Assignment 2: Avon Products Or GE Money America Case Study

From the Goldsmith & Carter textbook, select either the Avon Products (Chapter 1) or GE Money Americas (Chapter 6) case study for this assignment.

Write a five to seven (5-7) page paper in which you:

  1. Provide a brief description of the status of the company that led to its determination that a change was necessary.
  2. Identify the model for change theory typified in the case study of your choice. Discuss what led you to identify the model that you did.
  3. Illustrate the types of evaluation information that were collected and how they are used to benefit the company.
  4. Speculate about success of the changes within the next five (5) years and how adjustments could be made if the results become less than ideal.
  5. Use at least five (5) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not quality as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date.
  • The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Explore how to identify and develop high-potential talent.
  • Analyze behavior change theories and their impact on talent management processes.
  • Determine the effects of leadership in the management of talent pools and the talent review process.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in talent management.
  • Write clearly and concisely about talent management using proper writing mechanics.

What are potential obstacles I may face when working toward achieving this goal?

Explain how individual personality, perception, leadership styles, and self-concept influence human relations in informing the development of a personal leadership philosophy. Explain how the communications process in leadership situations affects positive human relations. Illustrate how the relationship between motivation, stress, and time management influences workplace dynamics. Identify appropriate human interaction skills necessary for managers to positively influence productivity

I. Human Interaction Skills: In two paragraphs, you will identify at least two skills—drawing from your course readings and your own experiences—that can positively influence workplace productivity, engagement, and/or motivation. In your discussion of each skill, be sure to address the following questions underneath the skill:

A. Description of Skill: What is this skill, and how is it used in personnel management?

B. Engagement and Motivation: How specifically would this skill positively impact engagement or motivation?

C. Intended Impact: How specifically does this skill positively influence workplace productivity?

II. Personal Development Plan: Finally, you will bring together your reflections on personality, self-concept, and human interaction skills in order to create actionable steps for your future as a leader. First, include a final paragraph answering the first prompt below. Then, identify three goals to enhance your skills as a leader.

A. First, reflect on how this experience has helped shape your personal leadership philosophy. Be specific.

B. Lastly, use the provided section below to identify three relevant goals to enhance your skills as a leader. Answer the following questions for each of your goals: What are action steps I can take to achieve this goal, what are potential obstacles I may face, and what is my plan to overcome these obstacles?

Goal #1:

What are action steps I can take to achieve this goal?

What are potential obstacles I may face when working toward achieving this goal?

What is my plan to overcome these potential obstacles?

Goal #2:

What are action steps I can take to achieve this goal?

What are potential obstacles I may face when working toward achieving this goal?

What is my plan to overcome these potential obstacles?

Goal #3:

What are action steps I can take to achieve this goal? Click here to enter text.

What are potential obstacles I may face when working toward achieving this goal?

What is my plan to overcome these potential obstacles?

How Much is Too Much – Analysis Paralysis?

Part 1- 250 words with intext citation and one reference in APA format.

 

How Much is Too Much – Analysis Paralysis?

Many times the models and forecasts that we create can be improved by adding additional factors and data that may have an effect. Some might say “the more detailed the model, the more accurate the results.”

Considering this please address the following prompts in your discussion:

  1. Do you feel this is the case?
  2. At what point should you stop improving the accuracy of a forecast and except the level of accuracy you already have?

Part 2- 250 words with intext citation and one reference in APA format.

Is Removing Human Intervention in Decision-Making a Good Thing?

 

Some recent decision aided models use artificial intelligence and other programming methods to collate and evaluate huge amounts of information in order to predict a result. The hope is that these calculations take into account more variables than a human would be able to (or want to).

Considering this please address the following prompts in your discussion:

  1. Is this a step forward? Why or why not?
  2. Think of an example where this approach would be beneficial and then another where it might be detrimental.
  3. Support your ideas with examples and/or references.

What characteristics of MITRE make it particularly attractive to older workers?

Personnel Planning and Recruitment

MITRE

The MITRE Corporation, founded in 1958, is one of eleven nonprofit U.S. corporations that manage Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs) for the government. Of our workforce of nearly 6,000 employees, most are in our two principal locations in Bedford, Massachusetts, and McLean, Virginia, and the rest at remote sites in the United States and around the world. MITRE’s mission is to assist the federal government with scientific research and analysis, development and acquisition, and systems engineering and integration.

MITRE’s excellent reputation in operating its FFRDCs is very attractive to many mid- and late-career people who view our employees as respected subject matter experts. Older engineers and scientists appreciate the kind and quality of work done at MITRE and how it affects at an early stage the high-level decisions made at the government agencies we support. Of the more than 500 new hires that join MITRE annually, nearly half (48 percent) are 40 years of age or older. Drawn heavily from industry, they are seasoned experts with knowledge of the latest technical developments, which enables MITRE to blend long-term domain knowledge and maturity with continuously updated expertise to benefit our sponsors.

In the past, MITRE depended heavily on advertising and employment agencies for the majority of our hires. As those methods became increasingly expensive, MITRE asked employees to become more actively involved in the identification and attraction of appropriately qualified new workers. MITRE employees are motivated to refer high-quality people like themselves because of their desire to fulfill our sponsors’ mission expectations and to work in collaboration with other equally talented individuals. In this case it is true that “birds of a feather flock together.” To further motivate such referrals, we implemented a referral program that pays employees a bonus of $2,000 for technical staff hires, $1,000 for nontechnical staff hires, and $500 for nonexempt hires. Employee referrals now provide more than half our new hires and assure us of high-quality candidates who are likely to be a good fit with MITRE’s culture.

Additionally, our data show that employee referrals significantly lower recruiting costs. In 2001, when 34 percent of new hires were through employee referrals, the average cost for all hires was about $14,200, which included agency and advertising fees, labor costs, relocation and interview expenses, and employee referral bonuses. In 2004, employee referrals accounted for 52 percent for our hires, and our cost per hire had decreased by nearly 40 percent to $8,700.

We use other methods as well to encourage employees to refer suitable candidates:

· We actively and frequently communicate our most urgent recruiting needs to employees by distributing “Hot Jobs” fliers throughout the corporation and posting hiring notices on the company’s intranet.

· Staff members attending conferences are encouraged to collect business cards of people who they think would be good team members.

· Potential candidates are also attracted to MITRE when they attend technical symposia or technology transfer meetings on MITRE property. They talk with an engaged cadre of MITRE attendees who are more than happy to respond to questions and inquiries.

· Employees can hand out networking, or “handshake,” cards to people who express an interest in MITRE so that they can nominate themselves in the future for a position with us.

· We bring our HR business partners into organizational meetings to alert our technical staff members about the importance of constantly being on the lookout for other subject matter experts.

We attribute the cost effectiveness of our process to several factors, including the following:

· More than two-thirds (roughly 70 percent) of our hires come from referrals, website postings, and rehires, which helps maintain our high standards. Thus, we rely very little on print advertising, employment agencies, or other broad-based recruiting channels that are costly and tend to generate less suitable candidates.

· We focus on certain niches for skilled and experienced workers, targeting organizations that employ people with relevant skills and experiences and certifications that represent a required level of expertise.

· Our recruiting teams are attuned to older workers, those who have demonstrated high levels of competency through past performance. Recruiters are coached so they can focus on relevant skill sets and criteria. Candidates who are subject matter experts (SME) are interviewed and evaluated by employees in the same area, a process we call SME-to-SME—again, birds of a feather.

 

QUESTIONS

1. What overall HR strategy do you think MITRE is pursuing? Is its recruiting focus broad or targeted? Does it primarily use internal or external sources?

2. What characteristics of MITRE make it particularly attractive to older workers?

3. Why is the referral program at MITRE so successful? What are some elements of success that could be copied by other organizations? What success factors do you think would be hard to duplicate elsewhere?

1