How should you handle the introduction, greeting, and handshaking?

400 words

apa format

2 references (at least) there can be more than 2  if needed

 

 

Knowing details about the culture of a prospective international client before a meeting assures a successful intercultural communication encounter. A Chinese businessman whom you have never met is coming to the United States to visit you. You and your female boss invite him to lunch. You call the in-house “culture coach” and ask the following questions:

 

 

  • How should you handle the introduction, greeting, and handshaking?
  • How do you exchange business cards?
  • How do you explain your position and your boss’s position?
  • Where should you take him to lunch, and when?
  • Should you exchange gifts?
  • How will you begin business discussions?
  • What should not be brought up in business discussions?
  • Is there anything else you should prepare for?

Reflection And Interview:Discrimination

Watch the Frontline program online.

Frontline: A Class Dividedhttp://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/divided/

A Class Divided explores the nature of prejudice. Third grade teacher Jane Elliott deliberately created a classroom situation to teach her students how it feels to be on the receiving end of discrimination. This is an encore presentation of the classic documentary on third-grade teacher Jane Elliott’s “blue eyes/brown eyes” exercise, originally conducted in the days following the assassination of Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968. This classic classroom experiment, conducted in the late 1960s in a small Midwestern town, demonstrates how quickly and easily schoolchildren can internalize prejudice and discriminate. Years later, these children discuss the valuable lessons they learned from this experiment. Elliott employs this same teaching strategy with a group of adults in the workplace, and discusses their reactions.

This assignment is designed to allow you to synthesize what you have been learning about the various dimensions of diversity and the necessity of treating everyone in an inclusive, sensitive and respectful manner.

Discrimination Paper Part I: Interpersonal Reflection

After viewing the video, consider the following questions and write your response. Your response should be 4-5 pages and should address each question thoroughly, reflecting an accurate representation of what you have learned in this course. Demonstrate scholarship by utilizing supporting resources to justify your ideas and responses:

  • What did you learn from the film? What scene or scenes do you think you’ll still remember a month from now and why those scenes?
  • Did any part of the film surprise you? Do you think someone with a disability, of a different sexual orientation, an older American or some of a different religion would also find it surprising? Why or why not?
  • Both Elliott and her former students talk about whether this exercise should be done with all children. What do you think? If the exercise could be harmful to children, as Elliott suggests, what do you think actual discrimination might do? Use an example, different from the example you used to describe labels, from what you have learned about people with disabilities, older people, sexual minorities, or people of differing religions.
  • How can negative and positive labels placed on a group become self-fulfilling prophecies? Use an example from what you have learned about people with disabilities, older people, sexual minorities, or people of differing religions.
  • Based on what you have learned in this course, discuss an example (either from the video or from your experiences) that illustrates each of the following statements:
    • Dimensions of diversity may be hidden or visible.
    • Dimensions of diversity are in a constant state of flux.
    • Dimensions of diversity are not always clear-cut or easily defined.

Discrimination Paper Part II: Personal Interview

For Part II of this assignment, you will have a conversation with someone who you feel may have faced discrimination. Examples include someone with a disability, an older American, someone who is a sexual minority, or someone who lives in a multicultural family. After choosing an individual to interview, explain to this individual what you have seen in the Class Divided program. Invite them to watch the program, or parts of the program, with you. After watching or discussing the program, pose the following questions to the individual. Be sure to explain the reason for your questions and why you have selected them to participate in the interview:

  • What, if any, discrimination do you experience?
  • How have you coped with this situation?
  • What do you think needs to change at the cultural level to reduce discrimination?

Following your refection (Part I listed above), add 2-3 pages to your paper which addresses the following:

  • A description of the individual you chose to interview and why. Explain how you went about approaching this individual for the interview.
  • What are your observations about the person’s view of discrimination and how it affects his/her daily life?
  • Did the interaction with the person change your view of discrimination? If so, explain how the interaction has affected you either positively or negatively. If it did not change your view of discrimination, explain why.
  • How well do you think you would cope with discrimination from this person’s perspective?
  • Finally, what is the best manner in which to advocate for those facing discrimination? What actions will you change based on what you have learned in this course and how will you serve as an advocate for those individuals who face discrimination?

Your final assignment, consisting of both Part I and II, should be approximately 6 -8 pages. Be sure to address each topic listed above and, as appropriate, cite the online course, the textbook, and other credible sources to substantiate the points you are making. For example, when discussing an example of how diversity may be hidden or invisible cite sources, which you have referenced to substantiate the points you are making.

MBA 604 – Decision Making Methodsa And Tools

ASSIGNMENT 2 – Research Proposal

Weighting: 30% towards final grade Word limit: 3000 (-/+10%) – text only, excluding tables, appendices, references, covers page, contents. This is an individual piece of work Apply the requirements of the Harvard Referencing System throughout the report. Use the structure appearing below:

 

Research Proposal Specifics

 

You are about to commence a new research project in a field of your choice. You are expected to write a report that constitutes a research proposal. 1. Working individually, you will:

– Have chosen a clear and specific research question/ aim/ hypothesis for your research;

– Have contextualised your research question/ aim within the academic literature;

– Understand the philosophical and methodological bases for your research;

– Have a sound method to address the research question/ aim/ hypothesis.

 

2. Use Harvard style in-text citation and referencing.

 

3. Do not copy any materials you use word for word unless you identify these sections clearly as quotations.

 

4. If you paraphrase any materials, you must identify sources through in-text referencing.

 

5. This is an individual assignment please do not work closely with anyone else.

 

6. Write 3000 words (+ or – 10%) excluding the header sheet, cover page, contents page, reference list, footnotes and appendices.

 

Marks for criteria: Criteria

10% Focus and Completion Does the proposal address the set tasks in a meaningful manner?

20% Research Objective Does the proposal clearly articulate

20% Synthesis and Soundness Does the proposal place the research objective in the context of the relevant academic literature and any relevant past studies? Does the discussion demonstrate a

 

 

 

comprehensive understanding of that literature?

30% Research Methods and Methodology Does the proposal sensibly outline methods for accessing sources of data that will address or answer the research objective? Is the method consistent with the methodology?

10% Clarity of Approach Is the proposal well organised, logically constructed and attentive to the needs of the reader? Does the timeline include an Gantt chart or key milestones for research?

10% Mechanical Soundness Is the portfolio clearly written, spell

 

Structuring the research proposal 1. Introduction (~200 words) Explain the issue you are examining and why it is significant.

Describe the general area to be studied

Explain why this area is important to the general area under study (e.g., psychology of language, second language acquisition, teaching methods)

2. Background/Review of the Literature (~1000 words) A description of what has already known about this area and short discussion of why the background studies are not sufficient.

Summarise what is already known about the field. Include a summary of the basic background information on the topic gleaned from your literature review

Discuss several critical studies that have already been done in this area (cite according to Harvard style).

Point out why these background studies are insufficient. In other words, what question(s) do they leave unresolved that you would like to study?

3. Research Objective (~500 words) A contextualisation and description of the questions you are examining and an exploration of the claims.

Outline the methodological position you will take (ontology and epistemology)

Outline the overarching research aim, objective or hypothesis that you will explore.

List the specific question(s) that you are exploring.

Explain how these research questions are related to the larger issues raised in the introduction.

 

 

 

 

4. Method and Design (~900 words) A description of how you would go about collecting data and test the questions your are exploring. (You are not required to come up with a new or original method!).

Describe the general method you choose for your study, in order to explore your research objective or test your hypothesis(es).

Explain why this method is the best for your purposes.

Explain any potential difficulties in collecting data and how these will be overcome

Explain the design features that ensure acceptability for ethical purposes

Describe the participants (if any) and explain how you selected the sample

Explain how you will present the collected data and how it will be able to be analysed the results to explore the research aim or to test the research hypothesis

5. Significance and Conclusion (~400 words) Discuss, in general, how your proposed research would lead to a significant improvement over the original studies, and how it would benefit the field. (In other words, why should someone care? 6. References (not in word count) Include all references in Harvard style. Appendix: (not in word count) Dissertation structure in chapters Gantt Chart or timeline

Does legislation to verify voter identification fall under the domain of unintentional or intentional discrimination?

1.A critical point of distinction between deceptive advertising and mere puffery is whether a claim is a measurable statement of fact.

  • Think of some contemporary examples of each and explain why they are or are not measurable statements of fact.
  • When you notice deceptive advertising or puffery, how does your sense of personal ethical perspectives and values affect the way you make decisions about those advertised goods and services?
  • How does the ethical program of a particular group to which you currently belong, or previously belonged, treat the topic of misrepresentation or exaggeration of company goods and service?

2. Unintentional discrimination occurs when a company’s policies uncritically reflect prejudicial stereotypes yet do not involve overt racial prejudices of its managers or executives. Does legislation to verify voter identification fall under the domain of unintentional or intentional discrimination? Explain your views.

Also, how does your personal ethical perspective on discrimination- intentional or unintentional- compare to the culture of a particular group to which you currently belong, or previously belonged?