of your business plan.

Assignment Instructions

Week 3 Assignment: Target Market (PO1, CO5, ILO.B.SK.3, SK.4, BIS.1, AL.1, AL.2, DL.4)

This week you discover who your target market is for your business. Use research to discover the Demographic, Geographic, Lifestyle, Pyschographic, Purchasing Patterns, Buying Sensitivity, and Market Size Trends for your business.

Compile the information into the Target Market Section of your business plan.

Please review attached assignment rubric

Minimum 2 pages

Minimum 2 scholarly sources

Business Professional Format

Do not submit an entire business plan

Federalist 10 & Federalist 51 Assignment

Federalist 10

To the People of the State of New York:

Among the many advantages promised by a better Union, few are more important than its ability to defend against the problem of factions.

A faction is a group of people united by some common interest. A faction’s interest may be opposed to the rights of other citizens. If a faction has a majority, it may abuse its power and make the country less stable.

Complaints are said that the public good is ignored by politicians because of the conflicts of rival parties. Laws are created according to the force of the largest faction, not according to the rules of justice. As much as we may wish that these complaints had no truth, the evidence will not allow us to deny that they are in some degree true.

“Zeal For Different Opinions”

The reasons people divide themselves into factions are due to the nature of man. Feelings for different opinions about religion or government can split people into factions. Liking different leaders that want power can divide people into opposing parties as well. The most common source of division has been the unequal distribution of property. Factions have made men more likely to oppose and oppress each other than to cooperate for their common good.

Therefore, the CAUSES of faction cannot be removed. The best that can be done is to try to control its EFFECTS. If a faction consists of less than a majority, the majority can defeat its views by regular vote. In this way, a minority faction may slow the work of government, but it will be unable to really do anything under the Constitution.

“The Great Question”

When a faction makes up a majority, on the other hand, it can harm both the public good and the rights of other citizens. How to protect against such a danger, and at the same time to save the form of democracy, is then the great question that we must try to answer.

There are only two possibilities. First, it might be ensured that no belief gains the support of a majority. Or, if a majority faction exists, it must be blocked from carrying out bad ideas.

“Two Great Points Of Difference”

A republic a government in which people are represented by elected leaders, gives us an answer to the problem of factions. There are two differences between a democracy and a republic. First, in a republic, the running of government falls to a small number of citizens elected by the rest. Second, a republic can work in a larger country.

The effect of the first difference is to balance the emotions of the people. The citizens who are chosen as representatives can figure out the best interest of the country. This will make them less likely than the masses to allow any citizen or principle to be given up. This means they can protect against a powerful majority faction.

“Safeguarding Against Factions”

The effect of these differences is to allow the government to rule over a larger country. This will also have the effect of guarding against factions. The influence of leaders may disrupt States, but will be unable to spread a general problem through the other States. A religious sect may become a political faction in a part of the nation, but other religious groups in other states will protect the nation against the danger that the faction poses. In the size and structure of the Union, therefore, we see a republican cure for the diseases of political factions.

PUBLIUS.

Supreme Court Case Study Research Paper

Supreme Court Case Study Research Paper

Goal: Use primary and secondary sources to identify and determine the central idea of the concept of judicial review and how it relates to modern day civil rights cases.

How: Conduct a research project to find and include recent examples (within the last five years) where the Supreme Court has used the power of judicial review to ensure DEMOCRACY and EQUITY within ONE topic for Civil Rights.

– There should be a theme to the cases you choose (eg. Freedom of Speech)

– Best chances for choosing applicable cases are if they have to do with the Bill of Rights or the Civil War Amendments (13th – 15th amendments). (Cite your sources, use PRIMARY or SECONDARY sources only).

Requirements: Write a report for TWO recent examples of cases, using key details and ideas, demonstrating an understanding of how the Supreme Court utilizes Judicial Review.

First you will have an introductory statement of at least one well written paragraph. This will include an explanation of your theme and why that theme was something you wanted to research. (This can be on your cover page along with your name/date/period).

Details: Each case summary should include:

1. A summary of the background of the case (in your own words that summarizes the arguments of both sides of the issue).

2. The question to the Court including the Provision of the Constitution in Conflict.

3. Key details and ideas within the case (including a summary of the majority opinion and if there was one, a dissenting opinion).

4. How judicial review was applied to the decision

5. Your personal opinion of the decision of the case.

Organize this so that it is easy to follow and presentable.

(I’m thinking one page per case with a final page for your citations).

This must be typed and completed in your own words.

Your main source should be http://www.oyez.org

This must be typed.

Due Date:

B Day: Tuesday, April 30th, 2019

 

 

A Day: Wednesday, May 1st, 2019

This is how it will be graded:

It’s worth a test grade and three homework grades.

Theme and introduction: 10 points

Points per case (60 points total):

1. A summary of the case with back story (in your own words). 10 points 
 2. Key details and ideas within the case (including a summary of the majority opinion and if there was one, a dissenting opinion). 10 points 
 3. How judicial review was applied to the decision 5 points 
 4. Your personal opinion of the decision of the case 5 point

Grammar/Spelling/Organization/Effort: 5 points

Citations: 5 Points

Cases are all under one theme: 5 points 
 
 Plagiarism = a zero. Make sure assignments are in your own words.

Total Points = 85 points

Scale:

– 0 – 8 = A

– 9 – 17 = B

– 18 – 26 = C

– 27 – 35 = D

– 36 and lower = F