BA 380: Operations Management Homework

Download a copy of the assignment template. Use this template to record your solutions. The assignment template contains digital signature unique to this term’s section of BA 380. Submission of an assignment in a workbook other than in this template is NOT acceptable and will receive NO credit.

Please read the policy on assignments detailed in the class syllabus.

Use this format in assigning name to your file: Assignment 1 – Your Last Name(s) First Name(s) A 5 percentage point penalty will be assigned for not following this instruction.

The key to this assignment, as well as the submission link, are found below.

Word of Advice: Start working on the assigned problems as soon as you can.

The entire assignment set will take several hours to complete. The assigned problems (each problem is found in a separate worksheet) are similar to the problems discussed in class (Face2Face), which are also presented in the digitized lectures found in Moodle (for online students). It is strongly suggested that you work on the assigned problems incrementally, that is, work on and complete several problems each week. Working on the entire assignment only days before the due date will create all sorts of issues for you.

Fore Prob 1

This assignment is for the Fall 2016 class only and NOT to be shared with anyone outside of this section.
Forecasting Problem 1 (10 points)
The following equation summarizes the trend portion of quarterly sales of automatic dishwashers over a long cycle. Sales also exhibit seasonal variations.
Ft = 40 – 6.5t + 2t2
where
Ft = Unit sales (in 000 units)
t = 1 at the first quarter of 2010
Quarter Relative
1 110
2 100
3 60
4 130
a)   Using the information given, prepare a seasonalized forecast of sales for each quarter of 2014.
b)   Prepare a quarter-by-quarter time series plot showing the forecast trend (seasonally unadjusted forecast) from the first quarter of 2010 to the fourth quarter of 2014. Superimpose on this graph the seasonally adjusted forecast for the same time period.

Fore Prob 2

This assignment is for the Fall 2016 class only and NOT to be shared with anyone outside of this section.
Forecasting Problem 2 (10 points)
The data below represent the relative shares (by quarter) of call volumes over 16 quarters from a call center at a major financial institution.
2010 2011 2012 2013 Average Qtr Percent Share
Q1 23.2% 23.0% 23.3% 21.9% 22.8%
Q2 25.1% 24.6% 26.2% 25.3% 25.3%
Q3 28.5% 28.8% 28.6% 29.8% 28.9%
Q4 23.2% 23.6% 21.9% 23.1% 22.9%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
(a) Using the average quarter percent share column (Column G), generate a pie chart and a bar chart to show the quarterly percent shares of call volumes to the call center.
(b) Using the percentage table above, what are the indices for each of the four quarters?
(c) Assume that the projected number of calls for the year 2014 is 50,000,000, what are the seasonally adjusted forecasts for the number of calls for Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4?

Fore Prob 3

This assignment is for the Fall 2016 class only and NOT to be shared with anyone outside of this section.
Forecasting Problem 3 (15 points)
The data below represent the call volumes over 16 quarters from a call center at a major financial institution. Develop a forecasting model for the volume of calls (in 000 units).
2010 2011 2012 2013
Q1 473 544 628 709
Q2 513 582 707 725
Q3 582 681 773 854
Q4 474 557 592 661
(a) Create a time series graph showing the: (1) actual data, (2) trend line for the data, and (3) deseasonalized actual data. Label the graph appropriately.
(b) Develop the quarterly (Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4) indexes for the volume of calls
See page117-118 of text for similar problem
(c ) Using the trend line you developed in Part (a), what are your seasonally unadjusted and seasonally adjusted forecasts for the four quarters of 2014?

Fore Prob 4

This assignment is for the Fall 2016 class only and NOT to be shared with anyone outside of this section.
Forecasting Problem 4 (15 points)
Many supply managers use a monthly reported survey result known as the purchasing managers’ index (PMI) as a leading indicator to forecast future sales for their businesses. Suppose that the PMI and your business sales data for the last 10 months are the following:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Month
PM 43 43.1 41.5 38.5 40.5 45.2 46.2 48.1 49 53
Sales (in $000) 122 124 125 123 119 120 125 127 135 136
A.     Develop a regression model that can be used by supply managers in forecasting future sales for businesses. Explain what forecasting model approach you used and why you chose it. Show complete work (cut and paste from Excel if used in the analysis). (10 points)
B.     Develop a sales forecast for the 11th and 12th months using the model you developed in part A when PMIs are 52 and 50, respectively. (10 points)

Fore Prob5

This assignment is for the Fall 2016 class only and NOT to be shared with anyone outside of this section.
Forecasting Problem 5 (15 pts)
An electrical contractor’s records during the last 5 weeks indicate the number of job requests:
Week Actual Requests
1 20
2 22
3 18
4 21
5 22
a) Graph the actual request data using appropriate labels, and provide insights about the time series (describe what you observe re the behavior of the sales over the period under review).
b) What is the forecast for Week 6 using a 2-period moving average?
c) What is the forecast for Week 6 using the Naïve method?
Compute the MAD, MAPE, and MSE for the two-period moving average and Naïve models and compare your results. Explain which of the two forecasting models you prefer and why.
d)
e) Graph the actual number of requests, the 2-period and Naïve forecasts. Use appropriate labels for your graphs

Rel Prob 1

This assignment is for the Fall 2016 class only and NOT to be shared with anyone outside of this section.
Reliability Problem 1 (15 points)
One of the industrial robots designed by a leading producer of servomechanisms has three major components. Components’ reliabilities are 80, 85, and 95%. All of the components must function in order for the robot to operate effectively.
a.  Compute the reliability of the robot.
b.  Designers want to improve the reliability by adding a backup component. Due to space limitations, only one backup can be added. The backup for any component will have the same reliability as the unit for which it is the backup. Which component should get the backup in order to achieve the highest reliability? Show proof of your answer by computing the overall reliabilities of the three options (assume 100% reliable backup switch)
c.   If one backup with a reliability of 99% can be added to any of the main components, which component should get it to obtain the highest overall reliability? Show proof of your choice by computing the overall reliabilities of the three options (assume a backup switch with 100% reliability).

Rel Prob 2

This assignment is for the Fall 2016 class only and NOT to be shared with anyone outside of this section.
Reliability Problem 2 (10 points)
Lucky Lumen light bulbs have an expected life that is exponentially distributed with a mean of 20,000 hours. Determine the probability that one of these light bulbs will last:
a.       At least 24,000 hours
b.       No longer than 4,000 hous
c.       Between 4,000 and 24,000 hours

Rel Prob 3

This assignment is for the Fall 2016 class only and NOT to be shared with anyone outside of this section.
Reliability Problem 3 (10 points)
An office manager has received a report from a consultant that includes a section on equipment replacement. The report indicates that scanners have a service life that is normally distributed with a mean of 41 months and a standard deviation of 4 months.
On the basis of this information, determine the percentage of scanners that can be expected to fail in the following time periods.
a. Before 38 months of service.
b. Between 40 and 45 months of service.
c. Within +/- 2 months of the average service life.
d.     If the manufacturer of the scanner offers a service contracts of 3 years on these scanners, what percentage of scanners can be expected to fail from wear-out during the service period?
e.       If the cost of replacement each scanner is $250, and if 1,000 units of this scanner are sold, what is the expected warranty replacement cost to the manufacturer.

Rel Prob 4

This assignment is for the Fall 2016 class only and NOT to be shared with anyone outside of this section.
Reliability Problem 4 (10 points)
How high must reliability be? Prime business customers expect public carrier-class communications data links to be available 99.999 percent of the time. The so-called five nines rule implies only 5 minutes of downtime per year. Such high reliability is needed not only in telecommunications but also for mission-critical systems such as airline reservation systems or banking fund transfers.
Suppose a certain network web server is up only 90 percent of the time (i.e. its probability of being down is 0.10). How many independent servers are needed to ensure that the system is up at least 99.999 percent of the time?
Show your work and explain your answer.

What would be a confidence interval for an additional sample of mower test performance an in the worksheet Mower Test?

 

Performance Lawn Equipment

What proportion of customers rate the company with “top box” survey responses (which is defined as scale levels 4 and 5) on quality, ease of use, price, and service in the 2012 Customer Survey worksheet? How do these proportions differ by geographic region?

 

What would be a confidence interval for an additional sample of mower test performance an in the worksheet Mower Test?

For the data in the worksheet Blade Weight, what is the sampling distribution of the mean, the overall mean, and the standard error of the mean? Is a normal distribution an appropriate assumption for the sampling distribution of the mean?

How many blade weights must be measured to find a 95% confidence interval for the mean blade weight with a sampling error of at most 0.2? What if the sampling error is specified as 0.1?

Dealer Satisfaction

Dealer Satisfaction
Survey Scale: 0 1 2 3 4 5 Sample
North America Size
2010 1 0 2 14 22 11 50
2011 0 0 2 14 20 14 50
2012 1 1 1 8 34 15 60
2013 1 2 6 12 34 45 100
2014 2 3 5 15 44 56 125
South America
2010 0 0 0 2 6 2 10
2011 0 0 0 2 6 2 10
2012 0 0 1 4 11 14 30
2013 0 1 1 3 12 33 50
2014 1 1 2 4 22 60 90
Europe
2010 0 0 1 3 7 4 15
2011 0 0 1 2 8 4 15
2012 0 0 1 2 15 7 25
2013 0 0 1 2 21 6 30
2014 0 0 1 4 17 8 30
Pacific Rim
2010 0 0 1 2 2 0 5
2011 0 0 1 1 3 0 5
2012 0 0 1 1 3 1 6
2013 0 0 0 2 5 3 10
2014 0 0 1 2 7 2 12
China
2012 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
2013 0 0 1 4 2 0 7
2014 0 0 1 5 8 2 16

End-User Satisfaction

End-User Satisfaction
Sample
North America 0 1 2 3 4 5 Size
2010 1 3 6 15 37 38 100
2011 1 2 4 18 35 40 100
2012 1 2 5 17 34 41 100
2013 0 2 4 15 33 46 100
2014 0 2 3 15 31 49 100
South America
2010 1 2 5 18 36 38 100
2011 1 3 6 17 36 37 100
2012 0 2 6 19 37 36 100
2013 0 2 5 20 37 36 100
2014 0 2 5 19 37 37 100
Europe
2010 1 2 4 21 36 36 100
2011 1 2 5 21 34 37 100
2012 1 1 4 26 37 31 100
2013 1 1 3 17 41 37 100
2014 0 1 2 19 45 33 100
Pacific Rim
2010 2 3 5 15 41 34 100
2011 1 2 7 15 41 34 100
2012 1 2 5 16 40 36 100
2013 0 2 4 17 40 37 100
2014 0 1 3 19 42 35 100
China
2012 0 3 3 6 28 10 50
2013 1 2 2 4 30 11 50
2014 0 1 1 3 31 14 50

2014 Customer Survey

2014 Customer Survey
Region Quality Ease of Use Price Service
NA 4 1 3 4
NA 4 4 4 5
NA 4 5 4 3
NA 5 4 4 4
NA 5 4 5 4
NA 5 5 3 5
NA 5 4 4 2
NA 5 5 4 5
NA 4 4 4 5
NA 4 5 4 5
NA 4 5 1 4
NA 5 5 4 4
NA 5 4 3 3
NA 4 5 4 4
NA 5 4 3 5
NA 5 5 2 5
NA 5 4 2 5
NA 5 4 2 5
NA 4 5 4 4
NA 4 4 5 4
NA 4 4 2 4
NA 4 3 3 4
NA 5 5 2 5
NA 5 3 4 3
NA 5 4 4 5
NA 5 5 2 5
NA 5 5 5 3
NA 4 4 5 4
NA 5 4 4 4
NA 5 1 5 5
NA 5 4 3 5
NA 4 5 1 4
NA 4 4 3 5
NA 5 3 4 4
NA 5 5 2 4
NA 5 4 4 4
NA 5 5 4 4
NA 5 5 4 5
NA 4 3 3 5
NA 5 4 4 3
NA 5 4 3 4
NA 5 5 1 5
NA 5 4 5 4
NA 3 4 3 4
NA 5 4 2 4
NA 5 5 4 5
NA 5 5 3 4
NA 5 4 4 4
NA 5 4 4 4
NA 5 4 4 5
NA 5 4 1 4
NA 5 4 5 5
NA 5 5 3 4
NA 5 4 4 5
NA 4 3 5 5
NA 5 4 4 4
NA 5 5 5 5
NA 5 5 4 5
NA 4 4 4 4
NA 5 4 5 5
NA 4 5 5 4
NA 5 5 5 4
NA 5 5 3 5
NA 5 4 4 4
NA 5 4 5 2
NA 4 4 5 5
NA 4 4 4 5
NA 5 4 4 4
NA 5 4 3 5
NA 5 4 5 4
NA 5 5 4 5
NA 5 4 4 4
NA 5 4 5 2
NA 5 3 4 5
NA 5 4 5 5
NA 5 4 1 5
NA 4 5 3 5
NA 3 5 2 5
NA 5 5 4 4
NA 4 4 3 5
NA 3 2 4 5
NA 1 4 3 4
NA 4 5 3 5
NA 5 5 4 4
NA 4 5 5 5
NA 5 5 4 5
NA 5 5 4 4
NA 4 2 4 5
NA 5 4 5 4
NA 5 4 5 4
NA 5 5 4 3
NA 5 5 5 5
NA 4 5 5 3
NA 5 5 4 5
NA 4 4 5 5
NA 5 5 3 4
NA 4 5 2 4
NA 5 5 5 4
NA 4 5 4 3
NA 4 5 5 4
SA 5 4 3 5
SA 5 4 2 4
SA 5 4 5 5
SA 4 2 4 5
SA 5 4 4 5
SA 4 5 2 5
SA 5 4 4 4
SA 4 5 3 5
SA 4 4 4 3
SA 4 4 2 4
SA 5 4 3 4
SA 3 3 5 5
SA 5 4 3 4
SA 5 4 2 5
SA 4 4 3 4
SA 4 4 3 5
SA 1 5 3 4
SA 5 4 2 4
SA 4 4 4 4
SA 4 4 5 5
SA 5 4 2 4
SA 4 4 5 5
SA 4 4 4 3
SA 3 3 4 5
SA 5 4 4 4
SA 4 4 4 1
SA 4 5 5 5
SA 4 1 4 5
SA 4 5 4 4
SA 4 4 4 5
SA 5 4 3 4
SA 4 4 4 5
SA 5 5 4 3
SA 5 5 4 4
SA 4 4 2 4
SA 4 4 4 5
SA 5 4 4 5
SA 5 4 4 4
SA 5 4 1 4
SA 3 4 4 5
SA 4 3 5 4
SA 4 4 2 3
SA 5 4 3 3
SA 4 3 4 5
SA 5 3 5 5
SA 5 4 4 4
SA 5 4 4 4
SA 3 4 3 4
SA 4 4 1 4
SA 4 3 4 3
Eur 4 5 5 3
Eur 4 4 4 2
Eur 3 4 5 4
Eur 3 4 1 3
Eur 4 4 5 5
Eur 5 5 5 5
Eur 5 5 5 1
Eur 4 5 5 4
Eur 3 4 4 4
Eur 3 5 3 3
Eur 4 4 5 4
Eur 5 4 5 5
Eur 5 3 4 4
Eur 5 5 4 5
Eur 3 4 4 4
Eur 4 5 4 5
Eur 4 5 4 4
Eur 5 4 4 5
Eur 4 5 4 4
Eur 3 5 3 4
Eur 4 4 4 2
Eur 5 5 3 4
Eur 5 3 4 5
Eur 4 5 2 4
Eur 4 3 4 4
Eur 5 4 3 3
Eur 2 4 4 4
Eur 5 4 5 4
Eur 4 5 4 3
Eur 5 4 1 5
Pac 5 4 4 5
Pac 5 5 5 5
Pac 4 4 4 4
Pac 4 3 4 4
Pac 5 4 5 4
Pac 4 4 4 4
Pac 5 5 4 5
Pac 4 2 3 3
Pac 3 4 4 4
Pac 5 4 4 5
China 5 5 4 4
China 5 5 4 3
China 4 4 3 3
China 4 4 3 3
China 4 4 3 2
China 4 4 3 3
China 4 4 3 2
China 3 4 3 3
China 3 4 2 2
China 2 3 2 1

Highlight THREE (3) distinct acquisition planning fundamentals,

Instructions: You have been individually assigned to a High Objective Tiger Team (HOTT) for the U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Acquisition Division.  However, your independent task is to provide the initial strategy for a multiple sourcing acquisition plan to acquire 1,000 Piezoelectric Embedded Transducers (PET) under the Wide Alignment Limited Loading (WALL) Geostructure Program.  The PET is aimed at providing an enhanced surveillance capability for the new WALL Program.  The resultant Contract will be a multi-year requirement within a notional budget of $20 – $30M.

The major deliverable Line Items are 1) Required Hardware, 2) Software, 3) Non-developmental Support and Data.  Under this scenario you must consider acquisition strategy planning to include documentation containing the following:

1. Highlight THREE (3) distinct acquisition planning fundamentals, and the rationale for managing each in the Acquisition process for the PET.  Provide an explanation for why these fundamentals are essential for the PET Sourcing and future negotiations. Be specific as to your justification for each.

2. Select a Contract type for the deliverable Line Items above, and discuss THREE (3) specific performance factors affecting your choice of Contract type. Explain how each of the factors contributes to meeting the contemplated PET performance standards and acquisition objectives.  Be specific as to your justification for each.

In all cases, your rationale and justification must be explicitly tied to the PET, and be as objective as possible. Keep your thoughts organized by placing a space between paragraphs, and use HEADINGS to match the requirements. Your exposition should reflect considerable thought and go beyond restating large literature passages.  A minimum of four peer reviewed sources are required, with attribution, in accordance with APA guidelines.
I am attaching my friends example to guide you but do not copy

I want you to write this in your own words doing appropriate research

 

Your total response scope should be no more than the equivalent of 4, and no less than 3, typed, double-spaced pages of content, not including the title, reference, extraneous tables or lists, and exhibits.  Abstracts are not required, and should not be included.  This paper is worth 25 points and is due on March 12, 2017.  You are required to observe and pay strict attention to the Academic Integrity Policies and Guidelines in your writing.

The information in the scenario is all that you need for this assignment. However, you are permitted to make clearly stated assumptions to support additional information that you need for your Paper deliverables 1, and 2 listed above.

Number of Pages=4

Deadline: 5 hours

Academic Level: College

Paper Format: APA

Harvard Case Study

W14030

AMISHA GUPTA’S FIRST YEAR AT WORK Srinivasan Tatachari wrote this case solely to provide material for class discussion. The author does not intend to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a managerial situation. The author may have disguised certain names and other identifying information to protect confidentiality. This publication may not be transmitted, photocopied, digitized or otherwise reproduced in any form or by any means without the permission of the copyright holder. Reproduction of this material is not covered under authorization by any reproduction rights organization. To order copies or request permission to reproduce materials, contact Ivey Publishing, Ivey Business School, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada, N6G 0N1; (t) 519.661.3208; (e) cases@ivey.ca; www.iveycases.com. Copyright © 2014, Richard Ivey School of Business Foundation Version: 2014-03-07

In the summer of 2010, 22-year-old Amisha Gupta had just completed her undergraduate degree in engineering in the electronics and communications stream from a reputable college in Bangalore, the Silicon Valley of India. The previous year’s engineering student batch had seen one of the worst periods of recession for the Indian information technology (IT) sector, with students sometimes waiting for a year before getting jobs, though they had received job-offer letters much earlier. Gupta’s cohort was spared that pain, though she did spend an anxious four months waiting for the results of her campus interview with Xciting. It was one of India’s top IT and IT-enabled services companies, with offices in many locations across the world, including some in India. With revenues in excess of $6 billion in 2010 and a global headcount of around 100,000, Xciting was a company that many in India aspired to work for. Gupta was therefore overjoyed when she was called to join the company and report to its office in Bangalore in September 2010 for her training. A year later, it was time for her first yearly review, which pushed her to reflect on her experiences. In September 2011, Gupta re-read the diary in which she loved to put her deepest thoughts. She read about her journey at Xciting and realized that a lot had changed, both with her and the way she saw Xciting as a place to work. Was she an Xciter? Was she an IT professional? Was she in the right place? THE EARLY, LIFE-CHANGING DAYS Large Indian IT companies hired fresh undergraduates in engineering in huge numbers and, due to their lack of quality programming skills, put these newcomers through very structured and in-depth training. This was further supplemented by specific domain-related training where they learnt about the particular service areas in which they would handle software projects, like enterprise applications or telecommunications. Xciting followed a similar model of newcomer induction and training. Given the large numbers being hired, the first day typically involved a lot of administrative work for the newcomers to complete.

For the exclusive use of R. BENDU, 2018.

This document is authorized for use only by RAMU BENDU in Org. Beh. taught by ED HIGGINS, University of the Cumberlands from May 2018 to Aug 2018.

 

 

Page 2 9B14C002 In her first diary entry, Gupta reflected on this:

Joining an organization is a bit of a culture shock. A highly unorganized life turns into a highly organized one. All those rules, things to do, overload. Reporting day was a little boring — paperwork, signatures, submitting documents, etc. At the end of this day, I’m thinking, “Is it going to be this boring every day?” In a way, it is really exciting. You’re finally employed.

The entry into Xciting was just the beginning of the journey, and the newcomers had to prove themselves worthy of the organization by passing examinations at the end of their training. Those not achieving a predetermined minimum level would not become Xciters.

God, how tough is this going to be? Cannot afford to burn out. . . . Will I survive? Girl, you’re here because they think you’re worthy of the position. You can do it.

A part of the training was about orienting the newcomers to the corporate world in general and the organization in particular. The sessions were packed with presentations from different departments of Xciting, and included administrative information, values, culture, the journey of Xciting and interactive games.

Will I be able to sit through it?… It was amazing. Everyone is so passionate about what they do. They are proud to work for such a big organization. Then I remind myself, “You’re a part of it now!” Chest swells up with pride. Will give my best. Suddenly, the uncontrolled mind says, “What if you don’t?” It was interesting to learn the extent to which this organization sticks to the values they say they are built on… “Winners,” it’s not a fight to the finish. . . . It was a game, if you look at everything so seriously, you’ll burn out!

TECHNICAL TRAINING After the orientation week, the newcomers underwent technical training over the next three months.

Still learning the ways of the organization. When faced with a problem, however stupid it is, the tension mounts. It would be nice if I had company. . . problems are easier to deal with when someone’s with you. Half the time the problem turns out to be the silliest of things. Take one step at a time. . .made new friends — it’s interesting to see how alike everyone is and yet unique. The trainers are super awesome! They are passionate about their work and teach from experience and encourage you to ask questions. It’s clearly liberating when you do something you love. I’m finally learning something. . . . I really enjoyed the classes, learnt a lot. And also noticed that the Xciter identity grows on you over the training. You are being observed. Your every move, the way you talk, interact with people, EVERYTHING! A certain code of conduct is expected. We are not students anymore… we’ve got to play by the rules.

The newcomers had to face three examinations over the course of the training.

For the exclusive use of R. BENDU, 2018.

This document is authorized for use only by RAMU BENDU in Org. Beh. taught by ED HIGGINS, University of the Cumberlands from May 2018 to Aug 2018.

 

 

Page 3 9B14C002

It is time for an important test, and along with it, yes, the tension! I know I should have just glanced through the stuff at least once while classes were still going on. This reminds me of college — where we would complete the whole semester’s syllabus in one week before the exam. During placements, we revised the whole engineering syllabus in one night! Result: Cleared the test. Double phew! Huge relief 🙂

A period of waiting followed where the batch of new hires was to be allocated to specific work domains. Based on the allotted domains, they would undergo different training paths and thereafter potentially relocate to various offices across the country.

It’s interesting how you find things to do even in places where, well, you can’t really do much. So what is it that makes this harsh life so bearable? Friends. If it wasn’t for these guys, I don’t really know what I would have done… we forged a bond between us that will never break. Wherever we went, whatever we did — we did it all in a group. We are crossing our fingers we will all be in the same domain. Worst case — HAD to happen. Four of us are thrown into three domains. I was alone in my domain. First day of domain-related training — I felt so out of place, for the first two days — I dreaded attending classes. Seeing my friends at tea and lunch gave me the strength to go back to class. Day three… an amazing, awesome teacher — filled with enthusiasm. A little bit of motivation goes a long way in the life of a student. A newfound enthusiasm, confidence — interest — made me want to learn more. Domain test time… I cleared it. Phew. Two down, one more to go to finish training. I can’t wait to rock the world — feel like I’m unstoppable.

BECOMING A PROFESSIONAL Part of the training also involved sessions on reorienting the newcomers to professional work culture and behaviours.

Our trainer asked us what we expected from the training. The big, fat unstoppable me opens her big mouth, “A little fun, along with the learning.” I got a lecture, one I will never forget, on how I shouldn’t expect “fun” in anything I do. Fun may be there. I am open to being corrected — but I didn’t expect anyone to scream — yell out, laugh hysterically — and then tell me, “You’re wrong.” I do wish she had said it in a better way. Lesson: Now I know how NOT to speak as well. Learned a lot of things about myself, which I never imagined — not even in my wildest dreams — shocking traits. All activities are group activities… time-bound — 10 minutes, 5 minutes — it sucks to be unorganized. Confusion? I scream out, and try to work towards a goal. Oops. Stop being so bossy. So I try to involve everyone. Didn’t expect the group to become quiet and do what I say. I make a note mentally — stop bossing people around. I didn’t like it, but I still did it. I hoped to find in these events whether someone was taking charge or all of us were pitching in with ideas.

For the exclusive use of R. BENDU, 2018.

This document is authorized for use only by RAMU BENDU in Org. Beh. taught by ED HIGGINS, University of the Cumberlands from May 2018 to Aug 2018.

 

 

Page 4 9B14C002

There was a session on what kind of personality you are. I thought of myself as a strategic person. When I told my trainer that, she laughed at me. “Yeah, right.” Then it flashed in my mind — I kept taking charge — not letting others try to lead — was I a dominant personality? Or an influential one? It feels like I am two different people. I am these two different people — under different circumstances. When left alone with a task, I’m a strategic person. But when I’m in a group that’s heading nowhere, I somehow feel responsible that I should do what I can to help. Which brings me to the question. Who exactly am I? What is my purpose? What should my career path be?

DEALING WITH DIFFICULT PEOPLE Towards the end of the training, the newcomers had to complete a simulated mini-project which replicated a real-life project, including realistic deadlines and development phases. This was to be done in groups of two.

Out of nowhere, someone sitting behind me asks if he can do the project with me. Phew, I thought. I got a taste of what a real project would be like. The initial stage of cluelessness, then confusion; left by myself, I guess I would have figured something out eventually, but seeing my classmates discuss stuff I would have never thought of kind of made me question my abilities. In the midst of all this chaos, time’s running out — as the project is only for six days. And the documentation was dumped entirely on my head. My partner didn’t offer to do anything. When I asked him why he didn’t make an effort, he gave me two reasons, which made me feel like a fool — “you didn’t insist” and “I’m too lazy for all that.” Somehow, that nightmare ended, I passed. And the rest is history.

LOCATION ANXIETY At the end of the training, those newcomers who had cleared the examinations were posted to various cities in India to take up their projects.

In the last week, results were out, postings were due. We were from Bangalore and we wanted to be in Bangalore. Those were a scary few days. It was scary when the staffing personnel said that there are not many opportunities here and to be ready to go to other cities. One of our friends got a posting outside the city. She is the life of our gang. This is life and distance makes the heart grow fonder! Then it was our turn — I get the news that I’m in the city (yay!) but in the other office (boo!).

STARTING ON PROJECT WORK After being allocated to their respective supervisors in various departments and cities, the newcomers reported to their project offices for further briefing.

 

For the exclusive use of R. BENDU, 2018.

This document is authorized for use only by RAMU BENDU in Org. Beh. taught by ED HIGGINS, University of the Cumberlands from May 2018 to Aug 2018.

 

 

Page 5 9B14C002

This training office feels like home — I’m so going to miss it. I now need to start all over again with a new office and new people. The person I’m supposed to report to is not responding to my calls. What on earth was I supposed to do? Since I had no news on where I was expected to report, I was back at the training office the next day. I finally get the news that my manager’s office is in the same campus as the training office! I was here, with my friends, my strength. The two others in my gang got posted here too. No access permission to the wing, so I call my manager. He comes to open the door. A familiar face. He asks me a few questions, I answer. Then he tells me about the project. What did I take away? The name of the customer and the name of the product we’re working on — and a host of terms that I never knew could be used as technical jargon. Then I go running to meet my trainer… I hear the pros and cons of being in that project… pros were too many 🙂 Some relief. Got introduced to my team. At first they looked so “I mean business,” “no messing around,” etc. Turns out that they are really friendly, down to earth, approachable. I had so many questions, no one to ask. What I didn’t realize was that I was asking only one person all my queries. Is it a good thing to say “thank you” when someone goes out of their way to help you? Turns out — you’re supposed to say it when you don’t need to. And not supposed to when you do. No! “Expressions” not allowed! We’re professionals. (Read: People with no life.) I make an effort to greet EVERYONE as they’re coming in (cos I arrive at work earlier and leave early too!) — not a slacker. Leave by the bus — but cos I leave early, they look at me as though I did nothing all day! (Which I did. But that was cos I was reading, and there was no work!) I thought that if the team has tea together, it would be a great opportunity to get to know them better. I had some hopes! It appears as though they don’t have stomachs! No tea, no lunch, and no dinner! One of the days, I was sitting in the corner, minding my own business, and my project lead walks up to me and politely asks where I live. Then, like it didn’t matter, he tells me I have to stay late every Thursday, cos of the client conference call at 7 p.m. I nod, saying, “Yes, sir!” Once he leaves, I’m planning my life. Work for a few years, then go teach! By this time, another classmate of mine had joined the same team, so I had company in being clueless! So, we are overloaded with documents to read, things not making sense, and what did I expect? Took me a while to say, “It’s okay not to know!” Huge relief. Had presentations for my project, didn’t see why I had to teach ABCs to people who were writing essays. But, turns out, they understood that I didn’t know stuff, made many mistakes, which they pointed out politely, to help me grow. Phew! Everyone is not out there to bite your head off. I should be my best — and leave the rest. So far, change has been coming in small quantities.

THE SCRAPPED PROJECT The software services business was heavily project-based, with project durations ranging from a few weeks to a few years. These projects were driven by the client’s requirements and timelines. Therefore, depending on the market imperatives of the client, the projects could get terminated prematurely or extended beyond the initially planned schedules. When such termination happened, the employees working on those projects became free resources and were “on bench,” as per industry parlance. Being on

For the exclusive use of R. BENDU, 2018.

This document is authorized for use only by RAMU BENDU in Org. Beh. taught by ED HIGGINS, University of the Cumberlands from May 2018 to Aug 2018.

 

 

Page 6 9B14C002 bench denied the employees a certain part of their pay and could impact their career through possible technical obsolescence. The employees waited until they were reassigned to new projects and, though there was a well-defined process, the uncertainty of the situation could impact their behaviour.

Soon my project gets a no-go, and I’m sitting idle, reading random things, waiting for my next project. It’s nearly a month (what was I doing?!). Then I find some guts and ask my manager to find me another project. It seemed scary at first. But luckily, people here are pretty understanding. I was told to meet someone at the other office. Just when I was getting used to a routine, a change-bomb explodes. Leave my friends and go to another office where I know no one? I felt like I was being punished. Hated those weeks, being in a vacuum-sealed tin. Depression sets in, fights with friends, ooh, bad combination. I realize that I’m not afraid of change. It’s those unknowns that happen during the transition. The sooner, the better.

A NEW PROJECT AT A NEW OFFICE LOCATION Gupta was reassigned to another project in another office location far away from the previous office. The location was relatively underdeveloped compared to the previous location, which meant that there was more dependence on the company-provided transport and its schedule in order to arrive at and leave the office.

I’m doing a whole lot more (with no solid work started yet) now than I ever would in the old project. A little patience, a little faith that something better awaits you in a little while. People come, people go, you cannot change that, but every event has something to teach you, if you’re willing to see it. But there are creeps everywhere. One in my team. A lazy idiot who is forever making excuses, staying home and avoiding work. I have been assigned work jointly with him! He never takes anything seriously. And here’s the best part. Has the gall to ask me why I haven’t completed the task. How do I deal with such people without affecting my peace, my reputation (which I worked very hard to build)? What do you do, when someone else walks away with credit for your hard work? Especially someone who did NOTHING?

REFLECTING ON THE ORGANIZATIONAL JOURNEY SO FAR It was in September 2011, close to her first work anniversary at Xciting, that Gupta was introspective about what the past year had meant for her.

I am from an electronics and communications background, I didn’t want to do a job that everybody does. I am not another software engineer who switched from one stream to another. I refused to call myself an IT professional. But then I realized, “I work for an IT firm, so I am sort of, somehow, an IT professional.” The project that I got into first didn’t demand much of work, for a start, and that was fine. For me, I am a person who likes to learn things. So if you give me something to do I’ll read a little about it. I like to know what I am doing. Not just jump into the task. It was like the life I wanted. So I thought, five years here and maybe more here.

For the exclusive use of R. BENDU, 2018.

This document is authorized for use only by RAMU BENDU in Org. Beh. taught by ED HIGGINS, University of the Cumberlands from May 2018 to Aug 2018.

 

 

Page 7 9B14C002

Then the project gets scrapped and I was sent here, to the other office. Slowly things started changing. I got into a new project. They are friendlier here, but… it’s like leaving your home. The association with the organization started deteriorating a little bit. I am feeling that now. I am sitting idle more than half of the time. I am not complaining, I utilize it to read. . . we like to be given work, even though we are getting paid either way. On the other hand, I have heard of people being overworked. The work culture… Unexpected tasks are thrown at you. It is the real world, after all. Maybe I don’t want to be here. The work is great, I have no complaints. But… if work is being dumped on you, which is impossible to finish in that little time, without any help… It’s the personal touch, a reassurance that “we are there for you if you fall.” Sometimes it’s there, but I don’t see it sometimes. Probably it’s because of the lack of communication from managers.

Gupta had two days before the yearly review meeting with her manager. The meeting was a great opportunity for her to get formal feedback as well as share her thoughts and concerns with her manager. She had to be clear on what she wanted in her career, at Xciting or elsewhere. She had to prepare for her meeting accordingly.

For the exclusive use of R. BENDU, 2018.

This document is authorized for use only by RAMU BENDU in Org. Beh. taught by ED HIGGINS, University of the Cumberlands from May 2018 to Aug 2018.