Administration of the psychedelic drug scopolamine results in:

 

Question 11 pts
Cell bodies of the neurotransmitter norepinephrine (NE. originate from the _____; its precursor (that is, the chemical from which it is directly converted. is _____.
midbrain; l-dopa
midbrain; dopamine
locus coeruleus; l-dopa
locus coeruleus; dopamine

Flag this QuestionQuestion 21 pts
Administration of the psychedelic drug scopolamine results in:
blockade of postsynaptic ACh receptors.
increased degradation of ACh.
decreased synthesis of ACh.
increased levels of ACh.

Flag this QuestionQuestion 31 pts
Jerri is being hired by a large multinational company. They are likely to request a sample of ______ to test for drug use because it is a convenient means of detecting drug metabolites.
hair
skin
saliva
urine

Flag this QuestionQuestion 41 pts
“Biotransformation” is carried out by the following organ: _____.  It usually involves making a drug _____ water soluble. The increased ability of this organ to carry out biotransformation after repeated exposure to a drug is termed _____ tolerance. The increased ability of this organ to biotransform drugs other than the one administered previously is termed _____.
small intestine; more; metabolic; cross-tolerance
kidneys; less; metabolic; cellular-adaptive
liver; less; pharmacodynamic; cross-tolerance
liver; more; metabolic; cross-tolerance

Flag this QuestionQuestion 51 pts
Drugs that block the action of presynaptic carrier proteins would be expected to ______ the level of neurotransmitter in the synapse ; drugs that facilitate the action of presynaptic carrier proteins would be expected to _____ the level of neurotransmitter in the synapse _____.
decrease; decrease
increase; increase
increase; decrease
decrease; increase

What is the composition of the group, in terms of number of people, age, sex, ethnicity, and so on?

***I have attached this file with all of the questions briefly answered and attached is the topic for which to be written on.***

Group Influence

This assignment will give you experience observing and interacting with people outside of the classroom. It has been designed to provide you with the opportunity to develop skills, synthesize knowledge, and integrate learning in a real-world setting. This goal is accomplished by challenging you to physically attend and observe a group.

Note: Social and family events, religious services, classes, court proceedings, lectures, and sporting events are not acceptable events for the purpose of this assignment.

Purpose: To provide you with an opportunity to experience a group setting and analyze how the presence of others substantially influences the behaviors of its members through social facilitation.

Observe a group discussing a topic of interest, such as a focus group, a community public assembly, a department meeting at your workplace, or local support group.

Study how the group members interact and influence one another.

Analyze how the group behaviors and communication patterns influence social facilitation.

Integrate your findings with evidence-based literature from journal articles, the course text, and additional scholarly sources. The literature should be about group patterns, not about the content of the meeting.

Process: You will participate as a guest at an interest group meeting in your community to gather data for a qualitative research paper. Once you have located an interest group, contact stakeholders, and explain the purpose of your inquiry. After you receive permission to participate, you will schedule a date to attend the meeting; at which time you will observe the members and document the following for your analysis:

  • How were the people arranged in the physical environment (layout of room and seating arrangement)?
  • What is the composition of the group, in terms of number of people, age, sex, ethnicity, and so on?
  • What are the group’s purpose, mission, and goals?
  • What is the duration of the group (short- or long-term)? Explain.
  • Did the group structure its discussion around an agenda, program, or rules of order?
  • Describe the structure of the group. How is the group organized?
  • Who are the primary facilitators of the group?
  • What subject or issues did the group members examine during the meeting?
  • What types of information did members exchange in their group?
  • What were the group’s norms, roles, status hierarchy, or communication patterns?
  • What communication patterns illustrated if the group was unified or fragmented? Explain.
  • Did the members share a sense of identity with one another (characteristics of the group, similarities, interests, philosophy, and so on)?
  • Was there any indication that members might be vulnerable to groupthink? Why or why not?
  • In your opinion, how did the collective group behaviors influence individual attitudes and the group’s effectiveness? Provide your overall analysis.

Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper incorporating your analysis with evidence to substantiate your conclusion.

Explain how your observations relate to research studies on norm formation, group norms, conformity, and/or social influence.

Integrate your findings with literature from the text, peer-reviewed journal articles, and other scholarly sources.

Format your paper according to APA guidelines.

  Title

ABC/123 Version X

1

 

  Group Influence

PSY/400 Version 6

2

 

 

University of Phoenix Material

 

Group Influence

 

This assignment will give you experience observing and interacting with people outside of the classroom. It has been designed to provide you with the opportunity to develop skills, synthesize knowledge, and integrate learning in a real-world setting. This goal is accomplished by challenging you to physically attend and observe a group.

 

Note: Social and family events, religious services, classes, court proceedings, lectures, and sporting events are not acceptable events for the purpose of this assignment.

 

Purpose: To provide you with an opportunity to experience a group setting and analyze how the presence of others substantially influences the behaviors of its members through social facilitation.

 

Observe a group discussing a topic of interest, such as a focus group, a community public assembly, a department meeting at your workplace, or local support group.

 

Study how the group members interact and influence one another.

 

Analyze how the group behaviors and communication patterns influence social facilitation.

 

Integrate your findings with evidence-based literature from journal articles, the course text, and additional scholarly sources. The literature should be about group patterns, not about the content of the meeting.

 

Process: You will participate as a guest at an interest group meeting in your community to gather data for a qualitative research paper. Once you have located an interest group, contact stakeholders, and explain the purpose of your inquiry. After you receive permission to participate, you will schedule a date to attend the meeting; at which time you will observe the members and document the following for your analysis:

 

· How were the people arranged in the physical environment (layout of room and seating arrangement)?

 

Two HSE (Health and Safety Executive) representatives standing up front facing the entire group made up of safety officers, safety employee representatives, supervisors, and a few employees. (A mix of military members, and civilian). Almost like a press conference room set up.

 

· What is the composition of the group, in terms of number of people, age, sex, ethnicity, and so on?

 

Men outnumbered women. Most men of higher rank were male, one female supervisor, employees were 80% men and a few females. About an even ethnic mix, Caucasian, African American, and Latino.

 

· What are the group’s purpose, mission, and goals?

 

To bring awareness to employees/supervisors/military of the safety issues we have within the work centers, and how safety shall be conducted. How to approach safety misconduct and conduct safety training when working in a military environment. What the risks are when working on top of aircraft, and the proper equipment needed to perform certain jobs on aircraft.

 

· What is the duration of the group (short- or long-term)? Explain.

 

Long-term. They are required to be at our work site to create a more safe environment.

· Did the group structure its discussion around an agenda, program, or rules of order?

 

Yes, safety when working on top and or around aircraft. Main issue was: not enough safety equipment for the amount of work that is being given. Trying to resolve the issue by looking over budget, manning, and amount of work being done to come to a conclusion to see if more safety equipment is being needed or if there are alternatives to being safe on and or around aircraft.

 

· Describe the structure of the group. How is the group organized?

 

Very well organized. Presentation covered all topics. The representatives were very knowledgeable and were able to answer all questions and have strong arguments behind their points being made.

 

· Who are the primary facilitators of the group?

 

Of the entire group, the HSE reps were the facilitators, with other members like military higher ups having their input in regards to safety.

 

 

· What subject or issues did the group members examine during the meeting?

 

Safety. More focused on the main body, mechanics who spend more time on the aircraft. How safety is important, and the input of the group is important to solution to the issue.

 

 

· What types of information did members exchange in their group?

 

Varied from one position to another. Work center supervisors received one set of information that pertained to their position, Military personnel received a set, and employees/workers received a different. Different perspectives on what to look for when conducting maintenance or supervising.

 

· What communication patterns illustrated if the group was unified or fragmented? Explain.

 

It seemed a bit more unified. Multiple gatherings have been conducted and this is the first that all personnel were in agreement with the information being put out. All levels of power were satisfied with what the HSE reps came to present. Seemed like the group was moving with progress to make safety a bit more convenient in the work environment.

 

· Did the members share a sense of identity with one another (characteristics of the group, similarities, interests, philosophy, and so on)?

 

Other than the topic on budget, the entire group seemed to be happy with the decisions being made and the ideas that were presented. Purchasing more safety stands was an option, identifying safety zones on aircraft for easy maintenance was another. Discussions were conducted within the group, but hardly any pushback and or complains.

 

· Was there any indication that members might be vulnerable to groupthink? Why or why not?

 

A couple of the workers either did not understand the purpose of the meeting, or were not interested. I noticed they lost track of place as more information was presented. They did not as question as the group discussed issues, and when asked what their input was, they had nothing to say but just agree with everyone else.

 

· In your opinion, how did the collective group behaviors influence individual attitudes and the group’s effectiveness? Provide your overall analysis.

 

Individually, I believe that a few peoples’ attitude towards this issue became more aware. When before they thought that this issue would not affect them in any way, now they were informed and realize that it is a serious thing to look out for. From listening to people’s experiences about safety and some of the tragedies that have occurred because of lack of safety equipment, they now realize that they should probably pay close attention to the environment and have a better lookout for each other as a group.

 

Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper incorporating your analysis with evidence to substantiate your conclusion.

 

Explain how your observations relate to research studies on norm formation, group norms, conformity, and/or social influence.

 

Integrate your findings with literature from the text, peer-reviewed journal articles, and other scholarly sources.

 

Format your paper according to APA guidelines.

Copyright © XXXX by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2017 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

A Masters Level Combined Case Study PPT Done For Ethics And Multicultural Issues

Create a PowerPoint presentation of at least 12 slides that could be given in a professional context. The presentation will analyze a simulated case study and demonstrate the use of professional guidelines and tools to work out a strategy for dealing with an ethical dilemma related to a cultural conflict as well as analyze the usefulness of those guidelines and tools.

Note: You are strongly encouraged to complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.

Ethics and multiculturalism are intimately related. Whatever your specialization or career goals, in order to behavior ethically, one must be multiculturally sensitive and maintain multicultural competence as part of lifelong learning.

SHOW LESS

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

Competency 1: Apply ethical principles and standards to ethical dilemmas.
Ethical Concerns: Apply ethical standards to ethical concerns pertaining to the case scenario.
Competency 2: Employ models of ethical reasoning and ethical decision making.
Ethical Theories: Analyze ethical theories and justify application of one theory in an attempt to resolve the ethical dilemma in the case scenario.
Ethical Decision Making: Apply steps in an ethical decision-making model to an ethical dilemma in the case scenario.
Solution: Design a viable solution for an ethical problem.
Competency 3: Evaluate multicultural influences on ethics for psychologists.
Case Overview: Create a scenario (based on one’s psychology specialization) that presents a cultural conflict and ethical dilemma.
Best Practices: Analyze how best practices cited in scholarly research articles could help a cultural conflict.
Competency 4: Analyze multicultural issues in psychology and the importance of multicultural competency in the profession.
Cultural Difference: Analyze how cultural differences could contribute to a conflict.
Biases: Describe one’s past or present biases toward others of different cultures.
Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the psychological professions.
Communication: Write clearly, with correct spelling, grammar, syntax, and good organization, following APA style standards.

Preparation
Create a case involving an ethical dilemma and cultural conflict(s) that could occur in your psychology specialization. It is recommended that you base the case study for this assessment on the one you developed in Assessment 2, with revisions in response to the feedback you received from faculty. However, you may create an entirely new case study that meets the criteria for this assessment. Again, while your case will be fictional, it must be entirely believable and realistic based on your psychology specialization.
Download and use the Combined Case Study Template, linked in Required Resources. Do not submit a paper for this assessment. Papers will not be graded. You will complete this assessment by replacing all language that is enclosed with brackets […] in the PowerPoint with your own words. As in the previous assessments, you may enhance the design of the presentation to make it more effective. Again, links to tips for using PowerPoint and designing effective presentations are provided in Suggested Resources.
The Presentation
Title slide: On the first slide of the PowerPoint:
Enter a descriptive title of approximately 5–15 words that concisely communicates the heart of the case study. It should stir interest while maintaining professional decorum.
Enter your name, and a job title and organization that would fit with your case study.
Case Study Overview slides: Provide the briefest possible narrative description of the professional conflict in the case. Additional supporting details and references can be added on the notes section of the slide. The overview should include:
The professional setting of the case, based on your psychology specialization.
The relationship that exists between you and the other individual(s), agency/business, or institution involved. Some possible examples may be:
Professor—Student.
Therapist—Patient.
Colleague—Colleague.
Consultant—Business.
Clinical Supervisor—Student intern.
Administrative Supervisor—Employee.
A very brief summation of an ethical dilemma involving cultural conflicts.
Cultural Differences slides: On the table provided, list side by side the main cultural identities from the Hays model, relevant to the conflict in the case, of yourself and another individual, agency/business, or institution in the case.
If more than one individual, agency/business, or institution is involved in the case, make a copy of this slide for each one, to compare yourself to all others involved.
In the notes section:
Identify common concerns with each cultural identity. Be careful to avoid using stereotypes.
Analyze how cultural differences contributed to the conflict in this case.
Relevant Biases: Identify two relevant biases you have or had, and at least one strategy for improving your cultural competency around each of those biases.
Note: This slide may be reused from Assessment 2, but if you received suggestions for improving it, be sure to revise it.
Ethical Concerns slides: Bullet point the three or more ethical concerns in the case and apply one or more ethical standard to each concern. Additional supporting details and references can be added in the notes section.
Comparison of Ethical Theories slides: In the first row of the table provided, enter the names of two ethical theories that you think would be the most appropriate for the situations in the case. In the following rows, enter comparisons of relevant features of the two theories. In the notes section, evaluate which theory provides a more functional framework for your case and explain why. (Note that ethical theories and ethical decision-making models are two different things. Please make sure that you are applying, comparing, and contrasting two ethical theories).
Ethical Decision-Making Model slides:
Identify each step in the model. Under each step of the model, apply it to your case.
Incorporate multicultural issues presented in the case study within the selected ethical decision-making model.
Add copies of this slide as needed, and combine steps on the slides as necessary or appropriate. In the notes section, write out supporting narrative details for your bullet points. (Note that ethical theories and ethical decision-making models are two different things. Please make sure that are applying the steps of the ethical decision-making model to your case).
Best Practices When Working With [Cultural Identity] slide:
Identify a best practice for working with a cultural identity in this case and cite the source below. Citation requirements: You must cite best practices from at least three scholarly research articles. You may cite reputable source from Web sites, books, textbooks, and suggested resources as well, but these will not count toward the three required scholarly research references.
Analyze, briefly, how the best practice could help you navigate this particular relationship and conflict.
Describe, in the notes section, the best practice in more detail, and elaborate as needed on your analysis of how the best practice could help you navigate the relationship and conflict.
Note: This slide may be reused from Assessment 2, but if you received suggestions for improving it, be sure to revise it.
Proposed Resolution slide: Use bullet points to summarize your proposed resolution to the ethical dilemmas in the case. In the notes section, write out supporting narrative details for your bullet points.
References slides: Use current APA style and formatting guidelines.
Other Requirements
Written communication: Should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
Format: Use the Combined Case Study Template provided in the Required Resources. Use current APA style and formatting guidelines as applicable to this assessment.
Resources: 10 scholarly research articles that can include those used in previous assessments.
Length of PowerPoint: A minimum of 12 slides.

Romantic Relationship Case Study

Part 1: Create a Case Study

Create a case study, 250-500-words involving a fictitious couple experiencing the stages and characteristics of romantic relationships. Think of this case study as a “story” that you are telling about the process the couple goes through when building a relationship.

Do not use any personal information or information related to current cases you are working on.

Part 2: Summary of Each Stage

After completing the case study, write a 250-500 word summary in which you explain each stage the couple experienced, including the characteristics associated with each.

Include at least three scholarly references in your paper.

Submit the case study and the summary as one document.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide