RCI Research Assignment Part IV

RCI Research Assignment Part IV

Question 1 = One Additional Source

By now you have used many of the following databases to locate sources:

 

Depending on the type of source you still need, do an appropriate search to locate one additional source.

Using proper Chicago style citation, type the full bibliographic citation of one additional source that provides you with insights about the historical roots of your contemporary issue.

Question 2 = Footnotes

Full Footnotes Within the body of your essay, you will need to provide footnote citations for your sources. A footnote is a numerical reference (called a superscript) embedded in the narrative itself and has a corresponding number at the bottom of the page with the source’s citation. Different word processing programs have different toolbar commands for footnoting (sometimes called reference in MS Word), so you’ll need to familiarize yourself with how yours works (note that footnotes are not the same as a footer). The major difference between bibliographic and footnote citations is the that bibliographic citations address the source as a whole, while footnotes (full or abbreviated) hone in on specific pages (or parts of the source). There are other important differences as well, including the order of an author’s name (first last vs. last, first) and punctuation. Consult the Chicago style, page for a refresher on the differences between bibliographic and footnote citations (you may remember this from LRA1). In your LRA 4 Word doc under a Question 2 heading, enter the correct full footnote citation for one of your monographs. Label it as “Full Footnote.”  You can use (a) page number(s) that correspond(s) with an example that you will use in your final essay. Abbreviated Footnotes For any single source, you should abbreviate all subsequent footnotes after the first one in the paper. Using the Chicago-style examples as references, enter the correct abbreviated footnote citation for the same monograph you used for the full footnote. Label it as “Abbreviated Footnote.”  You can use (a) page number(s) that correspond(s) with an example that you will use in your final essay.

Question 3 = Final Essay Preliminary Outline

Creating a quality outline is a key step in nearly all research writing. There are a number of basic requirements for the final essay which inform your outline work. Your outline should include the following: 1.) draft of your introductory paragraph, complete with thesis statement; 2.) a list of the 2 to 3 key aspects that will make up the body paragraphs of your essay; and 3.) a list of which sources you intend to use under each aspect; 4.) an attempt at your concluding statement.

YOUR OUTLINE SHOULD FOLLOW THIS FORMAT:

I.  Introduction & Thesis: The introduction (one paragraph) introduces your topic (featuring a topical hook, or short example of your topic – consider using your contemporary news article as an opening example) and/or background information on the topic. The introductory paragraph ends with your thesis statement, which should tell the reader the temporal and geographic scope of your project and provide the structure for your argument by identifying the two to three key aspects of the topic you are investigating in the order they will be presented in your paper.

II.   Aspect 1: A word or phrase that connotes what the first aspect you will explore will be.

A.  Source 1: List the abbreviated footnote of a source that will be used in this paragraph.

B.  Source 2: List the abbreviated footnote of a source that will be used in this paragraph.

III. Aspect 2: A word or phrase that connotes what the second aspect you will explore will be.

A.   Source 3: List the abbreviated footnote of a source that will be used in this paragraph.

B.   Source 4: List the abbreviated footnote of a source that will be used in this paragraph.

IV. Aspect 3: A word or phrase that connotes what the third aspect you will explore will be.

A.   Source 5: List the abbreviated footnote of a source that will be used in this paragraph.

B.   Source 6: List the abbreviated footnote of a source that will be used in this paragraph.

 

V. Conclusion: The conclusion should revise and restate your thesis as a concluding statement, summarize your main points, and explain how a historical understanding of your issue is critical to understanding it in the present. Try restating your thesis statement as a 1 sentence concluding statement.

Introduction to Modern Art and Visual Culture,

ARTH 204: Introduction to Modern Art and Visual Culture, 1860-1945

 

Essay Guidelines:

• Stapled, hard copies required. No late exams.

• You must properly cite all sources using the Chicago Manual of Style. Limit your citations to the assigned course Readings or other academic resources.

• Woodbury University policy clearly states that plagiarism is strictly prohibited.

 

Turn in your assignment on March 18, 2019 in lecture. Essays should be between 1,200 and 1,400 words. Please choose one of the following questions to answer.

 

You are encouraged to include images in your essay. Whenever you describe a work of art at any length, as you begin, ideally your reader should be able to see a reproduction of it (you choose the size) on the same page as your description (do this just once; no need to reiterate). Place a caption (in 12-point font) below the image stating the artist’s surname (only), the title of the work (in italics), and its date.

 

Paul Gauguin, The Vision after the Sermon, 1888

 

In general, your writing should follow these three principles:

 

(i) Place each work firmly within its social and historical context.

(ii) Drawing on your own observations, describe the way each image is constructed.

(iii) Relate your discussion to the relevant Readings and/or Lecture presentations. When you refer to a particular Reading, in a footnote write out the author’s name, the title of their chapter or article, and publication details (see the bottom of this page) – and to indicate your familiarity with the text, in the same footnote briefly summarize their argument.[footnoteRef:1] [1: See Darcy Grimaldo Grigsby, Extremities: Painting Empire in Post-Revolutionary France (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2002), 108. Grigsby’s account emphasizes the prevalnece of homophobia among the troops occupying Egypt.]

 

 

 

 

Essay Questions

 

2.

The late nineteenth century was a time of rapid transformation for Western Europe. Urbanization swelled cities like Paris or Berlin into booming metropolises while the countryside became an almost mythical retreat for Nature, or what people imagined Nature to be. In the cities, technological progress improved people’s lives while often alienating them from their work or from each other.

 

Analyze the reaction to ‘modern’ life as seen in two different painters of the period. Look at how their work reflects upon those developments while paying close attention to their style and how it may serve to embrace, reject, problematize or glorify modernity and its features. Contrast each painter’s reaction and use this juxtaposition as a springboard for a discussion of the larger context of society and politics at the time, as well as their own biography.

 

 

Please choose your own way to discuss the issue of critical negation in relation to the formation of modern art. Develop your own argument, providing a thorough visual analysis of three to five artworks. Engage critically with relevant course themes, and engage in some detail with at least three of the course Readings.

 

 

 

 

Midterm Paper Formatting Guidelines – Chicago Manual of Style

 

1. Heading: The heading goes in the upper right corner of the first page of your exam and should look like this:

 

Your Name

ARTH 204 – Midterm Exam

Spring 2019

Date

 

2. Formatting:

12-point font for the main text, footnotes and illustration captions

Times New Roman

1” page margins

Insert page number at the top right corner of each page

Heading is single-spaced, the entire body is DOUBLE SPACED

Need help?

Chicago Manual Style: http://www.docstyles.com/ctslite.htm

 

3.  When you cite a book or article in your essay…

You must always specify your exact source by means of a footnote placed at the bottom of the page. The footnote should be formatted like the example below & at the bottom of this page.

 

Example: Part of the difficulty in representing Mameluke figures in painting was that Mameluke society was ethnically so diverse. As Darcy Grimaldo Grigsby has pointed out, “Mamelukes came from throughout Eurasia and Africa and spoke many languages, among them, Arabic, Armenian, Greek, Turkish, Flemish, Italian, German, and French.”[footnoteRef:2] [2: Darcy Grimaldo Grigsby, Extremities: Painting Empire in Post-Revolutionary France (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2002), 108.]

 

Footnote (at the bottom of the page, 12-pt font):

Darcy Grimaldo Grigsby, Extremities: Painting Empire in Post-Revolutionary France (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2002), 108.

 

4. When you cite a work of art in your essay….

You must always specify exactly which work you are referring to by means of a footnote placed at the bottom of the page. In art history, referencing particular works of art normally includes the artist’s full name, the title of the work, the date, the medium and the location –

 

Jacques-Louis David, The Oath of the Horatii, 1785, oil on canvas, Paris, Louvre

 

5. Bibliography: You are not required to supplement your essay with a Bibliography.

Women Challenge Their Audience

 

  • Women Challenge their Audience. Essay. Lessons in Public Speaking:  Two women of very different backgrounds and language skills gave effective speeches in the cause of abolition.  Read the speeches and the background of them. Angelina Grimke Weld’s speech in Philadelphia in 1838:  http://www.historyisaweapon.com/defcon1/grimke.html   ;   the background of that speech is at   http://eloquentwoman.blogspot.com/2016/09/famous-speech-friday-angelina-grimkes.html .  Sojourner Truth’s famous 1851 speech and its background:  https://www.nps.gov/articles/sojourner-truth.htm .  Also see background in chapter 29 (p986)  of our class text.  Then write an essay that includes the following:
    1. Biographical information for each woman, emphasizing elements especially relevant to the speeches.
    2. Describe the obstacles and limitations each faced that normally would hinder the making of these speeches.
    3. Using specific lines, show or illustrate effective speaking methods that helped them connect to the audience.
    4. Describe two lessons you learn from these examples that could be of value to you for communications in your professional life.

Musical Critique

THEA 363/MUSC 373 – WILEY

FORMAT FOR MOVIE MUSICAL THEATRE CRITIQUE

Going To the Theatre

1. List the title of the musical you watched, and the date and circumstances (watched it by yourself, with your mom, etc)

2. Describe the opening credits and music that are noticeable before the action of the musical begins.

3. Describe how these first impressions combined to shape your expectations.

What Was It About

1. What was the musical about? What were the writer/composer/lyricist(s) of the show trying to communicate to the audience?

2. Describe how the meaning of the show was communicated to you – through dialogue, music, lyrics, dance, actions, symbols, spectacle or a combination? Be specific.

3. Which character changed the most and how did they change?

4. Did you identify most with one of the characters? If so, describe character you identified with and why.

Style

1. How would you describe the overall tone or mood of the show? Did that tone change during the show? If so, how?

2. In your own words (instead of prescribed terminology), describe the style of the music, dance, acting and design aspects. Did all of these aspects work together, or did they seem incongruous? Please explain.

3. Were the actors believable, given the requirements of the play? If they were believable, how did they seem to accomplish this? If they were not believable, what occurred to impair or destroy believability?

4. The director unifies a production and frequently provides an interpretation of the text. Did there seem to be a unifying idea behind the production? If so, how would you express it?

Design Aspects

1. What information did the scenery convey about time, place, characters, and situation? Give examples. Was it realistic or nonrealistic or somewhere in between? Detailed or minimal?

2. Address these same questions with regard to lighting, sound and costumes.

3. Did the design aspects seem appropriate to the production? Why or why not?

Assessing the Performance

1. How did this musical translate to the screen? Was it effective in this medium? Why or why not?

2. After watching the movie version, are you interested in seeing the musical done on stage? Why or why not?

Overall Experience

1. How did your experience compare to your expectations?

2. Did the experience leave a lasting impression? In what way?

3. Did the experience alter your opinions or expectations about musicals? Why or why not?

Note: All written assignments are to be typed and double spaced, using a standard font (not to exceed 12) and 1” margins. Spelling and grammar are evaluated, as well as content. If you are concerned about these assignments, please do not hesitate to seek assistance from the Writing Room.

Include the signed honor code pledge at the end of the critique. The last class day is deadline for all critiques.