Statement Of Purpose

Statement of Purpose and Objectives: A Statement of Purpose and Objectives is intended to give you the opportunity to submit a narrative describing your past education, experience, and current professional career objectives. You are encouraged to comment on any or all of the following: plans you have to use your education and training; the needs and/or challenges you perceive as important in your field of study; and any personal qualities, characteristics, and skills you believe will enable you to be successful in your chosen field of study. If there are any extenuating circumstances that you wish for the Admissions Committee to consider, please briefly describe them in your Statement of Purpose and Objectives. In addition, the personal statement should address the following:

Why Public Health?

What are your public health interests?

Why UT Health Houston?

“Click, click” the camera flashed and before I knew it I walked across the stage, I had just received my first college degree. Next week I would be walking across to receive my high school diploma. I thought to myself at 17?

 

The first time I encountered a health course was it was summer 17. The course, community health, I looked up the description and it indicated…

I never looked at Health as an important variable in my life. I recall watching An The Band Played On , In which was about the AIDS Epidemic and knives over forks, these documentaries and movies focus on the health and wellness aspect. At this period of time I also begin to incorporate and expose myself/discovered that I enjoyed exploring and learning about traveling and off I begin my research through my modeled United Nations class. I then was fascinated and decided to take matters into my own hands;I applied to a program in Madrid, Spain and later won a scholarship or took me abroad for a total of a month.

 

I was able to immerse myself into the culture anything it to study data that involved the (AIDS).

 

 

Senior year of high school had the opportunity to get an internship at eye care for kids, insert description.

 

I am able to graduate with a degree and a diploma in 2018 June. 17 I’m able to attend transfer and attend college at the University and Texas at San Antonio I continue to choose public health as my major. I decide to join The public health society, PERIOD at UTSA , Women in leadership. Professors and peers about expanding and they tell me that I am on the right path and they discussed that I have made the right decision to continue my education and get my Masters.

At UTSA I was able to take courses such as global health, United States healthcare systems, and intro to epidemiology. These courses motivated me to get an internship Prevent Blindness Texas. This opened my eyes to understand that there is a need for epidemiologist research in health disparities in my minority groups,global health and substance abuse.

 

I’m still on my academic path and I’m very ready to pursue my masters degree. I believe the UT health is able to push me too… Through Their specific concentrations by cardiovascular disease, diabetes malicious and other chronic diseases, health services research, injury violence and substance abuse. I’ve been able to learn with competency through my various journeys abroad and I feel as if this a major component to motivate to continue???

Resilience?

Persistence?

(Talk about skills?)

By choosing UT health I would have the privilege of continuing my ….. with Women in leadership and new organizations

What are the common causative factors?

Instructions

OSHA has identified four categories of hazards that account for more than 50% of all construction fatalities:

  • Falls (36.5%)
  • Struck by object (10.1%)
  • Electrocutions (8.6%)
  • Caught-in/between (2.5%)

The assignment is to write a research paper involving one of these four construction hazard categories. You may narrow your topic down to a more specific type of accident within the major category. For example, under falls, you could focus your research on falls from ladders. When writing the paper, consider the following questions:

  1. What are the common causative factors?
  2. What does data indicate?
  3. What are the effective proven corrective measures?

The submission must be a minimum of three pages in length, not including the title page or reference page. A minimum of three scholarly reference sources must be used from the CSU Online Library. Scholarly sources include:

  • peer-reviewed journal articles (Click here to access a webinar outlining peer-reviewed articles.)
  • safety reference books and textbooks, and
  • other publications by safety professionals and organizations (print or online).

Note that wikipedia.com, answers.com, ask.com, about.com, and similar broad-based Internet sites are not considered scholarly sources. Use government and professional safety-related sources, such as osha.gov, niosh.gov, asse.org, nsc.org, and nfpa.org. Contact your professor if you have any questions about the validity of a reference source.

APA format is required. Be sure to use in-text citations for direct quotes and paraphrased information.

Models In Science

Choose a scientific topic and identify a research question that could be addressed using a scientific model. The purpose of this assignment is to get you to think from the perspective of a modeler. You don’t need to actually build a model, but I’d like you to consider the type of model that would best suit the research question, how the model would be designed, etc. You can pick any type of model we covered in class. You can look at existing literature to get an idea of what an interesting research question could be, but please come up with the idea for the model yourself. Then, in at least 300 words, post answers to the following questions.

  1. What topic did you choose? What research question did you identify?
  2. What is the target system your model represents? (A target system is the system in the real world that is reproduced by the model)
  3. What type of modeling did you choose to address this question? Please explain your choice.
  4. Describe your model. What are the components? What type of synthetic data would it produce? What kind of results would support or refute your hypothesis?
  5. How does your model increase knowledge about underlying processes?
  6. What challenges might a modeler face if she was going to build your model?

Response posts are optional, but are worth 1% extra credit (max of 3). To get points you must respond to someone’s post with an idea for a different type of model that could address their research question (or one similar to it) from another angle. Answer questions 3-5 above and compare your model with that of the original poster.

 

What is nonscientific about this article?

Find an article that claims to be genuinely scientific but is actually pseudoscientific. This article might use scientific evidence but must ultimately make a claim that can not be defended scientifically. (You can use tabloids and pop science articles.) For general instructions on discussion posts, see the document posted in Week 1.

Attach the article to your discussion post or provide reference information (title, author, etc.). Then critique the article, answering the following questions in 300+ words:

  1. What is nonscientific about this article?
  2. What steps or principles of the scientific method does this article violate?
  3. Is it possible for the author(s) to be right about their claims anyway?
  4. What would be a more scientific way of exploring this topic?
  5. Include a link or full citation for your source material.

Next, write substantive, thoughtful replies to at least two of your peers’ posts. Reply posts should address the following prompts:

  • Do you agree with the assessment in the original post? If you do agree, indicate what convinced you. If you don’t agree, explain why.
  • Can you think of another scientific way of examining this topic?
  • You may also share any prior knowledge or personal experience you have with the topic to enrich the discussion.