The author blends reality and fantasy.

  • NEBRASKA STATE ACCOUNTABILITY

    ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ITEM AND SCORING SAMPLER

    GRADE 8

    Nebraska State Accountability assessments are administered by the Nebraska Department of Education (NDE). 301 Centennial Mall South – P.O. Box 94987 – Lincoln, Nebraska 68509 – (402) 471-2495

     

     

    NeSA-English Language Arts Item and Scoring Sampler – Grade 8 ii

    NeSA ELA Sampler

    Table of Contents

    INFORMATION ABOUT THE ITEM AND SCORING SAMPLER

    General Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Sampler Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Purpose and Uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Item Format and Scoring Guidelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Depth of Knowledge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Item and Scoring Sampler Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Additional Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

    PASSAGES AND ITEMS

    Passage 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Multiple-Choice Items . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Evidence-Based Selected Response Item . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Auto-Scored Constructed Response Item . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Text Dependent Analysis Item . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Text Dependent Analysis Rubric . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Example Student Responses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

    Passage 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Multiple-Choice Items . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Evidence-Based Selected Response Item . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 Auto-Scored Constructed Response Item . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Text Dependent Analysis Item . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 Text Dependent Analysis Rubric . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 Example Student Responses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39

    Independent Writing Items . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46

     

     

    NeSA-English Language Arts Item and Scoring Sampler – Grade 8 1

    NeSA ELA Sampler

    Information About the Item and Scoring Sampler

    GENERAL INTRODUCTION

    The Nebraska Department of Education provides districts and schools with tools to assist in delivering focused instructional programs aligned to the state assessment system . These tools include Table of Specifications documents, administration manuals, and content-based item and scoring samplers . This Item and Scoring Sampler is a useful tool for Nebraska educators in the preparation of local instructional programs and the statewide NeSA-ELA .

    SAMPLER CONTENTS

    This sampler contains reading passages with test questions (items) that have been written to align to the assessment indicators that are based on the Nebraska College- and Career-Ready English Language Arts Standards . The passages represent some of the genres approved by NDE to appear on an operational Nebraska College- and Career-Ready NeSA-ELA . The test questions provide a simulation of the types of items that will appear on an operational Nebraska College- and Career-Ready NeSA-ELA . Each sample test question has been through a rigorous review process to ensure alignment with the assessment indicators .

    PURPOSE AND USES

    The purpose of the sampler is to expose teachers and administrators to new item types and to show how these items align to the revised Nebraska College- and Career-Ready English Language Arts Standards . Many of the items provided in the sampler will be accessible to students in the form of ELA Practice Tests, Guided Practice Tests, and Online Tools Training resources .

    ITEM FORMAT AND SCORING GUIDELINES

    The Nebraska College- and Career-Ready NeSA-ELA has four types of test questions . For grade 8, the types of test questions are Multiple-Choice (MC), Evidence-Based Selected Response (EBSR), Auto-Scored Constructed Response (ASCR), and Text Dependent Analysis (TDA) .

    Multiple Choice (MC):

    All MC items have four answer choices, including three distractors and one correct answer . Distractors represent common misconceptions, incorrect logic, common misinterpretations, unsound reasoning, casual reading, etc . A correct response to an MC item is worth one point .

    Evidence-Based Selected Response (EBSR):

    EBSR items have two parts and are designed to elicit an evidence-based response based on what a student has read from either an Informational Text or Literature stimulus passage . Each EBSR item is linked to a passage or passage set . Part A of an EBSR item is similar to a typical MC test question . A student analyzes a passage and chooses a single, best (correct) answer from four answer choices . Part B of an EBSR item elicits evidence from the stimulus passage and requires that the student select one or two answers based on the response the student provided in Part A . Part B is also different from Part A in that it may have more than four answer options, which is typical of an MC item . Each EBSR (Part A and Part B combined) is worth two points .

     

     

    NeSA-English Language Arts Item and Scoring Sampler – Grade 8 2

    NeSA ELA Sampler

    Information About the Item and Scoring Sampler

    Auto-Scored Constructed Response (ASCR):

    ASCR item types provide a new forum in which to address higher-level thinking skills without the use of hand-scored test questions . Using the expansive features and functions of online testing, developers will incorporate technical enhancements to the test question, the response area, and/or the stimulus . Item types may include drag-and-drop, hot-spot, and in-line selection of multiple answers from drop-down menus . Students will be able to manipulate information within dynamic tasks such as dragging and pasting elements, highlighting text, and selecting multiple answers from a variety of presentation methods . Each ASCR test question is worth one or two points .

    Text Dependent Analysis (TDA):

    Similar to an EBSR item, the TDA Writing Prompt is designed to elicit an evidence-based response from a student who has read either an Informational Text or Literature passage during the test event . The TDA is an on-demand, text-based writing piece that requires students to provide evidence from the text to support analysis, reflection, or ideas and opinions . Students must draw on basic writing skills while inferring and synthesizing information from the passage (making use of and referencing content from the passage to support the analysis) in order to develop a comprehensive response . Students will be given a TDA Writer’s Checklist to assist in composing their response . The TDA will be scored using a holistic scoring rubric designed to provide a measurement of writing, conventions, and reading . The TDA is in alignment across grades 3–8 and 11 with the NeSA-ELA Standards indicated on the rubric . Each TDA Writing Prompt test question is scored using a rubric and will be reported to reading and writing .

    DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE

    In addition to being aligned to the standards, the sample items included in this sampler were also developed with a particular emphasis on cognitive complexity, or Depth of Knowledge (DOK) . The DOK level is also provided for each item in this sampler in the Item Information Table . DOK measures the level of cognitive demand required to complete an assessment item . The following descriptions show the expectations of the DOK levels in greater detail .

    Level 1 (Recall of Information) generally requires students to identify, list, or define, often asking them to recall who, what, when, and where . Consequently, this level usually asks students to recall facts, terms, concepts, and trends and may ask them to identify specific information contained in documents, excerpts, quotations, maps, charts, tables, graphs, or illustrations . Items that require students to “describe” and/or “explain” could be classified at Level 1 or Level 2, depending on what is to be described and/or explained . A Level 1 “describe” and/or “explain” would require students to recall, recite, or reproduce information .

    Level 2 (Basic Reasoning) includes the engagement of some mental processing beyond recalling or reproducing a response . A Level 2 “describe” and/or “explain” would require students to go beyond a description or explanation of recalled information to describe and/or explain a result or “how” or “why .”

    Level 3 (Complex Reasoning) requires reasoning, using evidence, and thinking on a higher and more abstract level than Level 1 and Level 2 . Students will go beyond explaining or describing “how and why” to justifying the “how and why” through application and evidence . Level 3 questions often involve making connections across time and place to explain a concept or “big idea .”

     

     

    NeSA-English Language Arts Item and Scoring Sampler – Grade 8 3

    NeSA ELA Sampler

    Information About the Item and Scoring Sampler

    ITEM AND SCORING SAMPLER FORMAT

    Sample questions are provided in this sampler, along with any related stimulus information such as a passage or graphic . Following each test question is an item information table .

    Example Response Item Information Table

    Item Information

    Alignment Assigned Indicator

    Assigned indicator definition

    Answer Key Correct Answer Option Annotations

How might such a structure help or hinder entry into new markets?

Assignment 3

Directions
Consider and explain the communication and negotiation utilized by Toyota, when referring to the “Internet Exercise: Working Effectively at Toyota” on page 236 in the textbook. Complete this assignment by answering the following questions:

1) What type of communication and negotiation challenges do you think you would face if you worked for Toyota and were in constant communication with home-office personnel in Japan?

2) What type of communication training do you think the firm would need to provide to you to ensure that you were effective in dealing with senior-level Japanese management in the Hierarchy?

3) Using Table 7-1 as your guide, what conclusions can you draw regarding communicating with the Japanese managers, and what guidelines would you offer to a non-Japanese employee who just entered the firm and is looking for advice and guidance regarding how to communicate and negotiate more effectively?

Write a one to two page paper summarizing your findings. The written summary should be double-spaced using 12-point Times New Roman font. You will need to cite your sources of information (at least three) at the end of your paper. Though the paper need not be in APA format, the citations at the end do. One of those three citations may be from the Luthans and Doh textbook, and one citation may come from an online website. However, at least one of these three citations should be from the NAU Online Library. You will need to conduct independent research using the Business Databases Subject Guide on the NAU Online Library.

 

Research paper abstract: The topic is case study 2.2 Walmart’s Global Strategies Page 264, I will upload the case.

 

Discussion 4: volkswagen comeback

Discuss the importance of recognizing and implementing different entry strategies and organizational arrangements which result in shared control and oversight through collaborative relationships, as illustrated in the Chapter 9 opening-discussion case, “Volkswagen’s Comeback: Aligning Strategy and Structure.”  Please post your Discussion based on the following questions:
1) Which organizational structure described in the chapter does Volkswagen’s “customer oriented” structure most closely resemble?
2) How might such a structure help or hinder entry into new markets?
3) Does a matrix or customer-oriented structure lend itself better to forming joint ventures and alliances?
Assignment 4:

This assignment assesses the Competency 4: Investigate aspects of strategic management unique to an international context.

Directions
Consider and explain entry strategies and organizational structures utilized by Ford Motor and Volkswagen, when referring to the “Internet Exercise: Organizing for Effectiveness” on page 339 in the textbook. Complete this assignment by answering the following questions:

1) What type of arrangement(s) do you see the two firms using in coordinating their worldwide operations?

2) Which of the two companies has the more modern arrangement?

3) Do you think this increases that firm’s efficiency, or does it hamper the company’s efforts to contain costs and be more competitive? Why?

Write a one to two page paper summarizing your findings. The written summary should be double-spaced using 12-point Times New Roman font. You will need to cite your sources of information (at least three) at the end of your paper. Though the paper need not be in APA format, the citations at the end do. One of those three citations may be from the Luthans and Doh textbook, and one citation may come from an online website. However, at least one of these three citations should be from the NAU Online Library. You will need to conduct independent research using the Business Databases Subject Guide on the NAU Online Library.

Do you think CMG is a successful company? Defend your stance with research application.

Read Case #18- Chipolte: Mexican Grill, Inc.: Food With Integrity and answer the following questions (each question a subsection): Case Study is attached!!!

Must be in your own words!!!!

 

  1. Do you think CMG is a successful company? Defend your stance with research application.
  2. How do CMG’s resources support the company’s competitive position?
  3. What challenges, within the case, did CMG face in 2012? In 2015 have they overcome such challenges? How?
  4. What would you recommend the company do moving forward to remain competitive?
  5. How does the topics in Chapter 4 apply to this case study?
  6. submit your responses to the Weekly Assignment Folder.

Additional case resources:

  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uERmpNGgaJA

Post/submit homework to the assignment folder for grading.

Make sure you provide substantive graduate level answers.

Make sure you use adequate, credible and reliable APA source citations to support your work.

**Minimum 3 full pages**

***Resubmittals are not accepted once a graded has been awarded***

***ALL written assignments must be submitted in Word document format ONLY**

**When you submit your written assignment, via Word document, it will be loaded automatically to TURNTIN.COM via each assignment weekly***

Review the information in the chapter about Six Sigma principles and Six Sigma organizations

Review the information in the chapter about Six Sigma principles and Six Sigma organizations. Brainstorm ideas for a potential Six Sigma project that could improve quality on your campus, at your workplace, or in your community. Write a short 1-page paper describing one project
idea and explain why it would be a Six Sigma project. Review and discuss how you could use the DMAIC process on this project. Worth 30 Points.

The book is attached